Upload
countrywide
View
36
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Quarterly Market ReviewSummer 2014
A decade of housebuilding in Europe Banks tighten lending criteria The art of compromise 42
4/5 www.countrywide.co.uk
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
ContentsWith Help to Buy never far from the headlines, this quarter Countrywide plc looks at where those buying through the scheme come from and the types of mortgage products they’re using.
Countrywide plc’s Q2 2014 Quarterly Market Review also looks at the number of homes built across Europe over the last decade, the impact of the £500,000 loan to income cap introduced by major banks and how rising house prices are driving first time buyers to cheaper areas of the country.
Countrywide plc is the UK’s largest property services group, operating the UK’s largest estate agency and lettings network of circa 1,300 branches under 52 high street brands. The group has a wide reaching scale with branches in locations from Stirling to Penzance.
Countrywide plc sells 1 in 11 houses in the UK and is the third largest mortgage distributor in the UK with just below a10% share of the intermediary mortgage market. The Group is also the UK’s largest transactional conveyancing business by completions, the UK’s largest land and new homes agency and a leading provider of residential valuations and surveys, accounting for circa 30% of all residential mortgage valuations in the UK.
As the UK’s largest integrated residential and commercial property services group, Countrywide plc has a unique perspective on the UK property market and is truly countrywide.
_ 04 | Countrywide plc’s market barometer
_ 06 | Who’s using Help to Buy?
_ 08 | Five slide story of the market
_ 10 | A decade of housebuilding in Europe
_ 12 | Banks tighten lending criteria
_ 14 | The art of compromise
ABOUT COUNTRYWIDE PLC:
Countrywide plc, the UK’s largest integrated property services Group, including the largest estate agency and lettings network, operates more than 1,300 associated branches across the UK.
Countrywide plc’s network of expertise helps more people move than any other business in the UK and is a leading provider of estate agency, lettings, mortgage services, land and new homes, auctions, surveying, conveyancing, corporate property management services and commercial property.
Countrywide plc’s award-winning service has earned the business over 150 high-profile industry awards in the last five years, with customers voting Countrywide Best Large Chain National category, at the 2013 ESTA awards. Our Land & New Homes team was named the UK’s Best New Homes Agent for two consecutive years at the Estate Agency of the Year Awards 2012 and 2013 and Countrywide Surveying Services won the award for Best Anti-Fraud Measure at the Mortgage Finance Gazette Awards 2013.
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
4/5
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
Market barometer: A question of supply and demand
The Countrywide barometer is based on supply and demand information generated from Countrywide plc’s circa 1,300 estate agency and letting branches. It provides a solid indicator of current market activity and future sentiment.
BUYERS TO SELLERS AND TENANTS TO LANDLORDS
15
12
9
6
3
0
NU
MB
ER
OF
BU
YE
RS
TO
E
AC
H N
EW
SE
LLE
R
Q2 2014 saw a degree of cooling in the housing market although there are still far more buyers and far fewer properties available than 12 months ago.
The increase in demand in the first quarter of the year led to large price rises across the South of England. While it may have taken some time, Countrywide plc is now beginning to see a larger number of people looking to sell, a trend which has begun to alleviate some of the upward pressure on house prices.
Demand in the rental sector, alongside growth in rents, has remained strongest across the south of the UK. Economic growth has seen jobs created at the fastest rate for four decades, with demand for rental accommodation highest in areas where large numbers of jobs have been filled by relocating professionals from across the UK or Europe.
