Austin Public and Private School Information 2013

Austin ISD

Florence ISD

Liberty Hill ISD Georgetown ISD

Jarrell ISD

Granger ISD

Hutto ISD Taylor ISD

Thrall ISD

CouplandISD

Elgin ISDManor ISD

Pflugerville ISD

Round Rock ISDLeander ISD

LagoVistaISD

Lake Travis ISD

Del Valle ISD

McDade ISD

Bastrop ISD

Smithville ISD

Lockhart ISD

San Marcos CISD

Hays CISD

Dripping Springs ISD

Wimberley ISD

Eanes ISD

School District Snapshots 2012Total Students Attendance Rate SAT Mean Total ACT Mean Total Student/Teacher Ratio Revenue Per Pupil

Austin 86,124 94.9 1014 21.2 15 11,389

Bastrop 9,082 95.1 942 19.4 15.7 10,530

Del Valle 11,120 95.8 876 18.6 15.4 10,835

Dripping Springs 4,571 96.6 1142 25.5 16.4 11,215

Eanes 7,776 96.6 1214 27 14.3 11,555

Elgin 4,062 95.1 941 19 16.5 9,906

Florence 992 95.9 981 20.9 13.8 11,108

Georgetown 10,337 95.8 1042 21.8 13.2 10,622

Hays 15,868 95.8 952 20.3 15.8 10,233

Hutto 5,642 96.5 954 20.9 17 7,441

Jarrell 1,005 96.3 1046 24.5 12.9 14,874

Lago Vista 1,328 96.3 1026 21.1 14.4 11,681

Lake Travis 7,361 96 1117 24.3 15.5 11,483

Leander 33,179 95.9 1070 23.7 15.4 8,168

Liberty Hill 2,746 96.6 1058 23.6 14.8 9,595

Manor 7,685 95.4 847 16.6 16.5 11,143

Pflugerville 22,987 95.6 989 20.6 15.3 9,615

Round Rock 44,862 95.9 1091 24 14.9 10,239

San Marcos 7,461 95.2 923 18.4 14 11,064

Smithville 1,722 95.8 1000 21 14 9,506

Taylor 3,101 96.4 955 19.7 14.6 11,541

Wimberley 2,015 96.2 1083 23.2 14.2 10,528

TThhee TTeexxaass EEdduuccaattiioonn AAggeennccyy ccoolllleeccttss mmaappss aanndd lleeggaallddeessccrriippttiioonnss ooff sscchhooooll ddiissttrriicctt bboouunnddaarriieess uunnddeerr SSeeccttiioonn 1133..001100 ooff tthhee TTeexxaass EEdduuccaattiioonn CCooddee..

SSeevveerraall yyeeaarrss aaggoo,, tthhee TTEEAA wwoorrkkeedd wwiitthh tthhee TTeexxaass LLeeggiissllaattiivvee CCoouunncciill ttoo ddiiggiittiizzee sscchhooooll ddiissttrriicctt bboouunnddaarriieess.. TThhee aaggeenncciieess uusseedd tthhee iinnffoorrmmaattiioonn pprroovviiddeedd bbyy sscchhooooll ddiissttrriiccttss iinn ccoonnjjuunnccttiioonn wwiitthhccoouunnttyy--lleevveell DDeeppaarrttmmeenntt ooff TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn ((TTxxDDOOTT))mmaappss ttoo ttrraannssffeerr tthhee bboouunnddaarriieess ffrroomm ppaappeerr ttoo ccoommppuutteerr..

GGeeooggrraapphhiicc ddaattaa ffoorr sscchhoooollss wwaass ccrreeaatteedd bbyy tthhee IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn TTeecchhnnoollooggyy DDiivviissiioonn ttoo eennhhaanncceeTTEEAA mmaappppiinngg aapppplliiccaattiioonnss aanndd ffoorr ggeenneerraall iinnffoorrmmaattiioonn ppuurrppoosseess.. TThhee ssoouurrccee ooff tthhee ddaattaa iiss tthhee TTeexxaass EEdduuccaattiioonn DDiirreeccttoorryy mmaaiinnttaaiinneedd bbyy TTEEAA..

School District Boundary Locator

History of the Accountability System SSttaattee aaccccoouunnttaabbiilliittyyIn 1993, the Texas Legislature enacted statutes that mandated the creation of the Texas public school accountability system to rate schooldistricts and evaluate campuses. A viable and effective accountability system was achievable in Texas because the state already had thenecessary infrastructure in place: a pre-existing student-level data collection system; a state-mandated curriculum; and a statewideassessment tied to the curriculum.

The system initiated with the 1993 legislative session remained in place through the 2001-02 school year. The ratings issued in 2002 werethe last under that system. Beginning in 2003, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) was administered. This assessmentincluded more subjects and grades, and was more difficult than the previous statewide assessment. A rating system based on the TAKSwas developed during 2003. Ratings established under the redesigned system were first issued in the fall of 2004. Districts and campuseswere required to meet criteria on up to 25 separate assessment measures and up to 10 dropout and completion measures. The last yearfor accountability ratings based on the TAKS was 2011.

In 2009, the Texas Legislature passed House Bill (HB) 3 mandating the creation of an entirely new accountability system focused on theachievement of postsecondary readiness for all Texas public school students. Texas Education Agency (TEA) has worked closely with publicschool personnel and others to develop an integrated accountability system based on the following goals and guiding principles.

GGooaallSStteexxaass wwiillll bbee aammoonngg tthhee ttoopp tteenn ssttaatteess iinn ppoossttsseeccoonnddaarryy rreeaaddiinneessss bbyy 22002200,, bbyy:: • improving student achievement at all levels in the core subjects of the state curriculum, • ensuring the progress of all students toward achieving advanced academic performance, • closing advanced academic performance level gaps among groups,• closing gaps among groups in the percentage of students graduating under the Recommended High School Program and Distinguishedachievement (advanced) High School Program• Rewarding excellence based on other indicators in addition to state assessment results.

In 2012, no state accountability ratings were issued while the Texas Education Agency (TEA) worked with advisory committees todevelop a new rating system based on the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) and a new distinction designationssystem. This new accountability system allows for a large number of measures without the rating being dependent on a single measure.The 2012-13 school year marks the first year of ratings using STAAR results and distinction designations.

22001133 ttRRaannSSiittiioonn yyeeaaRRThe 2013 ratings criteria and targets have been designed to apply to 2013 only because the performance index framework cannot be fullyimplemented in 2013. Advisory committees will convene in fall 2013 to finalize recommendations for accountability ratings criteria for 2014and beyond and targets for 2014 through 2016. In addition, the 2013 assessment results will be used to finalize the State of TexasAssessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) 1 English Language Learner (ELL) Progress Measure.

22001133 RRaattiinnGG llaabbeellSSTo meet state statutory requirements, the accountability system must identify acceptable and unacceptable campuses and districts.Districts and campuses will be assigned the following rating labels based on the performance index accountability system.

IImmpprroovveemmeenntt RReeqquuiirreedd.. Denotes that a district or campus did not meet one or more performance index targets.

NNoott RRaatteedd:: DDaattaa IInntteeggrriittyy IIssssuueess. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated because the accuracy and/or integrity of performanceresults are compromised, and it is not possible to assign a rating label based on the evaluation of performance. This label may be assignedpermanently or temporarily pending an on-site investigation.

This chart outlines the accountability ratings and distinctiondesignations that will be assigned in 2013.

2013 Ratings Criteria

NNoott RRaatteedd.. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated for one of the following reasons: • the district or campus does not have students enrolled in grades higher than Early Education (EE), • the district or campus has no data in the accountability subset, • the district or campus has insufficient data to rate through Small Numbers Analysis, • the campus is a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP), • the campus is a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP), • the campus is a residential facility, • the district operates only residential facilities, or • unusual circumstances (campus test answer documents lost in shipping).

NNoott RRaatteedd:: DDaattaa IInntteeggrriittyy IIssssuueess. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated because the accuracy and/or integrity of performanceresults are compromised, and it is not possible to assign a rating label based on the evaluation of performance. This label may beassigned permanently or temporarily pending an on-site investigation.

2013 RATINGS CRITERIATo receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, all campuses and districts must meet the following accountability targets onall indexes for which they have performance data in 2013.

22001133 iinnddeexx ttaarrggeettssEach of the four indexes will have a score of 0 to 100 representing campus/district performance points as a percent of the maximumpossible points for that campus/district. The performance targets that are set for each index will be used to assign accountability ratinglabels.

DDIISSTTIINNCCTTIIOONN DDEESSIIGGNNAATTIIOONNSSCampuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for distinction designations. Campus distinction designations willbe based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group of campuses. The following campus distinction designations will be awarded in 2013:

ttoopp 2255%% SSttuuddeenntt PPrrooggrreessssaaccaaddeemmiicc aacchhiieevveemmeenntt iinn RReeaaddiinngg//eenngglliisshh llaanngguuaaggee aarrttssaaccaaddeemmiicc aacchhiieevveemmeenntt iinn MMaatthheemmaattiiccss

SSYYSSTTEEMM SSAAFFEEGGUUAARRDDSSWith a performance index framework, poor performance in one subject or one student group does not necessarily result in an ImprovementRequired accountability rating. However, disaggregated performance will be reported and districts and campuses are responsible foraddressing performance for each subject and each student group. The disaggregated performance results will serve as the basis of safeguardsfor the accountability rating system to ensure that poor performance in one area or one student group is not masked in the performance index.The intent of the safeguards system is to also meet additional federal accountability requirements that are not met in the performance index.See Chapter 9 – Responsibilities and Consequences for more detailed information about the system safeguards that will be evaluated in 2013.

Targets for non-AEAcampuses correspond toabout the fifth percentileof non-AEA campus

performance by campustype. Targets for non-AEAdistricts correspond toabout the fifth percentileof non-AEA campusperformance across all

campus types.

** Targets for AEA campuses will be set atabout the fifth percentile

of AEA campus performance and will beapplied to both AEA

campuses and charters.

Austin ISD Bastrop ISD Del Valle ISD

Dripping Springs ISD Eanes ISD Elgin ISD Florence ISD

Georgetown ISD Hays CISD Hutto ISD Jarrell ISD

Lago Vista ISD Lake Travis ISD Leander ISD Liberty Hill ISD

Manor ISD Pflugerville ISD Round Rock ISD San Marcos ISD

Smithville ISD Taylor ISD Wimberley ISD

Region 13

Frequently Asked Questions

22001133 LLEEGGIISSLLAATTIIVVEE SSEESSSSIIOONN

Q: How will House Bill 5 (HB 5) affect the new state accountabilitysystem?

A: HB 5 does not affect the new state accountability ratings that willbe assigned for the first time to all districts and campuses on August8, 2013. As described in the final decisions released by thecommissioner on April 23, 2013, the 2013 state accountability ratingsystem will be based on the State of Texas Assessments of AcademicReadiness® (STAAR) grades 3-8 assessments administered in spring2013 and the STAAR end-of-course assessments administered in sum-mer 2012, fall 2012, and spring 2013. The changes to the number ofEOC assessments required for graduation will affect the state ratingsystem beginning with the 2013-14 school year.

