Upload
eumetsat
View
658
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
In this presentation, given at the WMO side event during the 2014 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference in Geneva, Alain Ratier (Director-General, EUMETSAT) discusses the value a recent study has placed on the socio-economic benefits polar satellite data provide for the protection of property and infrastructure, the value they add to the economy as well as for the private use by European citizens.
Citation preview
EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 20141
Alain RatierDirector-General
WMO / EUMETSAT Side-EventSocio-Economic Benefits of Satellites
EUMETSAT Meteorological Conference Geneva - 23 September 2014
Socio -Economic Benefits of Polar Satellite Data
2 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
The challenge: from observation to benefits
Slide: 2
Forecast & support to decision making
Observation
Numerical Prediction (ECMWF and NMSs)
Forecaster Expertise
Benefits from public and private decisions
De
live
ry a
nd
va
lue
Re
qu
irem
en
ts
3 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Methodology
4 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Joining forces
• Socio-economic benefit study launched in 2011, updated in 2013
• Collaborative venture:
- Socio-Economic Benefits of forecasts: World Bank/Météo-France
- Impact of satellites on forecasts : ECMWF, UKMO, DWD
- Benefits attributable to satellites : All
5 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Safety of life, property and infrastructure…
Transport … ...Climate policy and environment protection
….... ......
Benefits areas of weather forecasting
....Energy, agriculture,tourism....
6 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Eyjafjallajökull Ash cloud from 7 to 11 May 2010(Second eruption)
Transports: impact on aviation
7 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Energy sector
8 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Focus on areas where benefits of forecast can be qu antified
• Areas where quantitative assessment of benefits exists, isdocumented by research and publications
• Protection of property and infrastructure (avoided costs)
• Direct added value to the European Economy
• Value of private Use by European Citizens
• Published socio-economic studies compiled, analysed andextrapolated by an economist of the World Bank
• Scope: European Union (EU 27)
9 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Protection of Property & Infrastructure (avoided co sts)
• Forecast information integrated into warning/civil protection systems limits economic losses due to floods and storms• Floods in Europe cost on average €4Bn/year• Storms in Europe cost on average €2.6Bn/year
• Based on published information, likely annual benefit of forecast information in limiting EU losses due to floods and storms is €2.75Bn
• Publications suggest that forecasts of other severe phenomena (risk of forest fires, snow, heat-waves, cold spells, etc.) bring altogether benefits in the same order as for floods and storms
• Likely aggregate benefit is €5.5Bn/year
10 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Direct Added Value to the EU Economy (Exc. private use)
• Forecasts widely used to optimize business/increase productivity:• Transport Sector:
• Air traffic management (e.g. reduction in weather-induced delays)• Route planning / optimisation• Road and rail network management, …..• Ship routing
• Energy Sector: demand estimation, supply/grid management….)
• Agriculture (planting, harvesting, use of fertilizers…)
• Leisure and tourism (demand planning)
• Construction (planning)
• Mining
11 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Direct Added Value to the EU Economy… Ct’d
• About 1/3 of EU GDP is weather-sensitive, with some sectors particularly sensitive (e.g. transport and energy)
• Aviation sector alone contributes over €120Bn to European GDP, as well as being a vital infrastructure component for Europe
• Estimations available for added value of weather forecasts to weather-sensitive sectors of the EU economy
• Published studies show that forecast information yields at least “added value” of 0.25%: the benefit is at least €10.23Bn/year in the EU
• Published studies suggest that 1% is a more realistic value on average: the corresponding benefit is €41Bn/year
12 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Value of Private Use by European Citizens
• A US study has indicated that private households in the US place a value of about US$280 / year on forecast information
• Assuming European households are prepared to pay €20/year (directly or through taxes), the aggregate benefit is €4Bn/year
• With a more likely value of €80/year for European households the benefit increases to 15Bn/year
13 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
� Not captured: value of hundreds of lives saved each year is not captured
� Also ignored: additional benefits of weather forecasts on specialised forecasts of weather-
dependent phenomena, i.e. air quality, marine forecasts, dispersion of pollution, etc.
