Upload
iaeme
View
4.782
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
132
A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO GROUND WATER RECHARGE BY
RAIN WATER HARVESTING SYSTEM IN PUDUKKOTTAI DIST,
TAMILNADU
R.Greesan
Dept. of Civil Engg. Chendhuran College of Engg & Tech.,Pudukkottai,TN
ABSTRACT
The world was surrounded by water. Even though we are in the planet of earth which
has 97% of water, we are facing our maximum of trouble regarding water. Some of the
sources are saying that, Water scarcity will be the major reason to cause third world war. This
case study was done in the district of Pudukkottai, which is not having any perennial resource
of water and the dist was mostly depends on rain water for domestic and agri purposes. In this
project we are tried to give better solution to the ground water and ground water recharge.
This paper prescribed the technique of Roof Top Harvesting for storing and utilizing the
rainwater and also for recharging the ground water. In the trend of urbanisation, the roof top
harvesting is the effective, trouble-free system to implement with less expense. This will
result in effective utilisation of water, ground water recharge, sustain our natural resources
and automatically the environment will come under the greenish envelope without any doubt
and drought. That’s the solution was very near to us to build a green city.
WATER
Water is a prime natural resource, a basic human need and a precious national asset,
which is one of the most critical elements in Development Planning according to Indian
National Water Policy. Planning and Development of Water Resources and their Use need to
be governed by National Interest. It has been estimated that out of the Total precipitation
around 4000 billion cubic metre in the country, Surface Water availability is about 1780
billion cubic metre. Out of this, only about 50% can be put to beneficial use because of
topographical and other constraints.
In addition, there is a Ground Water Potential of about 420 billion cubic metre. The
availability of water is highly uneven in space and time. Precipitation is confined to only
about 3 to 4 months with 20 – 40 significant Rainy days within a year. Hence, there is an
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY (IJCIET)
ISSN 0976 – 6308 (Print)
ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online)
Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), pp. 132-148 © IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijciet.asp
Journal Impact Factor (2013): 5.3277 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com
IJCIET
© IAEME
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
133
imperative need for effective collection of Rain Water for storing in appropriate places like
Reservoir, Lakhs, Tanks, Ponds and Aquifers etc. In order to use the stored water efficiently
for Economical and Social Purposes.
Current Water Usage
Usage (%) World Europe Africa India
Agriculture 69 33 88 83
Industry 23 54 5 12
Domestic 8 13 7 5
Future Water Usage
Year Agriculture Industry Domestic Total Per Capita
India Billion Lit/Day Lit/Day
2000 1658 115 93 1866 88.9
2050 1745 441 227 2413 167.0
China
2000 1024 392 105 1521 82.7
2050 1151 822 219 2192 155.4
USA
2000 542 605 166 1313 582.7
2050 315 665 187 1167 484.6
Agriculture is the dominant section in Indian Economy. Tamil Nadu has poor ground
water potential, depends mainly on the Surface Water Irrigation, as well as Ground Water
Irrigation. The Surface Water Potential largely depends on the storage of water in Reservoirs,
Dams and Tanks only.
The state has used the Surface and Ground Water Potentials to maximum limit and
hence the future development and expansion depends only on the efficient and economical
use of Water Potential and Resources.
To achieve the Water Use Efficiency, it is necessary to improve and upgrade the
existing Conveyance and Storage System and also to introduce Modern Irrigation methods.
Per Capita Water Use
Continents Per Capita Water Use
(m3/yr)
Africa 245
Asia 519
North and C. America 1861
South America 478
Europe 1280
USSR (Former) 713
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
134
Per capita water availability in India
Year Population (Million) Per capita water
availability (m3/year)
1951 361 5177
1955 395 4732
1991 846 2209
2001 1027 1820
2025 1394 1341
2050 1640 1140
Study Area
Pudukkottai district area profile
PUDUKKOTTAI
Pudukkottai district is bound on the North and North West by Trichirapalli district,
Sivagangai district on the West and South West, on the East and North East by Thanjavur district
and on the South East by Bay of Bengal.
The district is formed in January 1974 out of certain pockets of the then Trichy and
Thanjavur districts, has an area of 4663 sq.km with a coastal line of 39 km.
Pudukkottai district is divided into two revenue divisions with 9 taluks. There are 7 Agricultural
Divisions which is headed by the respective Assistant Director of Agriculture and 13 blocks
headed by Agricultural Development Officer. Moreover, there are two municipalities and 8 town
panchayats covering 757 revenue villages and 498 village panchayats.
The average rainfall of the district is 923 mm per year. The frequency of rainfall is also uncertain.