It is not anticipated that the performance index framework of the newrating system will require substantial modifications due to HB 5changes in testing requirements for graduation or the addition of post-secondary readiness indicators. The design of the performance in-dexes allows for the addition and/or deletion of indicators over time.With a performance index each measure contributes points to anindex score. Since overall performance on the index must meet a sin-gle accountability target, changes in the underlying assessment meas-ures in a particular index do not increase the number of targets thatmust be met.

During the development of the new accountability system, it was an-ticipated that the new accountability indicators, such as career andtechnical education indicators, would be incorporated in the ratingsystem when available. The new postsecondary readiness indicatorslisted in Section 39.053 (4)-(6) of HB 5, such as percentages of stu-dents achieving Texas Success Initiative (TSI) benchmarks, can beevaluated with the other indicators that are currently included in Index4: Postsecondary Readiness. Since the performance index frameworkcannot be fully implemented in 2013, accountability advisory groupswill reconvene in fall 2013 to finalize recommendations for accounta-bility ratings criteria for 2014 and beyond and targets for 2014 through2016. At that time, advisory groups will also make recommendationson the options for incorporating the new additional postsecondaryreadiness indicators required by HB 5.

Regarding the accountability rating labels, HB 5 requires that the com-missioner assign performance ratings of A – F to districts and ratingsof exemplary, recognized, acceptable, and unacceptable to campusesbeginning with the 2016-17 school year. In fall 2013, accountability ad-visory groups will make recommendations to the commissioner on theaccountability rating labels that will be assigned in the 2013-14 throughthe 2015-16 school years.

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY

Q: Why did Texas develop a performance index framework for pub-lic school accountability?

A: In the previous state accountability system, campuses and districtswere required to meet criteria on up to 25 separate assessment meas-ures (five subjects times five student groups), plus up to 10 dropoutand high school completion measures in order to achieve the Aca-demically Acceptable rating. Based on House Bill 3 (2009) require-ments, separate indicators under the previous state accountabilityframework may have resulted in up to 100 measures. The performanceindex framework will produce an index score for each of the four per-formance indexes evaluated for each campus and district. Perform-

ance on each index will be evaluated against targets specific to eachindex. With a Performance Index, the resulting rating reflects overallperformance for the campus or district rather than the weakest per-formance of one student group/subject area.

The performance index framework was selected by advisory commit-tees to meet the House Bill 3 (2009) requirements for a more com-prehensive accountability system focused on postsecondary readinessand closing achievement gaps. The new framework allows educatorsand the public to understand how their district or campus is perform-ing on four indexes. The accountability reports that are planned forthe 2013 ratings release will provide an easy-to-understand summaryof each school’s performance on each index, including a graphicalpresentation of each index outcome relative to the accountability target.

Q: With a performance index, how will we ensure that individual stu-dent groups are not ignored?

A: Index 3 is specifically designed to address this concern. In additionto evaluating the economically disadvantaged student group, thisindex will identify the two lowest performing race or ethnicity studentgroups for the district and for each campus based on their prior yearperformance. Index 3 will be the critical index in the overall dis-trict/campus evaluation that ensures that their lowest performing stu-dent groups receive focused interventions.

Also critical to ensuring individual student group performance are theSystem Safeguards. The underlying accountability system safeguardsresults are reported to districts and campuses and addressed throughthe Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS). Along with pos-sible interventions, the system safeguards ensure that poor perform-ance in one area or one student group is not masked in theperformance index.

Additionally, the previous state accountability systems only evaluatedfive student groups (All Students, White, Hispanic, African American,and Economically Disadvantaged). The 2013 system will evaluate theperformance of eleven student groups (All Students, African Ameri-can, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two orMore Races, Students served by Special Education, Economically Dis-advantaged, and English Language Learners) depending on the spe-cific indicator and index.

Q: Do any other states use a performance index for the state ac-countability systems?

A: Yes, a number of states use different variations of performanceindex systems to evaluate their schools. The accountability advisorycommittee members that developed the performance index proposalreviewed the performance index systems that are in place in the fol-lowing states: California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Q: Who helped TEA develop the new state accountability rating system?

A: Between March 2012 and March 2013, two advisory committees, theAccountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) and the Ac-countability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC), met with TEA staffnumerous times to consider the complex technical issues related toaccountability and make recommendations to the commissioner onthe specific features of the system. The accountability developmentmaterials that were reviewed at each meeting by the advisory groupsare available online at the Accountability Development Materials site.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Who helped TEA develop the new state accountability rating system?

A: Between March 2012 and March 2013, two advisory committees, theAccountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) and the Ac-countability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC), met with TEA staffnumerous times to consider the complex technical issues related to ac-countability and make recommendations to the commissioner on thespecific features of the system. The accountability development mate-rials that were reviewed at each meeting by the advisory groups areavailable online at the Accountability Development Materials site.

Q: Who are the members of the APAC and ATAC advisory groups?

A: In addition to educators representing campuses, school districts, andeducation service centers, the members of the AccountabilityPolicy Advisory Committee include legislative representatives,business and community leaders, representatives of higher education,and parents of children attending Texas public schools.

Members of the Accountability Technical Advisory Committee are Texaspublic school educators from districts and education service centerswho have detailed knowledge of the state assessment andaccountability systems.

DISTINCTION DESIGNATIONS

Q: What are Distinction Designations?

A: Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard areeligible for the following distinction designations in 2013.

Top 25% Student ProgressAcademic Achievement in Reading/English language artsAcademic Achievement in Mathematics

Q: Are alternative education campuses eligible for DistinctionDesignations?

A: No. Campuses evaluated under alternative education accountability(AEA) provisions are not eligible for distinction designations, per TexasEducation Code (TEC) §39.201.

Q: What is a comparison group?

A: Campus distinction designations will be based on campus per-formance in relation to a comparison group of campuses. Eachcampus is assigned to a unique comparison group of 40 other publicschools (from anywhere in the state), that closely matches that schoolon the following characteristics: campus type, campus size, percenteconomically disadvantaged students, mobility rates (based on cu-mulative attendance), and percent of students with limited Englishproficiency. The campus comparison groups that will be used for the2013 distinction designations will be posted online in mid-June, 2013.

Q: Will schools and districts be able to earn Gold PerformanceAcknowledgments in 2013?

A: Gold Performance Acknowledgments will no longer be awarded. TECrequires that Distinction Designations be assigned to campuses for out-standing academic achievement.

Q: When will schools receive their distinction designations?

A: Distinction designations will be assigned to eligible campusesconcurrent with the release of the state accountability ratings onAugust 8, 2013.

2013 TARGETS AND RATINGS

Q: How is a rating label determined for 2013?

A: With a performance index, each measure contributes points to anindex score. Each of the four indexes will have a score of 0 to 100representing campus or district performance points as a percent ofthe maximum possible points for that campus or district.

MMeett SSttaannddaarrdd: Assigned to districts and campuses that meetperformance index targets on all indexes for which they haveperformance data in 2013.

MMeett aalltteerrnnaattiivvee SSttaannddaarrdd: Assigned to charter operators and alternativeeducation campuses (AECs) evaluated under alternative educationaccountability (AEA) provisions that meet modified performance indextargets on all indexes for which they have performance data in 2013.

iimmpprroovveemmeenntt RReeqquuiirreedd: Assigned to a district or campus that did notmeet one or more performance index targets in 2013.

Q: Are all districts and campuses rated in 2013, including newcampuses?

A: All public school campuses, including alternative education campuses(AECs) and open-enrollment charter schools are evaluated. Newcampuses and new open-enrollment charter schools are evaluated thefirst year they report fall enrollment.

Q: What if a campus does not have data for an Index?

A: Campuses and districts receive an accountability rating based on allindexes for which they have performance data in 2013. In someinstances, a campus may not have data necessary to calculate an indexscore, due to lack of students or grade-level configurations. For exam-ple, in 2013, most elementary campuses will not have postsecondarydata needed to calculate an Index 4 score. In these situations, the over-all 2013 accountability rating will be calculated using the remaining threeindex scores.

Q: When will schools receive their accountability ratings?

A: All schools and districts will be rated under the new accountabilitysystem in 2013, and will receive those ratings on August 8, 2013.

Q: When will the 2013 Accountability Manual be posted online?

A: Chapters 3 - 9 of the 2013 Accountability Manual are now availableonline. The remaining chapters and each appendix will be postedin mid-June, 2013.

Notifications and Calendar

NOTIFICATION OF RATINGS

AAuugguusstt 11,, 22001133The TEA secure website will be updated to include campus and district data tables that contain accountability data on which ratings willbe calculated. See Chapter 11 – TEASE Accountability for more information.

AAuugguusstt 88,, 22001133Notification of campus and district accountability ratings will occur on August 8, 2013. TEA’s website will be updated to include campusand district data tables and summary reports.

EEaarrllyy NNoovveemmbbeerr,, 22001133When the appeals process is complete, accountability ratings are considered final. Agency web products related to 2013 accountabilityratings will be updated to reflect the outcome of appeals.

22001133

January 8 83rd Regular Session of the Texas Legislature convenes

January STAAR (grades 3-8) results from spring 2012 available with standards

February 11-12 Fifth meeting of the ATAC

March 7 Third meeting of APAC

March Commissioner releases final decisions for 2013 accountability ratings and distinctions

May Key chapters of 2013 Accountability Manual released

May 27 Last day of 83rd Regular Session of the Texas Legislature

Early June Graduation and dropout data available to districts

August 8 District and campuses ratings are released, based on percent proficient indicator. Some distinction

designations are assigned to campuses.

August 8 Ratings may be appealed.

Late September Appeals Panel meets to consider appeals.

October Commissioner determines final ratings; ratings updated.

November Release of 2012-13 Performance Reports.

22001144

February/March Annual meeting of the ATAC and APAC.

March Commissioner releases final decisions for 2014 ratings

May Key chapters of 2014 Accountability Manual released.

Early June Graduation and dropout data available to districts

June 15 Notification reports issued to districts for campuses rated as “unacceptable*” in 2013 that are anticipated

to be rated as “unacceptable*” in 2014.

August 8 Release of district and campus performance ratings based on percent proficient and percent college

ready indicators. Some distinction designations are assigned to districts and campuses.

August 8 Ratings may be appealed.

Late September Appeals Panel meets to consider appeals

Early October Commissioner determines final ratings; ratings updated.

November Release of 2013-14 Performance Reports.

AUSTIN - The Texas Education Agency today released the 2013 state accountability system ratings for more than 1,200 school districts and charters, and morethan 8,500 campuses. The ratings reveal that almost 93 percent of school districts and charters across Texas have achieved the rating of Met Standard.

Districts, campuses and charters receive one of three ratings under the new accountability system: Met Standard; Met Alternative Standard;or Improvement Required. School district ratings (including charter operators) by category in 2013 are as follows:

Under the 2013 state accountability system, campus ratings (including charter campuses) by category and school type are as follows:

For eligible campuses that achieve the rating of Met Standard, distinction designations in the following areas have also been assigned: Top 25 Percent Student Progress; Academic Achievement in Reading/English language arts; and Academic Achievement in Mathematics.

