43
Toward a carbon neutral campus Epsil on Slide 1

AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

  • Upload
    nbs

  • View
    102

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Toward a carbon neutral campus

Epsilon

Slide 1

Page 2: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Summary of Contents

1. Background Informationi. What is carbon footprint?ii. Calculation of carbon footprintsiii. Limitations in calculation

2. Stakeholders Analysis

3. Estimation of NTU’s carbon footprint

4. NTU’s carbon reducing initiatives

Epsilon

Slide 2

Page 3: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Summary of Contents

5. Suggestion #1: Online learning to replace classroom teaching

6. Suggestion #2:Buying of carbon offset credits

7. Suggestion #3:CNG Powered Buses

8. Suggestion #4:Promote environmentalism through Earth-link

Epsilon

Slide 3

Page 4: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Summary of Contents

9. Decision Criteria & Matrix

10. Other evaluations

11. Executive Summary

12. References

Epsilon

Slide 4

Page 5: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Background InformationWhat carbon footprints are all about

Epsilon

Slide 5

Page 6: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Definition

“The carbon footprint is a measure of the exclusive total amount of carbon dioxide emissions that is directly and indirectly caused by an activity or is accumulated over the life stages of a product. “ - Wiedmann and Minx (2007)

Epsilon

Slide 6

Page 9: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Limitations

Impossible to exactly calculate the carbon footprint of an Organization(Too many possible sources of emission)

Lack of information to know who contributed to the carbon footprint of an OrganizationI.e. In NTU, difficult to allocate emissions between research and education

Epsilon

Slide 9

Page 10: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Stakeholders AnalysisWho are the parties of interest?

Epsilon

Slide 10

Page 11: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Stakeholders’ InterestsStakeholders Interests

Students Lower School Fees, Convenience, Effective and Fun Learning.

Staff Higher Pay, Convenience in the delivery of lessons, intangible satisfaction from imparting lifelong knowledge and values in students.

NTU Brand Name, hence will be concerned with CSR. Lower Costs, Effective education of students.

Government Reduction in Carbon emissions. Would want Businesses to be environmentally sustainable and competitive with the world.

Public Reduction in costs, improvement in the convenience of daily activities. Would be moderately concerned about the environment.

Future Employers

Would be interested in hiring students that are not just critical thinkers, but also aware of the importance of the triple bottom line in the sustainability of a business.

Epsilon

Slide 11

Page 12: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

NTU’s Carbon FootprintHow well is our campus fairing?

Epsilon

Slide 12

Page 13: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Steps to estimate Carbon Footprint

1. Design a Process Map

2. Set boundaries for analysis

3. Collect the necessary data

4. Calculate Carbon Footprint

Epsilon

Slide 13

Page 18: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

NTU Yearly Carbon Footprint Estimate

Epsilon

Slide 18

Scope Source CO2 Emissions (kg)

1 Campus Generated Electricity Negligible

2 Purchased electricity 52,000,000

3 Faculty commuting 3,000,000

Student commuting 9,000,000

Faculty air travel 2,500,000

Paper Consumption 120,000

Waste 180,000

Campus Transport (Tong Tar Transport)

80,000

Total 66,880,000

No. of Students 32,986

No. of Employees 6,612

Total per student 1,590.84

Total per employee 2,178.55

Page 19: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

NTU’s carbon reducing strategies What’s currently being done

Epsilon

Slide 19

Page 20: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Campus Initiatives

Member of the International Sustainable Campus Network (ISCN) since 18th August 2012

The School of Art, Design and Media (ADM) & Cleantech One are currently among the better performing energy efficient buildings in Singapore

Epsilon

Slide 20

Page 21: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Energy Efficiency Minus 10

Initiatives to reduce energy costs in NTU by 10% Airtightness in buildings and doorways Increasing air-con set points Shortened air-con hours Energy reduction for ventilation units Reducing unnecessary and excessive lightings High energy efficiency lighting system Ownership of costs by departments Re-engineering of ductwork Solar PV systems

Epsilon

Slide 21

Page 22: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Online Learning

Epsilon

Slide 22

Suggestion 1

Page 23: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

The Advantages

Quantitative Factors: Reduced travel costs and time (students & profs) Reduced human resources usage Reduced paper wastage Reduced utilities & maintenance costs

Qualitative Factors: Convenience Instill value of self-discipline

Epsilon

Slide 23

Page 24: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

The Disadvantages

Quantitative Factors: Increased costs for IT infrastructure Carbon footprint (paper wastage, utilities)

transferred from school to households

Qualitative Factors: Students still carrying traditional classrooms

mindsets may feel uneasy Over-reliance on technology

Epsilon

Slide 24

Page 25: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Buying Carbon Offset Credits Suggestion 2

