25
Presenter [name] [Date] DELIVERING AN EFFECTIVE GLOBAL BENEFITS STRATEGY Matthew Gregson 29 th October 2015

Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

Presenter [name][Date]

DELIVERING AN EFFECTIVE GLOBAL BENEFITS STRATEGY

Matthew Gregson

29th October 2015

Page 2: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

WE ARE…

Revolutionizing global benefits

In 73 countries, 22 languages

450 People in 4 global locations

Thomsons Online Benefits – world leader in global benefits management software

Page 3: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

WHAT IS GEBW?• Over 10 years of insight

• 2nd Global Edition

• Trends on global benefits strategy, employee engagement and technology solutions and adoption.

• Insight from more than 300 global HR leaders

• Covering 4 million employees worldwide

• 48 industries

• Americas, APAC, EMEA

Page 4: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

OUR HYPOTHESIS

There are some common building

blocks that companies use in

delivering a global benefits strategy

which have a measurable

impact on its success…

Page 5: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

WHAT ARE THE GLOBAL BENEFITS CHALLENGES?

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No Yes

There are some consistent challenges that companies are facing in delivering global benefits, centering on engagement, admin & governance

Page 6: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

HOW ARE COMPANIES TRYING TO SOLVE IT?51% of companies surveyed have a defined Global Benefits Strategy.

For those companies that do, there are some common ambitions for what they want their approach to achieve, which can be summed up as “bringing in the right people who can help drive business performance”

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

No Yes

Page 7: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

WHAT ARE GLOBAL COMPANIES TRYING TO ACHIEVE?

6%

67%

27%

Effectiveness of our Global Benefits Strategy

Very effective EffectiveNot very effective

So, are there any measurable differences in the 51% of companies with a defined strategy versus the 49% who don’t have a documented approach?

On self-diagnosis, nearly 75% of companies with a defined strategy feel their approach is effective…

But is it and can we find the building blocks that

differentiate them from the companies that don’t or don’t

have a defined strategy?

Page 8: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

GLOBAL BENEFITS STRATEGYWhereas, historically, many Global Benefits Strategies have been about consistency of benefits, that wasn’t a strong theme from this year’s results

Instead, we believe that the building blocks have evolved to:

Consistent Admin

Local Design

ConsistentComms

GlobalGovernance

Page 9: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

GLOBAL BENEFITS STRATEGY

American multinational that designs, manufactures, and sells networking equipment.

Industry: IT-HardwareGlobal Headcount: 74,043

Project: 62 EMEAR countries  

 

$35-60k savings on administration costs per country

$1M+ in savings through tax

efficiencies inEMEA

Page 10: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & ENGAGEMENT

Page 11: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENTEmployee engagement was both one of the greatest challenges companies face in delivering their global benefits strategy and one of their key objectives in proving its value

4%15%

66%

15%

Overall Employee En-gagement Trends

Not engaged at all

Varies by region

Somewhat engaged and responsive

Very engaged and responsive

With only 15% of companies feeling that their global workforce is

well-engaged, the majority of companies

have a way to go…

So what makes the difference?

Page 12: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENTWe asked respondents to self-diagnose the effectiveness of their communications and tell us about how they communicate benefits with their employees

8%

24%

57%

11%

Is Your Communications Approach Effective?

Strongly disagree

Somewhat disagree

Somewhat agree

Strongly agree

Those who feel their approach is effective are:

• 25% more likely to communicate frequently

• 35% more likely to have a global benefit brand

• 37% more likely to use Total Reward in some regions

Interestingly, no single medium had a positive link to engagement

Page 13: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

All Some None All Some NoneYes No

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Effectiveness of Communications Approach on Engagement

Not engaged at all Varies by region Somewhat engaged and responsive Very engaged and responsive

Overall, companies that used a combination of Total Reward and a Global Benefits Brand were:• Significantly more likely to have engaged employees; and• Consistently did not believe that they had a real engagement

challenge

Page 14: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENTNot only does a strong communications approach drive engagement, it also has a direct link to the effectiveness of the overall Global Benefits Strategy.