Approximately 3,600 campuses that achieved the Met Standard rating earned some type of distinction. More than 750 campuses earneddistinctionsin all three potential areas. These distinction designations are based on campus performance in relation to a comparison group

of campuses. Distinctions earned (by campus type) in 2013 are as follows:

* Denotes campus received Met Standard rating plus all three possible distinctions under the 2013 state accountability system.

TToo vviieeww tthhee 22001133 ssttaattee aaccccoouunnttaabbiilliittyy rraattiinnggss ffoorr ddiissttrriiccttss,, cchhaarrtteerrss aanndd ccaammppuusseess,, vviissiitt tthhee TTeexxaass EEdduuccaattiioonn AAggeennccyy wweebb ssiittee aatt hhttttpp::////rriitttteerr..tteeaa..ssttaattee..ttxx..uuss//ppeerrffrreeppoorrtt//aaccccoouunntt//22001133//iinnddeexx..hhttmmll..

2013 Accountability Ratings

TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 1DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY

DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE REPORTINGPRELIMINARY 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS

BY DISTRICT NAME

IInnddeexxeess DDiissttiinnccttiioonnssDDiissttrriicctt//CCaammppuuss NNaammee CCaammppuuss ## 22001133 AAccccoouunnttaabbiilliittyy RRaattiinngg 11 22 33 44 RReeaadd EELLAA MMaatthh PPrrooggrreessss

Austin ISD 227901 Met Standard Y Y Y YAUSTIN H S 002 Met Standard Y Y Y YLANIER H S 004 Improvement Required Y Y Y NMCCALLUM H S 005 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YREAGAN H S 006 Met Standard Y Y Y YTRAVIS H S 007 Improvement Required Y Y Y NCROCKETT H S 008 Met Standard Y Y Y YANDERSON H S 009 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YALTERNATIVE LEARNING CTR 012 Not RatedBOWIE H S 013 Met Standard Y Y Y YLBJ HIGH SCHOOL 014 Improvement Required Y N Y NGARZA INDEPENDENCE H S 015 Met Alternative Std Y Y YAKINS H S 017 Met Standard Y Y Y YLASA H S 018 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YEASTSIDE MEMORIAL AT THE JOHNSTON 019 Improvement Required Y Y Y NIDEA ALLAN COLLEGE PREP 024 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YPREMIER H S AT TRAVIS 025 Met Alternative Std Y YPREMIER H S AT LANIER 026 Met Alternative Std Y YTRAVIS COUNTY DAY SCHOOL 027 Improvement Required N NRICHARDS SCH FOR YOUNG WOMEN LEADERS 028 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YINTERNATIONAL H S 029 Not RatedTRAVIS COUNTY JUVENILE DET. 030 Not RatedPHOENIX ACADEMY 032 Not RatedLEADERSHIP ACADEMY 035 Not RatedTRAVIS COUNTY J J A E P 036 Not RatedFULMORE M S 043 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YKEALING M S 044 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YLAMAR M S 045 Met Standard Y Y Y YBURNET M S 046 Met Standard Y Y Y YO HENRY M S 047 Met Standard Y Y Y YPEARCE M S 048 Improvement Required Y N NMARTIN M S 051 Improvement Required Y Y NMURCHISON M S 052 Met Standard Y Y Y YWEBB M S 053 Met Standard Y Y Y YBEDICHEK M S 054 Met Standard Y Y YDOBIE M S 055 Improvement Required Y N YGARCIA MIDDLE 056 Improvement Required N Y NCOVINGTON M S 057 Met Standard Y Y Y YMENDEZ M S 058 Met Standard Y Y Y YBAILEY M S 059 Met Standard Y Y YSMALL M S 060 Met Standard Y Y YPAREDES M S 061 Met Standard Y Y Y YGORZYCKI MIDDLE 062 Met Standard Y Y Y YALLISON EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y YANDREWS EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBARTON HILLS EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y YBECKER EL 104 Met Standard Y Y Y YBLACKSHEAR EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YBLANTON EL 106 Met Standard Y Y Y YBRENTWOOD EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBROOKE EL 108 Met Standard Y Y YBROWN EL 109 Met Standard Y Y YBRYKER WOODS EL 110 Met Standard Y Y Y YCAMPBELL EL 111 Met Standard Y Y Y YCASIS EL 112 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YCUNNINGHAM EL 113 Met Standard Y Y YDAWSON EL 114 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YDAEP- EL 115 Not RatedGOVALLE EL 116 Met Standard Y Y YGULLETT EL 117 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YHARRIS EL 118 Met Standard Y Y Y YHIGHLAND PARK EL 119 Met Standard Y Y Y YJOSLIN EL 120 Met Standard Y Y Y YLEE EL 121 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YMAPLEWOOD EL 122 Met Standard Y Y Y

MAPLEWOOD EL 122 Met Standard Y Y YMATHEWS EL 123 Met Standard Y Y Y YMETZ EL 124 Met Standard Y Y YOAK SPRINGS EL 125 Met Standard Y Y YORTEGA EL 126 Met Standard Y Y Y YSANCHEZ EL 127 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YPEASE EL 128 Met Standard Y Y Y YPECAN SPRINGS EL 129 Met Standard Y Y YPLEASANT HILL EL 130 Met Standard Y Y YREAD PRE-K DEMONSTRATION 131 Met StandardREILLY EL 132 Met Standard Y Y YRIDGETOP EL 133 Met Standard Y Y Y YST ELMO EL 136 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YSUMMITT EL 138 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YSIMS EL 139 Met Standard Y Y YTRAVIS HTS EL 140 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YWALNUT CREEK EL 141 Met Standard Y Y YALLAN EL 142 Met StandardPATTON EL 143 Met Standard Y Y YWOOTEN EL 144 Met Standard Y Y YZAVALA EL 145 Met Standard Y Y Y YZILKER EL 146 Met Standard Y Y Y YMENCHACA EL 147 Met Standard Y Y YOAK HILL EL 148 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YBARRINGTON EL 149 Met Standard Y Y YNORMAN EL 150 Met Standard Y Y YPILLOW EL 151 Met Standard Y Y YWOOLDRIDGE EL 152 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YDOSS EL 154 Met Standard Y Y Y YHILL EL 155 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YODOM EL 156 Met Standard Y Y YWINN EL 157 Met Standard Y Y YSUNSET VALLEY EL 158 Met Standard Y Y Y YGRAHAM EL 159 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YLINDER EL 160 Met Standard Y Y YCOOK EL 161 Met Standard Y Y YHOUSTON EL 1 162 Met Standard Y Y YHART EL 163 Met Standard Y Y YPICKLE EL 164 Met Standard Y Y YMCBEE EL 165 Met Standard Y Y YWILLIAMS EL 166 Met Standard Y Y YLANGFORD EL 168 Met Standard Y Y YBOONE EL 170 Met Standard Y Y YPALM EL 171 Met Standard Y Y YKOCUREK EL 172 Met Standard Y Y Y YCASEY EL 173 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YRODRIGUEZ EL 174 Improvement Required Y N YWIDEN EL 175 Met Standard Y Y YGALINDO EL 176 Met Standard Y Y YUPHAUS EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR 177 Met StandardJORDAN EL 178 Met Standard Y Y YDAVIS EL 179 Met Standard Y Y Y YKIKER EL 180 Met Standard Y Y Y YMILLS EL 181 Met Standard Y Y YBARANOFF EL 182 Met Standard Y Y YCOWAN EL 183 Met Standard Y Y Y YCLAYTON EL 184 Met Standard Y Y YBLAZIER EL 185 Met Standard Y Y Y YBALDWIN EL 187 Met Standard Y Y Y YOVERTON EL 189 Met Standard Y Y YPEREZ EL 190 Met Standard Y Y YIDEA ALLAN ACADEMY 191 Met StandardDOBIE PK CENTER 192 Met StandardWEBB PRI CENTER 193 Met StandardAUSTIN ST HOSPITAL 250 Not RatedROSEDALE 251 Improvement Required N Y N



BY DISTRICT NAME


Bastrop ISD 011901 Met Standard Y Y Y YBASTROP H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YCEDAR CREEK H S 002 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YGENESIS H S 022 Met Alternative Std Y Y YGATEWAY SCH 033 Not RatedBASTROP MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YEMILE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YMINA EL 102 Met Standard Y Y YCEDAR CREEK EL 103 Met Standard Y Y YBASTROP INT 104 Met Standard Y Y Y YCEDAR CREEK MIDDLE 106 Met Standard Y Y Y YRED ROCK EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y YCEDAR CREEK INT 108 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YBLUEBONNET EL 109 Met Standard Y Y Y YLOST PINES EL 110 Met Standard Y Y Y

Del Valle ISD 227910 Met Standard Y Y Y YDEL VALLE H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YDEL VALLE OPPORTUNITY CTR 002 Met Alternative Std Y Y YTRAVIS CO J J A E P 005 Not RatedDEL VALLE MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YJOHN P OJEDA J H 042 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YDAILEY MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y YPOPHAM EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YSMITH EL 106 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YHILLCREST EL 107 Met Standard Y Y YBATY EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHORNSBY-DUNLAP EL 109 Improvement Required Y Y NDEL VALLE EL 110 Met Standard Y Y YCREEDMOOR EL 111 Met Standard Y Y Y YJOSEPH GILBERT EL 112 Met Standard Y Y Y

Dripping Springs ISD 105904 Met Standard Y Y Y YDRIPPING SPRINGS H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YDRIPPING SPRINGS MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YDRIPPING SPRINGS EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y YWALNUT SPRINGS EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YROOSTER SPRINGS EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y

Eanes ISD 227909 Met Standard Y Y Y YWESTLAKE H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YHILL COUNTRY MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YWEST RIDGE MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y YEANES EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YCEDAR CREEK EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y YVALLEY VIEW EL 103 Met Standard Y Y YFOREST TRAIL EL 104 Met Standard Y Y YBARTON CREEK EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBRIDGE POINT EL 106 Met Standard Y Y Y

Elgin ISD 011902 Met Standard Y Y Y YELGIN H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YPHOENIX H S 004 Met Alternative Std Y YELGIN MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YBOOKER T WASHINGTON EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YELGIN EL 102 Met Standard Y Y YNEIDIG EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y Y

Florence ISD 246902 Met Standard Y Y Y YFLORENCE H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YFLORENCE MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YFLORENCE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y



BY DISTRICT NAME


Georgetown ISD 246904 Met Standard Y Y Y YGEORGETOWN H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YCHIP RICHARTE H S 002 Met Alternative Std Y Y YGEORGETOWN ALTER PROG 003 Not RatedEAST VIEW H S 004 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YDOUGLAS BENOLD MIDDLE 040 Met Standard Y Y YJAMES TIPPIT MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YCHARLES A FORBES MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y YANNIE PURL EL 101 Met StandardCARVER EL 102 Met StandardFROST EL 103 Met Standard Y YPAT COOPER EL 104 Met Standard Y Y Y YDELL PICKETT EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YRAYE MCCOY EL 106 Met Standard Y Y Y YVILLAGE EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y YWILLIAMS EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YJO ANN FORD EL 109 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YJAMES E MITCHELL EL 110 Met Standard Y Y YWILLIAMSON CO J J A E P 197 Not RatedWILLIAMSON CO JUVENILE DET. 199 Not Rated

