Upload
matti-heino
View
294
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Preprints short and sweet
“… The purpose of this policy is twofold. In the first place, as Dr. Ingelfinger never hesitated to admit, it protects our newsworthiness.”
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198110013051408#t=article
Year: 1981 (rule origin: 1969)
“… We hope that our policies achieve a reasonable balance. We intend them to be flexible and open to appeal if the interests of the public are at stake. ”http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199111073251910#t=article
Year: 1991
More than half of US neuroscientists and more than 60% of German neuroscientists perceive the so-called Ingelfinger rule as still effective.
(2013)
Link to post
Link to article
Watch his Helsinki lecture, "Failures of journals and better ways of disseminating science" here!
“[The peer review system] is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-
innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily
abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.”
- Richard Smith (former BMJ editor)
As a taxpayer, you should be concerned(See e.g. http://tiedonhinta.fi/en/english/)
http://www.nature.com/news/biologists-urged-to-hug-a-preprint-1.19384
http://blog.psyarxiv.com/psyarxiv/2016/09/19/psyarxiv-faq/
https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/
Link to FAQ
Link to post
Having posted a preprint, you have a time-stamped copy of your manuscript on a third-party server.
Is this really the situation, when you should worry about someone stealing your great idea?
Link to thread
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php
Know your rights! (i.e. check what they are)
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php
http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php
“Presentation of data at a scientific meeting, as a poster, abstract, orally, on a CD, or as an abstract on the web or on a pre-print server does not conflict with submission to The Lancet”
“Scientific communication is in the midst of major changes. Open access, open data, and open peer review are coming, and rules like Ingelfinger's are proving themselves to be increasingly outdated and counterintuitive. Publishing work openly and freely is in the spirit of development, and it's now easier than ever.”
Link to post