BUYERS TO EACH NEW SELLER
9.9Q2 2014
PROSPECTIVE TENANTS PER NEW PROPERTY
6.5Q2 2014
20
08
| Q
4
20
08
| Q
1
20
08
| Q
2
20
08
| Q
3
20
08
| Q
4
20
09
| Q
1
20
09
| Q
2
20
09
| Q
3 20
09
| Q
4
20
10
| Q
1
20
10
| Q
2
20
10
| Q
3
20
10
| Q
4
20
11 |
Q1
20
11 |
Q2
20
11 |
Q3 20
11 |
Q4
20
12 |
Q1
20
12 |
Q2
20
12 |
Q3
20
12 |
Q4
20
13 |
Q1
20
13 |
Q2
20
13 |
Q3
20
13 |
Q4
20
14 |
Q1
20
14 |
Q2
20
08
| Q
1
20
08
| Q
2
20
08
| Q
3
20
09
| Q
1
20
09
| Q
2
20
09
| Q
3
20
09
| Q
4 2
01
0 |
Q1
20
10
| Q
2
20
10
| Q
3
20
10
| Q
4
20
11 |
Q1
20
11 |
Q2
20
11 |
Q3
20
11 |
Q4
20
12 |
Q1
20
12 |
Q2
20
12 |
Q3
20
12 |
Q4
20
13 |
Q1
20
13 |
Q2
20
13 |
Q3
20
13 |
Q4
20
14 |
Q1
20
14 |
Q2
4.0
3.9
SaleRental
7.7
4.9
7.2
6.5
3.2
6.4
4.1
6.3
4.4
6.6
7.5 7.6
6.6
6.6 6.7
6.5
7.1
7.1
7.0
7.5
8.4
8.1
7.2
6.1
7.3
8.5
8.5 8.6
9.1
6.8
6.5
6.3
6.1 6
.4
9.9
6.5
9.7
12.3
6.8
6.36.3
6.1
5.8
5.4 5.6 5.
9
6.5
5.3
5.0
6.6
6/7 www.countrywide.co.uk
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW
hile government data shows that around 80% of purchasers using the Help to Buy scheme are first
time buyers, little more is known about their path onto the housing ladder. First time buyers come in many shapes and sizes, and buyers using the Help to Buy scheme are no different. They represent a healthy cross section of those struggling to get onto the housing ladder today.
Countrywide plc data shows the largest group of purchasers has come from the private rented sector. 55% of people who have bought a house using Help to Buy have come from the private rented sector, higher than the average among first time buyers in general. This figure rises to 65% in London where the sector forms a larger proportion of households.The private rented sector is diverse and houses a wide range of people. While the income of the average buyer moving from privately rented accommodation is £41,000, over a third of renter house-holds earn less than £30,000. There has been a particular bias towards lower income renters in London and the South East where 40% of those renters using the scheme earn under £30,000.
Those living with family (30%) form the other central part of demand. These are households unable to access the private rented sector due to the cost of rent, or are unwilling to do so due to a desire to save more quickly for a deposit. As a consequence, they tend to be younger than average, earning 16% less than those living in the private rented sector. Half of these are single person house-holds, which might be expected given their early life stage, but means housing costs take up a larger proportion of their income. In the majority of cases these
W
Who’s using Help to Buy?
Q2 2014
choose from. Before the start of the Help to Buy Mortgage Guarantee scheme there were around 50 95% loan-to-value mort-gage products, compared to 200 today. Just over half are backed by the scheme, with a growing number of mortgages of-fered independently – a sign that lenders can operate effectively in a post Help to Buy market. Given the qualifying criteria of the scheme - a 5% deposit - the lend-ing profiles are similar. The difference in interest rates offered by lenders using the two parts of the scheme is reflective of the lending profile of the two schemes and the risk perceived by lenders. While buyers using the Equity Loan element in effect have a 25% deposit, under the terms of the Mortgage Guarantee lenders pay the government 0.9% of the loan amount to guarantee the mortgage for 7 years, the cost to borrowers therefore is higher.
With similar lending profiles, any change in interest rates will have a similar effect on the mortgage repayments of the majority of people buying through the scheme (65% of buyers using each part of the scheme borrow at a rate within a 0.5% range). The average household using the Help to Buy scheme spends 29% of their take home pay on mort-gage repayments - those using the Mortgage Guarantee are paying a slightly higher proportion despite higher aver-age incomes. By way of comparison, the average first time buyer purchasing inde-pendently of the scheme in 2014 spends a quarter of their take home income on mortgage payments. With only a 5% de-posit, the mortgage repayments of those using the Help to Buy Mortgage Guar-antee scheme are clearly higher than those able to put down a larger deposit, meaning a higher income is needed to make repayments affordable.