Estimated benefits of weather forecast in the EU 27
BENEFIT AREA LIKELY
Protection of property and infrastructure €5.4 billion/year
Added value to the European economy €41.0 billion/year
Private use by European citizens €15.0 billion/year
TOTAL €61.5 billion/year
14 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Impact of Metop Data on Forecasting
Parallel investigations undertaken to provide 3 different perspectiveson impact of EPS / Metop-SG on forecast accuracy:
Assessment of the relative contributions of the variousobservation sources to forecast accuracy (Met Office UK)
Statistical Impact on Forecast Accuracy using Data DenialExperiments (ECMWF)
Case Study on the Impact of Polar Data on the Forecasting ofWinter Storms over Europe (DWD)
15 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Observations into models: « Assimilation » Constraining the initial model « trajectory »
verificationverificationverificationverification
Model forecast without Model forecast without Model forecast without Model forecast without new observationsnew observationsnew observationsnew observations
«««« Real AtmosphereReal AtmosphereReal AtmosphereReal Atmosphere » » » »
timetimetimetime
T0 T0 T0 T0 ---- 06h06h06h06h T0T0T0T0 T0 + 24hT0 + 24hT0 + 24hT0 + 24h
ObservationsObservationsObservationsObservations
Model ForecastModel ForecastModel ForecastModel Forecast
Error Error Error Error ReductionReductionReductionReduction
State of atmosphereState of atmosphereState of atmosphereState of atmosphere
16 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Major impact of Metop -A on Day 1 forecast
24.5%
RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION
OF OBSERVATIONS TO
REDUCTION OF ERROR IN
DAY 1 NUMERICAL FORECAST
T0 + 24hT0 + 24hT0 + 24hT0 + 24h
Error Error Error Error ReductionReductionReductionReduction
17 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
ECMWF Data Denial Experiments
18 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Beyond statistics, some cases matter more than others: ECMWF Forecasts of Sandy landfall
Slide: 18
19 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
• Winter storm “Nicolas”: 45 hour forecasts and operational analysis (best approximation of ground truth) of surface pressure (contour lines) and 10m wind speed (shaded areas – units M/S) for 7 February 2011
Beyond statistics, some cases matter more than others: DWD Forecasts of Nicolas winter storm
20 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
IMPACT OF METOP DATA ON FORECASTING – MAIN RESULTS
• Polar orbiting satellites account for more than 58% of the impact of allobservations on NWP forecasts
• Metop-A biggest individual contributor at around 25%, i.e. roughly 2.5 timesgreater than a fully functional spacecraft from a previous generation (i.e. NOAA-19)
• Loss of Metop data would lead to an 8% drop in forecast accuracy over Europe(assuming other components of the observing system remained in place)
• If Metop were the only polar orbiting meteorological spacecraft, its loss wouldresult in a 13% drop in forecast accuracy over Europe
• A 15-20% loss of forecast accuracy would result from the simultaneousunavailability of Metop and the US counterpart of the Initial Joint Polar System
21 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
� Value of hundreds of lives saved each year not captured
� Also ignored: additional benefits of weather forecasts on specialised forecasts of weather-
dependent phenomena, i.e. air quality, marine forecasts, dispersion of pollution, etc.
Benefits of forecast attributable to EPS/Metop
BENEFIT AREA LIKELY
Protection of property and infrastructure € 0.4 billion/year
Added value to the European economy € 3.3 billion/year
Private use by European citizens € 1.2 billion/year
TOTAL €4.9 billion/year
Most conservative forecast impact of 8% taken for calculating benefits
22 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Benefit/cost ratio of EPS/Metop -SG Programme (€ 3 Bn )
BENEFIT AREA LIKELY
Protection of property and infrastructure € 6.0 billion
Added value to the European economy € 45.2billion
Private use by European citizens € 11.5 billion
TOTAL € 63 billion
Most conservative forecast impact of 8% assumed, as for EPS/Metop21 years of observation: 2020-2041
(2010 values, using discount rate of 4% and assuming GDP growth rate of 2%)
Benefit to cost ratio is in the order of 20
23 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Possible drivers of future evolutions of benefits ( 1/2)
• Benefits attributable to Metop-SG may increase wrt Metop, as capabilities will be significantly enhanced
• Conceptually, relative impact should level if all satellites are equally capable
• Impact study for dual Metop, Suomi-NPP, FY3 of great interest
• Populating the “early morning” orbit with advanced satellites expected to have highest impact in the short term
• Improvements in absolute forecast accuracy will increase benefits, possibly massively of performance thresholds are exceeded
• Assessment is a challenge: socio-economic benefits are based on current forecast
• How to measure elasticity of benefits to forecast performance?
24 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Impact of dual Metop operations
25 EUM/DG/VWG/14/770830, 23 September 2014
Possible drivers of future evolutions of benefits ( 2/2)
• Expectation of more frequent high-impact weather events in our changing climate, increasing further the “avoided costs”
• Increasing vulnerability/sensitiveness of society and economy (e.g. with the development of renewable energy) to weather
• ….but stagnant/slow economic growth will reduce benefits !
• Improved response of decision-making to forecasts and warnings
• Use of probabilistic forecast will make a difference