49
Gender * Interactive Crosstab Interactive Total 1.00 2.00 Gender 1.00 Count 1 4 5 % within Gender 20.0% 80.0% 100.0% % within Interactive 100.0% 36.4% 41.7% % of Total 8.3% 33.3% 41.7% 2.00 Count 0 7 7 % within Gender 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% % within Interactive 0.0% 63.6% 58.3% % of Total 0.0% 58.3% 58.3% Total Count 1 11 12 % within Gender 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% % within Interactive 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% % of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0% Gender * Informative Crosstab Informative Total 1.00 2.00 3.00 Gender 1.00 Count 2 1 2 5 % within Gender 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

depth interview tabs

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: depth interview tabs

Gender * InteractiveCrosstab

Interactive Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 1 4 5

% within

Gender

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

100.0% 36.4% 41.7%

% of Total 8.3% 33.3% 41.7%

2.00

Count 0 7 7

% within

Gender

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 63.6% 58.3%

% of Total 0.0% 58.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

Gender

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Gender * InformativeCrosstab

Informative Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

Gender 1.00 Count 2 1 2 5

% within

Gender

40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 100.0%

Page 2: depth interview tabs

% within

Informative

33.3% 33.3% 66.7% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 41.7%

2.00

Count 4 2 1 7

% within

Gender

57.1% 28.6% 14.3% 100.0%

% within

Informative

66.7% 66.7% 33.3% 58.3%

% of Total 33.3% 16.7% 8.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 6 3 3 12

% within

Gender

50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

Gender * OrganizedCrosstab

Organized Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 0 5 5

% within

Gender

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 45.5% 41.7%

% of Total 0.0% 41.7% 41.7%

2.00 Count 1 6 7

% within

Gender

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

Page 3: depth interview tabs

% within

Organized

100.0% 54.5% 58.3%

% of Total 8.3% 50.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

Gender

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

Organized

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Gender * WebsiteUsesCrosstab