With the Bank of England hinting inter-est rates will rise as the recovery takes hold, the impact will be felt by millions of mortgage holders. While 95% of Help to Buy backed mortgages are on a fixed rate for two years or longer, the impact of a rate rise will eventually be felt. A 2.5% rate rise would see the average house-hold spend 36% of their take home pay on repayments, up from 29% – but still
Help to Buy is enabling a growing number of households to realise their aspirations of homeownership
are new households which were wait-ing to form – saving for a deposit while paying reduced or no rent.
While the use of the scheme by existing homeowners is perhaps less politically acceptable, the scheme has provided a lifeline to many homeowners in parts of Northern England where falling house prices have eroded the equity held by many homeowners. For first time buyers in parts of Northern England who bought in 2006 or 2007, Help to Buy has helped households move after negative equity has prevented many from moving. In the North East almost 30% of homes bought through the scheme have been pur-chased by existing home owners.
Households using the Help to Buy scheme have enjoyed an increasing number of high loan to value mortgage products to
Average proportion of take home pay spent on mortgage repayments
well within what is deemed affordable by lenders. With most lenders introducing the stress tests required by the Mortgage Market Review prior to its formal intro-duction, the majority of borrowers using the Help to Buy scheme have already proved they are able to comfortably afford a rise in interest rates.
Fears that the Help to Buy scheme would allow households to borrow money which they couldn’t repay to buy houses they couldn’t afford have been waylaid. Mortgage repayments remain no less affordable than to the average first time buyer and new owners look well placed to ride out any rise in interest rates. Buyers have almost exclusively come from groups which are beginning to receive considerable political atten-tion given their rapid growth, as rates of home ownership among the young have gone into reverse.
With a General Election looming, Help to Buy seems likely to feature prominent-ly on the political agenda. While there has been criticism of the scheme from a number of political commentators, among aspiring homeowners which form an increasingly large sector of the elec-torate, Help to Buy remains a remarkably popular policy.
EQUITY LOAN
MORTGAGE GUARANTEE
Source: Countrywide plc 2014
Given that the scheme is funded by the Government, it is important that those using it would otherwise find it difficult to buy unassisted. So far this has been the case, with the majority of purchasers coming from the private rented sector or the parental home with below average incomes
At current rates
2.5% rise in interest rates
28%
30%
34%
37%
Lending profile of the Help to Buy Schemes
Help to Buy Mortgage Guarantee
Source: Countrywide plc 2014
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
2.8
%
2.9
%
3.0
%
3.1
%
3.2
%
3.3
%
3.4
%
3.5
%
3.6
%
3.7
%
3.8
%3
.9%
4.0
%4
.1%
4.2
%
4.3
%
4.5
%
4.7
%
4.4
%
4.6
%
4.8
%
4.9
%
5.0
%
5.1
%
5.2
%
5.3
%
5.7
%
5.6
%
5.4
%
5.5
%
AVERAGE APR
3.3%AVERAGE
APR
5.2%
Profile of those using the Help to Buy scheme
Source: Countrywide plc 2014
Tenant
Living with familyCurrent owner
55%Tenants
Average household income: £41,000
Older households (40+): 18%
Low income households (<£30k): 33%
30%Living With Family
Average household income: £35,500
Older households (40+): 4%
Low income households (<£30k): 51%
15%Current owner
Average household income: £50,000
Older households (40+): 13%
Low income households (<£30k): 12%
Help to Buy Equity Loan
8/9 www.countrywide.co.uk
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
All you need to know about the housing market in five simple charts
The five slide story of the market
With stock at a premium, the number of newly registered buyers gives an indication of changes in demand. In Q2 2014 the number of registered buyers was 34% higher in comparison to Q2 2013 - the largest jump in six years. There are signs however that this surge in demand is gently beginning to cool. Between June 2013 and June 2014 the number of buyers registering rose 26%, which while a considerable rise, it does represent a slowdown in the rate of growth.
In 2013, price rises in London were driven by a shortage of available stock. However there are strong signs that this is beginning to change in 2014. Outside London, the first half of 2014 has seen levels of supply remain tight.
