Click here to load reader
Upload
frickewi
View
10.329
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AP Language RHETORICAL ANALYSIS Test Strategy
Olson and Bailey
What it is …What it is not
• The analysis question asks the writer to analyze the methods that author employs in his or her writing to convey the author’s attitude, opinion, or conviction about some topic.
• The analysis question does NOT ask the writer to agree, disagree, or qualify.
Some things NOT to do
• Tell the reader the essay was well written
• Tell the reader the essay held your interest
• Reference the author by first name only or a nickname, “Honest Abe” – “Uncle Walt”– Whole name on 1st reference, last name after
• Bulk up a sentence with jargon, complexity– Think and write clearly with appropriately
controlled diction and syntax.
Discussion of Rhetorical Strategies
• Diction– Identify key words– Negative or Positive Connotation– DO NOT say “author uses diction to create meaning”
• Syntax– Short sentences are always abrupt, intense, and confrontational– Long Sentences are more thoughtful and permit reflection– Parallel Syntax functions like a train gathering steam– Rhetorical Questions manipulate the reader to provide the answer he or
she wants– Repetition provides emphasis
• Figures of Speech– Be versed in the main figures of speech (schemes & tropes)– Know what they do to the reader, for the writer
• Rhetoric– Use PELIDS to identify and remember basic rhetorical strategies
PELIDS
• P pathos– Most ads are emotional– Speeches use imagery and high connotation– Cannot say author uses pathos alone– Need to discuss purpose
• E Ethos– Credibility– Need to discuss purpose
• L Logos– Rational and reasonable– Is evidence valid?
PELIDS part 2
• I Inductive– Uses examples to convince reader of logical validity– Ask if examples are valid, then the validity of the claim
• D Deductive– Makes claims then builds an argument based you accepting
those claims are true– Ask if claims are valid, then the validity of conclusions made by
those claims
• S Syllogism– Provides two premises and then offers a conclusion
• God Created mankind, all of God’s creations are good, mankind is good