35
EDU702 Research Methodology Quantitative Research Prepared by Azurawati Binti Wok Zaki 2011313879 ED7701A2

Causal comparative n survey

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Causal comparative n survey

EDU702 Research Methodology

Quantitative Research

Prepared byAzurawati Binti Wok Zaki

2011313879ED7701A2

Page 2: Causal comparative n survey

Chapter 16:Causal-Comparative

Research

(Ex post facto ResearchNon-experimental research)

Page 3: Causal comparative n survey

THE AIM

to determine the cause of existing differences among groups.

Page 4: Causal comparative n survey

Causal-Comparative Research is Differentiated from Experimental

Research

• In an experiment, the independent variable is manipulated by the researcher.

• In causal comparative research the independent has already occurred.– Examples of independent variables

include socioeconomic status, pre-school history, number of siblings, and so on.

Page 5: Causal comparative n survey

Three types of causal-comparative research

Page 6: Causal comparative n survey

Causal- comparative and Correlational Research

• Similarities: researchers explore relationship

among variablesseek identify variables that are

worthy of later exploration through experimental research.

provide guidance for subsequent experimental studies.

attempt to explore causation

Page 7: Causal comparative n survey

Differences:Causal-Comparative vs Correlational

- Compare 2 or more groups of subjects

- Require a score on each variable for each subject.

-Involve at least one categorical variables (group membership)

- Investigate 2 (or more) quantitative variables

- Often compare averages or use crossbreak tables.

- Analyse data using scatterplots

Page 8: Causal comparative n survey

Causal-comparative and Experimental Research

• Similarities:• - Require at least one

categorical variable (group membership).

• - Compare group performances (average score) to determine relationship.

• - Both typically compare separate group of subjects.

Page 9: Causal comparative n survey

Differences: Causal-Comparative vs Experimental

- No manipulation takes place

- Independent variable is manipulated

- Provide much weaker evidence for causation than do experimental studies.

- The group are already formed (the researcher must locate them)

- The researcher can assign subjects to treatment groups

- The researcher has much greater flexibility in formulating the structure of the design.

Page 10: Causal comparative n survey

Value of Causal Comparative Research

• Uncovers relationships to be investigated experimentally.

• Used to establish cause-effect when experimental design not possible.

• Less expensive and time consuming than experimental research.

• Note: if you conduct a quantitative research study it most likely will be a causal-comparative study.

Page 11: Causal comparative n survey

• More Examples:• How does preschool attendance

affect social maturity at the end of the first grade?

• How does having a working mother affect a child’s school absenteeism?

Page 12: Causal comparative n survey

STEPS TAKEN

1) Problem Formulation2) Sample

3) Instrumentation4) Design

Page 13: Causal comparative n survey

Threats

• Subject Characteristics• - Matching the subjects• - Finding or Creating

Homogeneous Subgroups• - Statistical Matching

Page 14: Causal comparative n survey

Data Analysis in Causal-Comparative Studies

• To construct frequency polygon• Means and standard deviations are

usually calculated in the variables involved are quantitative.

• The most used test is a t-test for differences between means.

• Analysis of covariance is useful.• The results should always be

interpreted with caution.

Page 15: Causal comparative n survey

Chapter 17:Survey Research

The most popular technique for

gathering primary data in which a

researcher interacts with people to

obtain facts, opinions,

and attitudes.

Page 16: Causal comparative n survey

The Purpose of Survey Research

Page 17: Causal comparative n survey
Page 18: Causal comparative n survey

Types of Surveysi) Cross-sectional study

• A study in which various segments of a population are sampled. E.g. managers and non-managers.

• Data are collected at a single moment in time.

• When an entire population is surveyed: Census

Page 19: Causal comparative n survey

example

• A professor of Mathematics might collect data from a sample of all the high school mathematics teachers in a particular state about their interests in earning a master’s degree in Mathematics from his university.

Page 20: Causal comparative n survey

ii) Longitudinal study

• Longitudinal survey• - information is collected at

different points in time in order to study changes over time.