WebsiteUs

es

Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

Gender

1.00

Count 3 2 0 5

% within

Gender

60.0% 40.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

37.5% 66.7% 0.0% 41.7%

% of Total 25.0% 16.7% 0.0% 41.7%

2.00

Count 5 1 1 7

% within

Gender

71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

62.5% 33.3% 100.0% 58.3%

% of Total 41.7% 8.3% 8.3% 58.3%

Total Count 8 3 1 12

Page 4: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson

Chi-

Square

1.543 2 .462

Likelihood

Ratio

1.897 2 .387

Linear-by-

Linear

Associatio

n

.005 1 .942

N of Valid

Cases

12

Gender * PerceptionMihayloCrosstab

Perception

Mihaylo

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender 1.00 Count 5 0 5

% within

Gender

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

45.5% 0.0% 41.7%

Page 5: depth interview tabs

% of Total 41.7% 0.0% 41.7%

2.00

Count 6 1 7

% within

Gender

85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

54.5% 100.0% 58.3%

% of Total 50.0% 8.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 11 1 12

% within

Gender

91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

Gender * FacebookCrosstab

Facebook Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 2 3 5

% within

Gender

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

28.6% 60.0% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 25.0% 41.7%

2.00 Count 5 2 7

% within

Gender

71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

71.4% 40.0% 58.3%

Page 6: depth interview tabs

% of Total 41.7% 16.7% 58.3%

Total

Count 7 5 12

% within

Gender

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

Gender * TwitterCrosstab

Twitter Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 1 4 5

% within

Gender

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

% within

Twitter

20.0% 57.1% 41.7%

% of Total 8.3% 33.3% 41.7%

2.00

Count 4 3 7

% within

Gender

57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within

Twitter

80.0% 42.9% 58.3%

% of Total 33.3% 25.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 5 7 12

% within

Gender

41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

% within

Twitter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

Page 7: depth interview tabs

Gender * LinkedInCrosstab

LinkedIn Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 3 2 5

% within

Gender

60.0% 40.0% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

42.9% 40.0% 41.7%

% of Total 25.0% 16.7% 41.7%

2.00

Count 4 3 7

% within

Gender

57.1% 42.9% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

57.1% 60.0% 58.3%

% of Total 33.3% 25.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 7 5 12

% within

Gender

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

Gender * InstagramCrosstab

Instagram Total

1.00 2.00

Gender 1.00 Count 1 4 5

Page 8: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

50.0% 40.0% 41.7%

% of Total 8.3% 33.3% 41.7%

2.00

Count 1 6 7

% within

Gender

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

50.0% 60.0% 58.3%

% of Total 8.3% 50.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 2 10 12

% within

Gender

16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

Gender * WhyCSUFCrosstab

WhyCSUF

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Gender

1.00

Count 4 0 1 0 0

% within

Gender

80.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% within

WhyCSUF

57.1% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% of Total 33.3% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0%

2.00 Count 3 1 1 1 1

Page 9: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

42.9% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3%

% within

WhyCSUF

42.9% 100.0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 25.0% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3%

Total

Count 7 1 2 1 1

% within

Gender

58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3%

% within

WhyCSUF

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3%

Crosstab

Total

Gender

1.00

Count 5

% within Gender 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 41.7%

% of Total 41.7%

2.00

Count 7

% within Gender 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 58.3%

% of Total 58.3%

Total

Count 12

% within Gender 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 100.0%

% of Total 100.0%

Gender * UseServicesCrosstab

Page 10: depth interview tabs

UseServic

es

Total

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

Gender

1.00

Count 0 1 2 2 5

% within

Gender

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 100.0%

% within

UseServic

es

0.0% 50.0% 66.7% 40.0% 41.7%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 41.7%

2.00

Count 2 1 1 3 7

% within

Gender

28.6% 14.3% 14.3% 42.9% 100.0%

% within

UseServic

es

100.0% 50.0% 33.3% 60.0% 58.3%

% of Total 16.7% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 2 2 3 5 12

% within

Gender

16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

UseServic

es

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 41.7% 100.0%

Gender * TimesAdvisingCrosstab

TimesAdvi

sing

Total

2.00 3.00 4.00

Gender 1.00 Count 3 0 2 5

Page 11: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

42.9% 0.0% 50.0% 41.7%

% of Total 25.0% 0.0% 16.7% 41.7%

2.00

Count 4 1 2 7

% within

Gender

57.1% 14.3% 28.6% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

57.1% 100.0% 50.0% 58.3%

% of Total 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 58.3%

Total

Count 7 1 4 12

% within

Gender

58.3% 8.3% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 8.3% 33.3% 100.0%