1
2
Growth in registering buyers
Year on year change in number of properties on the market
The number of viewings taken to agree a sale is highly seasonal. The first few months of the year are traditionally associated with new buyers entering the market. New, would-be buyers tend to view a larger number of properties before purchasing. With fewer properties on the market alongside a growing number of buyers, a fall in the number of viewings required to agree a sale represents evidence of buyers increasingly willing to compromise.
The rise in the proportion of asking price achieved is an indicator of future market sentiment rather than one of market strength. Over the last 12 months, the difference between asking and achieved price narrowed by 1.1% to 98.6%. In a rising market sellers will generally raise asking prices. If buyers are willing to meet these prices, the differential between asking and achieved price will narrow. If however, asking prices rise faster than what buyers are willing to pay, the proportion of asking price achieved will begin to fall.
5
4
Market Appraisals
Viewings to agree a sale
Percentage of asking price achieved
While the number of properties available for sale across much of London and the South East remains down year on year, there are signs that this is changing.
Rising house prices are driving a raft of new sellers onto the market.Countrywide plc carried out 24% more market appraisals in June 2014 in comparison to June 2013.
3
Jan
| 12
Feb
| 12
Mar
| 12
Apr
| 12
May
| 12
Jun
| 12
Jul |
12
Aug
| 12
Sep
| 12
Oct
| 12
Nov
| 12
Dec
| 12
Jan
| 13
Feb
| 13
Mar
| 13
Apr
| 13
May
| 13
Jun
| 13
Jul |
13
Aug
| 13
Sep
| 13
Oct
| 13
Nov
| 13
Dec
| 13
Jan
| 14
Feb
| 14
Mar
| 14
Apr
| 14
May
| 14
Jun
| 14
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
-15%
-20%
-25%
LONDON
SOUTH
MIDLANDS
NORTH
Q2
20
14 -
Q2
20
13JU
NE
20
14 -
JU
NE
20
13
92
%
93
%
94
%
95
%
96
%
97%
98
%
99
%
10
0%
10
1%
10
2%
10
3%
2013
2014
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
North West
South EastLondonEast
Midlands
38%26%
East of England
44%23%
South West
40%40%
West Midlands
66%56%
25%13%
North East
20%13%
Yorkshire & Humber
12%2%
Scotland
21%14%
Wales
26%25%
25%27%
30%27%
2014 Market Appraisals
- Smith Street, London
- Ashley Avenue, Oxford
- Times Terrace, Leeds
- Portland Place, Sheffield
- Curzon Corner, Newcastle
- Merville Mansions, Chester
- Limes Lane, Cambridge
- Clive’s Close, Liverpool
2013 Market Appraisals
Jan
| 11
Fe
b | 1
1
Mar
| 11
A
pr |
11
May
| 11
Ju
n | 1
1
Jul |
11
A
ug |
11
Sep
| 11
O
ct |
11
Nov
| 11
D
ec |
11
Jan
| 12
Fe
b | 1
2
Mar
| 12
A
pr |
12
May
| 12
Ju
n | 1
2
Jul |
12
A
ug |
12
Sep
| 12
O
ct |
12
Nov
| 12
D
ec |
12
Jan
| 13
Fe
b | 1
3
Mar
| 13
A
pr |
13
May
| 13
Ju
n | 1
3
Jul |
13
A
ug |
13
Sep
| 13
O
ct |
13
Nov
| 13
D
ec |
13
Jan
| 14
Fe
b | 1
4
Mar
| 14
A
pr |
14
May
| 14
Ju
n | 1
4
A
BC
New buyers traditionally start looking for a home in the spring, viewing multiple properties.
Sales made at the end of the year tend to be concluded with fewer viewings. Fewer first time buyers and sellers are in the marketplace.
Early 2014 saw almost no seasonal slowdown, with the number of viewings per sale falling to a record low.
