38
August 22, 2014 Debugging Tech's Class Issues Carina C. Zona

Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

As developers, we have power to be constructors of social justice. If we are members of tech community, then we inherit a chain of responsibility for addressing intersections between our work and its sometimes profoundly local effects on communities. We can choose to engage in debugging and fixes. We start by engaging in introspection about the inequities that our industry imposes on groups who have fewer privileges than we have access to. We’re going to walk through some of these issues, and review methods for implementing change. Date: August 22, 2014 Author: Carina C. Zona Location: Madison, WI

Citation preview

Page 1: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

August 22, 2014

Debugging Tech's Class Issues

Carina C. Zona

Page 2: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

@cczona

Page 3: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 4: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 5: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 6: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Detecting

• "What was it originally designed to do?"

• "Why didn't the design go as planned?"

• Home in on actual culprit

• Identify its cause

"Debugging: The 9 Indispensable Rules for Finding Even the Most Elusive Software and Hardware Problems" by David J. Agans

Debugging is

Page 7: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Debugging applies to technology. !

Also to tech's socioeconomic issues.

Page 8: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

class.Understand the (Structural) System

Page 9: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

class.system of ordering a society in which people are divided into sets based on perceived social or economic status

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/class

Page 10: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

https://nonprofitquarterly.org/policysocial-context/23301-infographic-the-impact-of-stem-education-on-students.html

Page 11: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

class + race

Regardless of child's individual class

!

• Majority-poor schools:82% students are black or Hispanic

• Majority-middle-class schools:76% are white

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-green/high-poverty-schools_b_862869.html

Page 12: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

STEM in majority-poor schools

👎Course options 👎Instructors 👎Computer lab 👎Laptop 👎Broadband 👎CS AP

http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494820.pdf & http://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2014/jan/26/internet-luxury-low-income-americans & http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/school-segregation-sharply-increasing-studies-show/2012/09/22/5b34111a-04c6-11e2-91e7-2962c74e7738_blog.html

Page 13: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

High schoolers' access to advanced math & science classes81% of Asian-Americans

71% of whites

67% of Hispanics

57% of African-Americans

47% of American Indians & Native Alaskanshttp://ocrdata.ed.gov/Downloads/CRDC-College-and-Career-Readiness-Snapshot.pdf See also: final slide.

Page 14: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Advance Placement

69% of high schools have AP courses

• earn college credits

• waive college prereqs

!

• 30,000 students take AP computer science exam

• no Hispanics in 6 states

• no African Americans in 11 states

http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2014/01/girls_african_americans_and_hi.html

Page 15: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

diversity.variety; differing

Page 16: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Current enrollment

Accenture "full-time student in at least 2 semesters"

Box "sophomore or junior year of 4-year post-secondary institution"

Xerox "full-time student enrolled in a 4-year institution to receive a BS, MS, or PhD"

diversity scholarships

http://www.boxdiversityscholarship.com/ & http://www.xerox.com/downloads/usa/en/q/qualifications_and_process_steps.pdf & http://careers.accenture.com/us-en/your-future/development/graduate/internships/Pages/scholarship-program-minorities.aspx

Page 17: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

community colleges

• 45% of all undergrad students

• 44% of low-income students

• 50% of Hispanic students

• 31% of African American students

• 38% of students whose parents didn't graduate college

http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/Community-College-FAQs.html

Page 18: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

diversity scholarships.sometimes come with constraints that make underrepresented people least ineligible.

Page 19: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

learn-to-code workshops & bootcamps.assume life can be temporarily rearranged to accommodate goals

Page 20: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

https://twitter.com/jwoodum/status/227105668295954432://

Page 21: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

UX Gentrification

"Old phone" by Ellison Leão https://www.flickr.com/photos/br4k/5155287404

Page 22: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Shiny!

http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/cell-phone-and-smartphone-ownership-demographics/

Own a mobile phone at all

$30,000

$50,000

$75,000

>$75,000 98%

99%

90%

84%

42% of US adults don't own a smartphone

Page 23: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Sept 2013 http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/connection-type/

70% of adults have broadband at home

Page 24: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

disruptive.

Page 25: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

disruptive.•causing a disturbance or problem.

•drastically altering or destroying the structure of something.

Page 26: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

disruptive technology.replaces old technology. scales by applying more technology.

Page 27: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

disruptive business model.strategy isn't focused on making technologies that replace old

technologies.

!

strategy focuses on individual communities. !!!

Page 28: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

disruptive startup business.individual physical communities. !convenience service for local people with disposable income. !scaling requires expanding to a new town or city !scaling requiring adding more people on the ground.

Page 29: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Disrupt via Technology Innovation

Disrupt via Local Service Enhancement

Twitter Uber

Facebook Instacart

Page 30: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Uber

benefits local consumers benefits uber undercuts local businesses

price war (future) price war

more options less regulation higher operating costs

(depends on consumer protections) lobbying for new laws unequal competition

Page 31: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Are systemic barriers

Page 32: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 33: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 34: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]
Page 35: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Thank you.

Page 36: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

Carina C. Zona !

@cczona [email protected] http://cczona.com

Page 37: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

More reading

• http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/ap/rtn/10th-annual/10th-annual-ap-report-subject-supplement-computer-science-a.pdf

• http://diversity.berkeley.edu/the-new-age-segregation

• http://newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/Merit_Aid%20Final.pdf

• http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/expansive-survey-americas-public-schools-reveals-troubling-racial-disparities

Intersectional: income + race

Page 38: Debugging Tech’s Socioeconomic Class  Issues [Madison+ Ruby Conf 2014]

CORRECTION

In "High schoolers' access to advanced math & science classes", the figures I cited in the slides/presentation were incorrect. Corrected figures are:

+1% (81% total) for Asian-Americans

+1% (71% total) for whites

-3% (67% total) for Hispanics

The point stands; moreover, shows that their gap in access to advanced math & science courses is wider than presented.

http://ocrdata.ed.gov/Downloads/CRDC-College-and-Career-Readiness-Snapshot.pdf

Slide