44
Dr. Ir. Dieudonné Harahagazwe International Potato Center, CIP CONTROL OF BACTERIAL WILT IN EASTERN, CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN AFRICA: Successful Strategies

Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Dr. Ir. Dieudonné HarahagazweInternational Potato Center, CIP

CONTROL OF BACTERIAL WILT IN EASTERN,

CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN AFRICA:

Successful Strategies

Page 2: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Bacterial Wilt in SSA

= Ennemy No. 1 of Seed Production

Systems

Reduction of field BW infection from 60% to

0.7% (Berrios and Rubirigi, 1993)

Page 3: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Disease Triangle = Basis of Control Strategies

Pathogen

Host

Environment

Page 4: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Strategy 1

Clean Seed

• Formal Seed Systems

• Informal Seed Systems

Page 5: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Formal Seed Production Systems

• In vitro plantlet multiplication

• Mini-tuber production

– Conventional technique (sterilized substrate)

– Rapid multiplication techniques (cuttings)

– Aeroponic technique (Kenya, Malawi,

Mozambique, Rwanda)

– Sand hydroponic (Tanzania, Mozambique,

Rwanda)

Page 6: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

• Field Multiplication:

– Pre-basic Seed Production

– Basic Seed Production

– Certified Seed Production

• Case Study: Burundi Seed Scheme

Page 7: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Tissue Culture Labs

Lichinga, Mozambique (2012) Ruhengeri, Rwanda (2006)

Tigoni, Kenya (2011)

Gisozi, Burundi (2012)

Page 8: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Conventional mini tuber

production

Ruhengeri, Rwanda (2006) Mulungu, DR Congo (2013)

Page 9: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Sterilization of SubstrateRuhengeri, Rwanda (2006)

Gisozi, Burundi (2010)

Sussundenga, Mozambique (2013)

Page 10: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Aeroponic Seed Production

Tigoni, Kenya (2010)

Page 11: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Malawi, 2010

Page 12: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Sand Hydroponic Production

Maputo, Mozambique (2013)

Source: Armando Chilenge

Page 13: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Cold storage (Lichinga, Mozambique)

Page 14: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Quality Assurance and Control

�Official Standards

(variability across countries)

�Field Inspection

�Lab techniques

(Latent infection mainly)

Gisozi, Burundi (2004)

Page 15: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Informal Seed Production

Self Supply of Clean Seed by

small-scale farmers:

–Small plot techniques

–Diffused Light Storage (DLS)

Page 16: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Small Plot Technique

• Gusubizako ivu

• Gutera: 20 cm x 20 cm

• Gukangaza no gufurira

• Gupompa

• Gusoroma

1,6 m

9

m

Buyengero, Burundi (2007)

Page 17: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Buyengero, Burundi (2007)

Page 18: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Season 1

Season 2

Season 3

Season 4

SSP 1

SSP 2

SSP 3

SSP 4

Ware Plot 1

Ware Plot 2

Ware Plot 3

Market

Market

Market

Sequence of Seed and ware Plots

Page 19: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Quality Seed Means Approriate Storage

Angonia, Mozambique (2012) Tsangano, Mozambique (2010)

Promotion of low cost DLS for farmers

Page 20: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Farmers’ DLS at Malomo EPA in Ntchisi (Nov. 2009)

Farmers’ DLS in Mchinji (Nov. 2009)

A farmer inside his DLS in Mchinji, 2011

Examples of DLS in Malawi (Source:

P. Demo)

Page 21: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Farmer’s Improved DLS

Rotanda, Mozambique (2012)

Page 22: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Strategy 2

Pathogen Free Land/Soil

Example of

• Western Kenya

• Central Kenya

• Mozambique

Page 23: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Bacterial Wilt Incidence in Western Kenya (Trials 2013)

Genotype

3930

79.4

SHER

EKEA39

6027

.239

6036

.239

8098

.739

8180

.339

8180

.939

8190

.439

8180

.239

8192

.41

3981

93.6

539

8208

.29

3982

08.5

0539

8180

.292

3982

08.7

04

Ba

cte

ria

l W

ilt (

%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Itando

Mudungu

Ivojo

Page 24: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

On-Farm Trials in Embu District, Kenya(Linus, M., Muriithi, M. and Irungu)

� Period: 1999 – 2000

� Seed used: Certified Seed Tubers of Asante

� Surprising findings: 3.6 % (1999) and 3.2 %

(2000) of Bacterial Wilt Incidence:

“However, the farmers were advised to choose an area where

potatoes or other related crops like tomatoes had not been

planted for 3 years as precaution against possible source of

BW infection” (Linus et al., 2004)

Page 25: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Bacterial Wilt in Vanduzi

farm, Mozambique (2012)

Page 26: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Strategy 3

Appropriate Crop Rotation Systems

• Case study of Kabale (Uganda)

• Case Study of kajondi (Burundi)

Page 27: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Rotation Experiments in Kabale, Uganda (Lemaga, B., Kanzikwera, R., Kakuhenzire, R., Hakiza, J.J. and Maniz, G.)

