Upload
npaulson
View
164
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Computationally Efficient Protocols to
Evaluate the Fatigue Resistance of Polycrystalline Materials
Noah H. Paulson, Matthew W. Priddy, Surya R. Kalidindi, and
David L. McDowell
Generate Microstructures
CPFEM: Calculate
local 𝜺𝑝field
get FIP fields + FIP EVDs
Evaluate HCF resistance
HCF EvaluationExisting Approach
Smith (2013).
+UMAT
𝐻𝐶𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒:𝐃 > 𝐂 > 𝐁
(0001)min: 0, max: 8
Basal texture
3
Material Property RepresentationSVE Concept
Kanit, et al. (2003).
Numerous samples are needed to capture the statistics of the properties of the material. Let us call these samples statistical volume elements (SVEs)
4
RVE SVE set
vs.
BackgroundFatigue Indicator Parameters
FIPs are a surrogate measure of driving force for fatigue crack formation and growth
Critical Plane Approach
• Fatemi-Socie Parameter
𝐹𝐼𝑃 𝐹𝑆 =∆𝛾𝑚𝑎𝑥
𝑝
21 + 𝑘
𝜎𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑛
𝜎𝑦
max
n
2
Crack formation due to intense
shear along the slip band of Ti-
6Al-4V Le Biavant, et al. (2001).
5
Fatemi, et al. (1988).
Problem StatementComputational Burdens
Hypothetical: Rank HCF resistance of the 12 heat treatments of Ti-64
𝐶𝑃𝑈𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 = 12 microstructures ∗100 SVEs
microstructure∗
1.5 hours ∗ 4 processors
𝑆𝑉𝐸= 𝟕𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐬
A more efficient approach is needed to make computational fatigue analysis feasible for industrial applications
6
HCF Study MKS Approach
MKS: Predict local 𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡. field
Generate SVE set
(Statistical Volume Element)
get FIP fields + FIP EVDs
Evaluate HCF resistance
Estimate 𝜺𝑝𝑙from 𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡.
𝜺𝑒𝑙
𝝈
𝜏 𝛼 Integrate flow rule
𝛾 𝛼
𝜺𝑝𝑙
𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡. ≅ 𝜺𝑒𝑙
7
The Materials Knowledge System (MKS) is a localization technique to estimate local response (e.g., 𝜀𝑖𝑗) given
macroscopic applied condition
MKS Framework
𝜺 𝒙
𝜺 𝑥 = 𝑰 − 𝑅
𝐻
𝜶 𝑟, 𝑛 𝑚 𝑥 + 𝑟, 𝑛 𝑑𝑛𝑑𝑟
+ 𝑅
𝑅
𝐻
𝐻
𝜶 𝑟, 𝑟′, 𝑛, 𝑛′ 𝑚 𝑥 + 𝑟, 𝑛 𝑚 𝑥 + 𝑟 + 𝑟′, 𝑛′ 𝑑𝑛𝑑𝑛′𝑑𝑟𝑑𝑟′ −⋯ 𝜺 𝑥
𝑚 𝑥, 𝑛 =
𝐿
𝑠
𝑀𝑠𝐿𝑄𝐿(𝑛)𝑋𝑠(𝑥)
Microstructure function:
𝜶 𝑟, 𝑛 =
𝐿
𝑡
𝑨𝑡𝐿𝑄𝐿 𝑛 𝜒𝑡 𝑟
Influence function:
𝑄𝐿 𝑛 : orthonormal Fourier basis 𝑋𝑠(𝑥): indicator basis
(Kalidindi 2012), (Adams 2012), (Kröner 1986), Yabansu (2014)
𝜺 𝒙 = 𝒂 𝒙 𝜺 𝒙
Influence Function
8
HCF Study MKS Approach
MKS: Predict local 𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡. field
Generate SVE set
(Statistical Volume Element)
get FIP fields + FIP EVDs
Evaluate HCF resistance
Calibrate MKS Influence
Coefficients
Generate SVE set for training
FEM: Calculate local 𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡. field
Estimate 𝜺𝑝𝑙from 𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡.