Gender * ConcentrationCenterCrosstab

Concentrat

ionCenter

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender 1.00 Count 1 4 5

% within

Gender

20.0% 80.0% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

50.0% 40.0% 41.7%

Page 12: depth interview tabs

% of Total 8.3% 33.3% 41.7%

2.00

Count 1 6 7

% within

Gender

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

50.0% 60.0% 58.3%

% of Total 8.3% 50.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 2 10 12

% within

Gender

16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

Gender * UseTutorCenter

Crosstab

UseTutorC

enter

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 2 3 5

% within

Gender

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

25.0% 75.0% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 25.0% 41.7%

2.00 Count 6 1 7

Page 13: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

85.7% 14.3% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

75.0% 25.0% 58.3%

% of Total 50.0% 8.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 8 4 12

% within

Gender

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

Gender * LikeEmailsCrosstab

LikeEmails Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 4 1 5

% within

Gender

80.0% 20.0% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

44.4% 33.3% 41.7%

% of Total 33.3% 8.3% 41.7%

2.00

Count 5 2 7

% within

Gender

71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

55.6% 66.7% 58.3%

% of Total 41.7% 16.7% 58.3%

Total Count 9 3 12

Page 14: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

Gender * InfoFromTeacherCrosstab

InfoFromT

eacher

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 2 3 5

% within

Gender

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

28.6% 60.0% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 25.0% 41.7%

2.00

Count 5 2 7

% within

Gender

71.4% 28.6% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

71.4% 40.0% 58.3%

% of Total 41.7% 16.7% 58.3%

Total Count 7 5 12

% within

Gender

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 15: depth interview tabs

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

Gender * UseOfficeHoursCrosstab

UseOffice

Hours

Total

1.00

Gender

1.00

Count 5 5

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

41.7% 41.7%

% of Total 41.7% 41.7%

2.00

Count 7 7

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

58.3% 58.3%

% of Total 58.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 12 12

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 100.0% 100.0%

Gender * CareerCenterCrosstab

CareerCen

ter

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender 1.00 Count 2 3 5

Page 16: depth interview tabs

% within

Gender

40.0% 60.0% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

40.0% 42.9% 41.7%

% of Total 16.7% 25.0% 41.7%

2.00

Count 3 4 7

% within

Gender

42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

60.0% 57.1% 58.3%

% of Total 25.0% 33.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 5 7 12

% within

Gender

41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

Gender * LeadershipCenterCrosstab

Leadership

Center

Total

2.00

Gender 1.00 Count 5 5

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

LeadershipCent

er

41.7% 41.7%

% of Total 41.7% 41.7%

Page 17: depth interview tabs

2.00

Count 7 7

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

LeadershipCent

er

58.3% 58.3%

% of Total 58.3% 58.3%

Total

Count 12 12

% within Gender 100.0% 100.0%

% within

LeadershipCent

er

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 100.0% 100.0%

Gender * UseAllServicesCrosstab

UseAllServ

ices

Total

1.00 2.00

Gender

1.00

Count 0 5 5

% within

Gender

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

0.0% 45.5% 41.7%

% of Total 0.0% 41.7% 41.7%

2.00 Count 1 6 7

% within

Gender

14.3% 85.7% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

100.0% 54.5% 58.3%

Page 18: depth interview tabs

% of Total 8.3% 50.0% 58.3%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

Gender

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * InteractiveCrosstab

Interactive Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 3 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 27.3% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 1 8 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

100.0% 72.7% 75.0%

% of Total 8.3% 66.7% 75.0%

Total Count 1 11 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Page 19: depth interview tabs

% within

Interactive

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * InformativeCrosstab

Informative Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 1 1 1 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

Informative

16.7% 33.3% 33.3% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 25.0%

4.00

Count 5 2 2 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 22.2% 22.2% 100.0%

% within

Informative

83.3% 66.7% 66.7% 75.0%

% of Total 41.7% 16.7% 16.7% 75.0%

Total

Count 6 3 3 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

GradeLevel * OrganizedCrosstab

Page 20: depth interview tabs

Organized Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 3 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 27.3% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 1 8 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

% within

Organized

100.0% 72.7% 75.0%

% of Total 8.3% 66.7% 75.0%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

Organized

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * WebsiteUsesCrosstab

WebsiteUs

es

Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

GradeL 3.00 Count 3 0 0 3

Page 21: depth interview tabs

evel

% within

GradeLeve

l

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%

% of Total 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 5 3 1 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 33.3% 11.1% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

62.5% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0%

% of Total 41.7% 25.0% 8.3% 75.0%

Total

Count 8 3 1 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * BackgroundImage

Crosstab

Backgroun

dImage

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL 3.00 Count 3 0 3

Page 22: depth interview tabs

evel

% within

GradeLeve

l

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Backgroun

dImage

37.5% 0.0% 25.0%

% of Total 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 5 4 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

% within

Backgroun

dImage

62.5% 100.0% 75.0%

% of Total 41.7% 33.3% 75.0%

Total

Count 8 4 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

Backgroun

dImage

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * UsefulBackgroundCrosstab

UsefulBac

kground

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL 3.00 Count 1 2 3

Page 23: depth interview tabs

evel

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

UsefulBac

kground

25.0% 25.0% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

4.00

Count 3 6 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

UsefulBac

kground

75.0% 75.0% 75.0%

% of Total 25.0% 50.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 4 8 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