Epsilon

Slide 25

Page 27: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

The Advantages

Quantitative: Immediate reduction of carbon footprint Carbon neutrality accurately measured and achieved Cost savings on other green initiatives

Qualitative: Effortless and convenient way to reduce carbon

footprint Current practices can be continued

Epsilon

Slide 27

Page 28: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

The Disadvantages

Quantitative: Zero-Sum Game No reduction of carbon emissions, only a transfer to

CO2 Australia Expenses to buy carbon credits do not bring tangible

benefits to the campus

Qualitative: Difficulty in ensuring CO2 Australia keeps to their end

of the deal

Epsilon

Slide 28

Page 29: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

CNG Powered Shuttle BusesSuggestion 3

Epsilon

Slide 29

Page 32: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Promote EnvironmentalismSuggestion 4

Epsilon

Slide 32

Page 34: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

The Advantages

Addresses the human factor of environmental conservation

Educating students on environmentally friendly practices will help reduce carbon emissions

Large impact since students are one of the main contributors of carbon emissions from a school

Epsilon

Slide 34

Page 35: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Decision Criteria and MatrixA short comparison of all suggestions

Epsilon

Slide 35

Page 36: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Decision Criteria

Epsilon

Slide 36

Cost The cost, both long and short term, required to execute the alternatives

Long Term Carbon Reduction

The effects of the alternatives on reducing CO2 emissions in the long run. This includes the

Feasibility How possible and practical are the alternatives?

Adaptability How versatile are the alternatives, can they be changed easily in the event of an unexpected occurrence?

Page 37: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Decision Matrix

Epsilon

Slide 37

Online Learning Carbon Offset Credits CNG buses Earth-Link

Cost ✔ ✗ ✔ ✔Long Term

Carbon Reduction

✔ ✗ ✔ ✔

Feasibility ✗ ✗ ✔ ✔

Adaptability ✗ ✗ ✗ ✔

Page 38: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Other Evaluations

Epsilon

Slide 38

Page 39: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Green-Washing

A form of deceptive Green Marketing tactic Promote environmentally friendly policies

without actual reduction in carbon emissions Buying of carbon credits (as discussed earlier) is

a form of Green-Washing tactic

Epsilon

Slide 39

Page 40: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Tree Planting

A form of “carbon storage” solution This solution is temporary as carbon stored will

eventually be re-released into the environment The most tangible benefit of this solution is its

ability to give carbon emitters a peace of mind

Epsilon

Slide 40

Page 42: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

Executive SummaryBeing a member of the International Sustainable Campus Network (ISCN), NTU is already mobilising the necessary resources to become one of the world’s leading universities in integrated sustainability education, research, energy efficient buildings and student involvement, reducing carbon footprints of the organisation to a minimum. However, more can be done to further improve the Brand of the school, and bring about benefits such as convenience towards its stakeholders.

Being a School, the solution of educating students on reducing their individual carbon footprints has the most potential in changing the environmental scene on a macro scale. Taking a micro scale, our presentation explores the possibility of NTU further reducing its carbon footprints through E learning, buying of carbon offset credits and CNG vehicles to replace the shuttle buses. Carbon offset credits are not the way to go for NTU as it is a form of greenwashing. It will only give the perception that NTU is being environmentally friendly, when it is not reducing the amount of pollution it has. This will not bode well with the school’s values of being environmentally friendly. Also, the planting of trees does not have long term benefits as it only temporarily stores the carbon, and these trees will return the CO2 back to the environment when it is cut or burnt. E learning would not be a viable option as it will not be able to entirely replace physical classrooms and with notes still being printed during E learning, though it would be able to reduce a small portion of the carbon footprints by the NTU.

The long term solution we propose would be to first continue with the current research in sustainable sources of energy by the full time staff. Next, NTU must continue striving in the education of the students on the importance of the planet component of the triple bottom line and its impact on businesses, as it is an intangible investment which would potentially affect their future employers and improve the carbon footprints of the world as a whole.

Page 43: AB0401 Seminar 3 Group 7 (Aldrick, Adriel,Shawn, Hillary, Jun Cheng, Perry)

References

http://www.sustainapore.sg/events/ISCN_low_res.pdf http://clubs.ntu.edu.sg/earthlink/website/index.php http://www.co2australia.com.au/ http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-efficiency/

alternative-fuels/ngv4.htm http://www.zmescience.com/ecology/transit-buses-

fueled-by-natural-gas-more-viable-than-diesel-or-electric/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_natural_gas http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/faculty/hall/publicatio

ns/PAS2050_Guide.pdf Calculating the carbon footprint of universities – Stefan

Sprangers

Epsilon

Slide 43