Hays CISD 105906 Met Standard Y Y Y YJACK C HAYS H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHAYS CO JUVENILE JUSTICE ALT 003 Not RatedLIVE OAK ACADEMY 004 Met Alternative Std Y Y YLEHMAN H S 005 Met Standard Y Y Y YR C BARTON MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YERIC DAHLSTROM MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y YLAURA B WALLACE MIDDLE 044 Met Standard Y Y YARMANDO CHAPA MIDDLE 045 Met Standard Y Y Y YD J RED SIMON MIDDLE 046 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YKYLE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y YTOM GREEN EL 103 Met Standard Y Y YBUDA EL 106 Met Standard Y Y YELM GROVE EL 107 Met Standard Y Y YSUSIE FUENTES EL 108 Met Standard Y Y YHEMPHILL EL 109 Met Standard Y Y YTOBIAS EL 110 Met Standard Y Y YLAURA B NEGLEY EL 111 Met Standard Y Y YSCIENCE HALL EL 112 Met Standard Y Y YBLANCO VISTA EL 113 Met Standard Y Y YCAMINO REAL EL 114 Met Standard Y Y Y YCARPENTER HILL EL 115 Met Standard Y Y YRALPH PFLUGER EL 116 Met Standard Y Y Y

Hutto ISD 246906 Met Standard Y Y Y YHUTTO H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YWILLIAMSON COUNTY ACADEMY 002 Not RatedLOTT DETENTION CENTER 003 Not RatedHUTTO MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YFARLEY MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y YHUTTO EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YCOTTONWOOD CREEK EL 103 Met Standard Y Y YRAY EL 104 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YNADINE JOHNSON EL 121 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y

Jarrell ISD 246907 Met Standard Y Y Y YJARRELL H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YWILLIAMSON CO J J A E P 002 Not RatedLOTT DETENTION CENTER 004 Not RatedJARRELL MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YJARRELL EL 101 Improvement Required Y N Y



BY DISTRICT NAME


Lago Vista ISD 227912 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAGO VISTA H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAGO VISTA MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAGO VISTA EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y

Lake Travis ISD 227913 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAKE TRAVIS H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YTRAVIS CO J J A E P 002 Not RatedLAKE TRAVIS MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHUDSON BEND MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAKE TRAVIS EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YLAKEWAY EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBEE CAVE ELEMENTARY 103 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAKE POINTE ELEMENTARY 104 Met Standard Y Y Y YSERENE HILLS ELEMENTARYL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y Y

Leander ISD 246913 Met Standard Y Y Y YLEANDER H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YCEDAR PARK H S 002 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YVISTA RIDGE H S 003 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YROUSE H S 004 Met Standard Y Y Y YVANDEGRIFT H S 005 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YWILLIAMSON CO ACADEMY 010 Not RatedNEW HOPE H S 011 Not RatedWILLIAMSON COUNTY DETENTION 012 Not RatedCEDAR PARK MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YLEANDER MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YRUNNING BRUSHY MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y Y YARTIE L HENRY MIDDLE 044 Met Standard Y Y Y YCANYON RIDGE MIDDLE 045 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YKNOX WILEY MIDDLE 046 Met Standard Y Y YFOUR POINTS MIDDLE 047 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YFLORENCE W STILES MIDDLE 048 Met Standard Y Y YWHITESTONE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YADA MAE FAUBION EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBLOCK HOUSE CREEK EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y YCYPRESS EL 104 Met Standard Y Y YC C MASON EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y YLOIS F GIDDENS EL 106 Met Standard Y Y YSTEINER RANCH EL 107 Met Standard Y Y YPAULINE NAUMANN EL 108 Met Standard Y Y YBAGDAD EL 109 Met Standard Y Y YCHARLOTTE COX EL 110 Met Standard Y Y Y YLAURA WELCH BUSH EL 111 Met Standard Y Y YPATRICIA KNOWLES EL 112 Met Standard Y Y YDEER CREEK EL 113 Met Standard Y Y YPLEASANT HILL EL 114 Met Standard Y Y YRUTLEDGE EL 115 Met Standard Y Y YJIM PLAIN EL 116 Met Standard Y Y YWILLIAM J WINKLEY EL 1 17 Met Standard Y Y YRIVER PLACE EL 118 Met Standard Y Y Y YGRANDVIEW HILLS EL 119 Met Standard Y Y Y YPARKSIDE EL 120 Met Standard Y Y YWESTSIDE EL 121 Met Standard Y Y YRONALD REAGAN EL 122 Met Standard Y Y YRIVER RIDGE EL 123 Met Standard Y Y Y

Liberty Hill ISD 246908 Met Standard Y Y Y YLIBERTY HILL H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YWILLIAMSON CO JUVENILE DET 006 Not RatedLIBERTY HILL J H 041 Met Standard Y Y YLIBERTY HILL EL 101 Met StandardLIBERTY HILL INT 102 Met Standard Y Y YBILL BURDEN EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y



BY DISTRICT NAME


Manor ISD 227907 Met Standard Y Y Y YMANOR H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YMANOR EXCEL ACADEMY 002 Met Alternative Std Y Y YMANOR NEW TECHNOLOGY HIGH 004 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YMANOR MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YDECKER MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y YMANOR EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBLUEBONNET TRAIL EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y YDECKER EL 104 Improvement Required N Y YBLAKE MANOR EL 105 Met Standard Y Y YPRESIDENTIAL MEADOWS EL 106 Met Standard Y Y Y YOAK MEADOWS EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y YPIONEER CROSSING EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y

Pflugerville ISD 227904 Met Standard Y Y Y YPFLUGERVILLE H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YJOHN B CONNALLY H S 003 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHENDRICKSON H S 004 Met Standard Y Y Y YTRAVIS CO J J A E P 008 Not RatedPFLUGERVILLE MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y YWESTVIEW MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y YPARK CREST MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YDESSAU MIDDLE 045 Met Standard Y Y YKELLY LANE MIDDLE 046 Met Standard Y Y YPFLUGERVILLE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YPARMER LANE EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YTIMMERMAN EL 103 Met Standard Y Y Y YNORTHWEST EL 104 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YDESSAU EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y YWINDERMERE EL 106 Met Standard Y Y YRIVER OAKS EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YBROOKHOLLOW EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y YSPRINGHILL EL 109 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YWINDERMERE PRI 110 Met StandardCOPPERFIELD EL 111 Met Standard Y Y Y YMURCHISON EL 112 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YDELCO PRI 113 Met StandardCALDWELL EL 114 Met Standard Y Y YROWE LANE EL 115 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHIGHLAND PARK EL 116 Met Standard Y Y Y YWIELAND EL 117 Met Standard Y Y Y YRIOJAS EL 118 Met Standard Y Y Y YRUTH BARRON EL 119 Met Standard Y Y Y

Round Rock ISD 246909 Met Standard Y Y Y YROUND ROCK H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YROUND ROCK OPPORT CTR DAEP 002 Not RatedWESTWOOD H S 003 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YMCNEIL H S 004 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YSTONY POINT H S 007 Met Standard Y Y Y YCEDAR RIDGE H S 008 Met Standard Y Y Y YSUCCESS H S 011 Met Alternative Std Y YWILLIAMSON CO J J A E P 012 Not RatedWM S LOTT JUVENILE CTR 016 Not RatedC D FULKES MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YNOEL GRISHAM MIDDLE 042 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YCHISHOLM TRAIL MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YCANYON VISTA MIDDLE 044 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YDEERPARK MIDDLE 045 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YHOPEWELL MIDDLE 046 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YCEDAR VALLEY MIDDLE 047 Met Standard Y Y Y YRIDGEVIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL 051 Met Standard Y Y Y YJAMES GARLAND WALSH MIDDLE 052 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YPFC ROBERT P HERNANDEZ 053 Met Standard Y Y YCLAUDE BERKMAN EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YEL DAEP 102 Not Rated



BY DISTRICT NAME




BY DISTRICT NAME


CLAUDE BERKMAN EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YEL DAEP 102 Not RatedSPICEWOOD EL 105 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YXENIA VOIGT EL 106 Met Standard Y Y YDEEP WOOD EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YFOREST NORTH EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y YANDERSON MILL EL 109 Met Standard Y Y Y YKATHY CARAWAY EL 110 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YVIC ROBERTSON EL 111 Met Standard Y Y YPURPLE SAGE EL 113 Met Standard Y Y YBRUSHY CREEK EL 114 Met Standard Y Y Y YWELLS BRANCH EL 115 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YLAUREL MOUNTAIN EL 116 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YPOND SPRINGS EL 1 17 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YBLUEBONNET EL 118 Met Standard Y Y YDOUBLE FILE TRAIL EL 119 Met Standard Y Y Y YLIVE OAK EL 120 Met Standard Y Y Y YGATTIS EL 121 Met Standard Y Y YOLD TOWN EL 122 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YFERN BLUFF EL 123 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YJOLLYVILLE EL 124 Met Standard Y Y Y YCANYON CREEK EL 125 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YFOREST CREEK EL 126 Met Standard Y Y YCALDWELL HEIGHTS EL 127 Met Standard Y Y Y YGREAT OAKS EL 128 Met Standard Y Y YBLACKLAND PRAIRIE EL 130 Met Standard Y Y YTERAVISTA EL 131 Met Standard Y Y Y YCACTUS RANCH EL 132 Met Standard Y Y YPATSY SOMMER EL 134 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YCHANDLER OAKS EL 135 Met Standard Y Y YNEYSA CALLISON EL 136 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YUNION HILL EL 137 Met Standard Y Y YLINDA HERRINGTON EL 138 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y YELSA ENGLAND EL 139 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y

San Marcos CISD 105902 Met Standard Y Y Y YSAN MARCOS H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YHAYS CO JUVENILE JUSTICE ALT 004 Not RatedGOODNIGHT MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y Y YMILLER MIDDLE 043 Met Standard Y Y Y YBOWIE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YCROCKETT EL 102 Met Standard Y Y Y Y YDEZAVALA EL 103 Improvement Required Y N YTRAVIS EL 105 Met Standard Y Y YHERNANDEZ EL 107 Met Standard Y Y Y YMENDEZ EL 108 Met Standard Y Y Y

Smithville ISD 011904 Met Standard Y Y Y YSMITHVILLE H S 002 Met Standard Y Y Y YSMITHVILLE J H 041 Met Standard Y Y YSMITHVILLE EL 101 Met Standard Y Y Y YBROWN PRI 102 Met Standard

Taylor ISD 246911 Met Standard Y Y Y YTAYLOR H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y YWILLIAMSON CO JJAEP 010 Not RatedTAYLOR MIDDLE 041 Met Standard Y Y YT H JOHNSON EL 102 Met Standard Y Y YNAOMI PASEMANN EL 103 Met Standard Y YNORTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD 107 Met Standard

Wimberley ISD 105905 Met Standard Y Y Y YWIMBERLEY H S 001 Met Standard Y Y Y Y Y Y YDANFORTH J H 041 Met Standard Y Y YJACOB'S WELL EL 101 Met Standard Y Y YSCUDDER PRI 102 Met Standard

Graduation and Drop Out Rates

TExAS HIGH SCHOOL GRADuATION RATE SETS ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH August 6, 2013

AuSTIN - Commissioner of Education Michael Williams announced today that the Texas high school on-time graduation rate has setan all-time high, reaching 87.7 percent for the Class of 2012. The graduation rate for the Class of 2012 is 1.8 percentage points higherthan the previous record set by the Class of 2011 and marks the fifth consecutive year the rate has increased.