UsefulBac

kground

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * PerceptionMihayloCrosstab

Perception

Mihaylo

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00 Count 3 0 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Page 24: depth interview tabs

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

27.3% 0.0% 25.0%

% of Total 25.0% 0.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 8 1 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

88.9% 11.1% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

72.7% 100.0% 75.0%

% of Total 66.7% 8.3% 75.0%

Total

Count 11 1 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * FacebookCrosstab

Facebook Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00 Count 1 2 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

14.3% 40.0% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

Page 25: depth interview tabs

4.00

Count 6 3 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

85.7% 60.0% 75.0%

% of Total 50.0% 25.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 7 5 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

Facebook

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * TwitterCrosstab

Twitter Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 3 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Twitter

0.0% 42.9% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

4.00 Count 5 4 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

Page 26: depth interview tabs

% within

Twitter

100.0% 57.1% 75.0%

% of Total 41.7% 33.3% 75.0%

Total

Count 5 7 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

% within

Twitter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * LinkedInCrosstab

LinkedIn Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 2 1 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

28.6% 20.0% 25.0%

% of Total 16.7% 8.3% 25.0%

4.00

Count 5 4 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 44.4% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

71.4% 80.0% 75.0%

% of Total 41.7% 33.3% 75.0%

Total Count 7 5 12

Page 27: depth interview tabs

% within

GradeLeve

l

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

LinkedIn

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * InstagramCrosstab

Instagram Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 3 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

0.0% 30.0% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 2 7 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

22.2% 77.8% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

100.0% 70.0% 75.0%

% of Total 16.7% 58.3% 75.0%

Total Count 2 10 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

% within

Instagram

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 28: depth interview tabs

% of Total 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * WhyCSUFCrosstab

WhyCSUF

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 3 0 0 0 0

% within

GradeLeve

l

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% within

WhyCSUF

42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

% of Total 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

4.00

Count 4 1 2 1 1

% within

GradeLeve

l

44.4% 11.1% 22.2% 11.1% 11.1%

% within

WhyCSUF

57.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 33.3% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3%

Total

Count 7 1 2 1 1

% within

GradeLeve

l

58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3%

% within

WhyCSUF

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 8.3% 16.7% 8.3% 8.3%

Crosstab

Total

GradeLevel 3.00 Count 3

Page 29: depth interview tabs

% within GradeLevel 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 25.0%

% of Total 25.0%

4.00

Count 9

% within GradeLevel 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 75.0%

% of Total 75.0%

Total

Count 12

% within GradeLevel 100.0%

% within WhyCSUF 100.0%

% of Total 100.0%

GradeLevel * ScaleCommunicationCrosstab

ScaleCommunication

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 1 1 1 0

% within

GradeLev

el

0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0%

% within

ScaleCom

munication

0.0% 100.0% 50.0% 20.0% 0.0%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 0.0%

4.00 Count 2 0 1 4 2

% within

GradeLev

el

22.2% 0.0% 11.1% 44.4% 22.2%

Page 30: depth interview tabs

% within

ScaleCom

munication

100.0% 0.0% 50.0% 80.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 0.0% 8.3% 33.3% 16.7%

Total

Count 2 1 2 5 2

% within

GradeLev

el

16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 41.7% 16.7%

% within

ScaleCom

munication

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 8.3% 16.7% 41.7% 16.7%

GradeLevel * UseServices

Crosstab

UseServic

es

Total

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 0 2 1 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

UseServic

es

0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 20.0% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 8.3% 25.0%

4.00 Count 2 2 1 4 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

22.2% 22.2% 11.1% 44.4% 100.0%

Page 31: depth interview tabs

% within

UseServic

es

100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 80.0% 75.0%

% of Total 16.7% 16.7% 8.3% 33.3% 75.0%

Total

Count 2 2 3 5 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

UseServic

es

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 16.7% 25.0% 41.7% 100.0%

GradeLevel * TimesAdvisingCrosstab

TimesAdvi

sing

Total

2.00 3.00 4.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 2 0 1 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 0.0% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

