Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Socio-Economic Impact Assessment (SEIA)
FITMAN Webinar
Vegard Engen, IT Innovation [email protected]
16th June 2015
16/06/2015 (C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 1
SEIA methodology
Aims of the socio-economic impact assessment
• Analyse and measure potential social and economic impacts of new technologies and business models
– On the respective enterprise, its customers, suppliers and wider society
– For each trial in FITMAN scale up to industry level
• Identify the potential long-term costs and benefits
– For the different stakeholders
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 216/06/2015
SEIA Scope
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 3
FoF roadmap (mega trends):• Employment• Environmental impact• Economic growth
People’s way of lifeTheir environmentHealth and wellbeingTheir community
PublicationsOutreachAwareness creationRecommendations
16/06/2015
Three step SEIA methodology
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 416/06/2015
Three step SEIA methodology: step 1
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 5
1: Outline the socio-economics of the manufacturing sub-sector
16/06/2015
Status quo, example stats
• Bringing in stats, e.g., from EuroStat [1], such as:– Number of enterprises and turnover
– Organisation sizes
– Employment figures (broken down for organisation sizes, for example)
• Information on the effect on the environment.– The sources for this would depend on the respective
industry that is analysed.
– Could be academic literature, government reports, etc.
[1] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
16/06/2015 (C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 6
Three step SEIA methodology: step 2
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 7
2: Case study with new technology
16/06/2015
Example value network
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 816/06/2015
Example costs & benefits definition
Actor Type Cost / benefit Related Performance Indicator (PI)
Actor 1 Benefit Reduced project management
overhead
PI1: Average lead-time to perform,
record and analyse test results.
Actor 2 Cost Cost of system implementation None
Actor 3 Benefit Reduced resource usage PI2: Average amount of resource used
before and after change
implementation.
Society Benefit Reduced paper usage PI3: Average number of pages used in
the test results recording, archival, etc.
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 916/06/2015
Three step SEIA methodology: step 3
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 10
3: potential long-term benefits of technology take-up by the manufacturing sub-sector
16/06/2015
FoF 2020 roadmap mega trends
• Employment: Effect of technology on individual
employees, staffing requirements of enterprise, health & safety, conditions of work, job satisfaction and staff training.
• Environment: Direct or indirect effects of technology on
the environment (e.g. improved energy efficiency, reduced waste, improved product development leading to more environmentally friendly products).
• Economic Growth: Economic impact of the technologies
for the whole manufacturing ecosystem (the enterprise itself, its suppliers, the wider manufacturing industry and the economy as a whole).
16/06/2015 (C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 11
Application of SEIA methodology
• Applied by 6 different partners in FITMAN• Successfully applied to 10 use case trials in the
FITMAN project• Key challenges:
– getting data from the organisation that is being analysed. In FITMAN, all organisations were external; thus confidentiality was an issue.
– getting business-related measurements for quantifying impacts of the use of new technologies.
(C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 12
Actual results cannot be shared here
due to confidentiality
16/06/2015
Questions?
Contact:
• Vegard Engen
Survey:
• https://www.isurvey.soton.ac.uk/16440
16/06/2015 (C) 2015 University of Southampton IT Innovation Centre 13
![1,2 ID 2,3 4 2,6 1,2, ID · about the original methodology can be found in [16]. We modified the original methodology to determine ATPs for different socio-ecological objectives](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5fcef4bcfc525b7c6933752e/12-id-23-4-26-12-id-about-the-original-methodology-can-be-found-in-16-we.jpg)