Even though the district has more number of tanks, most of the tanks are silted in nature. So the
water holding capacity of the tanks is very poor. This often leads to water scarcity for irrigation
during the critical stages of the crop, especially during maturity. The major crops of Pudukkottai
district are Paddy, Groundnut, Cashew, Sugarcane, Pulses, Fruits,Coconut.
Geology The district is mainly covered with crystalline metamorphic rock period predominantly
occupying the western part of the district ; the sedimentary formations comprising cretaceous,
tertiary and quaternary periods occupy the eastern and south-eastern part of the district. The stage
of ground water development in all the thirteen blocks is less than 65% of utilizable recharge.
Genocide Pudukkottai District is a coastal covered district and lies between 9 51’ 0’’ & 10 45, 0’
North latitude and 78 25’ 30’’ and 79 16’ 30’’ East longitude covering a geographical area of
about 4661 sq.km in the South Eastern part of Tamil Nadu.
Agro Ecological Region Generally Hot and dry with moderate moisture availability, but the coastal plain including
Cauvery delta has moderately large moisture availability.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
Agro climatic zone: Cauvery delta zone and southern zone.
Physiographic and Drainage Pudukkottai district has an undulating topography with a gen
towards Southeast. Small hillocks are seen in the Northern, Western and Southern part of the
district. Alluvial plains of Agniar, Ambuliar and
Avudaiyarkoil and Manamelkudi blocks in the Southeastern
Rainfall Details
Climate of Tamil Nadu Tamil Nadu is largely dependent on the monsoon rains, the failing of which
sometimes leads to droughts in the country. The climate Tamil Nadu varies from dry sub
humid to semi-arid. There are 3 distinct times of rainfall in Tamil Nadu, namely the South
West monsoon from the months of June to September characterized by heavy southwest
winds; the North East monsoons
northeast winds; and the dry season from the months of January to May. The annual rainfall
of the state is approximately 945 mm (37.2 in), of which 32% is the South West monsoon and
48% is the North East monsoon. The state can be divided into 7 agro
west, north-east, southern, west, high altitude hilly, high rainfall, and Cauvery Delta.
Rainfall Details On Pudukkottai Dist
Climate and Rainfall
• Climate is mainly tropical in nature with a cooler period from
February.
• Maximum average temperature is
• Rainfall is variable both annually and seasonally. The annual rainfall ranges from
496.4mm to 1032 mm in the last 10 years period.
• The season wise rainfall pattern of the district is as below:
1. Winter period 52.2 mm
2. Summer period 123.6 mm
3. South West monsoon period
4. Northeast monsoon period
392.1
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
135
Cauvery delta zone and southern zone.
Pudukkottai district has an undulating topography with a general genital slope
towards Southeast. Small hillocks are seen in the Northern, Western and Southern part of the
district. Alluvial plains of Agniar, Ambuliar and coastal plains occupy the Aranthangi,
Avudaiyarkoil and Manamelkudi blocks in the Southeastern part of the district.
Tamil Nadu is largely dependent on the monsoon rains, the failing of which
sometimes leads to droughts in the country. The climate Tamil Nadu varies from dry sub
d. There are 3 distinct times of rainfall in Tamil Nadu, namely the South
West monsoon from the months of June to September characterized by heavy southwest
winds; the North East monsoons from the months of October to December, characterized by
inds; and the dry season from the months of January to May. The annual rainfall
of the state is approximately 945 mm (37.2 in), of which 32% is the South West monsoon and
48% is the North East monsoon. The state can be divided into 7 agro- climatic zones:
east, southern, west, high altitude hilly, high rainfall, and Cauvery Delta.
Rainfall Details On Pudukkottai Dist
Climate is mainly tropical in nature with a cooler period from December to
emperature is 24C- 43C.
Rainfall is variable both annually and seasonally. The annual rainfall ranges from
mm in the last 10 years period.
The season wise rainfall pattern of the district is as below:
123.6 mm
South West monsoon period 350.0 mm
Northeast monsoon period 392.1 mm
52.2123.6
350
392.1WINTER
SUMMER
SW MONSOON
NW MONSOON
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
eral genital slope
towards Southeast. Small hillocks are seen in the Northern, Western and Southern part of the
plains occupy the Aranthangi,
Tamil Nadu is largely dependent on the monsoon rains, the failing of which
sometimes leads to droughts in the country. The climate Tamil Nadu varies from dry sub-
d. There are 3 distinct times of rainfall in Tamil Nadu, namely the South
West monsoon from the months of June to September characterized by heavy southwest
from the months of October to December, characterized by
inds; and the dry season from the months of January to May. The annual rainfall
of the state is approximately 945 mm (37.2 in), of which 32% is the South West monsoon and
climatic zones: north-
east, southern, west, high altitude hilly, high rainfall, and Cauvery Delta.