Page 21: Causal comparative n survey

3 Longitudinal designs

Trend study

Cohort Study

Panel Study

different samples from a population whose member may change are surveyed at different points in time.

a particular population whose members do not change over the course of the survey.

the researcher surveys the same sample of individuals at different times during the course of the survey.

Page 22: Causal comparative n survey

Examples:

• Trend study:- A researcher might be interested in the

attitudes of high school principals towards the use of flexible scheduling. He would select a sample each year from a current listing of high school principals throughout the year. The same individual would not be the sampled each year, he would compare responses from year to year to see whether any trends were apparent.

Page 23: Causal comparative n survey

Cohort study

• A researcher would like to study growth in teaching effectiveness of all the 1st year teachers who had graduated in the past 5 years from a university. The names of all would be listed, and different sample would be selected from this listing at different times.

Page 24: Causal comparative n survey

Panel study

• A researcher select a sample of last year’s graduates from a university who are 1st year teachers and survey on the same individual several times during the teaching years.

Page 25: Causal comparative n survey

Steps taken

Defining the problem

- It should be interesting and

important to motivate individuals to

respond.

Identifying the target population

Page 26: Causal comparative n survey

Forms of Survey Research

Mail SurveysMail Surveys

Telephone surveysTelephone surveysPersonal InterviewsPersonal Interviews

Internet surveysInternet surveys

Page 27: Causal comparative n survey

Comparison of three kinds of surveysComparison of three kinds of surveysCOMPARISON OF SURVEY TECHNIQUES

Page 28: Causal comparative n survey

Advantages and Disadvantages Direct Administration

Tele-phone

Mail Inter-view

Comparative Cost Lowest Inter-mediate

Inter-mediate

High

Facilities needed? Yes No No Yes

Require training of questioner?

Yes Yes No Yes

Data collection time Shortest Short Longer Longest

Response rate Very high Good Poorest Very High

Group administration possible

Yes No No Yes

Allow for random sampling? Possibly Yes Yes Yes

Require literate sample? Yes No No No

Permit follow-up-questions? No Yes Yes Yes

Encourage response to sensitive topics?

Somewhat Somewhat

Somewhat

Weak

Standardization of responses Easy Somewhat

Somewhat

Hardest

Page 29: Causal comparative n survey

Questionnaire Design

Open-EndedQuestion

Open-EndedQuestion

Closed-EndedQuestion

Closed-EndedQuestion

An interview question that encourages an answer phrased in respondent’s

own words.

An interview question that encourages an answer phrased in respondent’s

own words.

An interview question that asks the respondent to make a selection

from a limited list of responses.

An interview question that asks the respondent to make a selection

from a limited list of responses.

Page 30: Causal comparative n survey

Advantages Closed-ended Open-ended

-Enhance consistency of response across respondents

- Allow more freedom of response

-Easier and faster to tabulate - Easier to construct

- More popular with respondents - Permit follow-up by interviewer

Disadvantages- May limit breadth of response - Tend to produce responses that

are consistent in length and content across respondents

- Take more time to construct - Both questions and responses subjects to misinterpretation

- Require more questions to cover the research topic

- Harder to tabulate and synthesize

Page 31: Causal comparative n survey

Typical problems in wording questionsTypical problems in wording questionsTYPICAL PROBLEMS IN WORDING QUESTIONS

Page 32: Causal comparative n survey

Respondent Error

• A classification of sample bias resulting from some respondent action

Non-response -Total Nonresponse

Page 33: Causal comparative n survey

Non-response-total nonresponse

• Not enough people respond or refuse to respond

• NONRESPONDENTS - People who refuse to cooperate

• NOT-AT-HOMES• SELF-SELECTION BIAS

especially in case of self-administered questionnaire. People respond to only those they like.

Page 34: Causal comparative n survey

Item Nonresponse

- The respondent may not know the answer to a particular question, the respondent may find the questions embarrassing or irrelevant.

Page 35: Causal comparative n survey

The END

Thank You