28.6% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

% of Total 16.7% 0.0% 8.3% 25.0%

4.00 Count 5 1 3 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

55.6% 11.1% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

71.4% 100.0% 75.0% 75.0%

Page 32: depth interview tabs

% of Total 41.7% 8.3% 25.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 7 1 4 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

58.3% 8.3% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

TimesAdvi

sing

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 8.3% 33.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * ConcentrationCenterCrosstab

Concentrat

ionCenter

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 1 2 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

50.0% 20.0% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

4.00

Count 1 8 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

50.0% 80.0% 75.0%

% of Total 8.3% 66.7% 75.0%

Total Count 2 10 12

Page 33: depth interview tabs

% within

GradeLeve

l

16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

% within

Concentrat

ionCenter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 16.7% 83.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * UseTutorCenterCrosstab

UseTutorC

enter

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 1 2 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

12.5% 50.0% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

4.00

Count 7 2 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

77.8% 22.2% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

87.5% 50.0% 75.0%

% of Total 58.3% 16.7% 75.0%

Total Count 8 4 12

Page 34: depth interview tabs

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

UseTutorC

enter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * LikeEmailsCrosstab

LikeEmails Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 2 1 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

22.2% 33.3% 25.0%

% of Total 16.7% 8.3% 25.0%

4.00

Count 7 2 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

77.8% 22.2% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

77.8% 66.7% 75.0%

% of Total 58.3% 16.7% 75.0%

Total Count 9 3 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within

LikeEmails

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 35: depth interview tabs

% of Total 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%

GradeLevel * InfoFromTeacherCrosstab

InfoFromT

eacher

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 1 2 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

14.3% 40.0% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

4.00

Count 6 3 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

85.7% 60.0% 75.0%

% of Total 50.0% 25.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 7 5 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

% within

InfoFromT

eacher

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 58.3% 41.7% 100.0%

Page 36: depth interview tabs

GradeLevel * UseOfficeHoursCrosstab

UseOffice

Hours

Total

1.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 3 3

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

25.0% 25.0%

% of Total 25.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 9 9

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

75.0% 75.0%

% of Total 75.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 12 12

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseOfficeHours

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 100.0% 100.0%

GradeLevel * CareerCenterCrosstab

CareerCen

ter

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL 3.00 Count 1 2 3

Page 37: depth interview tabs

evel

% within

GradeLeve

l

33.3% 66.7% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

20.0% 28.6% 25.0%

% of Total 8.3% 16.7% 25.0%

4.00

Count 4 5 9

% within

GradeLeve

l

44.4% 55.6% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

80.0% 71.4% 75.0%

% of Total 33.3% 41.7% 75.0%

Total

Count 5 7 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

% within

CareerCen

ter

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%

GradeLevel * LeadershipCenterCrosstab

Leadership

Center

Total

2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00 Count 3 3

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

Page 38: depth interview tabs

% within

LeadershipCent

er

25.0% 25.0%

% of Total 25.0% 25.0%

4.00

Count 9 9

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

% within

LeadershipCent

er

75.0% 75.0%

% of Total 75.0% 75.0%

Total

Count 12 12

% within

GradeLevel

100.0% 100.0%

% within

LeadershipCent

er

100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 100.0% 100.0%

GradeLevel * UseAllServicesCrosstab

UseAllServ

ices

Total

1.00 2.00

GradeL

evel

3.00

Count 0 3 3

% within

GradeLeve

l

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

0.0% 27.3% 25.0%

% of Total 0.0% 25.0% 25.0%

4.00 Count 1 8 9

Page 39: depth interview tabs

% within

GradeLeve

l

11.1% 88.9% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

100.0% 72.7% 75.0%

% of Total 8.3% 66.7% 75.0%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

GradeLeve

l

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

UseAllServ

ices

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Concentration * InteractiveCrosstab