December to
Rainfall is variable both annually and seasonally. The annual rainfall ranges from
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
136
Rainwater Harvesting
A Glance of RWH
Figure shows the State wise Rainwater Harvesting
The principle of collecting and using precipitation from a catchments surface.
An old technology is gaining popularity in a new way. Rain water harvesting is
enjoying a renaissance of sorts in the world, but it traces its history to biblical times.
Rainwater harvesting provides an independent water supply during regional water
restrictions and in developed countries is often used to supplement the mains supply.
Rainwater harvesting systems are appealing as they are easy to understand, install and
operate. They are effective in 'green droughts' as water is captured from rainfall where runoff
is insufficient to flow into dam storages. The quality of captured rainwater is usually
sufficient for most household needs, reducing the need for detergents because rainwater is
soft. Financial benefits to the users include that rain is 'renewable' at acceptable volumes
despite climate change forecasts, and rainwater harvesting systems generally have low
running costs, providing water at the point of consumption.
History In ancient Tamil Nadu (India), rainwater harvesting was done by Chola
kings. Rainwater from the Brihadeeswarar temple was collected in Sivaganga tank. During
the later Chola period, the Vīrānam tank was built (1011 to 1037 CE) in Cuddalore district
of Tamil Nadu to store water for drinking and irrigation purposes. Vīrānam is a 16-kilometre
(9.9 mi) long tank with a storage capacity of 1,465,000,000 cubic feet (41,500,000 m3).
At Present
India
• In India, rain water harvesting was first introduced by Andhra Pradesh ex-Chief
Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu. He made a rule that every house which is going to built
in cities of that state must have a percolation pit/rainwater harvesting system. This rule
increased the ground water level in good phase.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
137
• In the state of Tamil Nadu, rainwater harvesting was made compulsory for every building
to avoid ground water depletion. It proved excellent results within five years, and every
other state took it as role model. Since its implementation, Chennai saw a 50 percent rise
in water level in five years and the water quality significantly improved.
• In Rajasthan, rainwater harvesting has traditionally been practiced by the people of
the Thar Desert. There are many ancient water harvesting systems in Rajasthan, which
have now been revived
Need Of Rwh Rain water harvesting is essential because:
• Surface water is inadequate to meet our demand and we have to depend on
ground water
• Due to rapid urbanization, infiltration of rain water into the sub-soil has
decreased drastically and recharging of ground water has diminished.
Rainwater Harvesting Techniques The two main techniques of rainwater harvesting are:
• Storage of Rainwater on surface for future use.
• Recharge of Ground water
The storage of rain water on surface is a traditional techniques and structures
used were underground tanks, ponds, check dams, weirs etc.
Components Of A Rainwater Harvesting System
A rainwater harvesting system comprises components of various stages -
transporting rainwater through pipes or drains, filtration, and storage in tanks for reuse or
recharge.
The common components of a rainwater harvesting system involved in these stages
are illustrated here.
1.Catchments The catchment of a water harvesting system is the surface which directly receives the
rainfall and provides water to the system. It can be a paved area like a terrace or courtyard of
a building, or an unpaved area like a lawn or open ground. A roof made of reinforced cement
concrete (RCC), galvanised iron or corrugated sheets can also be used for water harvesting.
2.Coarse mesh at the roof to prevent the passage of debris
3.Gutters
Channels all around the edge of a sloping roof to collect and transport rainwater to the
storage tank. Gutters can be semi-circular or rectangular and could be made using
4.Conduits Conduits are pipelines or drains that carry rainwater from the catchment or rooftop area
to the harvesting system. Conduits can be of any material like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or
galvanized iron (GI), materials that are commonly available. 5.First-flushing A first flush device is a valve that ensures that runoff from the first spell of rain is
flushed out and does not enter the system. This needs to be done since the first spell of rain
carries a relatively larger amount of pollutants from the air and catchment surface.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
138
6.Filter
The filter is used to remove suspended pollutants from rainwater collected over roof.
A filter unit is a chamber filled with filtering media such as fibre, coarse sand and gravel
layers to remove debris and dirt from water before it enters the storage tank or recharges
structure. Charcoal can be added for additional filtration. In a simple sand filter that
can be constructed domestically, the top layer comprises coarse sand followed by a 5-10 mm
layer of gravel followed by another 5-25 cm layer of gravel and boulders.
i) Charcoal water filter A simple charcoal filter can be made in a drum or an earthen pot. The filter is made of
gravel, sand and charcoal, all of which are easily available.
