24
Social metrics for research: Quantity and Quality William Gunn Head of Academic Outreach [email protected] @mrgunn

Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Social metrics for research: Quantity and Quality

William GunnHead of Academic [email protected]

@mrgunn

Page 2: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

“The state of knowledge of the human race is sitting in the scientists’ computers, and is currently not shared […] We need to get it unlocked so we can tackle those huge problems.”

A Big Problem

Page 3: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Research is too slow

Page 4: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Research is poor quality

- Amgen: 47 of 53 “landmark” oncology publications could not be reproduced.

- Bayer: 43 of 67 oncology & cardiovascular projects were based on contradictory results

- Dr. John Ioannidis: 432 publications purporting sex differences in hypertension, multiple sclerosis, or lung cancer. Only one data set was reproducible.

Page 5: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

https://secure.flickr.com/photos/fireflythegreat/2845637227/

Page 6: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Journal Impact Factor

Number of citationsCiteable items

= Impact Factor

Page 7: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

It's inaccurate

Problems with Impact Factor

Page 8: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Problems with Impact Factor

Page 9: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291

Problems with Impact Factor

“During discussions with Thomson Scientific over which article types the company deems as “citable,” it became clear that the process of determining a journal's impact factor is unscientific and arbitrary.”

Page 10: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Highly Tweeted articles are 11x more likely to be highly cited. (Eysenbach 2011) http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/

The higher the impact factor, the more likely the research is to be retracted, partly due to intense competition.http://bjoern.brembs.net/news766.html.11

What matters is who is reading your work!

Page 11: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Why are altmetrics important?

Get better data on what's working

Get it faster

Provide qualitative descriptions, not just quantitative measures

Page 12: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

...and aggregates research data in the cloud

Mendeley makes science more collaborative and transparent:

Mendeley extracts research data…

Collecting rich signals from domain experts.

Page 13: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

200 million documents uploaded2.0 million users

Cambridge Stanford University MITImperial College LondonUniversity of OxfordHarvard UniversityUniversity of MichiganUniversity College LondonUniversity of California at BerkeleyColumbia University

Page 14: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Rich user profile data

Page 15: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Papers, people, topics

Page 16: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 17: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 18: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 19: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 20: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 21: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 22: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality

Google Analytics for research

Page 23: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality
Page 24: Social metrics for Research: Quantity and Quality