Interactive Total

1.00 2.00

Concen

tration

1.00

Count 0 2 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 18.2% 16.7%

% of Total 0.0% 16.7% 16.7%

2.00 Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

Page 40: depth interview tabs

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

3.00

Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

4.00

Count 1 3 4

% within

Concentrat

ion

25.0% 75.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

100.0% 27.3% 33.3%

% of Total 8.3% 25.0% 33.3%

5.00

Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

6.00

Count 0 2 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 18.2% 16.7%

% of Total 0.0% 16.7% 16.7%

7.00 Count 0 1 1

Page 41: depth interview tabs

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

Concentrat

ion

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

Interactive

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Concentration * InformativeCrosstab

Informative Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

Concen

tration

1.00

Count 1 0 1 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

16.7% 0.0% 33.3% 16.7%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3% 16.7%

2.00 Count 0 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

Page 42: depth interview tabs

3.00

Count 0 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

4.00

Count 3 1 0 4

% within

Concentrat

ion

75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

50.0% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3%

% of Total 25.0% 8.3% 0.0% 33.3%

5.00

Count 1 0 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

6.00

Count 1 0 1 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

16.7% 0.0% 33.3% 16.7%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3% 16.7%

7.00

Count 0 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

Page 43: depth interview tabs

% within

Informative

0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

Total

Count 6 3 3 12

% within

Concentrat

ion

50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

% within

Informative

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 50.0% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0%

Concentration * OrganizedCrosstab

Organized Total

1.00 2.00

Concen

tration

1.00

Count 0 2 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 18.2% 16.7%

% of Total 0.0% 16.7% 16.7%

2.00

Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

3.00 Count 0 1 1

Page 44: depth interview tabs

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

4.00

Count 0 4 4

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 36.4% 33.3%

% of Total 0.0% 33.3% 33.3%

5.00

Count 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

100.0% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

6.00

Count 0 2 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Organized

0.0% 18.2% 16.7%

% of Total 0.0% 16.7% 16.7%

7.00 Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Page 45: depth interview tabs

% within

Organized

0.0% 9.1% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

Total

Count 1 11 12

% within

Concentrat

ion

8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

% within

Organized

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 8.3% 91.7% 100.0%

Concentration * WebsiteUsesCrosstab

WebsiteUs

es

Total

1.00 2.00 3.00

Concen

tration

1.00

Count 1 1 0 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

12.5% 33.3% 0.0% 16.7%

% of Total 8.3% 8.3% 0.0% 16.7%

2.00 Count 0 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

Page 46: depth interview tabs

3.00

Count 1 0 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

4.00

Count 3 1 0 4

% within

Concentrat

ion

75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

37.5% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3%

% of Total 25.0% 8.3% 0.0% 33.3%

5.00

Count 0 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

6.00 Count 2 0 0 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7%

% of Total 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7%

Page 47: depth interview tabs

7.00

Count 1 0 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3%

Total

Count 8 3 1 12

% within

Concentrat

ion

66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

WebsiteUs

es

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 66.7% 25.0% 8.3% 100.0%

Concentration * PerceptionMihayloCrosstab

Perception

Mihaylo

Total

1.00 2.00

Concen

tration

1.00

Count 2 0 2

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

18.2% 0.0% 16.7%

% of Total 16.7% 0.0% 16.7%

2.00 Count 1 0 1

Page 48: depth interview tabs

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

9.1% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

3.00

Count 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

9.1% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

4.00

Count 4 0 4

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

36.4% 0.0% 33.3%

% of Total 33.3% 0.0% 33.3%

5.00

Count 1 0 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

9.1% 0.0% 8.3%

% of Total 8.3% 0.0% 8.3%

6.00 Count 2 0 2

Page 49: depth interview tabs

% within

Concentrat

ion

100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

18.2% 0.0% 16.7%

% of Total 16.7% 0.0% 16.7%

7.00

Count 0 1 1

% within

Concentrat

ion

0.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

0.0% 100.0% 8.3%

% of Total 0.0% 8.3% 8.3%

Total

Count 11 1 12

% within

Concentrat

ion

91.7% 8.3% 100.0%

% within

Perception

Mihaylo

100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 91.7% 8.3% 100.0%