12
Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication Prof. Axel Bruns ARC Future Fellow Digital Media Research Centre Queensland University of Technology [email protected] | @snurb_dot_info

Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public CommunicationProf. Axel BrunsARC Future FellowDigital Media Research CentreQueensland University of [email protected] | @snurb_dot_info

Page 2: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

The Impact Agenda• Impact, for better or for worse:

– RAE, REF (UK), RQF, ERA (Australia), …– Traditional measures of impact:

• Citation rates• Competitive grants income• Industry partnerships

– Negative Consequences:• Reduction of research activities to those with countable metrics• Focus on established rather than emerging fields• Staff poaching to bolster institutional impact

– But: ‘impact’ is here to stay

Page 3: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Revisiting Impact• Need to recognise other forms of impact:

– Altmetrics:• Not all forms of citation and dissemination covered by citation counts• E.g. pre-print / e-print access and citation• E.g. circulation through social networking platforms

– Public value of research:• Impact beyond scholarly and industry circles• Visibility of scholars in public debate• Media take-up of research and public presence of scholars• Social and societal impact of scholarly research• Take-up in public policy-making at all levels of government

Parallels with EU’s ‘public value test’ for public service media

Page 4: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Developing the Indicators• Measures of altmetrics and public value:

– Altmetrics:• Some potential for harvesting institutional e-prints stats• Comprehensive, ‘big social data’ studies of social media / online circulation• (Incentivised) self-reporting by scholars themselves?

– Public value of research:• Media monitoring, especially for online media• Harvesting of Hansard and other parliamentary transcripts• Institutional self-reporting?• Qualitative, case study-based evaluations (cf. UK REF in 2013-14)

Page 5: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

A Network Model of Public Value• Public value arises from multi-partner collaborations:

– Formal partnerships:• Research institutions• Industry partners• Government agencies

– Informal arrangements• Media organisations• NGO support and engagement

– Third-party services:• Social media platform providers• Amplifier services: The Conversation, Medium, …

These all generate their own impact metrics, too!

Page 6: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication
Page 7: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Amplifier Platforms• Amplifying the impact of scholarly work:

– Crowdsourced content:• Scholars themselves pitch stories based on their work• Curation of material by editorial team

– Journalism-as-a-service (JAAS):• Scholarly research, journalistic editors• One central, popular platform

– Designed for sharing:• Creative Commons licences used throughout• Promotion through social media

– Impact measurement:• Personal and institutional access and engagement dashboards• Tracking of social media sharing and mainstream media republication

Page 8: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication
Page 9: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Assessing Amplification• Assessing the role of such third-party services:

– Directly measurable:• Website readership, comments, etc.• On-sharing through social media, email, etc.• Republication in other media outlets

– Potentially measurable:• Media-follow-ups – interviews, additional coverage• Impact on citation rates (short-term / longer-term)

– Qualitative impressions:• New partnerships with researchers, industry, media, …• Career impacts – publishing and keynote opportunities, promotion, …

Assessment against the null hypothesis also desirable

Page 10: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Tweets sharing links to The Conversation, compared to other Australian news and opinion sites (Jan. 2016)

Page 11: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

Where to from Here?• ‘Impact’ is here to stay:

– Institutional responses:• Shift the conversation beyond simplistic citation and grant counts• Explore and embrace altmetrics where they make a meaningful contribution• Develop and define the concept of public value for publicly-funded research

– Scholarly strategies:• Scholars have a duty to engage as public intellectuals in public debate• Institutions should encourage and recognise such engagement• This should include amplifier platforms and social media where possible

– Research into impact:• Need to test and document reliable alternative impact indicators• Particular focus on role and utility of amplifier platforms QUT / CRCA / Conversation partnership to do so

Page 12: Amplifying Impact: Developing Indicators of Public Value in Public Communication

http://mappingonlinepublics.net/@snurb_dot_info

@socialmediaQUT – http://socialmedia.qut.edu.au/ @qutdmrc – https://www.qut.edu.au/research/dmrc

This research is funded by the Australian Research Council through Future Fellowship and LIEF grants FT130100703 and LE140100148.