A
B
C
20
15
0
10
5
So
urc
e:
Co
untr
ywid
e p
lc 2
014
So
urc
e:
Co
untr
ywid
e p
lc 2
014
% o
f sa
les
So
urc
e:
Co
untr
ywid
e p
lc 2
014
So
urc
e:
Co
untr
ywid
e p
lc 2
014
10/11 www.countrywide.co.uk
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
House building has rarely been higher on the political agenda and it seems likely that the 2015 election will become a num-bers game – with the three main parties all pledging to increase the number of homes built. While targets tend to be based on the number of homes built domestically, analysis of house building rates across Eu-rope shows that house building in the UK has long lagged our European neighbours.
Both pre and post recession, the UK has consistently been building amongst the fewest homes in Europe taking into account population size and growth. Per head of population, and taking into account rates of growth, the UK builds the 3rd fewest new homes – 1 for every 2.5 new people. The recession, while reducing the number of homes built, hasn’t changed the UK’s rela-tive position in Europe, with house building falling by similar rates elsewhere. Only Switzerland and Luxembourg, with smaller populations and the highest average house prices in Europe, build less. While levels of
A decade of house building in Europe
portion of homes required for future years. In 2007 Spain alone built more houses than the UK, Germany, Greece, Belgium, Portugal, Sweden and Denmark combined.
Pre-crash levels of house building have been used by governments as a bench-mark of the number of homes that should or could be built in the UK. The downturn in construction however should not disguise the fact that the UK has failed to build the required number of homes over an extended period of time. In reality, many European countries have been better at building more homes over much longer periods. A lack of house building has meant that the UK was among the least well prepared countries to deal with any fall in house building. In 2008, house building fell by around 30% in the UK, exactly in line with the fall across Europe. The difference between the UK and much of Europe is that while Europe was busy building houses during the late 1990s and early 2000s, in the
past 20 years the UK has never built large numbers of homes. While compar-isons are frequently made to the 1930s and 1960s when the UK was building 250,000+ homes annually, the reality is that Britain has changed significantly over the following 50 years. If the government is serious about delivering the number of homes the UK needs, it should look to our European neighbours rather than to the 1960s for ways of doing it.
The UK needs to look to Europe rather than the past to increase house building
house building are the product of national economies, countries can be grouped by their ability to build new homes. Much of Northern Europe is characterised by low but stable levels of delivery, alongside moderate population growth, a group which the UK falls into. Central and East-ern Europe have seen medium to high levels of new development which has consistently delivered large numbers of new homes over the past decade. France, with a similar population to the UK, built an average of 375,000 homes annual-ly over the past 10 years. While house building may have fallen by a similar rate to the UK, the French are still delivering 300,000+ homes a year. Finally, levels of house building in Southern Europe have proved extremely volatile. Large numbers of new houses built pre-2007 have given way to very low levels of house building post crunch as falling house prices made development unviable. Each year between 2003 and 2007 Spain built more than 500,000 homes, equating to a a high pro-
Average number of homes built annually (2004 - 2013)
Population growth per home built (2004 – 2013)The number of homes built in the UK in 2013
Population:
Population:
139,950
146,122The number of homes built in Poland in 2013
Source: ONS and Central Statistical Office Poland 2014
Source: Countrywide plc 2014, European Government data 2014
Source: Various European statistical agencies 2014
Increase in completions
-20% to 0%
-40% to -20%
More than -40%
CHANGE IN COMPLETIONS (07-13)
2,000
45,000
25,000
21,000
36,000
70,000
3,000
27,000
29,000
4,000
6,000
7,000
33,000
5,000
18,000
179,000
30,000
2,0002,000
5,0002000
11,0003,000
28,000
16,00033,000
15,000
51,000
143,000
50,000
47,000
204,000
376,000
421,000
180,000
BY NUMBERS
VOLATILE DELIVERY - SPAIN
At its peak in 2006 almost 20% of Spanish GDP growth came from the construction industry, more than twice the amount in the UK. 1 in 8 of the working population was directly employed in construction. The Spanish planning system, unlike the UK system, is based on the principle of zoning. This gives developers a high level of certainty when buying land. Developers knew if schemes conformed to certain size, height and space standards, planning permis-sion would almost certainly be granted.