YYEEAARR GGRRAADDuuAATTIIOONN RRAATTEE

CCllaassss ooff 22001122 8877..77 ppeerrcceenntt






"last year, the class of 2011 in texas set a graduation rate that was among the highest in the nation, and now the class of 2012 has bested thatnumber," said commissioner Williams. "all those working in texas education should be proud of our strong numbers and the strides wecontinue to make as a state."

Out of 316,758 students in the Class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort, 87.7 percent graduated. An additional five percent of students in the Class of 2012continued in high school the fall after their anticipated graduation date. One percent received GED certificates.

tthhee llaatteesstt ggrraadduuaattiioonn fifigguurreess aarree aammoonngg tthhee fifinnddiinnggss hhiigghhlliigghhtteedd iinn tthhee tteexxaass eedduuccaattiioonn aaggeennccyy''ss ssttuuddyy,, ""SSeeccoonnddaarryy SScchhooooll ccoommpplleettiioonn aannddDDrrooppoouuttss iinn tteexxaass PPuubblliicc SScchhoooollss,, 22001111--1122.."" ootthheerr nnoottaabbllee ggrraadduuaattiioonn fifinnddiinnggss ffrroomm tthhee ssttuuddyy iinncclluuddee::

• across racial/ethnic groups, the graduation rate for the class of 2012 reflects all-time highs for White (93 percent), Hispanic (84.3 percent) and african-american (83.5 percent) students.

• asian students in texas had the highest graduation rate (94.4 percent) in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort.

• Females in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort had a higher graduation rate (90.1 percent) than males (85.4 percent).

• the graduation rate for economically disadvantaged students in the class of 2012 Grade 9 cohort was 85.1 percent, an increase of 1.4percentage points over the class of 2011.

Out of 2,150,364 students who attended Grades 7-12 in Texas public schools during the 2011-12 school year, 1.7 percent were reported to havedropped out, an increase of 0.1 percentage points from 2010-11. The number of dropouts in Grades 7-12 increased to 36,276, a 5.6 percentincrease from the 34,363 students who dropped out in 2010-11.

"Districts across our state work every year to keep students in school and to get those students who have left to return to the classroom,"said Commissioner Williams. "But as long as there are students who are not reaching the finish line and earning their high school diploma, weshould not be satisfied. As Commissioner, I will be watching closely how districts address this critical issue."

ootthheerr ddrrooppoouutt fifinnddiinnggss ffrroomm tthhee ssttuuddyy iinncclluuddee::

• a total of 1,991 students dropped out of Grades 7-8, and 34,285 dropped out of Grades 9-12. the Grade 7-8 and Grade 9-12 annual dropoutrates were 0.3 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively.

• across racial/ethnic groups, the 2011-12 Grade 7-12 dropout rates showed asian students at 0.6 percent, White students at 0.8 percent, Hispanic students at 2.1 percent and african-american students at 2.6 percent.

• the Grade 7-12 dropout rate for males (1.9 percent) exceeded the rate for females (1.5 percent) in 2011-12. More males dropped out from Grade9 (5,436) than from any other grade. by contrast, more females dropped out from Grade 12 (4,818) than from any other grade.

• the longitudinal dropout rate for economically disadvantaged students was 7.8 percent, an increase of 0.1 percentage points from the classof 2011

A dropout is defined as a student who is enrolled in public school in Grades 7-12, does not return to public school the following fall, isnot expelled, and does not: graduate, receive a GED certificate, continue school outside the public school system, begin college, or die.

Address Phone Website

Austin 1111 W 6th St, Austin, TX 78703 (512) 414-1700 http://www.austinisd.org

Bastrop 906 Farm St, Bastrop, TX 78602 (512) 321-2292 http://www.bastrop.isd.tenet.edu

Del Valle 5301 Ross Rd., Ste 103, Del Valle, TX 78617 (512) 386-3010 http://delvalle.tx.schoolwebpages.com

Dripping Springs PO BOX 479, Dripping Springs, TX 78620 (512) 858-3000 http://www.dsisd.txed.net

Eanes 601 Camp Craft Rd, Austin, TX 78746 (512) 732-9001 http://www.eanesisd.net

Elgin PO BOX 351, Elgin, TX 78621 (512) 281-3434 http://www.elginisd.net

Florence PO BOX 489, Florence, TX 76527 (254) 793-2850 http://florence.tx.schoolwebpages.com

Georgetown 603 Lakeway Dr.,Georgetown, TX 78628 (512) 943-5015 http://www.georgetownisd.org

Hays 21003 Interstate 35, Kyle, TX 78640 (512) 268-2141 http://www.hayscisd.net

Hutto PO BOX 430, Hutto, TX 78634 (512) 759-3771 http://www.hutto.txed.net/education

Jarrell PO BOX 9, Jarrell, TX 76537 (512) 746-2124 http://www.esc13.net/jarrell/

Lago Vista PO BOX 4929, Lago Vista, TX 78645 (512) 267-8300 http://www.lagovistaisd.net

Lake Travis 3322 RR 620 S., Austin, TX 78738 (512) 533-6000 http://www.ltisdschools.org/laketravis

Leander P O BOX 218, Leander, TX 78646 (512) 434-5000 http://www.leanderisd.org

Liberty Hill 14001 W Hwy 29, Liberty Hill, TX 78642 (512) 260-5580 http://www.libertyhill.txed.net

Manor PO BOX 359, Manor, TX 78653 (512) 278-4000 http://www.manorisd.net

Pflugerville 1401 W Pecan St, Pflugerville, TX 78660 (512) 594-0000 http://www.pflugervilleisd.net

Round Rock 1311 Round Rock Ave., Round Rock, TX 78681 (512) 464-5000 http://www.roundrockisd.org

San Marcos PO BOX 1087, San Marcos, TX 78667 (512) 393-6700 http://www.smcisd.net

Smithville PO BOX 479, Smithville, TX 78957 (512) 237-2487 http://www.smithvilleisd.org

Taylor 602 W 12th St, Taylor, TX 76574 (512) 365-1391 http://www.taylorisd.org

Wimberley 14401 RR 12, Wimberley, TX 78676 (512) 847-2414 http://www.wimberley.txed.net

1 Edinburg 2 Corpus Christi 3 Victoria 4 Houston 5 Beaumont 6 Huntsville 7 Kilgore 8 Mt. Pleasant 9 Wichita Falls 10 Richardson 11 Fort Worth 12 Waco 13 Austin 14 Abilene 15 San Angelo 16 Amarillo 17 Lubbock 18 Midland 19 El Paso 20 San Antonio

Falls

Red River

Jefferson

Orange

repsaJ

notweN

Sabine

naSenitsuguA

Shelby

Panola

Harrison

Marion

Cass

Bowie

Titus

Camp

sirroM

Upshur

Gregg

Rusk

Nacog-doches

Angelina

Liberty

Hardin

Tyler Polk

San Jacinto

El Paso

Hudspeth Culberson

Jeff Davis

Presidio

Reeves

Loving

Ward

Winkler

Brewster

Pecos

Terrell

Dallam

Hartley

Oldham

Deaf Smith

Sherman

Moore

Potter

Randall

Hansford

Hutch-inson

Carson

Armstrong

Ochiltree Lips-comb

Hemphill

Wheeler

Roberts

Gray

Donley Collings-worth

Val Verde

Kinney

Maverick

Webb

Zapata Jim Hogg Brooks

Kenedy

Starr

Hidalgo

Willacy

Cameron

Uvalde Medina

Zavala Frio

Dimmit La Salle McMullen

Duval

Jim Wells

Parmer Castro Swisher Briscoe Hall Child-ress

Bailey Lamb Hale Floyd Motley Cottle

Delta

Lamar FanninGrayson MontagueClay

WiseJack

Wichita

Archer

Young

Hardeman

Knox Baylor

Galveston

Chambers

Crockett Schleicher

Sutton

Edwards Real Bandera

Kerr

Gillespie

Kendall

Blanco

Mason Llano Menard

Kimble

Tom Green ConchoIrion

ReaganUpton Crane

Ector Midland Glasscock Sterling Coke Runnels

Smith

Van Zandt

nilknarFHopkins

Wood Rains

Hunt

Rock-wall

Kaufman DallasTarrant

CollinDenton

Parker Palo PintoStephensShackel-

ford

Haskell

Jones

CallahanTaylor Nolan

Cochran Hockley Lubbock

Yoakum Terry Lynn

Crosby Dickens King

Garza Kent Stonewall

Gaines Dawson Borden Scurry Fisher

Andrews Martin Howard Mitchell Eastland

Coleman Brown

McCulloch San Saba

Mills

Comanche

Lampasas

Burnet

Henderson

Anderson

Houston

Cherokee

Trinity

Brazoria

Matagorda

Calhoun

Nueces

Kleberg

Aransas

Atascosa

Bexar

Erath

Hood Somer-vell

Johnson Ellis

Navarro

San Patricio

BeeLive Oak

Hays

Travis

Williamson

Bell

Coryell

Comal

Guadalupe

Wilson

Karnes Goliad

Victoria Jackson

Refugio

Freestone

Limestone

Leon

Hill

McLennan

Bosque

Hamilton

Robertson

Brazos Milam

Burleson

Madison

semirG

Walker

Montgomery

HarrisaW

rell

Fort Bend

Washington Lee

Bastrop Fayette Caldwell

Gonzales Lavaca

Colorado

Austin

Wharton

Dewitt

Cooke

Wilbarger

Throck-morton

Foard

Regional Education Service Centers�

Regional EducationService Centers

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.usSchool Contact Information

AAss iinn aallll pprrooggrreessssiivvee cciittiieess,, eedduuccaattiioonn iiss iimmppoorrttaanntt ttoo tthhee ppeeooppllee ooff AAuussttiinn TTeexxaass – and it is an especiallyimportant consideration for those relocating to a new city. That emphasis on quality education hastranslated into a wealth of choices for private and parochial schools – offering more options for parentsand children – and Austin Texas is no exception.

According to u.S. Department of Education statistics, private schools have slowly become a morepopular alternative – even in the face of recession and curbed spending. Recent figures from a NationalAssociation of Independent Schools (NAIS) survey found that while enrollment dipped less than 1percent nationally, it’s still higher than it was five years ago.

Today, the Department of Education estimates that 6 million students attend the country’s 33,000private schools – about 11 percent of all American elementary and high school students. These Austinprivate schools run the gamut – from elite preparatory academies that cost more than $20,000annually to less pricey parochial schools where tuition is often offset by generous donations.

