Upload
ilri
View
3.550
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Peter J. Cotty and Ranajit Bandyopadhyay at the Science Forum 2013, Bonn, Germany, 23?25 September 2013
Citation preview
Biological control of Aflatoxins
Peter J. Cotty,
Agricultural Research Service, USDA
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Ranajit Bandyopadhyay,
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
Ibadan, Nigeria
Breakout Session 4 on Food Security
Science Forum 2013
Nutrition and health outcomes: targets for agricultural research, Bonn, Germany, 23‒25 September 2013
Opportunity Aflatoxins are highly toxic cancer causing fungal metabolites that contaminate crops and impact human health, development, and income throughout the warm production regions.
With a single biological control technology aflatoxins can be reduced and eventually eliminated on treated crops, rotation crops, and throughout the environment. $50 million over the next decade will be used to adapt and disseminate this technology across sub-Saharan Africa.
Aflatoxin prevention will have health and economic impacts throughout the warm regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America.
One Technology Many Benefits This technology will reduce aflatoxins in all susceptible crops (Groundnut, Maize, Chilies, etc.) both prior to and after harvest.
Protection remains with the crop until it is actually consumed.
The technology is adaptable to any target location.
Does not assert selective pressure on aflatoxin producers.
The technology works every time and is Less Expensive than sampling a small holders field and analyzing it for aflatoxins.
Removes the need to increase and maintain host resistance to aflatoxins during the process of selecting high yielding cultivars.
Resistance to aflatoxin contamination has been sought for over 3 decades in both groundnut and maize without development of commercially acceptable cultivars.
During Crop Development
Irrigation, Weed Control, Fertilize
Best cultivars, Insect Control
During transport
Rapid, Dry, No Damage
During Processing
Sort, Cull, Discard, Add binders.
During Storage
Dry, prevent moisture, cool
Prevent damage: insects, rodents
Prevent Formation of Dangerous Aflatoxin Levels
Protect Crops Until Use
A single application at 10 kg/hectare is
enough to consistently reduce aflatoxins
in maize, groundnut, and other crops.
Nigeria
Biological Control: One Action by the Farmer Reduces Aflatoxins under all Conditions
As Applied
After
Fungal Growth
Either Sorghum, Wheat,
or Barley are used.
The grain is killed by
cooking before use.
Sorghum is used in
Africa.
Afl
ato
xin
B1 (
ng
/g X
10,0
00
)
Isolates (%) in Applied Atoxigenic Strain
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 20 40 60 80 100
Dots Represent Values
for Replicate Plots
Aflatoxin in Crop versus Atoxigenic Incidence
Cotty, 1994. Phytopathology:1270-1277.
www.iita.org
MAIZE: Aflatoxin reduction (%)
Stage 2009 2010 2011 2012
Harvest 82 94 83 93
Storage 92 93 x x
PEANUT: Aflatoxin reduction (%)
Stage 2009 2010 2011
Harvest - 95 82
Storage 100 80 x
Results from 482
on-farm trials
71% and 52% carry-over of
inoculum 1 & 2 years after
application
Crops are Protected in the Field and During Storage Aflatoxin reduction after 4 months poor storage (Field Treated Crops – Nigeria)
0
200
400
600
800
Birnin Gwari Lere Maigana Pampaida
Afl
ato
xin
(p
pb
) Control
Treated
96
14
271
49
646
17
171
9
85% 82% 99% 95%
% reduction in aflatoxin content in treated fields over control
www.iita.org
Farmers threshing groundnut
Farmers treating groundnut fields with AflaSafe
Aflatoxin Reduction:
2010 : 87% at harvest; 89% after Storage
2011: 82% at harvest; 93% after Storage
2012: 86% at harvest; 83% after Storage
Senegal
38 Farms Treated in 2010
40 Farms Treated in 2011
196 Farms Treated in 2012
Hola Irrigation Scheme, Coast Province, Kenya: 2012 Tests
First Season Farmer Field Tests Treatment = 10 kg/ha Aflasafe KN01
Percent of Fields
Tota
l Aflato
xin
s Deadly (3,700 ppb & 2,270 ppb)
Safe Food
Partners • Ministries of Health, Trade, & Agriculture
• African Union and it’s Regional Economic Commissions
• Technical Organizations (IR-4,
• Regulatory Organizations
• Farmers & Farmer Organizations
• Universities & Cooperative Extension
• Processors, Food & Feed Producers
• Producers of Poultry, Fish, Pork, etc.
• Middlemen, Marketers, Exporters
• Implementers, Public & Private
• Manufacturers
Plan
Engage, Adapt, Disseminate, Develop, Optimize, repeat…..
Pesticide Registrations, Agronomic Practices, Fungal Germplasm,
Business Models, Manufacturing…..
1st Generation Large-Scale Manufacture Arizona Cotton Research & Protection Council
Phoenix, Arizona
2nd Generation Large-Scale Manufacture International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
Ibadan, Nigeria
3rd Generation Large-Scale Manufacture
4th Generation Large-Scale Manufacture
5th Generation Large-Scale Manufacture
Return on Investment • More Health
– Improved Immune Systems
– Reduced Stunting
– Slower spread of HIV
– Better Utilization of Nutrients
– Less Cancer
– Healthier Lives
The very reasons aflatoxins are regulated stringently in the developed world.
• More Money – Export Value of Crops and Crop Products will be Increased.
Punch Line
• The biological control works. It can be the principal tool for eliminating aflatoxins from the food supply and the environment.
• Elimination of aflatoxins will have broad benefit.