HIGH DELIVERY – FRANCE
The French planning system is based on the PLU, a form of development plan. It sets out the sort of development required and where it should happen. The PLU covers an area of around 1,550 people – the smallest plan area in Europe. In comparison, the lowest level of planning in the UK is at Local Authority level which covers an average of 122,000 people. Given the plan covers just 1,550 peo-ple, development plots tend to be small and therefore more suitable for smaller developers and individuals. Latest data from the French government shows that around 40% of houses built in the last 12 months were built by individuals, around eight times the UK average.
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
SW
ITZ
ERLA
ND
LUX
EMB
OU
RG
UK
GEO
RG
IA
SWED
EN
NO
RW
AY
BEL
GIU
M
SLO
VEN
IA
ICEL
AN
D
IREL
AN
D
MA
CED
ON
IA
ITA
LY
SPA
IN
DEN
MA
RK
CZ
ECH
REP
UB
LIC
FRA
NC
E
FIN
LAN
D
NET
HER
LAN
DS
AU
STR
IA
PORT
UG
AL
POLA
ND
SLO
VAK
IA
BO
SNIA
- H
ERZ
EGO
VIN
A
MO
NTE
NEG
RO
BEL
AR
US
HU
NG
AR
Y
GR
EEC
E
GER
MA
NY
MO
LDO
VA
ESTO
NIA
CR
OA
TIA
BU
GLA
RIA
RO
MA
NIA
LATV
IA
LITH
UA
NIA
SER
BIA
ALB
AN
IA
3.0
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
-0.8
-0.8
-0.9
-1.0
-1.0
-1.3
-1.7
-2.7
-2.7
-3.7
-3.9
-5.0
-5.9
4.0
Over the last decade the UK has built one home for each 2.5 new people…
…while France has built a home for every 0.9 new people.
New
peo
ple
per
ho
use
(20
04
-13
)
Falling populations
64m
39m
www.countrywide.co.uk
Q1 2013
The decision by Lloyds Banking Group and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to impose a maximum household loan to income (LTI) multiple of four to lending over £500,000, came just weeks before George Osborne legislated to allow the Bank of England to “direct” to lenders how much people taking out larger loans are able to borrow. While highly geared lending might seem safer than it was now that the economy is picking up speed, the fact that the economy is recov-ering means that the point at which interest rates begin to rise moves closer. It is the most highly geared borrowers who are most vulnerable to rising rates, so a decision to limit lending to this sector seems prudent.
The £500,000 limit set by Lloyds and RBS means that it’s really only highly geared lending in London that is choked off. A loan to income ratio of four at £500,000 implies a household income of £125,000 which is about 44 per cent higher than the combined mean gross average earnings of a male and female working full time in London. So the policy is less restrictive than it seems and will hit only those at the higher end of the price distribution.
Lloyds and RBS have a large market share, so the policy undoubtedly sends a cau-tionary message to the market as a whole. New legislation from the Chancellor doesn’t necessarily mean much will change. The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Commit-tee already has powers to recommend such limits, but it does undoubtedly send out a strong signal.
Lenders are already aware of the risks associated with deteriorating affordability and the increased vulnerability of highly geared borrowers. The number of mort-gage applications failing lenders’ tests has already been increasing according to the Bank of England’s credit conditions survey. In the first quarter of 2014, a much bigger proportion of lenders reported a reduction in the numbers of mortgage applications being approved than they expected just three months earlier. Looking ahead, one quarter of lenders expect that there will be a fall in the numbers of approved applications showing that there is a clear expectation that affordability terms and conditions are biting much harder.
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
Banks tighten lending criteria
A number of major lenders have introduced a maximum loan to income ratio for mortgages over £500,000 – but will its impact be felt?
