38
OSAHS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH INSOMNIA Pilot study Céline Degrande Justine Degrande Justine Mestdagh Astrid Verschaeve Supervisor Prof. Dr. Degryse

OSAHS in elderly patients with insomnia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

OSAHS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH INSOMNIAPilot studyCéline DegrandeJustine DegrandeJustine MestdaghAstrid VerschaeveSupervisor Prof. Dr. Degryse

2

Table of contents

Goal of the pilot study Background Methods Results Discussion Conclusion

3

Goal of the Pilot Study

• Prevalence of OSAHS in elderly patients with insomnia

• Validity and practical feasibility of questionnaires

4

A little quiz…

• How often do you think older patients complain of sleep disturbances such as insomnia?o 25%o 50%o 75%o 90%o I don’t know

5

Background: Insomnia• Dissatisfaction with either duration or quality

of sleep.

• 3 fundamental criteria• recurrent• despite adequate opportunities for sleep.• impairment of daytime functioning.

• Most common comorbidities:• psychiatric illness • sleep disordered breathing: OSAHS

• Associated with older age – underdiagnosis:• ‘Ageism’• mental illnesses – cognitive disorders• threshold consulting GP• burden of PSG

6

Background: OSAHS• Prevalence:

o 30-60 years:• ♂: 4%• ♀: 2%

o ↑ prevalence with age: • ♂: 28-62% • ♀: 19,5-60%

• Symptoms:o excessive daytime sleepinesso snoring

• Risk factors: o obesity, male gender, ageing, familial

history, sedating medication,…

• Comorbidities: o cardiovascular o metabolic o neurobehavioral

• Diagnosis:o PSG vs portable device (Brizzy®)

7

Background: Questionnaires

• Insomnia:o ISI

• Sleep quality: o PSQIo ESS

• OSAHS:o BQo STOP-BANG

• Snoring, Tired, Observed, blood Pressure, BMI, Age, Neck circumference, Gender

8

Methods

9

10

Methods

11

Methods

• Exclusion criteriao terminal patients (life expectancy < 3 months)o diagnosis of dementia (MMSE < 24) o acute precipitating factor for insomnia (physical or

psychological) o Already diagnosed with OSAHS by PSG

• Patients already taking sleep medication NOT excluded!

12

Methods

13

Methods

• Home visito Anamnesis

• History patient• CV RF (smoking, alcohol, familial history,

hypertension, hypercholesterolemia)• Medication use

o Clinical examination• Height, weight, neck circumference,

abdominal circumference, blood pressure,

heart rhythm

14

Methods

• Home visito Questionnaires

• PSQI• ESS• Berlin questionnaire• STOP-BANG

15

16

17

18

19

Methods: Brizzy®

20

Methods: JAWAC

21

Results

• Brizzy® report

• Patient characteristics

• Brizzy® analyses

• Questionnaires

22

Brizzy® report

23

24

25

Results: Patient characteristics

26

Results:Brizzy ® reports

A small example….

30

Results:Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, AUC and p-value of parameters in Brizzy® reports using optimal cut-off values

31

Results:Questionnaires mean scores and statistic significance

32

Results:Questionnaires sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV using normal cut-off values

33

Results:Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, AUC of questionnaires using optimal cut-off values

34

Discussion

• Strenghts o Uniformo First step in an unexplored domain

• Limitations o Sample sizeo Brizzy as golden standard o Interobserver variability

35

Discussion

• Underdiagnosis

• Case-finding protocol and ISI as screening tool highly suitable

• Patient characteristics

• RDI – ODI – CT SpO2 < 90%

• Brizzy as a valid ambulant alternative

• ESS – BQ valid questionnaires with optimal cut-off

Conclusion

• OSAHS: severe underdiagnosis • Brizzy as a practical and feasible alternative • Questionnaires in screening

36

37

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

38

Any questions?