23
Preprints short and sweet

Preprints, short and sweet

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Preprints, short and sweet

Preprints short and sweet

Page 2: Preprints, short and sweet

“… The purpose of this policy is twofold. In the first place, as Dr. Ingelfinger never hesitated to admit, it protects our newsworthiness.”

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198110013051408#t=article

Year: 1981 (rule origin: 1969)

Page 3: Preprints, short and sweet

“… We hope that our policies achieve a reasonable balance. We intend them to be flexible and open to appeal if the interests of the public are at stake. ”http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199111073251910#t=article

Year: 1991

Page 4: Preprints, short and sweet

More than half of US neuroscientists and more than 60% of German neuroscientists perceive the so-called Ingelfinger rule as still effective.

(2013)

Link to post

Page 5: Preprints, short and sweet

Link to article

Watch his Helsinki lecture, "Failures of journals and better ways of disseminating science" here!

“[The peer review system] is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-

innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily

abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant.”

- Richard Smith (former BMJ editor)

Page 6: Preprints, short and sweet

As a taxpayer, you should be concerned(See e.g. http://tiedonhinta.fi/en/english/)

Page 7: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.nature.com/news/biologists-urged-to-hug-a-preprint-1.19384

Page 8: Preprints, short and sweet
Page 9: Preprints, short and sweet

http://blog.psyarxiv.com/psyarxiv/2016/09/19/psyarxiv-faq/

Page 10: Preprints, short and sweet

https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/

Page 11: Preprints, short and sweet
Page 12: Preprints, short and sweet
Page 14: Preprints, short and sweet

Link to post

Having posted a preprint, you have a time-stamped copy of your manuscript on a third-party server.

Is this really the situation, when you should worry about someone stealing your great idea?

Page 16: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Know your rights! (i.e. check what they are)

Page 17: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Page 18: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Page 19: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Page 20: Preprints, short and sweet

http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php

Page 21: Preprints, short and sweet

“Presentation of data at a scientific meeting, as a poster, abstract, orally, on a CD, or as an abstract on the web or on a pre-print server does not conflict with submission to The Lancet”

Page 22: Preprints, short and sweet
Page 23: Preprints, short and sweet

“Scientific communication is in the midst of major changes. Open access, open data, and open peer review are coming, and rules like Ingelfinger's are proving themselves to be increasingly outdated and counterintuitive. Publishing work openly and freely is in the spirit of development, and it's now easier than ever.”

Link to post