22
Optimizing Overall Manufacturing System Performance through the Use of Animal-free Cell Culture Supplements BioManufacturing Summit, January 27, 2010 KiriLynn Svay, Jeff Rosenbloom, Delyan Rusev, and Matt Croughan Amgen Bioprocessing Center Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA

Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Optimizing Overall Manufacturing System Performance through the Use of Animal-free Cell Culture Supplements

BioManufacturing Summit, January 27, 2010

KiriLynn Svay, Jeff Rosenbloom, Delyan Rusev, and Matt Croughan

Amgen Bioprocessing CenterKeck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA

Page 2: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

25 Years of Progress in Clinical Protein Production from Recombinant CHO Cells in Batch and Fedbatch Culture

Professor Matt Croughan, Keck Graduate Institute, Claremont, CA

y = 0.082e0.3477x

R2 = 0.9593

y = 9.941e0.205x

R2 = 0.7939

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Years Since 1980

Prod

uct C

once

ntra

tion

at H

arve

st (m

g/L)

New to Technology >2 Years Experience

Page 3: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Analysis of Variance for Experienced FirmsProfessor Matt Croughan, Keck Graduate Institute

y = -0.0804x + 50.266R2 = 0.0005

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0 5 10 15 20 25 30Years Since 1980

Perc

ent C

V fo

r Pro

duct

Con

cent

ratio

n at

Har

vest

Page 4: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010
Page 5: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

“..It” flows down hill

Consequences of 10g/L

• Cell density (volume)• Cell debris• Product Mass• HMW

Cell Culture 10g/L

Purification •Drug Product Development

•From Jon Coffman

Page 6: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Fed-batch cell culture in 1990

Page 7: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Cell culture strategies to optimize overall system performance

Consistent and sufficient titers◦ Every process, every timeShorter culture duration◦ Higher vol. productivity, lower contamination riskReduced cell death◦ Lower degradative enzyme levels◦ Lower HCP and debris loads downstreamImproved downstream processing◦ Higher yields or fewer/simpler stepsImproved product quality and/or stability

Page 8: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Recombinant Human Serum Albumin (rHSA) made in an animal free production host by InVitria (www.InVitria.com)Roles of Albumin in Cell Culture:◦ Binding and transport mechanism

Supply of LipidsVitaminsHormones

◦ Buffering agent◦ Detoxifying agent◦ Protectant from shear

Page 9: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Recombinant Lactoferrin is a naturally occurring iron-binding protein that was made in an animal free production system by InVitria (www.InVitria.com)Advantages of Lactoferrin in Cell Culture◦ Can be used as a growth factor

◦ Protects against oxidation due to Fe3+ ions

◦ Microbial deterrent

◦ Iron transport to cells

Page 10: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010
Page 11: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Impact of Cellastim/Lacromin Supplements on CHO Cell Culture in CD medium

% Improvement, Supplemented/Control(data from five separate experiments)

Peak viable cell density (VCD)◦ Average: 28%, Range: 2 - 47%

Peak titer (product concentration)◦ Average: 40%, Range: 2 – 88%

Volumetric productivity at peak titer◦ Average: 69%, Range: 3 – 162%

Page 12: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Batch Shake Flask Results

Cells supplemented with 250 mg/L Cellastim or 500 mg/L Cellastim reached the greatest cell density in batch shake flasks

This data was very similar to the InVitria studies using the same conditions

012345678

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

VC

D (

mill

ion

cells

/mL)

Days

Viable Cell DensityControl 125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin

250 mg/L Cellastim 500 mg/L Cellastim

2030405060708090

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

% V

iabi

lity

Days

% ViabilityControl 125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin

250 mg/L Cellastim 500 mg/L Cellastim

Page 13: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Bioreactor Density TrendsSimilar trends appeared in the fed batch bioreactors

•Better growth than un-supplemented cells•Slower decline rate at end of culture

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

%V

iabi

lity

VC

D (

mill

ion

cells

/mL)

Days

Bioreactor Viable Cell Densities and % Viability125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin VCD Control VCD

125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin %VIA Control %VIA

Page 14: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Specific Glucose and Lactate Trends

