22
Achieving interoperability between the CARARE schema for monuments and sites and the Europeana Data Model Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis Dublin Core Conference 4 September 2013

Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model By Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis & Stavros Angelis Paper at Dublin Core conference (awarded best paper award!), September 4, 2013. Conference site: http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2013 Paper: http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2013/paper/view/171

Citation preview

Page 1: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Achieving interoperability between the CARARE schema for monuments and sites

and the Europeana Data Model

Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis

Dublin Core Conference4 September 2013

Page 2: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Europeana.eu, Europe’s cultural heritage portal

Text

Image

Video

Sound

3D

Page 3: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Europeana’s aggregation network

Museums

National Aggregators

Regional Aggregators

Archives

Thematic collections

Libraries

29M objects from 2,200 European galleries, museums, archives and libraries

CARARE

Page 4: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

CARARE: Bringing content for archaeology and historic buildings to Europeana users

When: 3 year project (2010-2013)

Who: heritage organisations, archaeological museums, research institutions and specialist archives

29 partners in 21 countries

What: delivering content to Europeana

What: aggregation services and good practices for content relating to archaeological monuments and historic sites

• Metadata repository (MORE)

• Metadata schema

http://www.carare.eu

Page 5: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

CARARE Content

Images, text, videos, 3D models…

Page 6: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

CARARE Metadata Schema

Heritage asset

Digital resources

Activities

Collection

4 themes

http://www.carare.eu/eng/Resources/CARARE-Documentation

Acts as an intermediary between the native metadata of content providers and Europeana

Page 7: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Heritage Assets

Monuments, landscape areas, artefacts…

Title, Description

Characteristics• Type, Materials, Dimensions, Inscriptions

• Spatial (place, address, map coordinates)

• Temporal (date, time span, period)

Actors

Designation, Condition

References

Relations

7

Page 8: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Digital Resources

Images, texts, videos, audio, 3D models

Title, Description

Characteristics

Publication statement

Actors

Link to the object (URL)

Rights

Relations

8

Page 9: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Europeana Data Model: an example

Page 10: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Provided Cultural Heritage Object (CHO) and descriptive metadata

Page 11: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Web Resources – digital representations

Page 12: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Aggregations – Bundling it all together

Page 13: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Objectives

Mapping: finding correspondences between the elements of both models so that CARARE can send good metadata to Europeana

Why is it important to report on this?

Mapping is rarely an easy issue

Models are complex, with subtle differences in world views

Both CARARE and Europeana benefits from “mapping meditation”

One of the hardest (confronting) metadata exercises!

Sharing concrete experiences benefits to all Europeana partners

And beyond: cf. goals of DC, “a metadata ecosystem”

Page 14: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Questions so far?

Page 15: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Mapping CARARE data to EDM

A CARARE object becomes one or several EDM Provided Cultural Heritage Objects with:

Related web resources

Aggregations

Contextual information about place

Some activity and spatial data cannot currently be mapped

Page 16: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Creating EDM resources from CARARE data

edm:ProvidedCHO HA:PamFond/1978155

ore:Aggregationhttp://store.carare.eu/uid/iid:1655549/HA:PamFond/1978155

Heritage Asset’s identifier

PamFond/1978155

CARARE’s Heritage Assets always give raise to one EDM ProvidedCHOs with its companion Aggregation

The next issue is whether CARARE’s Digital Resources are also EDM CHOs…

It depends on the collection!

Page 19: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

edm:ProvidedCHO 1

edm:WebResource 2edm:WebResource 1

Scenario 3: Digital Resources that are views of lesser cultural importance are treated as EDM Web Resources

Page 20: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Contextual Resources – e.g., Places

CARARE’s geospatial enrichment represented with EDM contextual resource class

Page 21: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Conclusions

CARARE provides better metadata to Europeana for 2M objects

In the process

We identified non-trivial issues

We documented solutions (this paper!)

It prompted updates to CARARE’s schema (3D ICONS project)

It confirms the relevance of a richer model like EDM for Europeana

Human supervision remains crucial for choosing the right option

Data curators can help here

as with many other quality issues in data aggregation projects!

Page 22: Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model

Thank you!

Questions?

[email protected]

Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis