Upload
chcrpa
View
78
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Final presentation of the 2040 RTP to the Community Advisory Committee and Core Technical Team.
Citation preview
Chattanooga-Hamilton County/N. GA Transportation Planning Organization
Chattanooga-Hamilton County/ North Georgia 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
Final Community Advisory Committee (CAC) & Core Technical Team (CTT) Meeting
December 2, 2013
Melissa TaylorDirector, Strategic Long Range Planning
Chattanooga-Hamilton County Regional Planning Agency
Chattanooga Region
• 443,000 people with 26% growth over plan horizon
• 216,000 jobs with 39% growth over plan horizon
• 19 jurisdictions (four counties and 15 municipalities)
• 2,110 lane-miles
Public Outreach
30 events/activities:
89 @ 1st Leadership Symposium
113 @ committee meetings
25 @ stakeholder discussion groups
76 @ topic-based workshops (climate change, transit, and call for projects)
60+ @ public mtgs/workshops
+ 511 @ questionnaires
872+ interactions
In just eights months…
Need for New Investment Approach
• Nationally:– Transportation funds lagging, at same time that transportation needs
have increased– Emphasis on asset management, coupled with less revenue, has
serious implications on revenue availability for new infrastructure– Multimodal capital investments must be identified in transparent
processes that are performance-driven and outcome-based
• In Chattanooga:– Shift to multimodal investment
has been limited in its geographic extent
– Large areas throughout region remain dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists and inaccessible to transit users
Safety
ADA Compliance
Health
Improved Access
High Speed Rail
Chattanooga Bypass
Intermodal Investment
CongestionReduction
Multimodal Connections
Community Character
Public Transit
Complete Streets
Tourism
We heard about many needs and frustrations.
Defining tailored solutions that address the many,
often-competing needs was the challenge.
Protecting Chattanooga’s Environmental
Resources
“Community to Region” Framework
Within CommunityCommunity to Region
Region to Region
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Local, multimodal connections and access to community resources
•Advance livability and quality of life principles
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Strategic, multimodal connections between communities and regional activity/economic centers to support economic development
INVESTMENT NEEDS THAT SUPPORT:
•Mobility and intermodal improvements to ensure region is well connected within the state and the nation • Support economic competitiveness and advance overall economic development potential
GAAL
KY
PM Categories Project Level MeasuresWithin
CommunityCommunity to Region
Region to Region
System Maintenance 1. Project addresses pavement, bridge deficiency
15 15 15
Congestion Reduction 2. Project reduces delay• Interstate• Corridor to/within key center
10 15 20
Safety and Security 3. Project reduces fatal or serious crashes4. Addresses security or emergency response
need, provides network redundancy
15 15 15
Economic Growth/Freight Movement
5. Project reduces delay• Intermodal connection• Freight corridor/area
5 10 20
Environmental Sustainability
6. Project reduces VMT7. Promotes safe, nonmotorized access;
integrates complete streets8. In keeping with community character
30 20 10
System Reliability 9. Adopted corridor protection plan10. Project fills gap in existing system11. Improves efficiency through ITS
15 15 10
Project Delivery 12. Supported by TDOT and local jurisdictions 10 10 10
Performance Measures & Weights
Comparison of Alternatives
Bypasses and
Connectors Measure of
Effectiveness Big Transit % Difference
16,035,000 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 14,943,000 -6.8%
521,000 Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT) 533,500 +2.4%
2,670 Delay (Hours) 3,060 +14.6%
3,573,00 Total Number of Trips 3,573,00 0%
6,400 Transit Trips 12,000 +87.5%
28.7 Vehicle Miles Traveled / Capita
26.8 -6.6%
0.1%-0.3% Percent of trips by transit 0.5%-1.5% +400%
239,545 PM2.5 Emissions (grams/day) 229,474 -4.2%
Scoring and Ranking Outcomes
• Process yielded three ranked lists; one for each scale• Projects were combined into one rank based on scores• Projects were grouped into four tiers (“Rank 1, Rank 2, etc.)
based on groupings of scores• Process produced:
– Blend of high ranking projects (by project type and across geographic scales) for the fiscally constrained 2040 RTP
– Objective support for variety of investments given the mode-neutral performance evaluation
– Focus on performance and priorities – Priorities established before funding source entered discussion
– All projects Rank 1 and 2 were funded in the 2040 RTP
Key 2040 RTP Outcomes
• Doubling of system preservation funding levels - fully funded long-term needs
• Doubling of funding for bicycle and pedestrian improvements.
• Strategic roadway and transit capacity expansion improvements
• Identification of two, new major transit capital projects
• Identification of targeted safety and system operations funding set-asides
• Process carried forward in TIP
5%
30%
32%
17%
6%
2% 8%
Bike/Ped
Roadway Capacity
Roadway Maintenance
Transit Capacity
Transit Operations and Maintenance
System Operations/ITS
Safety
Funded Projects Summary
21%
51%
28%
2035 LRTP
28%
30%
42%
2040 RTP
Alternate Modes
Roadway Capacity
Roadway System Preservation, Operations, and Safety
PLAN COMPARISON MOST NOTABLE PROJECTS
Study
Next StepsINTEGRATING LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION• Continue transit analysis• Evaluate land use impacts
related to transportation choices/investments
• Revisit Comprehensive Plan to reflect Transportation Plan
• Create new land use strategy to incorporate 27+ neighborhood plans and transportation needs
Questions/Concerns/Comments
PLAN DOCUMENTS & PROJECT MAPS:www.chcrpa.org/2040RTP.htm
PUBLIC COMMENTS: www.surveymonkey.com/s/2040RTPdraft (Accepted until close of business December 13, 2013)
FINAL DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION TO TPO BOARD:December 17, 2013 at 1:30 room 1ADevelopment Resource Center, 1250 Market Street, Chattanooga
QUESTIONS/CONCERNS:Melissa [email protected]