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0-Prefeed Post Feed - 7 7-10

sp. G

luco

se C

onsu

mpt

ion

(ng/

cell*

day)

Specific Glucose Consumption in Fed Batch Bioreactors

Control 125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin

In fed batch bioreactors there was decreased sp. glucose consumption and decreased sp. lactate production from cells supplemented with Cellastim and Lacromin

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0-Prefeed Post Feed - 7 7-10sp. L

acta

te P

rodu

ctio

n (n

g/ce

ll*da

y)

Specific Lactate Production in Fed Batch Bioreactors

Control 125:125 mg/L Cellastim:Lacromin

6.66.8

77.27.47.6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

pH

Days

pH vs. Time125:125 pH Control pH

Page 15: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Con

cent

rati

on (

g/L)

Day

Glucose Trends EXP4 BioreactorsControl 250 mg/L Cellastim

0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Con

cent

rati

on (

g/L)

Day

Lactate Trends EXP4 BioreactorsControl 250 mg/L Cellastim

Page 16: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

6.70

6.75

6.80

6.85

6.90

6.95

7.00

7.05

7.10

7.15

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

pH

Day

pH Trends EXP4 BioreactorsControl 250 mg/L Cellastim

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

400.00

450.00

500.00

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

Osm

olal

ity

(mO

sm)

Day

OsmolalityTrends EXP4 BioreactorsControl 250 mg/L Cellastim

Page 17: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010
Page 18: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Purification Step Using GE-ÄKTApilot

Column Equilibration

Sample Loading/ Flow-Through Collection Column Wash Eluted

Fractions

Column Re-

equilibration

a-IL-8

Page 19: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

SDS-PAGE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Coomassie Blue Staining

25kD

75kD

50kD

1 Protein Marker2 Supernatant: 125/125 mg/L Cellastim/Lacromin

3 Purified a-IL-8 by Protein A Column from supernatant containing 125/125 mg/L Cellastim/Lacromin

4 UF Purified a-IL-8 of #3 product5 Supernatant: 250 mg/L Cellastim6 Purified a-IL-8 by Protein A Column from supernatant containing 250 mg/L Cellastim7 UF Purified a-IL-8 of #6 product8 Supernatant: 500 mg/L Cellastim9 Purified a-IL-8 by Protein A Column from supernatant containing 500 mg/L Cellastim

10 UF Purified a-IL-8 of #9 product

Page 20: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

SDS-PAGE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

25kD

75kD

50kD

Silver Staining

1 Protein Marker2 Supernatant: 250 mg/L Cellastim3 Flow – through fraction (time point:10-11min) of #2 run through Protein A Column4 Purified a-IL-8 by Protein A Column from supernatant containing 250 mg/L Cellastim5 Waste Fraction (time point: 59-60min) of #2 run through Protein A Column6 Supernatant from Protein A Column after column disassembling 7 Supernatant: 125/125 mg/L Cellastim/Lacromin8 Flow – through fraction (time point:10-11min) of # 7 run through Protein A Column

9 Purified a-IL-8 by Protein A Column from supernatant containing 125/125 mg/L Cellastim/Lacromin

10 Waste Fraction (time point: 47-48min) of # 7 run through Protein A Column

Page 21: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

IgG Standard Curve

y = 197.13e1.28x

R2 = 0.9936

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40

OD 450nm

Tite

r (ng

/mL)

SampleAmount of IgG loaded

(milligrams)

Amount of IgG recovered

(milligrams)% Recovered

CONTROL

0 mg/L Cellastim

0 mg/L Lacromin

784 328 41.8

125mg/L Cellastim

125 mg/L Lacromin619 321 51.9

250 mg/L Cellastim 537 315 58.7

500mg/L Cellastim 449 313 69.7

ELISA

Page 22: Bio manufacturing summit croughan et al jan 2010

Summary

Optimize overall system performanceCellastim/Lacromin supplementation◦ Higher product concentration (titers)◦ Higher specific productivity◦ More efficient glucose metabolism◦ Reduced cell death◦ Higher consistency◦ Equal or improved yields at protein A capture

Supplements in flow throughReduced non-specific losses of MAb