7
Scotland – Enduring the Settlement “If Britain does not change of its own volition, Scotland will demand, at a minimum, “home rule within the UK”, and could force upon the whole country a system of government as close to federalism as you can have in a nation where one part forms 85% of the population. But what is now at stake is more serious than even that: the nationalists would consign the very idea of the “United” Kingdom and of “Great” Britain to the past.” Gordon Brown, The Guardian, Monday 9 June 2014 20.00 BST http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/09/scottish-referendum-not-britain-v- scotland Gordon Brown characterised the debate surrounding Scotland’s referendum as one between federalism and independence. This was the choice that most people thought they were making, between a federal UK state with devolution of matters other than Defence and Foreign Affairs to, in Scotland’s case the Scottish Parliament. If that was what we voted for, is that what we got? When we talk about federalism we use the term as meaning fiscal federalism, the control over, most importantly, taxation with the Scottish Parliament able to alter this to suit the changed circumstances we find ourselves in over time. Is this what the nation has seen delivered? A detailed study of the proposals set out in the UK Government’s Command Paper “Scotland in the United Kingdom – an enduring settlement” follows below looking at what has and has not been transferred and the limitations placed upon those things which have been transferred: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scotland-in-the-united-kingdom-an-enduring- settlement Lord Smith of Kelvin was faced with a short timescale to reach his conclusions. Essentially he had in front of him a fork in the road. He could head one way and plot out a Devo-Max parliament with full powers over taxes and spending, the scenario that Gordon Brown was presenting as his alternative to independence. Such a choice provided an opportunity to reach a settlement which could endure. That was not the road chosen. Smith’s chosen route of travel charts a very limited change in the Scottish Parliament’s powers over taxation. We are given much wider control over the Parliament’s powers to spend. It is a diminutive version of devolution which I’m happy to Christen “Devo-Dim”. No-one can look at the powers transferred and conclude that these will endow the Scottish Parliament with the resource it needs to create a powerhouse economy in an enterprising nation. We can’t even set up an Enterprise Zone. The choice made has negated our chance of an “Enduring Settlement”. Power over Taxation Power over Spending Power over Economy Other

Scotland enduring the settlement

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Scotland enduring the settlement

Scotland – Enduring the Settlement

“If Britain does not change of its own volition, Scotland will demand, at a minimum, “home rule

within the UK”, and could force upon the whole country a system of government as close to

federalism as you can have in a nation where one part forms 85% of the population. But what is now

at stake is more serious than even that: the nationalists would consign the very idea of the “United”

Kingdom and of “Great” Britain to the past.”

Gordon Brown, The Guardian, Monday 9 June 2014 20.00 BST

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/09/scottish-referendum-not-britain-v-

scotland

Gordon Brown characterised the debate surrounding Scotland’s referendum as one between

federalism and independence. This was the choice that most people thought they were making,

between a federal UK state with devolution of matters other than Defence and Foreign Affairs to, in

Scotland’s case the Scottish Parliament. If that was what we voted for, is that what we got?

When we talk about federalism we use the term as meaning fiscal federalism, the control over, most

importantly, taxation with the Scottish Parliament able to alter this to suit the changed

circumstances we find ourselves in over time. Is this what the nation has seen delivered?

A detailed study of the proposals set out in the UK Government’s Command Paper “Scotland in the

United Kingdom – an enduring settlement” follows below looking at what has and has not been

transferred and the limitations placed upon those things which have been transferred:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scotland-in-the-united-kingdom-an-enduring-

settlement

Lord Smith of Kelvin was faced with a short timescale to reach his conclusions. Essentially he had in

front of him a fork in the road. He could head one way and plot out a Devo-Max parliament with full

powers over taxes and spending, the scenario that Gordon Brown was presenting as his alternative

to independence. Such a choice provided an opportunity to reach a settlement which could endure.

That was not the road chosen.

Smith’s chosen route of travel charts a very limited change in the Scottish Parliament’s powers over

taxation. We are given much wider control over the Parliament’s powers to spend. It is a diminutive

version of devolution which I’m happy to Christen “Devo-Dim”. No-one can look at the powers

transferred and conclude that these will endow the Scottish Parliament with the resource it needs to

create a powerhouse economy in an enterprising nation. We can’t even set up an Enterprise Zone.

