Upload
alonso-giannoni
View
138
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Digital Twins for Offshore Infrastructure
Akselos Simulation Technology
North America – Akselos, Inc. ֎ Switzerland – Akselos S.A. Akselos.com
Akselos Enables Full Simulation of the Largest Infrastructure
Globally linear Æ 1000x faster Localized nonlinearities Æ 10x to 100x fasterGlobally nonlinear Æ 1x
Modern computational technologies (parallel, cloud)
Divide-and-Conquer Algorithms (US Patent 9,213,788)
Set parameters and solve (2 seconds instead of 30 minutes)
Assemble model
Create/update RB components
(similar to parameterized
substructuring)
Parameterizedphysics
Computational Approx.
15 Years of R&D Funded by US DoD. More than 100 Publications
100+publications
100+Person years
Peer reviewed papers in top journals. Two text books.
Two Akselos founders are patent authors.
Reduced Basis Algorithms
Leading researchers frommajor academic
institutions
US Patent 9,213,788Funded by US DoD + 20 other Universities
Fast FEA Enables Akselos Digital Twin
Digital Twin: Detailed virtual replica of an entire asset, tracking the current state of the asset(including cracks, corrosion, damage etc.)
� Improved risk assessment
� Simulate extreme events
� Condition-based fatigue analysis
� Predictive maintenance
� Safe lean design
One Global Fine Model of your Entire Asset (1/2)
Standard workflow: DNV-RP-C206
The standard workflow involves juggling many models. Slow and error prone!
One Global Fine Model of your Entire Asset (2/2)
� Global mesh meets all requirements of DNV-RP-C206, e.g. includes 1t x 1t mesh refinement in hot spot areas
� Can incorporate condition-based data in the global model (hull damage, corrosion, etc.)
Akselos provides one global model that uses a fine mesh everywhere
We Provide the Full Range of Analysis…
Contact analysis
Geometric nonlinearity
Buckling analysis
Plasticity
*Akselos’s RB-FEA solvers accelerate the linearregions of the model. We use conventional FEAfor nonlinear regions. Akselos’s Hybrid solverseamlessly couples RB-FEA and conventional FEA.
… and the Full Range of Elements
Shells
Beams
Solids
Hybrid
Solver Capabilities
Analysis Type RB-FEA FEA & Hybrid
Structural 9 Steady-state linear elasticity
9 Dynamic linear elasticity9 Modal analysis9 Node-to-node contact9 The full range of
element types (springs, beams, shells, solids)
9 Plasticity9 Geometric nonlinearity 9 Surface-to-surface
contact 9 Buckling
Acoustics 9 Frequency-domain acoustics
9 Modal analysis
9 Time-domain acoustics
Thermal 9 Steady-state and dynamic linear thermal analysis
9 Nonlinear (temperature-dependent materials)
Parallel Cloud-based Solver
Massively parallelCloud-based solver which can efficiently run 1000s of load cases
Cloud data center One request
Code-based analysis and fatigue analysis can require 1000s of solves
Digital Twin: Integration with Sensors/ IoT (1/2)
Calibrated Digital TwinWind &
Seastates
Accelerometers
Strain
CorrosionWave
Sensors
Cloud-based Servers
Real-time risk-baseddecisions
Digital Twin: Integration with Sensors/ IoT (2/2)
Calibrated Digital TwinWind &
Seastates
Accelerometers
Strain
CorrosionWave
Sensors
Cloud-based Servers
Real-time risk-baseddecisions
Akselos focuses on these links in the value chain.
Partners provide the other links.
The Akselos Digital Twin Safely Avoids Unnecessary Downtime
2.Akselos Digital Twin used to quickly and safely assess the situation. First, the Digital Twin is updated to incorporate the crack in full detail.
3. Thousands of simulations are run
on the updated Digital Twin. With Akselos’s revolutionary simulation algorithms and cloud-based platform, this analysis can be performed within a day.
1. During an inspection,
a crack is identified. The impact and required action are not clear. Is an unplanned shutdown required? Or, can the repair be postponed until the next planned shutdown?
