14
Evaluation of glyphosate loss from a maize traited field La Jaillière : french experimental site La Jaillière : french experimental site Benoît Réal, Julie Maillet-Mezeray Brussels march 23th 2010

B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluation of glyphosate loss from a maize traited fieldLa Jaillière : french experimental site

Citation preview

Page 1: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evaluation of glyphosate loss from a maize traited field

La Jaillière : french experimental siteLa Jaillière : french experimental site

Benoît Réal, Julie Maillet-Mezeray

Brussels march 23th 2010

Page 2: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Experimental plots

La Jaillière

Representative of the western part of France

11 plots with different rotations but no repetition

Non-drained Plot

Drained Plot

Recording Station

Runoff Collectors

Ditch

Grass buffer strip

11 plots with different rotations but no repetition

Surface of the plots : 0.5 to 1 ha

Type of soil : hydromorphic loam with 22 % of clay and 2.2 % of organic matter

Substratum : schist at 0.80 depth m

Annual average rainfall: 750 mm

Annual average quantity of water drained : 220 mm

⇒More than 15 000 datas concerning 68 active ingredients⇒770 datas on glyphosate and AMPA

Page 3: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Datas collection

Flow

Rain water

Water from drainage and run off

Sunshine

Temperature

Practices : Applications (dates, doses)

Soil Surface

Solar Panel

Data Acquisition Unit

Runoff / Drainage water Inlet

Flow meter

Waste

Automatic Sampler

Practices : Applications (dates, doses)

Page 4: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Experimental trials on glyphosate.Round up Ready use simulations

3 plots

3 drained, 3 with run off,

2 ploughing, 1 no tillage

Years of study: 4

Application period: June

No GM maizeNo GM maize

Special sprayer

Page 5: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evolution of concentrations of glyphosate, AMPA and drained water quantity.

Draining water. Plot T7 (drainage / ploughing)

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

04/06/2009

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha

13/06/2008 1080 g/ha

26/06/2008 1080 g/ha

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha10/03/200406/03/2002

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

mm

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

µg/l

RR practicesDuring drainage

Just after drainage

No drainage

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

10/03/2004

720 g/ha

06/03/2002

720 g/ha

0

5

10

15

20

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Lame d'eau (mm) Application C glyphosate µg/l C AMPA µg/l

⇒ Immediate transfer of glyphosate and AMPA when application during

draining period: 2002 : 0.002% of applied quantity. ⇒ RR practices: No transfer in june. Low transfer of glyphosate and AMPA in October / November⇒ AMPA transfer lower than glyphosate ones

Page 6: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evolution of glyphosate, AMPA's flows accumulations and drained water quantity.

Draining water. Plot T7 (drainage / ploughing).

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

04/06/2009

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha13/06/2008 1080 g/ha

26/06/2008 1080 g/ha

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

10/03/2004

720 g/ha

06/03/2002

720 g/ha800

1000

1200

mg/ha

10

12

14

16

mm

RR practices

During drainage

Just after drainage

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

0

200

400

600

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0

2

4

6

8

Drained water quantity (mm) Application Glyphosate's flow mg/ha AMPA's flow mg/ha

⇒ Flow / Applied quantity: 0.00012 % during the whole experimentation. ⇒ Lower with RR practices.

Page 7: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evolution of concentrations of glypohosate, AMPA and drained water quantity.

Drained water. Plot T8 (drainage / no tillage).

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

02/06/2009

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha

13/06/2008

1080 g/ha

26/06/2008

1080 g/ha16/03/2007

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha

10/03/2004

720 g/ha

25

30

35

40

45

50

mm

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

µg/l

RR practicesJust after drainage

1080 g/ha16/03/2007

720 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

720 g/ha

0

5

10

15

20

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Lame d'eau (mm) Application C glyphosate µg/l C AMPA µg/l

⇒ Same pattern in no tillage.

⇒ RR practices: transfer >0.001 % of applied quantity.

Page 8: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evolution of flows accumulations of glyphosate, AMPA and drained water quantity.