The choice made has negated our chance of an “Enduring Settlement”.

Power over Taxation Power over Spending

Power over Economy Other

Page 2: Scotland enduring the settlement

Powers Retained

Policy Area Proposal Power Transferred Power Reserved

Corporation Tax No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Value Added Tax No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved. Cannot adjust rates. Police/Fire expenses VAT not recoverable.

Inheritance Tax No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Capital Gains Tax No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

National Insurance No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Excise Duty Rates No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Defence No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Foreign Affairs No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Macroeconomic Policy No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Interest Rate setting No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

The Constitution No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Immigration & Asylum No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Broadcasting No transfer of Power None, right to consult re BBC Charter MoU to govern operations of BBC

All areas Reserved

Competition Policy - CMA No transfer of Power Will have right to consultation and to request Enquiries and full CMA Phase II Investigations

Some Changes

Regulation of Energy - OFGEM No transfer of Power Will have right to consultation and to request Enquiries and full CMA Phase II Investigations

Some Changes

Regulation of Telecoms - OFCOM No transfer of Power Will have right to consultation & to appoint 1 OFCOM Board Member

UK Secretary of State can veto Board Appointment

Crown Estate No transfer of Power over main assets

T/f of Power over Land & Property in Scotland (Inc. Shoreline)

Defence, Security, Oil & Gas and Energy Reserved

Offshore Oil & Gas Licensing No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Offshore Oil & Gas Taxation No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Pensions No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Page 3: Scotland enduring the settlement

Policy Area Proposal Power Transferred Power Reserved

Borrowing Limits No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Power for bodies to reclaim VAT No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Scottish Budget No transfer of Power None, Must remain balanced. All areas Reserved

Right to Levy new taxes No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Tax Rate on Savings No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Tax Rate on Dividends No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Tax Reliefs & Allowances No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Pensions No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Universal Credit Scotland to do Admin of UC here. Right to be Consulted. Right to vary frequency of payments – not rate. Right to pay Landlords directly.

Some changes

Migrant Benefits No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Maritime & Coastguard Agency No transfer of Power None. MoU to govern operations of MCA

All areas Reserved

Oil & Gas Decommissioning No transfer of Liabilities None Westminster got Tax receipts & must carry the costs.

Equality Act 2010 No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Special Immigration Appeals Cttee No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Proscribed Organisns. Appeals Cttee No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Pathogens Access Appeals Cttee No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Investigatory Powers Tribunal No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Power to create Enterprise Zones No transfer of Power None All areas Reserved

Renewable energy incentives ROCs, FITs, RHIs

No transfer of Power None, will have right to be consulted

All areas Reserved

Page 4: Scotland enduring the settlement

Powers Devolved

Policy Area Proposal Power Transferred Power Reserved

Votes for 16-17 Year Olds T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Parl & Council Elections in Scotland Reserved for UK & EU Elections

Set Stamp Duty rates in Scotland T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Set Land Tax rates in Scotland T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Set Landfill Tax rates in Scotland T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Set Income Tax Rate in Scotland T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Power to set Basic Rate +/-3p in £ Power to set Higher Rate +/-3p in £ -cannot vary +/- rate for each band

Power to set zero rate band Power to set Personal Allowance Barnett Formula adjusted for change

Borrowing from National Loan Fund Grant Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Limit set by UK Parliament £300m Borrowing subject to UK agreement

Establish a Cash Reserve Grant Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Limit set by UK Parliament £125m Borrowing subject to UK agreement

Scottish Block Grant Up if Scots Income Tax receipts rise faster than the UK’s. Down if Scots Income Tax recpts rise more slowly.

Proposed. Potentially catastrophic if oil prices fall. Should be counter cyclical if oil price falls - but isn’t.

Potential to collapse the Scottish Economy when oil prices fall and expand the economy when they rise.