4. Engineers can
then plan and execute the appropriate
response based on accurate simulation
data. The Digital Twin stops unnecessary
downtime.
Akselos GUI
Client’s Model Library
The Akselos Simulation Platform
Simulation Engine
Decision Support System
Comparative Advantage
Example of a Shiploader
Example of a 6,000 ton structure
Load combinations [lc] 100 lc. 30 lc.
Model degrees of freedom[dof] 5 m. dof. 500 m. dof.
Image
Time for FEA, all load combinations 3 days 7.5 hours Too large for FEA
Time for RB-FEA, all load
combinations8 min 20 seconds 1 hour 45 min
Digital Twin Examples
On-shore structures Mining and
port infrastructure Pressure vessels
Wind turbines Offshore structures FPSO
Current Major Project: FPSO Digital Twin
5 Reasons Akselos is Unique
Akselos Reduced Basis FEA is the next generation simulation technology: fast, detailed, accurate.
Parameterized full 3D models which can be reconfigured and re-solved in seconds.
Cloud-based solvers for fast analysis, and enhanced collaboration between engineers.
Results from inspections are incorporated into Digital Twins, which are then re-analyzed based on preset decision support system criteria.
Perform fast 3D solves of entire assets, and include localized nonlinear analysis with conventional FEA where needed.
Appendix
Akselos’s Hybrid “Linear/Nonlinear” Solver is Ideal for Push-over Analysis
Method:1. Start with a fully linearmodel, represented by RB-FEAeverywhere.2. Apply load increments to itas per standard push-overanalysis methodologies3. Once any component thathas stress that exceeds yield, oronce a component requiresgeometrically nonlinearanalysis, it is converted to anFEA component.4. Continue load-steps, modifythe nonlinear region adaptivelyin each step.
This enables a fast, detailed,parameterized approach topush-over analysis.
Traditional Push-over Akselos Push-over
The user must specify plastic regions ahead of time, based on where they expect high stresses to occur.
The approach is fully adaptive and does not require plastic regions to be specified manually. This means we cannot miss critical regions due to “bad guesses”.
Traditional push-over analysis of large structures relies extensively on beamelements because it is too computationally expensive to use shell or solid elements.
Fast RB-FEA solvers make it practical to use shell or solid elements throughout the entire model.
Plastification is assumed to be concentrated at the predefined plastic hinge locations
Spread of plasticity is allowed throughout the volume of the structure
RB-FEA Components Consist of Two Regions: Interior and Ports (1/2)
Interior: The Reduced Basis Method is used to efficiently represent component interiors. This methodology is the product of extensive published academic research*.
The key idea is to create a set of basis functions that efficiently and accurately represent the component’s behavior over the full parameter range of interest. This is achieved by the RB-FEA Greedy Algorithm which efficiently samples the
nonlinear parametric manifold (see Figure on the left). This yields a basis that typically converges at an exponential rate, and hence reproduces full FEA at a small fraction of the computational cost.
*E.g. see: G Rozza, DBP Huynh, and AT Patera, Reduced Basis Approximation and A Posteriori ErrorEstimation for Affinely Parametrized Elliptic Coercive Partial Differential Equations — Application toTransport and Continuum Mechanics. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 15(3):229–275,2008.
Ports: RB-FEA components connect to each other on ports. We use modes on the ports to represent the range of behaviors that can be exhibited on component interfaces. Similarly to component interiors, a reduction algorithm is used to choose an efficient port
space. Once again, we typically observe exponential convergence (See the right figure for an example of rapid port mode convergence) with the number of modes, using an optimal reduced set of modes leads to fast and accurate results. **.
**Port modeling is discussed in: Smetana and AT Patera, Optimal local approximation spaces for component-based static condensation procedures. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
N=4 N=5 N=6
RB-FEA Components Consist of Two Regions: Interior and Ports (2/2)
Standards-Based Analysis
Akselos component-based models enable standards-based analysis, e.g. output from DNV-RP-C201 is shown below.