(ii)Sand Filters Sand filters have commonly available sand as filter media. Sand filters are easy and
inexpensive to construct. These filters can be employed for treatment of water to effectively
remove turbidity (suspended particles like silt and clay), colour and microorganisms.
In a simple sand filter that can be constructed domestically, the top layer comprises
coarse sand followed by a 5-10 mm layer of gravel followed by another 5-25 cm layer of
gravel and boulders.
Artificial Recharge To Ground Water Artificial recharge to ground water is a process by which the ground water reservoir is
augmented at a rate exceeding that obtaining under natural conditions or replenishment. At
man-made scheme or facility that adds water to an aquifer may be considered to be an
artificial recharge system.
Source: A water harvesting manual for urban
areas
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
Urbanisation Effects On Groundwater Hydrology
• Increase in water demand
• More dependence on ground water use
• Over exploitation of ground water
• Increase in run-off, decline in well yields and fall in water levels
• Reduction in open soil surface area
• Reduction in infiltration and deterioration in water quality
Methods Of Artificial Recharge In Urban Areas
• Water spreading
• Recharge through pits,trenches,wells,shafts
• Roof top collection of rainwater
• Roadtop collection of rainwater
• Induced recharge from surface water bodies
Artificial recharge methods can be classified into tw
(i) direct methods, and (ii) indirect methods.
Direct Methods
(a) Surface Spreading Techniques
The most widely practised methods of artificial recharge of groundwater employ
different techniques of increasing the contact area and resident
soil so that maximum quantity of water can infiltrate and augment the groundwater storage.
Areas with gently sloping land without gullies or ridges are most suited for surface
spreading techniques.
Flooding The technique of flooding is very useful in selected areas where a favourable hydro
geological situation exists for recharging the unconfined aquifer by spreading the surplus
surface-water from canals / streams over large area for sufficiently long period so that it
recharges the groundwater body. This technique can be used for gently sloping land with
slope around 1 to 3 percentage points without gullies and ridges.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
139
Urbanisation Effects On Groundwater Hydrology
r demand
More dependence on ground water use
Over exploitation of ground water
off, decline in well yields and fall in water levels
Reduction in open soil surface area
Reduction in infiltration and deterioration in water quality
Artificial Recharge In Urban Areas
Recharge through pits,trenches,wells,shafts
Roof top collection of rainwater
Roadtop collection of rainwater
Induced recharge from surface water bodies
Artificial recharge methods can be classified into two broad groups
(i) direct methods, and (ii) indirect methods.
Surface Spreading Techniques The most widely practised methods of artificial recharge of groundwater employ
different techniques of increasing the contact area and resident time of surface-water with the
soil so that maximum quantity of water can infiltrate and augment the groundwater storage.
Areas with gently sloping land without gullies or ridges are most suited for surface
que of flooding is very useful in selected areas where a favourable hydro
geological situation exists for recharging the unconfined aquifer by spreading the surplus
water from canals / streams over large area for sufficiently long period so that it
recharges the groundwater body. This technique can be used for gently sloping land with
slope around 1 to 3 percentage points without gullies and ridges.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
The most widely practised methods of artificial recharge of groundwater employ
water with the
soil so that maximum quantity of water can infiltrate and augment the groundwater storage.
Areas with gently sloping land without gullies or ridges are most suited for surface-water
que of flooding is very useful in selected areas where a favourable hydro-
geological situation exists for recharging the unconfined aquifer by spreading the surplus
water from canals / streams over large area for sufficiently long period so that it
recharges the groundwater body. This technique can be used for gently sloping land with
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
140
Ditches and Furrows In areas with irregular topography, shallow, flat-bottomed and closely spaced ditches
and furrows provide maximum water contact area for recharging water from the source
stream or canal. This technique requires less soil preparation than the recharge basin
technique and is less sensitive to silting.
Recharge Basins Artificial recharge basins are either excavated or enclosed by dykes or levees. They
are commonly built parallel to ephemeral or intermittent stream-channels. The water contact
area in this method is quite high which typically ranges from 75 to 90 percentage points of
the total recharge area. In this method, efficient use of space is made and the shape of basins
can be adjusted to suite the terrain condition and the available space.
(b) Sub-Surface Techniques When impervious layers overlie deeper aquifers, the infiltration from surface cannot
recharge the sub-surface aquifer under natural conditions. The techniques adopted to recharge
the confined aquifers directly from surface-water source are grouped under sub-surface
recharge techniques.
Injection Wells Injection wells are structures similar to a tube well but with the purpose of
augmenting the groundwater storage of a confined aquifer by “pumping in” treated surface-
water under pressure. The aquifer to be replenished is generally one that is already over
exploited by tube well pumping and the declining trend of water levels in the aquifer has set
in.
Gravity-Head Recharge Wells
In addition to specially designed injection wells, ordinary bore wells and dug wells
used for pumping may also be alternatively used as recharge wells, whenever source water
becomes available. In certain situations, such wells may also be constructed for effecting
recharge by gravity inflow. In areas where water levels are currently declining due to over-
development, using available structures for inducing recharge may be the immediately
available economic option.
Connector Wells Connector wells are special type of recharge wells where, due to difference in
potentiometer head in different aquifers, water can be made to flow from one aquifer to other
without any pumping. The aquifer horizons having higher heads start recharging aquifer
having lower heads.
Recharge pits Recharge pits are structures that overcome the difficulty of artificial recharge of
phreatic aquifer from surface-water sources. Recharge pits are excavated of variable
dimensions that are sufficiently deep to penetrate less permeable strata. A canal trench is a
special case of recharge pit dug across a canal bed. An ideal site for canal trench is influent
stretch of a stream that shows up as dry patch. One variation of recharge pit is a contour
trench extending over long distances across the slope and following topographical contour.
This measure is more suitable in piedmont regions and in areas with higher surface gradients.
Recharge Shafts
In case, poorly permeable strata overlie the water table aquifer located deep below
land surface, a shaft is used for causing artificial recharge. A recharge shaft is similar to a
recharge pit but much smaller in cross-section.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
141
Indirect Methods
(a) Induced Recharge It is an indirect method of artificial recharge involving pumping from aquifer
hydraulically connected with surface water, to induce recharge to the groundwater reservoir.
In hard rock areas, the abandoned channels often provide good sites for induced recharge.
The greatest advantage of this method is that under favourable hydro-geological situations,
the quality of surface-water generally improves due to its path through the aquifer materials
before it is discharged from the pumping well.
Pumping Wells Induced recharge system is installed near perennial streams that are hydraulically
connected to an aquifer through the permeable rock material of the stream-channel. The outer
edge of a bend in the stream is favourable for location of well site. The chemical quality of
surface-water source is one of the most important considerations during induced recharge.
Collector Wells For obtaining very large water supplies from river-bed, lake-bed deposits or
waterlogged areas, collector wells are constructed. The large discharges and lower lift heads
make these wells economical even if initial capital cost is higher as compared to tube well. In
areas where the phreatic aquifer adjacent to the river is of limited thickness, horizontal wells
may be more appropriate than vertical wells. Collector well with horizontal laterals and
infiltration galleries can get more induced recharge from the stream.
Infiltration Gallery
Infiltration galleries are other structures used for tapping groundwater reservoir below
river-bed strata. The gallery is a horizontal perforated or porous structure (pipe) with open
joints, surrounded by a gravel filter envelope laid in permeable saturated strata having
shallow water table and a perennial source of recharge. The galleries are usually laid at
depths between 3 to 6 metres to collect water under gravity flow. The galleries can also be
constructed across the river-bed if the river-bed is not too wide. The collector well is more
sophisticated and expensive but has higher capacities than the infiltration gallery. Hence,
choice should be made by the required yield followed by economic aspects.
(b) Aquifer Modification
These techniques modify the aquifer characteristics to increase its capacity to store
and transmit water. With such modifications, the aquifer, at least locally, becomes capable of
receiving more natural as well as artificial recharge. Hence, in a sense these techniques are
artificial yield augmentation measures rather than artificial recharge measures.
(c) Groundwater Conservation Structures The water artificially recharged into an aquifer is immediately governed by natural
groundwater flow regime. It is necessary to adopt groundwater conservation measures so that
the recharged water remains available when needed.
Groundwater Dams / Underground Barriers A groundwater dam is a sub-surface barrier across stream that retards the natural
groundwater flow of the system and stores water below ground surface to meet the demands
during the period of greatest need. The main purpose of groundwater dam is to arrest the flow
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
of groundwater out of the sub-basin and increase the storage within the aquifer. The sub
surface barriers need not be only across the canal bed. In some micro watersheds, sub
dykes can be put to conserve the groundwater flow in larger area in a valley. Sites have to be
located in areas where there is a great scarcity of water during the summer months or there is
a need for additional water for irrigation.
Data Collection And Analysis
To study about the rainwater harvesting system and ground water recharge the
following data’s are collected from the respective department in the district of pudukkottai.