Air Passenger Duty T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Barnett Formula adjusted for change

Aggregates Levy can be altered T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Barnett Formula adjusted for change

Benefits Spending (Except Pensions) T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Bedroom Tax T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

New Benefits Power to create new Benefits Yes None, not subject to benefits cap

Housing Benefits T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Crisis Loans T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Page 5: Scotland enduring the settlement

Policy Area Proposal Power Transferred Power Reserved

Community Care Grants T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Attendance Allowance T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Carer’s Allowance T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Barnett Formula adjusted for change

Personal Independence Payt (PIP) T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Barnett Formula adjusted for change

Industrial Injuries Disabilities Allow T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Severe Disablement Allowance T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Cold Weather Payment T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Funeral Grant T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Maternity Grant T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Winter Fuel Payment T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Discretionary Housing Payment T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Sec of State for Work & Pensions to agree changes in Scotland

Cost of Renewables decommissioning

T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Barnett Formula not adjusted for change & potentially huge cost

Payday Loans Shops T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Fixed Odds Betting Shops T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Social Security Tribunal T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Criminal Injuries Tribunal T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Information Rights Tribunal T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

Page 6: Scotland enduring the settlement

Policy Area Proposal Power Transferred Power Reserved

Onshore oil & gas Licensing T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes Can’t levy a royalty on production.

Appoint Rail Operator T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None, can be a public sector firm

Power over Road Speed Limits T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None

British Transport Police T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes None, but who gets VAT on spend?

Energy Efficiency T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes How to Pay for it - Reserved

Fuel Poverty T/f Power to Scottish Parliament Yes How to Pay for it - Reserved

Page 7: Scotland enduring the settlement

Further Observations Under Chapter 2: Fiscal framework on Page 33 we are told that: “The Scottish Government will not therefore be isolated from all risks, so will need tools to manage appropriate risks. If Scotland experiences an economic shock when the rest of the UK does not, the funding model would not provide the Scottish Government with additional to offset its lower tax receipts or higher spending pressures” We are also told: “Borrowing could be undertaken to respond to a shock, but a clear plan will be needed to repay the debt incurred in order to ensure a sustainable fiscal position” Remember, we were told above that if Scotland’s share of income taxes for the whole UK falls we will see a cut in our share of the Barnett Formula grant. This is hardly a hypothetical position, it is precisely where we are now. If oil prices fall jobs in Scotland would be lost. The UK as a whole would benefit from a fall in oil & gas prices, these would boost company profits and wages in the rest of the UK. In Scotland, our share of income tax receipts would fall. In the event of a crisis in Scotland, the UK’s “Enduring Settlement” could well make things worse. A cut to Barnett formula funding for Scotland would follow our fall in income tax receipts. Nor would we be able to borrow more without permission, nor would we be able to alter any other taxes in response to the crisis. Conclusion It is delusional given the diminutive nature of the powers over the economy transferred under this settlement to suggest that this formula will be one which endures. The fault is not Lord Smith’s. He was there to act as a cipher for the political parties round the table. He did his job. What was put together essentially reflects the views of the Con-Dem-Lab coalition for a “No” vote. Having won they were unwilling to enhance the powers of the Scottish Parliament in any material way. Faced with the threat from the three amigos to walk away if their view didn’t prevail the SNP and the Greens got the best deal they could in the circumstances. That it isn’t what the public expected or wanted is clear from the SNP’s membership quadrupling since the referendum. We are left with a Parliament which has lots of control over spending but little say on how taxes are set and the money raised to pay for it. Few things can be changed without a consequence for the Barnett Formula negating them. Yet again, power devolved is power retained. We’ve often heard the argument made that the pro-Unionist parties fear a “Neverendum” more than anything. Clearly this can’t be the case. If it was they’d have given the people of Scotland what they asked for and expected, proper Fiscal Federalism with powers over “tax” as well as over “spend”. Devo-Max this settlement ain’t. If the polls are to be believed the Con-Dem-Lab coalition might be regretting their lack of magnanimity in victory on May 8th. Derek W Louden Abbian House Tower Street Tain Ross-shire IV19 1DY Tel: 01862 892734 Mob: 07876 774412 Email: [email protected]