Draining water. Plot T9 (drainage/ploughing/buffer strip 2004)

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

04/06/2009

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha

13/06/2008 1080 g/ha

26/06/2008 1080 g/ha

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha10/03/200406/03/2002

25

30

35

40

45

50

mm

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

µg/l

RR practicesApplication 2 years before.

First degradation after application

1215 g/ha08/06/2006 1080 g/ha

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

10/03/2004

720 g/ha

06/03/2002

720 g/ha

0

5

10

15

20

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

Lame d'eau (mm) Application C glyphosate µg/l C AMPA µg/l

⇒ Same transfer pattern

Page 9: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Evolution of concentrations of glyphosate, AMPA and run off water quantity. Run off water. Plot T8 (run off / no tillage).

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

13/06/2008

1080 g/ha

26/06/2008

1080 g/ha

16/03/2007

720 g/ha

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

10/03/2004

720 g/ha2.0

2.5

3.0

µg/l

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

mm RR practicesJust after drainage

⇒ Same pattern of transfer⇒Concentrations can be higher than in drainage but always below PNEC (60 µg/l; AFSSA opinion)

02/06/2008

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Run off water (mm) Application C glyphosate µg/l C AMPA µg/l

Page 10: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

19/03/2009

720 g/ha

02/06/2009

1215 g/ha

19/06/2009

1215 g/ha

13/06/2008

1080 g/ha

26/06/2008

1080 g/ha16/03/2007

04/04/2006 720 g/ha

01/06/2006 1080 g/ha

08/06/2006 1080 g/ha10/03/2004

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

mg/ha

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

mm

Evolution of flows accumulations of glyphosate, AMPA and run off water quantity.

Run off water. Plot T8 (run off / no tillage).

RR practices

Just after drainage

1080 g/ha16/03/2007

720 g/ha

31/03/2005 720 g/ha

03/06/2005 1332 g/ha

14/06/2005 1008 g/ha

720 g/ha

0.0

10.0

20.0

28/08/2001 29/08/2002 30/08/2003 30/08/2004 31/08/2005 01/09/2006 02/09/2007 02/09/2008

0.0

1.0

2.0

Lame d'eau (mm) Application Flux glyphosate mg/ha Flux AMPA mg/ha

⇒ Higher concentrations than in drained water but, lower flows

⇒ Drained plots : more transfers in drainage water than in run off water.

Page 11: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

39

600

800

1000

1200

Flows (mg/ha)

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Doses (g/ha)

Etiquettes de données : Nombre

d'analyses

Average glyphosate transfer by drainage and average applied rates.

Various application periods.

311

15

19

4

0

200

400

September October February March beginning mid-March April

0

500

1000

1500

Average transfered flow Average applied doses

⇒ When soil is watersatured (winter until mid-March), the transfers of glyphosate are possible and more important.

Page 12: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

Synthesis of all the results

Western france - hydromorphic loam

Without drainage network, transfers of glyphosate could be important: up to 100 % detections in runoff water,

concentration peak up to 50 µg/L,

maximum flow up to 5 g/ha.

With drainage network, transfers of glyphosate are less With drainage network, transfers of glyphosate are less important: up to 70 % detections,

concentration peak 12 µg/L,

maximum flow 1.5 g/ha.

When the soil is watersatured (winter until mid-March), transfers of glyphosate are possible and more important.

Page 13: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

The applications of glyphosate in may - june (RR practices) don’t cause immediate transfers by drainage or runoff

Drainage and runoff during the autumn after RR applications of glyphosate don’t cause important

Synthesis of all the results Western france - hydromorphic loam

Drainage and runoff during the autumn after RR applications of glyphosate don’t cause important transfer of glyphosate and AMPA

Results in term of concentration, flow and kinetics to be confirmed in other soil and climatic conditions

Page 14: B Real & J Maillet Mezeray

ARVALIS experimental sites dedicated to the pesticide transfers

La Jaillière 11 plots :

Geispitzen3 plots :runoff

Thibie : 28 lysimeters

La Jaillière 11 plots : drainage and runoff

Le Magneraud14 lysimeters

Auradé 4 plots : runoff

LSE : 26 lysimeters

Parisot 3 plots : drainagerunoff