Annual Rainfall Details
0
1000
2000
3000
2005 2006 2007
Month NORMAL 2005
January 3.95
FEBRAURY 32.3
WINTER 36.25
March 24.7
APRIL 29.1 76.6
MAY 69.9 61.5
SUMMER 123.7 145
June 39.2 14.8
JULY 46 66.6
AUGUST 102.3 85.3
SEPTEMBER 98.2 112.9
S.W.MONSOON 285.7 279.6
OCTOBER 192.3 197.2
NOVEMBER 239.8 453.9
DECEMBER 96.1 161.1
N.E.MONSOON 528.2 812.2
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
142
basin and increase the storage within the aquifer. The sub
surface barriers need not be only across the canal bed. In some micro watersheds, sub
erve the groundwater flow in larger area in a valley. Sites have to be
located in areas where there is a great scarcity of water during the summer months or there is
a need for additional water for irrigation.
the rainwater harvesting system and ground water recharge the
following data’s are collected from the respective department in the district of pudukkottai.
Seasonal Rainfall
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Grand Total
N.E.Monsoon
S.W.Monsoon
Summer
Winter
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
1 5.3 1.25 6.2 9.9 1.4 14.36
23 0 1.95 38 0 0
24 5.3 3.2 44.2 9.9 1.4
6.9 42 0 185.3 3.9 0
76.6 39.2 19.7 19 46.6 6.6 54.05
61.5 32.3 21.2 15.7 36.3 103.2
145 113.5 40.9 220 86.8 109.8 94.91
14.8 74.1 46.6 23.2 32 52.4
66.6 10.5 50.6 58.2 27.1 44.9
85.3 74.8 167.6 158.5 54.2 106.3 116.08
112.9 66 49.8 27.8 113.7 171.5 109.6
279.6 225.4 314.6 267.7 227 375.1 317.88
197.2 213.4 195.3 196.5 36.9 123.2 213.2
453.9 239.8 51.8 343.7 324.9 257.4 283.7
161.1 24.2 284.7 63.8 163.9 131.3
812.2 477.4 531.8 604 525.7 511.9 534.6
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
basin and increase the storage within the aquifer. The sub-
surface barriers need not be only across the canal bed. In some micro watersheds, sub-surface
erve the groundwater flow in larger area in a valley. Sites have to be
located in areas where there is a great scarcity of water during the summer months or there is
the rainwater harvesting system and ground water recharge the
following data’s are collected from the respective department in the district of pudukkottai.
Grand Total
N.E.Monsoon
S.W.Monsoon
Summer
Winter
2011 2012
14.36 2.01
7.14 0
21.5 2.01
3.66 0
54.05 22.12
37.2 28.94
94.91 51.06
35.7 9.44
56.5 29.51
116.08 95.98
109.6 128.1
317.88 263.03
213.2 262.2
283.7 51.6
37.7 9.8
534.6 323.6
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
• Annual Rainfall Details
COMPUTATION OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BY ROOFTOP
The computation was carried out in Individual Buildings
follows:
1. Average Roof Top Area for Individual Buildings
2. Average Rainfall of Pudukkottai Dist
3. Effective Annual Rainfall contributing to Recharge :70%
4. Considering Losses:30%
5. Total rainfall collected in the year = 0.923 x 100 = 92.3 cum
6. Quantity available for recharge per Annum : 92.3 x 0.7 = 64.6cum/yr
7. Average family size:4Nos
8. Zone: Residential Zone
9. Per capita stipulated for domestic use
10. Per capita availability of rainwater:64.6/4 = 16.15cum/yr
SL.NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1260.8
821.6
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2005 2006
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
143
COMPUTATION OF GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BY ROOFTOP HARVESTING
The computation was carried out in Individual Buildings and Multistoried Buildings
for Individual Buildings:100Sqm
of Pudukkottai Dist: 923mm
Effective Annual Rainfall contributing to Recharge :70%
Total rainfall collected in the year = 0.923 x 100 = 92.3 cum
Quantity available for recharge per Annum : 92.3 x 0.7 = 64.6cum/yr
ly size:4Nos
stipulated for domestic use :135lpcd
Per capita availability of rainwater:64.6/4 = 16.15cum/yr
YEAR RAINFALL IN MM
2005 1260.8
2006 821.6
2007 890.5
2008 1135.9
2009 849.4
2010 998.2
2011 969.1
2012 639.7
821.6890.5
1135.9
849.4
998.2 969.1
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
RAIN FALL
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
HARVESTING
and Multistoried Buildings as
639.7
2012
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
SL.NO DESCRIPTION
01 Roof top area
02
Total Quantity
available for
recharge per
Annum
03
Per Capita
Demand per
Annum
The computation was carried out in Multistoried Buildings as follows:
1. Average Roof Top Area for In
2. Average Rainfall of Pudukkottai Dist: 923mm
3. Effective Annual Rainfall contributing to Recharge :70%
4. Considering Losses:30%
5. Total rainfall collected in the year = 0.923 x 500 = 461.5cum/year
6. Quantity available for recharge per Annu
7. Average family size:4Nos
8. Zone: Residential Zone
9. Per capita stipulated for domestic use :135lpcd
10. Per capita availability of rainwater:323.05/4 = 80.76
Figure shows the Quantity
0
100
200
300
100200
64.6
Qty of Water for Recharge
323.05
80.760
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
500 1000