AAuussttiinn’’ss PPrriivvaattee SScchhoooollssGiven the city’s accolades as an educated community with lots of brainpower, it’s not surprising thatthere are more than 300 private schools in Austin Texas and in surrounding Central Texas communities,with enrollment that ranges from pre-K through 12th grade.

The total enrollment for all private schools in the Austin Metro area is more than 11,000, and studenttuition ranges from $300 per month to $18,000 per school year. Austin also has an active home schooland charter sscchhooooll ccoommmmuunniittyy..

The following is a list of the 25 largest private schools in the Austin Texas area – including the mostrecent enrollment figures, grades served, address, contact information and website, where available.

Austins Largest Private Schools

This and the list of colleges were provided by the Austin Relocation Guide http://www.austinrelocationguide.com

11.. RReeggeennttss SScchhooooll ooff AAuussttiinnGrades K-12; Enrollment: 900+3230 Travis Country Circle512-899-8095www.regents-austin.comFocus is “a classical and christian education inthe service of both God and man.”

22.. SStt.. AAnnddrreeww’’ss EEppiissccooppaall SScchhoooollGrades 1-12; Enrollment: 850Lower & Middle Schools – Grades 1-81112 West 31st Street512-299-9800upper School – Grades 9-125901 Southwest Parkway512-299-9700www.sasaustin.orgepiscopal school focused on well-rounded education of community service, academics, and social skills.

33.. BBrreennttwwoooodd CChhrriissttiiaann SScchhoooollGrades PK-12; Enrollment: 713+11908 N. Lamar Blvd.512-835-5983www.brentwoodchristian.org"christ-centered education” at church of christschool.

44.. SStt.. SStteepphheenn’’ss EEppiissccooppaall SScchhoooollGrades 6-12; Enrollment: 665+2900 Bunny Run512-327-1213www.sstx.orgRigorous academics/college prep school; sports,fine arts activities; boarding optional.

55.. HHyyddee PPaarrkk BBaappttiisstt SScchhoooollGrades K-12; Enrollment: 540+3901 Speedway512-465-8338www.hpbs.orgacademic excellence, christian values, collegeprep curriculum; affiliated with Hyde Park baptist church.

66.. RReeddeeeemmeerr LLuutthheerraann SScchhoooollGrades K-8; Enrollment: 500+1500 West Anderson Lane512-451-6478www.redeemerschool.net“christ-centered environment dedicated to developing the whole child: spiritually, intellectually, physically, emotionally, socially.”

77.. HHiillll CCoouunnttrryy CChhrriissttiiaann SScchhooooll ooffAAuussttiinnGrades K-12; Enrollment: 500+12124 RR 620 North512-331-7036www.hillcountrychristianschool.orgchrist-centered college prep school with “classical teaching methodology.”

88.. RRoouunndd RRoocckk CChhrriissttiiaann AAccaaddeemmyyGrades PK-12; Enrollment: 500+301 N. Lake Creek Drive512-255-4491 (Main office); 512-716-1354(Secondary office)www.rrca-tx.orgcurriculum includes chapel, bible study, music,fine arts, learning centers and creative play.

99.. HHoollyy FFaammiillyy CCaatthhoolliicc SScchhoooollGrades PK-8; Enrollment: 450+9400 Neenah Avenue512-246-4455www.holyfamilycs.orgcatholic, christ-centered school with a “nurturingenvironment that fosters the growth of the child.”

1100.. SStt.. TThheerreessaa’’ss SScchhoooollGrades PK-8; Enrollment: 425+4311 Small Drive512-451-7105www.st-theresa.orgSchool’s mission is to “develop elementary/middle school students to their full potential byeducating them in a catholic and academicallyexcellent environment.”

1111.. SStt.. GGaabbrriieell’’ss CCaatthhoolliicc SScchhoooollGrades PK-8; Enrollment: 400+2500 Wimberly Lane512-327-7755www.sgs-austin.orgSt. Gabriel’s catholic School “celebrates the individuality of each child and cultivates virtue,excellence, leadership, and service.”

1122.. SStt.. MMiicchhaaeell’’ss CCaatthhoolliicc AAccaaddeemmyyGrades 9-12; Enrollment: 4003000 Barton Creek Blvd.512-328-2323www.smca.comcollege prep school; “academic excellence combined with faith formation.”

1133.. TTrriinniittyy EEppiissccooppaall SScchhoooollGrades K-8; Enrollment: 4003901 Bee Cave Road512-472-9525www.trinitykids.coma school in which students are “engaged spiritually, physically, intellectually, and academically;” daily chapel services.

1144.. AAuussttiinn WWaallddoorrff SScchhoooollGrades PK-12; Enrollment: 380+8700 South View Road512-288-5942www.austinwaldorf.orgGrades K-12; Focus on balancing “academic,artistic and practical disciplines”

155.. SStt.. LLoouuiiss CCaatthhoolliicc SScchhoooollGrades PK-8; Enrollment: 3652114 St. Joseph Blvd.512-454-0384www.st-louis.org/school.htmcatholic school and community of faith; affiliated with St. louis King of France catholicchurch.

1166.. SSuummmmiitt CChhrriissttiiaann AAccaaddeemmyyGrades PK-12 (Cedar Park campus) and 2-4 yearold program at the Leander and Steiner RanchLocations); Enrollment: 4252121 Cypress Creek Road;512-250-1369 (Cedar Park)1303 Leander Drive;512-259-4416 (Leander)www.summiteagles.orgcurriculum includes “rigorous academics,training in biblical character, and engagement inservanthood;” affiliated with Shoreline christianSchool at the high school level.

1177.. AAuussttiinn MMoonntteessssoorrii SScchhoooollGrades: Preschool-8; Enrollment: 2805006 Sunset Trail (Main campus)512-892-02536817 Great Northern Blvd.(Great Northern campus)512-450-19405676 Oak Blvd.www.austinmontessori.orgAges 14 months–9 years; Association MontessoriInternationale curriculum.

1188.. SShhoorreelliinnee CChhrriissttiiaann SScchhoooollGrades PK-12; Enrollment: 275+15201 Burnet Road512-310-7358www.shorelinechristianschool.orgchristian-based education; school partneredwith Summit christian academy as start of effortto create a christian school district.

1199.. SStt.. IIggnnaattiiuuss MMaarrttyyrr SScchhoooollGrades PK-8; Enrollment: 272120 West Oltorf Street512-442-8547www.st-ignatius.org/school/School is a “christian environment wherestudents, teachers and parents build acommunity of faith, hope and love.”

2200.. SSttrriicckkllaanndd CChhrriissttiiaann SScchhoooollGrades PreK-8; Enrollment: 225+7415 Manchaca Road512-447-1447www.stricklandschool.comSchool’s mission is to “equip students to belovers of Jesus and His Word and to emulatechrist’s character, purpose and ministry.”

2211.. SStt.. AAuussttiinn CCaatthhoolliicc SScchhoooollGrades K-8; Enrollment: 2081911 San Antonio Street512-477-3751www.staustinschool.orgelementary / middle school opened in 1917;affiliated with St. austin church.

2222.. SStt.. MMaarrttiinn’’ss LLuutthheerraann DDaayy SScchhoooollGrades 18 months-K; Enrollment: 190606 West 15th Street512-476-4037www.saintmartins.orgbalanced, integrated education programs;music, art, computers and Spanish.

2233.. AAllll SSaaiinnttss EEppiissccooppaall SScchhoooollGrades PreK3-K; Enrollment: 170+209 West 27th Street512-472-8866www.allsaints-austin.org/aseds.htmespiscopal school that is focused on “learningthrough active exploration.”

2244.. SStt.. PPaauull LLuutthheerraann SScchhoooollGrades PK3-8; Enrollment: 165+3407 Red River Street512-472-3313www.stpaulaustin.orgElementary/middle school; opened in 1893;affiliated with St. Paul Lutheran Church.

2255.. TThhee CChhiillddrreenn’’ss SScchhoooollGrades PK-4; Enrollment: 1552825 Hancock Drive512-453-1126www.thechildrensschool.orgMontessori-based curriculum, open since 1979.http://www.austinrelocationguide.com

Colleges and UniversitiesHigher Education Choices in AustinFortune magazine once named Austin one of the country’s top five “intellectual capitals,” and it’s nowonder. Forbes has ranked Austin the third-biggest “brain magnet” city, and Kiplinger’s Personal Financeranks the university of Texas at Austin among its “Best Values in Public Colleges” list. And, according to anAmerican Community Survey, Austin ranks fifth in the number of college graduates, with 45 percent of thepopulation holding a degree.

Many of those degrees are awarded right here in Central Texas. That’s because Austin’s thriving intellectualcapital attracts students from across the country and internationally to attend one of the city’s notedcolleges and universities. In fact, the business, law and engineering schools at the university of Texas haveall earned regular spots on Hispanic Business magazine’s lists of top ten schools for Hispanics.

Getting a quality education outside the area is easy, too, with many prestigious colleges and universitieswithin 100 miles of Austin. These schools include Baylor university (Waco); Texas A&M university (CollegeStation); Trinity university (San Antonio); Central Texas College (Killeen); Texas Lutheran university (Seguin);university of Mary Hardin-Baylor (Belton); Our Lady of the Lake university (San Antonio); Texas State TechnicalCollege (Waco) St. Mary’s university, (San Antonio); university of Texas at San Antonio (San Antonio);Temple College (Temple); and the university of Texas Health Science Center (San Antonio).

Add these schools to what’s already here in Austin, and it’s easy to see how more than 100,000 undergraduate students and more than 18,000 degrees conferred each year are right here in Central Texas.

The following is an overview of Austin’s major colleges and universities, including school history, degree programs and enrollment, tuition and fees (not including room/board), and contact information.

AAuussttiinn CCoommmmuunniittyy CCoolllleeggee5930 Middle Fiskville Roadaustin, tX 78752512-223-4acc (4222)www.austincc.edu

The Austin Independent School District established Austin CommunityCollege in 1973. Now governed by an independent board, ACC has grown tosix campuses, plus the Highland Business Center and Downtown Center, aswell as 40 teaching locations throughout Austin and surrounding areas. ACCalso provides contracted training to many local high tech companies, and theschool’s Highland Business Center and Downtown Center are involved in thedevelopment of course work and training specifically designed for Austin in-dustries like high tech, government and manufacturing. ACC offers 235degrees and certificates, including two-year Associate of Arts and Associateof Science degrees in 30-plus university transfer majors, and Associateof Applied Science degrees and certificates in more than 80 technical fields,as well as an Associate of Arts in Teaching program. ACC is also the leadingsource of transfer students to the university of Texas-Austin and Texas Stateuniversity-San Marcos, and is the top choice for high school graduates andadults who enter college.

ACC enrolls more than 44,000 credit students, with an additional 15,000students enrolled in noncredit classes. One-year tuition and fees (30credits) is $1,740 in-district, and $4,980 for out-of-district tuition.