𝜺𝑒𝑙
𝝈
𝜏 𝛼 Integrate flow rule
𝛾 𝛼
𝜺𝑝𝑙
𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡. ≅ 𝜺𝑒𝑙
9
𝜺𝑝𝑙 =
𝛼=1
𝑁
𝛾 𝛼 𝒔0𝛼⨂𝒎0
𝛼
𝑠𝑦𝑚
Calculate 𝜺𝑝𝑙
Calculate 𝜺𝑝𝑙
Calculate 𝜏 𝛼 from 𝝈
𝜺𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝝈𝑙𝑜𝑐.
𝜺𝑒𝑙𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 ≈ 𝜺𝑒𝑙
𝝈 ≈ 𝑪𝜺𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
𝛾 𝛼 = 𝛾0𝜏 𝛼 − 𝜒 𝛼 − 𝜅 𝛼
𝐷 𝛼
𝑀
sgn 𝜏 𝛼 − 𝜒 𝛼
Integrate flow rule for 𝛾 𝛼
(1) (2)
(3) (4)
10
HCF StudySVEs and Loading
DREAM.3D input information
– Grain size distribution• Avg. Grain Size: 43
elements
– Misorientation distribution
– Texture
xy
z
εt
Fully-reversed cyclic loading• x-, y-, and z-direction uniaxial strain• Periodic boundary conditions
11
HCF StudyMKS Results (α-Ti Basal Texture)
ε11 mean error: 0.22%, ε11 max error: 1.3%
𝑒𝑟𝑟 ≡𝜀𝑖𝑗𝐹𝐸𝑀 − 𝜀𝑖𝑗
𝑀𝐾𝑆
𝜀𝑖𝑗𝐹𝐸𝑀
12
HCF Study Results
15
Gumbel distribution
• New protocol 240X faster than traditional protocols• Traditional Protocol: 1.5 hours on 4 processors per SVE• New Protocol: 90 seconds on 1 processor per SVE
• Protocols have been developed to evaluate the HCF and LCF resistance of polycrystalline materials
𝛾 𝛼 = 𝛾 𝛼 𝜏 𝛼 , 𝜺𝑝𝑙 =
𝛼=1
𝑁
𝛾 𝛼 𝑷 𝛼
• HCF Study: New protocol 240X faster than traditional protocols
HCF/LCF StudyConclusions
16
Acknowledgements
Also thanks to Donald S. Shih (Boeing), Yuksel C. Yabansu(GT), Dipen Patel (GT), and David Brough (GT)
GOALIFunding provided by:
References
• Alharbi HF, Kalidindi SR. Int J Plasticity 2015;66:71.
• Adams BL, Kalidindi SR, Fullwood DT. Microstructure Sensitive Design for Performance Optimization: Elsevier Science, 2012.
• Bunge HJ, Moris PR. Texture Analysis in Materials Science: Butterworth & Co, 1982
• Fast T, Kalidindi SR. Acta Mater 2011;59:4595.
• Kalidindi SR. ISRN Mater Sci 2012;2012:13.
• Kröner E. J Mech Phy Solids 1977;25:137.
• Landi G, Niezgoda SR, Kalidindi SR. Acta Mater 2010;58:2716.
• Przybyla C., Prasannavenkatesan R., Salajegheh N., McDowell D.L. Microstructure-sensitive modeling of high cycle fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 32, Iss. 3, (2010) pg. 512-525
• Przybyla C.P., McDowell D.L. Simulation-based extreme value marked correlations in fatigue of advanced engineering alloys. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, (2010) pg. 1045-1056
• Smith BD. Masters Thesis 2013.
• Yabansu YC, Patel DK, Kalidindi SR. Acta Mater 2014;81:151.
19