12/13
Credit condition changes
Proportion of transactions affected by a £500,000 lending cap
£87kAverage earnings of a male and female couple working full time in London
NORTH EASTAverage house price: £99,313Affordability limit: £302,211Affected transactions: 5%
NORTH WESTAverage house price: £109,042Affordability limit: £305,336Affected transactions: 7%
YORKSHIRE & HUMBERAverage house price: £116,993Affordability limit: £295,225Affected transactions: 7%
WALESAverage house price: £113,275Affordability limit: £291,190Affected transactions: 6%
WEST MIDLANDSAverage house price: £113,532Affordability limit: £306,681Affected transactions: 9%
SOUTH EASTAverage house price: £221,189Affordability limit: £405,989Affected transactions: 16%
SOUTH WESTAverage house price: £179,066Affordability limit: £306,307Affected transactions: 17%
EAST MIDLANDSAverage house price: £127,384Affordability limit: £299,397Affected transactions: 8%
EAST OF ENGLANDAverage house price: £184,980Affordability limit: £366,054Affected transactions: 15%
LONDONAverage house price: £414,490Affordability limit: £430,679Affected transactions: 35%
10%
0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
More Than 20%
15% - 20%
10% - 15%
7% - 10%
Less Than 7%
Source: Bank of England 2014
A
A
B
E
C
B
D
F
H
C
ID
J
E
G
F
I
G
H
J
Q1 2014
Next 3 Months
-12
%
-25
%
19
%
-40
%
-10
%6
%
Ap
pro
ved
ap
plic
atio
ns
Cre
dit
sco
rin
g
Qu
alit
y o
fap
plic
atio
ns
Greater LondonHAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
Average house price: £696,344Affordability limit: £549,728Affected transactions: 59%
CAMDENAverage house price: £735,454Affordability limit: £545,840Affected transactions: 62%
BRENTAverage house price: £374,643Affordability limit: £353,152Affected transactions: 61%
WESTMINSTERAverage house price: £908,786Affordability limit: £793,963Affected transactions: 53%
KENSINGTON & CHELSEAAverage house price: £1,269,897Affordability limit: £824,412Affected transactions: 54%
K
L
M
N
P
Source: Hamptons International and Countrywide plc 2014
K
P
N
LM
More Than 50%
40% - 50%
30% - 40%
20% - 30%
Less Than 20%
The £500k Loan to Income cap imposed by Lloyds and RBS will effectively only choke off highly geared lending in London, but existing affordability constraints are already beginning to bite
FIONNUALA EARLEY DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL
*based on local earnings
COUNTRYWIDE QUARTERLY MARKET REVIEW Q2 2014
The term ‘renty somethings’ was coined to describe the growing number of young peo-ple in their 20s and increasingly 30s who are living for longer in the private rented sector. With a growing private rented sector, over half of the population now live in rental accommodation in the centre of most larger cities. At the same time however, research has consistently shown the appetite for homeownership remains strong amongst the young. While for many renting is a ques-tion of flexibility, for others it is a question of finances. The result has been first time buyers showing increasing willingness to compromise to get onto the housing ladder, a trend which has benefited some of the UK’s more deprived inner city areas.
The private rented sector has long allowed tenants, particularly in more expensive areas of the country, to live in areas where they otherwise might not be able to afford to buy. Typically this is in a central location, close to the centre of a city and their place of work. For those looking to buy a home for the first time however, a degree of compromise has always been required.
As house prices have risen, first time buyers have shown an increasing willingness to buy in cheaper areas in order to get onto the housing ladder. Analysis by Countrywide plc shows that in the first half of 2014, the average first time buyer in the UK bought a home in an area which is 10% cheaper than where they were living previously. Rising house prices over the last 12 months mean that this figure is up from 6% on 2012.
The effect has been most pronounced in the most expensive areas of the country where the cost of renting relative to buying is lowest. Taking London as a whole, the av-erage first time buyer chooses to live in an area 16% cheaper than where they rented. This figure is up from 10% in 2012 as rising house prices have outstripped rents. In the most expensive parts of London, the South East and Edinburgh, first time buyers typi-cally live in areas up to 50% cheaper than where they previously rented.
