Upload
informa-australia
View
2.374
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Strictly Confidential
Kwinana Waste to Energy Project
WA Power and Gas Conference
Phoenix Energy Australia Pty Ltd
16th March 2016
1
Strictly Confidential
Who is Phoenix Energy?
Phoenix Energy is a privately owned Australian Waste to Energy (WtE) project development company
Our role is to develop WtE projects from conceptual stage through to Final Investment Decision (FID) by:
• Using proven WtE technologies provided by reputable technology providers, and
• Partnering with international experts and local & international professional services firms with expertise in WtE
We are technology agnostic, but performance zealots……least risk, with highest outcomes for clients.
• By not having our own technology, we are free to choose a ‘best for application’ approach in the selection of the technology.
• Therefore we ‘own’ the outcome for the client.
2
Strictly Confidential
Benefits to WA
• A step change in the diversion of municipal solid waste from landfill.
• A new source of renewable energy at a low price.
• Support economic activity and jobs in the Kwinana area.
• WA being the first State in Australia to successfully develop a large-scale waste to
energy plant.
3
Strictly Confidential
Key Milestones Achieved
• Execution of the City of Kwinana Waste Services Agreement
• Execution of the Rivers Regional Council Waste Services Agreement
• EPA part IV Environmental Approval
• Development Approval by JDAP
• Equity agreements with Covanta Energy, LLC and John Laing
• Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) completing
• Exemption of the process plant area from a building permit
• Submission and acceptance of EPA part V Works Approval application
• Obtained Ministerial Approval for Exemption of a Generator License (Governor
signed off Jan 5th and gazetted)
• WEMS generator registration complete
• Submission of Grid Connection Application to Western Power
4
Strictly Confidential
What is the technology selected for Kwinana?
5
Our core technology is
mainstream
• Martin Grate combustion technology
supplied by Mitsubishi
• Over 1000 of these type of plants
operating around the world [source:
WSP UK Limited for EPA WA, 2013]
• 435 Martin Grate plants operating or
under construction world wide
(~700kW/t of waste)
• 123 processing between 200,000t/y
& 400,000t/yr of MSW residuals
• 38 plants processing more than
400,000t/yr. The largest is five times
the size of proposed Kwinana Plant
this is a very low-risk solution!
Strictly Confidential
Key control systems
Refuse firing control (60%-110% of Maximum
Continuous Rating (MCR))• Feedstock specific heat content varies continuously
• Grate control system adjusts throughput to maintain heat release
necessary to attain a target steam rate
• Automated grab crane premixes feedstock in the waste bunker and
feeds refuse to the feed chute
Combustion temperature control• Primary (underfire) and Secondary (overfire) combustion air
• Minimum 850oC to be maintained in the burnout zone for 2 seconds
• Auxiliary burners (NG fired) also act to maintain minimum combustion
temperature
• bottom ash Total Organic Carbon (TOC) content is to be less than 3%
(or loss on ignition is less than 5%) of the dry weight of the material
CEWB 2005
Rated continuous
operating range
6
Strictly Confidential
Compatibility to Recycling
Does this discourage waste reduction,
reuse or recycling?
Not in the US.
7
Strictly Confidential
Key to eliminating landfill in the EU
Achieving sustainability in managing waste can only
be achieved with WtE as an integral component of the
waste strategy.
WtE is targeted at the
residual or general
waste bin
8
Strictly Confidential
Ash & Slag Reuse Options
Ash Handling (~5% by volume of feedstock)
• Option 1: Vitrified and/or turned into bricks and pavers• Already in operation in Japan and the US
• Meets all US EPA leach testing
• More economical and energy efficient than raw brick manufacturing
• Option 2: Used for construction as an aggregate• Used globally. US EPA and UK EPA have significant data on effective reuse.
• Used in Japan for creating new land
• Option 3: Landfilled• Used as daily cover. Rarely contemplated for new plants
9
Strictly Confidential
Environmentally Proven
• Denmark - a leader in green energy, population 5.5million – has 29 WtE’s!!
• Japan, Europe, UK, US, and most of the world except Australia!
The plants will be designed to stringent EU Emissions
standards for gaseous and aqueous emissions, using Best
Available Air Pollution Control Technology
10
Strictly Confidential
Typical Emissions Profile
The Air Pollution Control technologies are well established in the global power generation, Waste to Energy and gas processing
industries.