� Period: 1995B – 1999A

� Site: Kachwekano (2200 masl)

� Variety: Victoria (Asante)

� Experiment 1 (one-season rotation):

maize, wheat, beans, onions, peas, cabbage,

sweetpotato, millet, carrots

� Experiment 2 (two-season rotation):

Beans – wheat/Beans – maize/Wheat –

maize/Beans – beans/Maize – maize/Wheat –

wheat

Page 28: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Key findings (Lemaga et al., 2001a)

�One-season Rotation:

� Maize and wheat reduced the BWI by around 18%

and significantly increased tuber yields

� Beans alone not advised as it might carry the

bacterium

� Lowest incidences with finger millet and

sweetpotato but with low yields as they are

reported to be heavy feeders (competition – need

to fertilize)

Page 29: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Two-season rotation:

� All rotations reduced BWI but planting 2

different crops was superior to planting the

same crop in 2 consecutive seasons

� Best rotations:

�Potatoes – beans – maize – potatoes (81 % to

21.9%)

�Potatoes – wheat – maize - potatoes

Page 30: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Kajondi Basic Seed Farm (Burundi)

• 300 ha arable land

• Around 25 ha of

clean basic

seed/season

• Rainfall: ca. 1400

mm/year

• Tmean: ca. 17°CSource: Google Earth

Page 31: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Rotation Plan in Kajondi

Hill BlockArea

(ha)98 B 99 A 99 B 00A 00B 01A 01B 02A 02B 03A 03B 04A 04B

I

1 25

2 22

3 25

III

1 20

2 26

3 20

V

1 20

2 22

Potato Maize Fallow Buckweat

WheatSource: Bizoza, 2001

Page 32: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Some results

Year

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Bacte

rial W

ilt (

%)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Pro

du

ctio

n (

x1

000

t)

150

200

250

300

350

400

Data from Bizoza, 2001

Page 33: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Strategy 4

Negative Selection (Rogueing)

Page 34: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Field detection (Rotanda, Mozambique)

Page 35: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Wilted

Plant

G1 Field

G2 Field

Page 36: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Rogueing by farmers

Example of Burundi Example of Mozambique

Page 37: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Strategy 5

Other Agronomic Practices

Page 38: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Geospatial distribution

�Toposequence of

seed plots (run-

off)

�Logical altitudinal

localization of

seed centres per

seed grade

Mugamba, Burundi

Page 39: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Case study: Lulimile production in Mozambique

40 kg of mini tubers1 t of G1

Tsangano,

2011

6 t of G2

Ntengo umodzi, 2012

0.6 ha of G2

Ntengo umodzi, 2012

Page 40: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Liming

The incidence of BW

is exacerbated

under low pH

Literature cited by Lemaga

et. al, 2001b and Linus et

al. 2004

Page 41: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Soil Fertilizers

Organic Manure

(Mparambo, Burundi)

Inorganic Fertilizers

(Rotanda, Mozambique)

Soil Amendments on BWI (Lemaga et al., 2001b):

� Best results when organic and inorganic fertilizers combined

� Presence of K in any combination of amendments important for both BW reduction

and yield increases

� Sesbania gave best results compared to other green manures

Page 42: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Key Message – Integrated Approach

1) Clean Seed

2) Pathogen Free Soil/Land

3) Appropriate Rotation Systems

4) Negative selection

5) Quality Control (Latent Infection/ELISA-Test)

6) Other Agronomic Practices (soil amendments, Volunteers, altitude of seed centers, etc…)

Page 43: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

References• Linus, M., Muriithi, M. and Irungu, J.W. 2004. Effect of integrated use of inorganic

fertilizer and organic manures on Bacterial Wilt incidence (BWI) and tuber yield in

potato production systems on hill slopes of Central Kenya. Journal of mountain

Science, Vol. 1. (1): 81-88.

• Lemaga, B., Kanzikwera, R., Kakuhenzire, R., Hakiza, J.J. and Maniz, G. 2001a. The

effect of crop rotation on Bacterial Wilt incidence and potato yield. African Crop

Science Journal. Vol. 9 (1): 257-266.

• Lemaga, B., Sirri, D and Ebanyat, P. 2001b. Effect of soil amendments on Bacterial

Wilt incidence and yield of potatoes in Southwestern Uganda. Kinya, Z.M., Smith,

J.J., Lung’aho, C., Olanya, F. and Priou, S. 2001. On-farm successes and challenges

on producing Bacterial Wilt-free tubers in seed plots. African Crop Science Journal.

Vol. 9 (1): 279-285.

• Berrios, D. and Rubirigi, A. 1993. Integrated control of Bacterial Wilt in seed

production by the Burundi National Potato Program. ACIAR Proceedings No. 45:

284-288.

• Bizoza, F. 2001. Gestion d’un centre semencier: cas de la ferme semenciere de

Kajondi. In FAO: Techniques de Production, de Protection et de Conservation de

Semences de Pomme de terre. Proceedings of a Seed Potato Workshop held in

Bujumbura, Burundi, 2001.

Page 44: Successful strategies against bacterial wilt in SSA

Asante

Thanks

Murakoze

Ameseginalehu!

Contact: [email protected]

Photo credit: All

photos included in this

presentation, except

the Google map,

belong to the author.