And, those companies without a global benefits strategy were 25% less likely to say their comms approach was working

Strongly disagree

Somewhat disagree

Somewhat agree

Strongly agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Link between Effective Comms and Effective Global Benefits Strategy

Very effective Effective Not very effective

Page 15: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

COMMUNICATIONS & EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

Multinational food-products corporation based in France.

Industry: FMCGGlobal Headcount: 98,236 

 

83% of employees logged onto the site

over the benefits selection window

Employees rated their reward scheme 24.6% higher

EMEA Challenges:• Poor response rate and

results in their global survey• No consistent approach to

benefits across business units

Page 16: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

ADMINISTRATION & GLOBAL GOVERNANCE

Page 17: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATIONSecond to employee engagement in the challenges faced by respondents was the administration burden carried by teams:

Intern

al Burd

en

Provide

r Erro

rs/SLA

Inabil

ity to

Rep

ort G

loball

y

Too M

any S

uppli

ers

Lack

of E

mploye

e Owne

rhship

Accura

cy of

Inter

nal R

eport

ing0%

10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Global Admin Challenges

Yes No

Page 18: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATIONOnce again, we know what the consistent issues are, but can we identify those who are overcoming the admin challenge?

37%

11%

51%

Use of Global HRSS Model

No

Planning

Yes

18%

55%

6%

13%

8%Benefits Management Approach

Manual process

Different by Location

Local brokers software

HR software

Global Benefits Software

Although 51% have global HRSS, only 21% have consistent approach to benefits admin (HR or Benefits Software)

Page 19: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATIONSo, do the 21% that have a consistent approach to admin have an advantage over the rest?

Global Benefits Software

HR software

Local brokers software

Different by Location

Manual process

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

Admin Burden versus Benefits Admin Approach

1 day or less 2 to 5 days 6+ days

In addition to being 20% more likely to get admin

down to a day or less and 15% less likely for admin to

take 6 days or more, people using benefits

software are also:• 25% less likely to have an

internal admin burden• Up to 40% less likely to have

global reporting issues• 19% less likely to have an issue with the # of suppliers

Page 20: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATION

Manual process

Different by Location

HR software

Local brokers software

Global Benefits Software

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

Ability to Report Globally by Admin Approach

Strongly agree Somewhat agree Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree

Companies with global benefits software are significantly more likely to be able to govern and report globally on benefit spend.

In addition to that, companies with Global Benefits Software are 28% more likely to say their Global Benefits Strategy was effective

Page 21: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

EFFECTIVE ADMINISTRATIONConsidering the above, it is interesting to see the admin preferences and plan for our respondents, depending on the approach they take today.

Other than those companies using local broker software, the majority of companies are looking to move to Global Benefits Software

Local brokers software

HR software

Different by Location

Manual process

Global Benefits Software

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Current and Preferred Approach to Administration

Manual process Different by Location Local brokers softwareHR software Global Benefits Software

Page 22: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

DARWIN IN THE SHARED SERVICES CENTER

Global principles around engagement of employees

HR shared service centersGlobalizing payroll

Different benefits models

Reduced headcount

Better understanding and engagement

Ability to deliver local info remotely

Centralized reporting

American multinational manufacturer

Industry: Manufacturing and Tech

Global Headcount: 100,000+

Page 23: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

KEY FINDINGS

Page 24: Delivering an effective global benefits strategy

KEY FINDINGS

• Those companies with a defined Global Benefits Strategy(GBS) are

running their Global Benefits More Effectively

• Effective Communications drives an Effective GBS

• Effective Comms is impacted by having a Global Benefits Brand,

Frequent Communications and Total Reward

• Effective Administration drives an Effective GBS

• Effective Admin is more likely with consistent software, especially

Global Benefits Software, which is more effective at reducing the

admin burden and improving global reporting