26
Factors shaping learners’ interactions in networked learning context Srećko Joksimović [email protected] @s_joksimovic Dragan Gašević [email protected] @dgasevic Vitomir Kovanović [email protected] @vkovanovic

Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Factors shaping learners’ interactions in networked learning context

Srećko Joksimović[email protected]

@s_joksimovic

Dragan Gašević[email protected]

@dgasevic

Vitomir Kovanović[email protected]

@vkovanovic

Page 2: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

C X- Open design- Learner centered- Use of social media- Distributed communication

- Fixed design- Focused on learner-content Interaction- Video lectures- Peer assessment

2023-04-15 Slide 2 of 23

Page 3: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC study context

Social capital

Slide 3 of 23

Page 4: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC study context

Social capital

Social network analysis

Slide 4 of 23

Page 5: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC study context

Information exchange

Slide 5 of 23

Page 6: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC study context

• Language and the quality of social ties are mutually dependent.

Slide 6 of 23

Page 7: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

xMOOC study context

2023-04-15 Slide 7 of 23

Srecko
add research objectives
Page 8: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC study approachCCK11 (12 weeks)

CCK12 (12 weeks)Week1

Learner 1

Learner 2

Learner N

Week2

Learner 1

Learner N

SNA

Degree centralityEigenvalue centralityBetweenness centralityCloseness centrality

Coh-Metrix

NarrativitySyntactic SimplicityWord ConcretenessReferential CohesionDeep Cohesion

MLM

<<extract>

>

<<extract>>

<<analyze>>

<<an

alyz

e>>

<<measure>>

<<measure>>

Slide 8 of 23

1755 posts

2483 posts

1473 posts

61 posts

2266 posts

624 posts

Page 9: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

xMOOC study approach

Slide 9 of 23

NGIx (8 weeks)SNA

Degree centralityEigenvalue centralityBetweenness centralityCloseness centrality

<<extract>>

<<analyze>> <<measure>>

Learner 1

Learner 2

Learner N

Coh-Metrix<<

anal

yze>

>

<<extract>> NarrativitySyntactic SimplicityWord ConcretenessReferential CohesionDeep Cohesion<<measure>>

MLMActive learners

All learners

Grades

MLMActive learners

All learners

Page 10: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

SNA metricsDegree Centrality

Closeness Centrality

Betweenness Centrality

Eigenvalue Centrality

Slide 10 of 23

Page 11: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

Linguistic properties• Narrativity

• Deep cohesion

• Referential cohesion

• Syntactic simplicity

• Word concreteness

Slide 11 of 23

Page 12: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

Statistical analyses

Slide 12 of 17

Dependent Independent Random

cMOOC and xMOOC cMOOC and xMOOC cMOOC

Degree centrality Narrativity Learner within a course

Eigenvalue centrality Deep Cohesion Course slope

Betweenness centrality Referential Cohesion

Closeness centrality Syntax Simplicity xMOOC

xMOOC Word Concreteness Learner

Final grade cMOOC Word count

Media

Time

Activity

Page 13: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06

Degree models

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1

*

*

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

All learners Active learners

**

*

**

**

*

***

**

cMOOC

xMOOC

Page 14: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Betweenness models

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.05 0 0.05 0.1

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

All learners Active learners

*

***

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.05-0.04-0.03-0.02-0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03

*

*

cMOOC

xMOOC

Page 15: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Closeness models

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

All learnersActive learners

**

**

**

*

**

**

cMOOC

xMOOC

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02

Page 16: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

cMOOC Eigenvalue model

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04

***

Slide 16 of 23

Low referential cohesion Higher eigenvalue centrality

Page 17: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

Week 1

Week 2

Week 3

Week 4

Week 5

Week 6

Week 7

Week 8

Week 9

Week 10

Week 11

Week 12

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1

cMOOC Contextual factors

Slide 17 of 23

Media Twitter vs. Facebook vs. Blogs

Differ in their affordances

Time Negative association?

Activity More active -> more likely to grow

influence

Page 18: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

2023-04-15

xMOOC Performance models

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.25 -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1

Slide 18 of 23

Syntax Simplicity

Deep Cohesion

Referential Cohesion

Word Concreteness

Narrativity

-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6

All learners Active learners

****

**

**

**

**

*

**

**

Page 19: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

What do we know…?

• Contextual, as well as linguistic and discourse features of written artefacts, are important determinants of learning in a cMOOC environment.

• cMOOC: Course participants who tend to use more narrative and informal style, nevertheless still manage to maintain a deeper cohesive structure in their communication will have more ties.

• xMOOC: – Better performance – more expository style discourse– Higher centrality – more narrative style, with less overlap between

words and ideas

2023-04-15 Slide 19 of 23

Page 20: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

So what…?• Practice

– Effective use of language to communicate and share knowledge – Sharing novel information, using concrete and coherently

structured language– Traditional academic performance vs. social centrality

• Research– Are learners able to develop all the necessary skills to learn in

distributed settings?– Changes in linguistic features as indicators of learning progress

2023-04-15 Slide 20 of 23

Page 21: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

What we are missing?

• cMOOC– temporal dimension– 72 undirected weighted graphs

• xMOOC– cross-sectional analysis– limited set of interactions

2023-04-15 Slide 21 of 23

Page 22: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

What we are missing?

L1

L2

L3

FB post - fi

TW post - ti

L4Blog post - bi

TW post - tj

SM post - smn

post

comment

like

comment

post

mention

retweet

post

post

post

commentreference fa

vorit

e

Page 23: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

What we are missing?

L2Temporal properties:- Linguistic and discourse features – t1- Linguistic and discourse features – t2- …- Linguistic and discourse features – tn

Overall- GPA- Previous activities- Demographics

2023-04-15 Slide 23 of 23

Page 24: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Further research• (Temporal) Exponential Random Graph

Models– Mathematical vs. Statistical model

Henry and Dietz (2011)2023-04-15 Slide 24 of 23

Page 25: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

Factors shaping learners’ interactions in networked learning context

Srećko Joksimović[email protected]

@s_joksimovic

Dragan Gašević[email protected]

@dgasevic

Vitomir Kovanović[email protected]

@vkovanovic

Page 26: Factors shaping learners interactions in networked learning

References• Joksimović, S., Dowell, N. M., Skrypnyk, O., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Graesser,

A.C. - Exploring the Development of Social Capital in cMOOC through Language and Discourse, Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2015 (submitted).

• Dowell, N. M., Skrypnyk, O., Joksimović, S., Graesser, A. C., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Hennis, T. A., de Vries, P., Kovanović, V. – Modeling Learners’ Social Centrality and Performance through Language and Discourse, The 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Madrid, Spain, 26-29 June, 2015 (accepted).

• Henry, A. D., Dietz, T. - Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance. International Journal of the Commons, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 188-212, sep. 2011. ISSN 1875-0281. Available at: <http://www.thecommonsjournal.org/index.php/ijc/article/view/312/231>. Date accessed: 17 May. 2015.