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
144
INDIVIDUAL HOUSES MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS
100 sq.m 200 sq.m 500 Sq.m 1000Sq.m
64.6 cu.m 129.2
cu.m 323.05 646.1
16.15 cu.m 32.30
cu.m 80.76 161.525
The computation was carried out in Multistoried Buildings as follows:
Average Roof Top Area for Individual Buildings:500Sqm
Average Rainfall of Pudukkottai Dist: 923mm
Effective Annual Rainfall contributing to Recharge :70%
Total rainfall collected in the year = 0.923 x 500 = 461.5cum/year
Quantity available for recharge per Annum : 461.5 x 0.7 = 323.05cum/yr
Average family size:4Nos
Per capita stipulated for domestic use :135lpcd
lity of rainwater:323.05/4 = 80.76cum/yr
Figure shows the Quantity of Harvested Water for Recharging Ground
200300
400
129.2 193.8258.4
Qty of Water for Recharge
Qty of Water for
Recharge
646.1
969.15
1292.2
161.52242.28
323.04
1000 1500 2000
Ground Water
Recharge Qty
Per Capita Availability
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
MULTISTORIED BUILDINGS
1000Sq.m
646.1
161.525
m : 461.5 x 0.7 = 323.05cum/yr
d water
Qty of Water for
Per Capita Availability
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
Benefits Of Artificial Recharge In Urban Areas
• Improvement in infiltration and reduction in run
• Improvement in groundwater levels and yields.
• Reduces strain on Special Village Panchayats/ Municipal / Municipal
Corporation water supply
• Improvement in groundwater quality
• Estimated quantity of additional recharge from 100 sq. m. and 500sq.m
roof top area is64.600 and 323.050 litres.
ROOF TOP AREA(Sq.m) VS ANNUAL RAINFALL(mm)
0
50
100
150
2005 2006 2007
132.38
86.27
Roof Top Area/ Annual Year (i)
Roof Top
Area/
Annual
Year
2005
(1260.8)
2006
(821.6)
2007
(8
50 44.13 28.76 31.17
100
88.26 57.51 62.34
150
132.38 86.27 93.50
200
176.51 115.02 124.67
250
220.64 143.78 155.84
300
264.77 172.54 187.01
350 308.90 201.29 218.17
400
353.02 230.05 249.34
450 397.15 258.80 280.51
500
441.28 287.56 311.68
1000
882.56 575.12 623.35
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
145
Benefits Of Artificial Recharge In Urban Areas
Improvement in infiltration and reduction in run-off.
Improvement in groundwater levels and yields.
Reduces strain on Special Village Panchayats/ Municipal / Municipal
Corporation water supply
Improvement in groundwater quality
Estimated quantity of additional recharge from 100 sq. m. and 500sq.m
roof top area is64.600 and 323.050 litres.
ROOF TOP AREA(Sq.m) VS ANNUAL RAINFALL(mm)
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
86.27 93.5
119.27
89.19104.81101.75
67.16
Roof Top Area/ Annual Year (i)
50
100
150
2007
(890.5)
2008
(1135.9)
2009
(849.4)
2010
(998.2
)
2011
(969.02)
2012
(639.65)
31.17 39.76 29.73 34.94 33.92 22.39
62.34 79.51 59.46 69.87 67.83 44.78
93.50 119.27 89.19 104.81 101.75 67.16
124.67 159.03 118.92 139.75 135.66 89.55
155.84 198.78 148.65 174.69 169.58 111.94
187.01 238.54 178.37 209.62 203.49 134.33
218.17 278.30 208.10 244.56 237.41 156.71
249.34 318.05 237.83 279.50 271.33 179.10
280.51 357.81 267.56 314.43 305.24 201.49
311.68 397.57 297.29 349.37 339.16 223.88
623.35 795.13 594.58 698.74 678.31 447.76
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
2012
(639.65)
22.39
44.78
67.16
89.55
111.94
134.33
156.71
179.10
201.49
223.88
447.76
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March
Cost Analysis
Typical investment cost for rooftop harvesting systems are in range of Rs.4000/
Rs.8000/- A completely new structure exclusively for rainwater harvesting would have a cost
involvement as follows:
0
100
200
300
2005 2006 2007
Roof Top Area/ Annual Year (ii)
32.30564.61
96.915129.22
161.525193.83
10
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
50
10
0
15
0
20
0
25
0
30
0
35
0
Avg. Rainfall
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976
6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
146
Typical investment cost for rooftop harvesting systems are in range of Rs.4000/
A completely new structure exclusively for rainwater harvesting would have a cost
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Roof Top Area/ Annual Year (ii)
150
250
300
193.83226.135
258.44290.754
323.05
646.1
40
0
45
0
50
0
10
00
Avg. Rainfall
Series 1
For Avg. Rainfall of
923mm
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1000
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
April (2013), © IAEME
Typical investment cost for rooftop harvesting systems are in range of Rs.4000/- to
A completely new structure exclusively for rainwater harvesting would have a cost
Avg. Rainfall of
923mm
32.305
64.61
96.915
129.22
161.525
193.83
226.135
258.44
290.745
323.05
646.1
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
147
Abstract Estimate
S.NO QTY DESCRI PTION OF WORK RATE UNIT AMOUNT
01 12.60
Earth work excavation for foundation
in all soils including initial lead and lift
etc., and refilling the sides of
foundation in the excavated earth etc.,
complete.