The impact of this in London, and other cities with growing populations, has been to push first time buyers outwards into more peripheral areas where house prices tend to be lower. While in London, out-
The art of compromiseRising house prices are increasingly driving buyers to cheaper areas
www.countrywide.co.uk14/15
Difference in price between areas where first time buyers bought and rented previously
Origin of first time buyers
Number of renters moving into homeownership
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
19
99
/00
20
00
/01
20
01/0
2
20
02
/03
20
03
/04
20
04
/05
20
05
/06
20
06
/07
20
07/0
8
20
08
/09
20
09
/10
201
0/1
1
201
1/1
2
201
2/1
3
Source: English Housing Survey 2013, 2000 - 2013
er boroughs have a larger proportion of first time buyers purchasing in the same borough in which they rented, the last 12 months has seen this proportion fall across London. Eight or nine years ago Hackney, in East London, began to attract buyers priced out of more central areas. A com-bination of Victorian housing stock, lower house prices, new transport infrastructure and a reversal of the 1960s trend of leav-ing the inner city for suburbia, has meant house prices have soared. The speed of change is remarkable: Land Registry data shows that house prices in Hackney have risen 108% over the last 10 years while prices across the capital grew 57%.
Hackney’s housing market is now closely intertwined with that of the rest of London’s in contrast to that of poorer Boroughs fur-ther east such as Barking and Dagenham. 57% of first time buyers in Hackney came from Central or West London in the last 12 months, the largest proportion in any East London Borough. This influx of new buyers from across London has meant Hackney has changed significantly in the last 10 years. In 2004, government data showed that Hackney was the single most deprived Local Authority in England and Wales. While the indices of deprivation won’t be updated until 2015, Hackney will almost certainly have relinquished ‘top’ spot.
Hackney is however just one example of an area which has become the destination of choice for buyers priced out of central, more expensive locations. The repopulation of the inner city since the 1980s has been led by first time buyers and young profes-sionals who were attracted by the low cost of housing.
From Hove near Brighton to Didsbury in Manchester, our inner cities have changed significantly over the last 30 years. As a result people choosing to move to inner city areas today are increasingly doing so for reasons of lifestyle rather than cost. House prices in many inner city areas are now higher than in their suburban coun-terparts, having over taken them during the mid-2000s. While the desire for inner city living remains strong, rising prices may once again force first time buyers to begin looking elsewhere for cheaper options.
The repopulation of the inner city since the 1980s has been led by first time buyers and young professionals who were attracted by the low cost of housing.
HARROW
34%
19%
15%
81%
85%
66%
EALING
HACKNEY
Proportion who previously lived in the Borough
BARKING AND DAGENHAM
GREENWICH
17% 83% 24% 76% 4% 96%
CROYDON
London
Outside London
-3% to 0%
-6% to -3%
-9% to -6%
Less than -9%
More Than 50%
45% - 50%
40% - 45%
35% - 40%
Less Than 35%
The 2007 downturn had the effect of restricting
the availability of mortgage finance
The number moving from the rented sector into
home ownership has recovered faster than
transactions overall
Source: Countrywide plc 2014
Countrywide House
88-103 Caldecotte Lake Drive
Caldecotte
Milton Keynes
Buckinghamshire
MK7 8JT
Tel 01908 961000
Conveyancing
Lee House
Great Bridgewater Street
Manchester
M1 5RR
Tel 0161 200 8200
Fax 0161 200 8205
Surveying
2 Boundary Court
Willow Farm Business Park
Castle Donington
Derby
DE74 2UD
Tel 01332 813002
Corporate Property Services
Tamar House
The Bridges
Brants Bridge
Bracknell
Berkshire
RG12 9BG
Tel 01344 389 500
Corporate/Emergency/
Commercial/Social Relocation
Thamesgate House
33 Victoria Avenue
Southend on Sea
Essex
SS2 6DF
Tel 01702 236403
Fax 01702 437119
Estate Management -
Leasehold, Commercial,
LPA, Residential Lettings
4th Floor
Thamesgate house
33-41 Victoria Avenue
Southend on Sea
SS2 6DF
Tel 01702 221000
Fax 01702 434145
Lettings
Countrywide House
Sherwood Court
Lake View Drive
Annesley
Nottingham
NG15 0DT
Tel 01623 721222
Property Auctions
80 - 86 New London Road
Chelmsford
Essex
CM2 0PD
Tel 01245 344133
Registered Office
17 Duke Street
Chelmsford
Essex
CM1 1HP
Tel 01245 294000
Fax 01245 294028
For more information please contact:
Corporate Client Enquiries - 0207 9081562 [email protected]
www.countrywide.co.uk/insight