BBaayylloorr uunniivveerrssiittyy EExxeeccuuttiivvee MMBBAAoak creek Plaza3107 oak creek Drive, Suite 240austin, tX 78729www.baylor.edu/aeMba

Baylor university offers a 21-month Executive MBA Program in Austin,admitting up to a maximum of just 40 industry professionals each year.Classes are held on Monday and Thursday evenings, and the Baylor EMBAprogram is AACSB-accredited. Senior faculty members, department chairs,deans, and industry leaders all have years of experience as instructors.Baylor executive MBA graduates complete 48 credit hours over fivesemesters and 21 months in a curriculum designed to strengthen analyticaland managerial skills. Areas of study include finance, economics, manage-ment, accounting, strategy, and more. Students also take a 9-day trip for toAsia unique perspective on the global marketplace.

The cost of the Baylor Executive MBA Program in Austin for those entering inAugust 2011 is $73,500, which includes a $2,000 non-refundable deposit (thedeposit is also “deferrable” for one year to include entry in fall 2012). The costincludes graduate tuition and student fees for 48 credit hours, a week-longresidency program in Waco (including hotel and meals), a fully-configuredlaptop computer and wireless Internet access, all books, case studies, andother instructional materials, a 5-day trip to Washington, D.C. (including air,lodging and most meals), a 9-day international trip to Asia (including lodgingand most meals, as well as the flight between two cities in the middle of thetrip), parking and meeting facilities at the Austin campus, and meals andsnacks each class evening.

CCoonnccoorrddiiaa uunniivveerrssiittyy11400 concordia university Driveaustin, tX 78726512-313-3000www.concordia.edu

Concordia university at Austin is a small, private liberal arts and sciencesschool offering both undergraduate and graduate degrees. Founded in 1926,Concordia university is part of the Concordia university System and focuseson quality, Christ-centered, Lutheran higher education for lives of service toChurch and community; the school’s mission is to develop Christian leaders.Concordia is affiliated with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod; however,all faiths are welcome.

Concordia offers 18 undergraduate majors in four colleges: Business, Education,Liberal Arts, and Sciences, as well as a Master of Education and Master ofBusiness Administration graduate degrees. Concordia also offers both adultdegree and distance learning programs for part-time and adult returning students.

Enrollment was approximately 2,100 (as of May 2011). Off-campus tuition and

fees for the fall and spring semesters was $22,920; room and board for the falland spring semester was $8,460; and the on-campus total for the fall andspring semesters was $31,380.

HHuussttoonn--TTiilllloottssoonn uunniivveerrssiittyy900 chicon St.austin, tX 78702-2795512-505-3000www.htu.edu

Huston-Tillotson university is an independent, church-based, historically blackschool that is affiliated with the united Methodist Church, the united Churchof Christ, and the united Negro College Fund. The school’s mission is to“provide opportunities to a diverse population for academic achievementwith an emphasis on academic excellence, spiritual and ethical development,civic engagement, and leadership in a nurturing environment.”

The Austin campus is located on 23 acres near downtown Austin; the collegealso owns 12 acres of property adjacent to the campus for future expansionand development, as well as a biological field station south of the citythat faculty and students use for environmental research.

The school awards four-year undergraduate degrees in business, education,the humanities, natural sciences, social sciences, science, and technology. Thegeneral college curriculum is focused on providing “a diverse student bodywith an exemplary education that is grounded in the liberal arts and sciences,balanced with professional development, and directed to public service andleadership.”

The average class size is 24, and classes are intentionally small to providepersonalized attention to students. Enrollment as of May 2011 was 785.Annual in- tuition and fees for full-time undergraduates in 2009-2010 was$11,434; books and supplies were $800; on-campus room and board was$6,744; and miscellaneous expenses totaled $2,252.

PPaarrkk uunniivveerrssiittyy10415 Morado Circle,Avallon II, Suite 100Austin, Tx 78759512-385-PARK (7275)www.park.edu (main)

Founded in 1875 with its main campus in Parkville, Missouri, Park universityis part of the university’s School for Extended Learning. An independent,private, Christian school offering students a four-year, liberal artseducation in a co-educational environment, Park university is accreditedby the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. Park universityhas 43 campus centers in 21 states, as well as an extensive online program.

Colleges and Universities

The Austin campus was established in 1975 at the former Bergstrom AirForce Base, founded to meet the educational needs of primarily militarymembers and their dependents, as well as civilians. That’s still the casetoday; the Austin campus is part of the Park university School forExtended Learning, which offers online classes and flexible schedules.

Park university offers several online degree options, including two-yearassociate of science degrees (computer science, management andmanagement/accounting); four-year bachelor of science degrees (com-puter science, management, management/accounting, managementcomputer information systems, management/human resources, managementmarketing, and social psychology), plus six graduate programs, also online.

Tuition is $316/credit hour at all campuses and $441/credit hour for grad-uate school. Active duty military tuition ranges from $193-$210/credithour, and the school’s nursing program is $20,437 per year. Internetcourses are $316/credit hour for civilians; $210/credit hour for active dutymilitary; and $441/credit hour for online graduate courses.

SStt.. EEddwwaarrdd’’ss uunniivveerrssiittyy3001 S. Congress Ave.Austin, Tx 78704512-448-8400www.stedwards.edu

St. Edward’s university is a private, Catholic liberal arts college that wasfounded in 1885 by the Reverend Edward Sorin, Superior General of theCongregation of Holy Cross, who also founded the university of NotreDame.

St. Edward’s emphasizes critical thinking, ethical practice, an internationalperspective, and a liberal arts education, as well as small classes, personalattention, study abroad programs, and service-learning opportunities.u.S. News & World Report has ranked the school as one of “America’sBest Colleges” for the last eight years; Forbes and the Center for CollegeAffordability have also named St. Edward’s among “America’s Best Colleges.”

St. Edward’s offers undergraduate degrees in more than 50 areas andfive schools, including humanities, education, natural sciences, manage-ment and business, and behavioral and social sciences, as well as 10 grad-uate degree programs. The school also offers programs in pre-law,pre-medicine, pre-dentistry, engineering and physical therapy, as well aselementary, secondary and bilingual/ bicultural education certifications.

Enrollment for 2011 was about 5,300. The school’s full-time (12-18 credithours) flat rate per semester for undergraduate tuition in fall 2011-spring2012 was $14,150.

SSoouutthhwweesstteerrnn uunniivveerrssiittyy1001 E. university AvenueGeorgetown, Tx 78626512-863-6511www.southwestern.edu

Located just 28 miles north of Austin in Georgetown, Southwestern uni-versity was the first institution of higher learning in Texas, chartered bythe Republic of Texas in 1840. Affiliated with the united Methodist church,Southwestern is an independent four-year undergraduate national liberalarts college whose mission is to “foster a liberal arts community whosevalues and actions encourage contributions toward the well-being of humanity.”

Southwestern was also the second university in Texas to sign the TalloiresDeclaration, a green and sustainable practice initiative that includes agreen residence hall, computer-based effluent water irrigation systems,alternative transportation programs, use of sustainable/recycled prod-ucts, low/no maintenance building finishes and products, low-volumeshower heads, and LEED certification on new construction projects.

The school is known for its solid liberal arts curriculum, including theBrown College of Arts and Sciences and the Sarofim School of Fine Arts.The university also has pre-professional programs in engineering, medicine,law, business, education and theology.

Degrees offered include a bachelor of arts, bachelor of science, bachelorof music, and bachelor of fine arts; no graduate degrees or programs areoffered. Enrollment as of 2010-2011 was 1,301, and annual tuition and feesfor full-time students (12 credit hours) was $31,630.

TTeexxaass SSttaattee uunniivveerrssiittyy –– SSaann MMaarrccooss601 university DriveSan Marcos, Tx 78666512-245-2111www.txstate.edu

Texas State university is located in San Marcos - a scenic Hill Countrycommunity about halfway between Austin and San Antonio on the SanMarcos River. Formerly known as Southwest Texas State university, theschool was founded in 1899 as Southwest Texas Normal College, inresponse to the state’s need for trained public school teachers. Theschool changed its name to Texas State university – San Marcos in 2003and is the fifth-largest public university in Texas with more than 32,000students (including about 4,300 graduate students).

Texas State is also an NCAA Division I university (Division I-AA in football;2005 Southland Conference champions) that supports 7 men’s and 9women’s sports. The school has also been a regular on u.S. News & WorldReport’s “America’s Best Colleges” list for the last several years.

The school offers 97 bachelor’s, 89 master’s, and nine doctoral degreeprograms in nine colleges, including applied arts, business administration,education, fine arts and communication, health professions, liberal arts,science, university College (general studies), and the Graduate College.Full-time (12 hours), in-state, undergraduate tuition and fees for fall 2010was $3,390; full-time, in-state, graduate tuition and fees for fall 2010 was$3,900.

uunniivveerrssiittyy ooff TTeexxaass aatt AAuussttiinn1 university StationAustin, Tx 78712512-475-7348www.utexas.edu

Founded in 1883, the university of Texas at Austin (uT Austin) is thelargest component of The university of Texas System – a conglomerateof 15 academic and health institutions – and the largest institution ofhigher education in the Austin area. With more than 51,000 students (in-cluding 11,000 graduate students), and about 24,000 faculty and staffmembers, uT is one of the largest public universities in the u.S.

uT Austin offers more than 170 fields of study and 100 majors acrossundergraduate and graduate programs in 17 colleges and schools, award-ing more than 12,000 degrees each year – including more than 8,700bachelor’s degree and 3,500-plus graduate degrees. Enrollment as of fall2010 was 51,195, and annual tuition and fees were $8,936 for in-state under-graduate students.

Besides top-notch research facilities, including the fifth-largest academiclibrary in the country, uT Austin is also famous for Longhorns’ sports andis a member of both the NCAA and the Big 12 Conference. In football,uT’s a winner of four national titles (1963, 1969, 1970 and 2005) and ranksthird in NCAA all-time victories.