200.00 M3
2520.00
02 0.62 Filling the foundation and basement in
the clean river sand watering and
ramming to consolidation etc.,
complete.
1000 M3
700.00
03 0.62 Cement concrete 1:5:10, using 40mm
ISS HBG metal for foundation and
flooring concrete etc.,
1800 M3
1200.00
04 5.78 Brick work in cement mortar 1:5, using
chamber bricks size is standard etc.,
including materials and labour charges
etc., complete.
3700 M3
21300.00
05 23.00 Plastering in cm 1:5, 12mm thick etc.,
including materials and labour charges
etc., complete.
150 M2
3450.00
06 Sand layer L.S 1000.00
07 Pebbles & charcoal L.S 4000.00
08 Water supply arrangements L.S 1000.00
09 Contingencies & other unforeseen
items.
L.S 530.00
TOTAL 37000.00
CONCLUSION
From the Project we can conclude that
• Rainwater Harvesting plays a vital role in urbanisation to prevail over the demand of
water.
• Ground water recharge is the major result of Rainwater harvesting
• In the Dist of Pudukkottai which was not having any perennial resource of river, the
storage of rainwater is the only backbone for agriculture and production.
• The sample of study shows that , For 100Sq.m we can recharge ground water with
64.6cu.m of rainfall per year
• Without having any demand, up to 100days we can utilise the harvested rainwater for
our own use.
• The cost of instalment is also worthable to implement such valuable system.
• With the rain harvesting and optimum usage of water, we can able to rebuild our
environment as green city.
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), ISSN 0976 – 6308
(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6316(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), © IAEME
148
REFERENCES
1. Kawsal Kishore (2004) “ Rain Water Harvesting “. Journal of Civil Engineering &
Construction Review ,may 2004,P42-P48.
2. Hand book for planning water shed management works” Govt of India, Ministry of
Water Resource CWC, December 2008.
3. WRO _ Pudukkottai.
4. Kumar, M. Dinesh. 2003. Paper: “Roof Water Harvesting for Domestic Water
Security”: Who gains and who loses?
5. Michael Nicklas, “Rainwater, High Performance Buildings”, Summer 2008.
6. “Gawai A.A. and Aswar D.S (2006) “Towards Self Reliance for Water Needs through
Rain Water Harvesting”.
7. “Rain Water Harvesting Technology “ Dr.K.A.Patil & G.K.Patil National Seminar on
8. Rain Water harvesting & Management 11-12, November 2006.
9. IS 10500:1991 :Drinking Water Standards”
10. Rain water Harvesting & Ground Water Recharge “Madharao Bhajirao Deshmukh”.
11. Nadia Khelif, Imed Ben Slimène and M.Moncef Chalbaoui, “Intrinsic Vulnerability
Analysis to Nitrate Contamination: Implications From Recharge in Fate and Transport in
Shallow Groundwater (Case of Moulares-Redayef Mining Basin)”, International Journal
of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET), Volume 3, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 465 - 476,
ISSN Print: 0976 – 6308, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6316.
12. Neeraj D. Sharma and Dr. J. N. Patel, “Experimental Study of Groundwater Quality
Improvement by Recharging With Rainwater”, International Journal of Civil
Engineering & Technology (IJCIET), Volume 2, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 10 - 16,
ISSN Print: 0976 – 6308, ISSN Online: 0976 – 6316.