Example: Data from Brescia WTE
(Mass combustion) facility in Italy,
processing MSW and biomass
Stack Emissions
(Martin GmbH Brescia
(Italy))
Plant
Approva
l Limits
1993
Plant
Design
Data
1994
EUROPEA
N UNION
Limits
2000
Actual
Operating
Data
Particulate Matter 10 3 10 <0.5
Sulphur Dioxide 150 40 50 10
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 200 100 200 80
Chlorine acid (HCl) 30 20 10 5
Fluorine acid (HF) 1 1 1 0.2
Carbon Monoxide 100 40 50 20
Heavy Metals 2 0,5 0,5 0.01
Cadmium (Cd) 0,1 0,02 0,05 0.002
Mercury (Hg) 0,1 0,02 0,05 0.002
PAH (Polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbon)
0,05 0,01 - 0.001
Dioxin (TCDD Teq)
ng/Nm3
0,1 0,1 0,1 0.01
Example: The Japanese Dioxin Experience
Dioxin emissions are now barely detectable
in the flue gas emissions from the 21 WtE
plants (and 2 support plants) operating
within the 23 Wards of the City of Tokyo)
Expressed in ng-TEQ/Nm3 (FY2012 Ave. values)
Plant Actual Plant Actual Plant Actual Plant Actual
Suginami Under re-construct-ion
Chitose 0.000022 Toshima 0.000030 Shinagawa 0.000018
Hikarigaoka 0.000015 Edogawa 0.000021 Shibuya 0.000013 Katsushika 0.0000081
Ota 0.000022 Sumida 0.000014 Chuo 0.000009 Setagaya 0.000011
Meguro 0.000015 Kita 0.000017 Itabashi 0.000074 Chubo Ash Melting Plant
0.000085
Nerlma Under re-construct-ion
Shin-koto 0.000019 Tamagawa 0.000074 ChuboPulverization Plant
0.000046
Ariake 0.000010 Minato 0.000019 Adachi 0.000014
The Perth Australia Day Fireworks releases more Dioxins than the Kwinana
WtE Plant will in Four Years
Seven trucks driving past the plant in an hour will release more particulates than the
plant will in that hour
11
Strictly Confidential
Lifecycle Carbon Emission Study Results
RTI International Solid Waste Modeling Support example for: Net Total Carbon Equivalent Emissions by Scenario for Maryland (US) WtE proposed plant (for Frederick and Carroll Counties, where their MSW is being trucked across the border to an out-of-State landfill for disposal)
A second example from a proposal for the
Viridor Trident Park EfW facility in the UK
-35,000
-30,000
-25,000
-20,000
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Local Landfill Local WTE Out-Of-State Landfill
An
nu
al
Carb
on
Em
issio
ns (
MT
CE
)
Kwinana Project has potential to reduce the carbon emissions equivalent to removing
250,000 cars from the road
12
Strictly Confidential 13
Strictly Confidential 14
Strictly Confidential
What will the Kwinana Wte Plant Look Like?
15
Strictly Confidential
What will the Kwinana Wte Plant Look Like?
16
Strictly Confidential
What will the Kwinana Wte Plant Look Like?
17
Strictly Confidential
What will the Kwinana Wte Plant Look Like?
18
Strictly Confidential
Who are the Key Contractors?
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Environment and Chemical Co. (MHIEC) part of the MHI Group
In the role of Technology provider, Engineering and Procurement for Plant (excluding civils).
MHIEC: is also the Technology license holder and have built over 180 WtE plants, 90 of which are the same technology as
proposed for the Kwinana Project.
• Tried and proven WtE technology with a tried and proven technology provider and engineering capabilities.
19
Strictly Confidential
Who are the Key Contractors?
POSOC E&C
In the role of Engineering Procurement & Construction provider (EPC)
• Nearly $8.0bil USD turnover, one of the worlds largest steel manufacturers
and third largest Korean construction company
• Have constructed over 15 WtE plants
• Proposing to use BGC as civil contractor
• Proposing to transfer team current on the Krakow WtE in Poland to the
Kwinana WtE project
• Tried and proven WtE technology with a tried and proven WtE construction
company.
20
Strictly Confidential
Who are the Key Contractors?
Covanta
In the role of Operations and Maintenance (O&M)
• Own and/or Operate over 43 WtE plants
• Over 22 are Martin Grate
• Tried and proven WtE technology with a tried and proven WtE O &M contractor. THIS IS ALL THEY DO!
21
Strictly Confidential
Summary of Key Facts
• Worldwide there are over 1000 thermal waste to energy plants, but none in Australia.
• Fits Renewable Energy policies as a renewable electricity generation technology
• Their emissions are well below the most stringent EU or US standards
• They reduce waste going to landfill by 95% or more
• From one tonne of waste they produce enough energy to power an average house for 7 weeks in Australia. This is
14% of a households needs
• From one tonne of waste processed it avoids one barrel of oil or ¼ tonne of black coal or ¾ tonne of brown coal
• A tonne of waste processed at a Waste to Energy facility generates 9 times more energy than the same tonne
produces in landfills that capture the methane from buried waste
• A tonne of MSW processed at a Waste to Energy facility avoids one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions due
avoidance of methane generation at landfills, the offset of greenhouse gases from fossil fuel electrical production, and
the recovery of metals
22
Strictly Confidential
KARA-Roskilde, Denmark
Thank-you! Questions?
23