Colleges and Universities

StateCapitol

BergstromAFRS

Wills CreekParkWalnut Spring

ParkJim Hogg

Park

Wilson HFox ParkSawyer

Park

San GabrielPark

Arkansas BendPark

MalbergerPark

Bull CreekPark

Mckinney FallsState Park

LakeTravis

Granger Lake

LakeGeorgetown

Middle Fork SanGabriel River

Lake Travis

Pedernales River

Pedernales River

Colorado River

Colora

do R

iver

Colorado River

Walter ELong Lake

PedernalesRiver

BlancoRiver

ColoradoRiver

Westinghouse Rd

Red Bud Ln

Gattis School Rd

Cow Creek Rd

Roun

d M

ount

ain R

d

Nameless Rd

Bee Creek Rd

Hammets Crsg

Reim

ers-

Peac

ock

RdHamilton Pool Rd

Hamilton Pool Rd

W F

itzhu

gh R

d

Bullick Hollow Rd

Rive

r Pla

ce B

lvd

Slaughter Ln

Old Lockhart Rd

Pearce Ln

Blake Manor Rd

Blake Manor Rd

Pflugerville East Rd

Gregg Manor Rd

Fitzhugh Rd

Fitzhugh Rd

Trautwein Rd

Old Kyle Rd

Fischer Rd

Garden Hill Rd

C F

Wal

l Ln

PaulNeumann Ln

Rowe Ln

Priem Ln

Pflugerville

Round Rock Rd

Wate

rson

Rd

High Grov

e Rd

Boyd

Rd

Pearce Ln

E 2nd St

Old San Antonio Rd

Williams Dr

Williams Dr

Lakeway

Dr

Airport Rd

Aust

in A

ve

2nd St

Aust

inAv

eAu

stin

Ave

2nd St

College St

MLK

St

University Ave

Railr

oad

St

15th St18th

St

Leander R

d

Bagdad Rd Gilmore St

Davis St

JonesSt

Lake Dr

North StSouth St Burkett St

Sam Bass Rd

Sloa

n St

7th St4th St

Main St

Walnut St

Crystal Falls

Pkwy Rio Grande

St

Old Settlers

Blvd

Sunr

ise

Rd

Mays St

Grea

t Oak

s DrWhitestone Blvd

Geor

geto

wn

StRoundRock Ave Bagdad Ave

E Logan StButtercup

Creek Blvd

Greenlawn

BlvdChishol

m

Valley D

r

McNeil

Rd

Louis Henna Blvd

MopacExwy

Lake Creek Pkwy

Pond Springs Rd

Peca

nCr

eek P

kwy

Hunters Chase Dr

Dallas D

r

McNeil Dr

Brushy Creek Rd

Anderson Mill Rd

Ranger Trl

Timbe

rTrl

N Mopac Exw

y

Heath

erwi

ldeBl

vd

Dawn Dr

Pflugerville LoopPfennig Ln

Visions

Dr

McNeil Dr

W Parmer Ln

Pecan St

Dess

au R

d

Dess

au R

d

Oak

Knol

l Dr

Lake

Travis Dr

Texas Plume Rd

Amhe

rst D

r

Yaup

on D

r

Duval Rd

RainCreek Pkwy

Lam

ar B

lvd

Lam

ar B

lvd

E Howard LnBu

rnet

Rd

Braker Ln

Yager LnGeneral

Williamson Dr

N Capita

l Of T

exas H

wy

Jollyville

Rd

Venture

Blvd Geronimo

Trl

Rutland Dr

Mes

a Dr

RunningDeer Trl

Debba Dr Steck Ave Payton Gin RdAnderson Ln

Rundberg Ln

Far WestBlvd

Cam

eron

Rd

Cam

eron

Rd

Balco

nes D

r

Bast

rop

StLa

Gra

nge

St

Wing

reen

Lp

Justin Ln Ferguson Ln

Cuer

nava

ca D

r Old Hwy 20Parsons

St

Mount

Bonnell Rd

Lexi

ngto

n St

W Lake Dr

W Lake Dr

Sprin

gdale

Rd

Sprin

gdale

Rd

Airport Blvd

AirportBlvd

Koenig Ln

Hancock DrPerryLn

45th St

Berk

man

Dr

Bull Creek Rd

CommonsFord Rd 51st St

Manor

Rd

35th StPeco

s St

Guad

alup

e St

Guad

alupe

St

Scenic D

r

Expo

sitio

nBl

vd

S Capital Of Texas Hwy

WindsorRd

38th St

Enfield Rd

Lake Austin

Blvd

24th StAnchorLn

Broo

ksRa

nch

Rd M L K Blvd

San

Jaci

nto

Blvd

12th St

Martin Luther King Blvd

6th St

12th St15th St

1st St

5th St

Trav

is C

ook

Rd

Wals

h Ta

rlton

Ln 11th St Rosewood Ave

Barton Springs Rd 7th St

S Lamar

Blvd

2nd StCesar Chavez St

S 1s

t St

Old Bee Caves Rd

Thom

as

Sprin

gs Rd

Cong

ress

Ave

Cong

ress

Ave

Riverside Dr

Riverside Dr

Plea

sant

Valle

y Rd

Circle Dr

Oltorf St

Brod

ie Ln

Burleson Rd

Jones Rd

Man

chac

a Rd

William Cannon Dr

William Cannon Dr

Convict Hill RdBen White Blvd

Ben White Blvd

Beck

ett

Rd

Bastrop Hwy

Stassney Ln

Stassney Ln

Todd

Ln

SlaughterLn

Slaughter Ln

Davis Ln

DavisLn

Mon

topo

lisDrE Saint Elmo Rd

NuckolsCrossing Rd

Nuck

ols C

ross

ing

Rd

Bluff Springs Rd

Dittmar Rd

Salt

Sprin

gs D

r

Colton BluffSprings Rd

Finch

er R

d

Edw

ards

Hol

low

Run

Frate Barker RdMcKenzie Dr

Clin

ger R

d

Southwest Pkwy

Ha

milton Pool Rd

Esca

rpm

ent

Blvd

W

illiam

Cann

on D

r

Hudson Bend Rd

Lakeway Blvd

The Hills Dr

Lohmans Crossing Rd

Lohmans Crossing R

d

Hurst Cr

eek

Rd

Grisham Tr

l

Lime Creek R

d

McArth

ur A

ve

Highland Lake Dr

Boggy Ford Rd

Bar K

Ranch Rd

Lost Cree

k Blv

d

Redbud Trl

Bee Caves Rd

N Ri

ver H

ills R

d

Pick

fair

Dr

Spicewood Springs Rd

Old Lampasas Trl

Grand Ave Pk

wy

Wells Branch Pkwy

Spicewood Springs Rd

Shoa

l Cre

ek Bl

vd

Red R

iver

St

Cam

eron

Rd

Cameron Rd

Sprin

kleRd

Brooks

Ranch Rd

Nutty Brown Rd

LakewoodDr

ShadyAcres D

rD

ove Dr

Main St

SequoyahSt

Goforth Rd

Old Kyle Rd

Rebel Rd

Center St

Hill St

Valley Spring Rd

Jacobs W

ell Rd

Eagl

e Bl

uff R

d

Taylor Rd

Main St

Harri

sSt

Bell Blvd Palm Valley Blvd

Taylor Ave

S Bell Blvd

Research

Blvd

Research Blvd

Anderson Ln

Ed B

lues

tein

Blv

d

Ben WhiteBlvd

Bast

rop

Hwy

Mop

ac E

xwy

Lamar Blvd

Cypress Creek Rd.

Forest CreekGolf Club

LakelineMall

The MarketMall

Circle CGolf Club

Lakeway ResortGolf Course

Barton Creek ResortGolf Course

River PlaceGolf Club

Barton CreekResort

HighlandMall

MunicipalAuditorium

Saint EdwardsUniversity

Huston TillotsonCollege

Universityof Texas

Universityof Texas

GeorgetownMunicipal

Airport

Taylor MunicipalAirport

RustyAllen Airport

Austin-BergstromInternational Airport

LakewayAirpark

Serenada

Georgetown

Weir

Taylor

Coupland

RicesCrossing

NormansCrossing

FrameSwitch

Jonah

Montadale

CirclevilleWaterloo

Hoxie

RockHouse

LibertyHill

Leander

RoundRock

Hutto

BrushyCreek

CedarPark

JollyvilleAndersonMill

Jonestown

LagoVista

Austin

WindemereWellsBranch

Pflugerville

Briarcliff

Lakeway

Manor

MandaLund

Littig

Bee Cave

LostCreek

West LakeHills

Rollingwood

SunsetValley

Garfield

TanglewoodForest

OnionCreek

SanLeanna

Creedmoor

MustangRidge

NewSwedenDessau

Daffan

Webberville

Elroy

Maha

MooresCrossing

Turnersville

BluffSprings

Manchaca

Circleville

Fitzhugh

CedarVallley

Village ofthe Hills

TravisPeak

Volente

Nameless

SandyCreek

PilotKnob

PointVenture

DrippingSprings

Driftwood

HaysCity

PioneerTown

Hollow

MountGainor

Hays

Buda

MountainCity

Niederwald

Woodcreek

Wimberley

Kyle

Oatmeal

Spicewood

BuffaloGap

SpicewoodBeach

Smithwick

Elgin

Utley

Rockne

Watterson

CedarCreek

Elysium

Wyldwood

LyttonSprings

Mendoza

TRAVIS

HAYS

BAST

ROP

CALDWELL

WILLIAMSON

BURNET

BLANCO

OakHill

FourPoints

MarshallFord

Coxville

KingsVillage

PilotKnob

6

3

2

5 4

1

7

183

183A

183

79

79

79

BUS79

971200201

1869

1869

2338

1105

1660

1660

1660

1660

3349

1466

1460

14602243

2243

1431

14313406

1325

95

95

397

29

29

29

29

619

112

619

973685

117

112

110107

100

120

137130

190A

279282

175

734

734

620

174

172

171

4545

130

1331

290

290

290

183

183

95

973

734

734

360

360

275

275

685

973

973

111

812

1327

1625

1626

2304

1826

973

969

969

71

7171

45

71

71

71

2244

3238

3238

2244

620

296

620

6202322

1431

1431

2222

1825

1325

1100

2769

1431

2243

2243

1

1

1

183

183

290 290

81

21

21

81

12

101

101

187

190

220

170

164

162

244

218

12

12

150

150

150

150

127

157

131

122

2770

1626

967

967

1626

2325

2325

3237

1826

2001

71

191

243

1174

1174

1869

1431

1431

962

302

290

21

21

71

71

95

969

969

20

20

812

812

812

535

535

1704

1209

183

21

672

172

1854

1854

11852001

2222

35

35

35

35

35

130

130

8

Branch Location Map

1. Cedar Park 901 Cypress Creek Road, Ste. 204, Cedar Park, Tx 78613512.823.2800 o�ce

2. Northwest3708 Spicewood Springs Rd. , Ste. 100, Austin, Tx 78759512.346.4020

3. North9600 N. MoPac Expwy., Ste. 125, Austin, Tx 78759512.459.7222

4. Downtown 1717 W. 6th Street, Ste. 105, Austin, Tx 78703512.329.0777

5. Westlake3520 Bee Caves Rd., Ste. 250, Austin, Tx 78746512.306.0988

6. Round Rock 810 Hesters Crossing, Ste. 155, Round Rock, Tx 78681512.244.2266

7. Bastrop696 Hwy 71 W., Bldg. 2, Ste. B, Bastrop, Tx 78602512.303.9633

8. Georgetown501 Austin Avenue, Ste. 1115, Georgetown, Tx 78628512.423.3291

Visit our website at www.austintitle.com to view a list of closers at each location.

Where Austin Closes

www.austintitle.com

Becky HopkinsAVP/Business [email protected] Mobile

Roxanne FordBusiness [email protected] Mobile

Cheryl ScullyBusiness [email protected] Mobile

Jenny NewmanAVP/Business [email protected] Mobile

Ashley BoydBusiness [email protected] Mobile

Leslie LinderAVP/Business [email protected] Mobile

Josh WilliamsVP/Director of Business [email protected] Mobile

Pam CarrollBusiness [email protected] Mobile

George BirgeCommercial Business [email protected] Mobile

Tina FucileBusiness [email protected] Mobile

Real Estate

Austin Public and Private School Information 2013