43
Beth Wallace [email protected] 734.887.7134 Great Lakes Regional Center, National Wildlife Federation - Enbridge oil spill update, Kalamazoo River tar sands spill – - Pipelines in the Great Lakes – - Pipelines Rules and Regulations - - Proposed Pipelines - - Involvement and Recommendations – Tweet questions: #GLPipelineSafety

Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Did you know there is a massive 60-year-old oil pipeline running under Lake Michigan and Lake Huron, along the Straits of Mackinac? Did you know that up to 20 million gallons of oil travels through that pipeline a day and the operators have plans to expand the capacity without making significant updates? You might also be surprised to learn that most of the oil traveling through our pipelines comes from the Alberta tar sands. This panel will explain the issues and the regulatory framework governing oil pipelines as well as provide recommendations on ways we can safeguard our lakes from spills.

Citation preview

Page 1: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Beth [email protected]

734.887.7134Great Lakes Regional Center, National Wildlife Federation

- Enbridge oil spill update, Kalamazoo River tar sands spill –

- Pipelines in the Great Lakes –- Pipelines Rules and Regulations -

- Proposed Pipelines -- Involvement and Recommendations –

Tweet questions: #GLPipelineSafety

Page 2: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 3: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Kalamazoo River Watershed

Page 4: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 5: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

July 15th, 2010 Congressional Committee Hearing regarding safety violations:

Enbridge officials testified that the company was able to detect a leak “almost instantaneously” after it occurred.

Page 6: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

TimelineJuly 25th, 2010• 5:56 p.m. Officials at Enbridge Energy’s Edmonton, Alberta control center effect a shut

down of Lakehead Pipeline 6B. The shut down was previously scheduled for routine upkeep of the line. (NTSB, Schauer)

• 5:58 p.m. Officials at Enbridge Energy’s Edmonton, Alberta control center receive an alarm that pressure has dropped in line 6B. The Marshall pumping station goes into shut down. (NTSB, Schauer)

• 9:26 p.m. The first of what will become numerous phone calls comes into the Calhoun County Consolidated Dispatch Authority reporting a dense smell of natural gas. (911 logs, Schauer, NTSB)

• 9:27 p.m. City of Marshall firefighters are dispatched to investigate the gas smell. (911 logs) the call is cleared because they were unable to find a source

It is important to note that 911 calls continued through the night.

Page 7: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

July 26, 2010• 4:04 a.m. Officials in the Edmonton, Alberta control room attempt to restart Lakehead

Pipeline 6B. The system will not start up, and technicians spent nearly the next four hours “troubleshooting” the problem. (NTSB)

• 4:26 a.m. Officials in Edmonton, Alberta call in mass balance analysts to assist with the start up. Officials increase the pressure in the line, as well as turn the line off and on “repeatedly.” (Schauer)

• 7:52 a.m. Officials in Edmonton, Alberta order the line shut down, and the trouble area of Marshall sealed off. That means they closed valves at either end of a three mile stretch of pipeline. (Schauer, NTSB, Enbridge officials)

• 9:49 a.m. Edmonton, Alberta control room officials dispatch an Enbridge employee to the pipeline. Employee reports “readings are at zero” and that he “doesn’t see anything.” (Schauer)

• 11:11 a.m. Calhoun County Consolidated Dispatch Authority initiates a response call about “entire downtown smells like natural gas” in the city of Marshall. City of Marshall firefighters dispatched. (911 logs)

• 11:16 a.m. Consumer’s Energy employee calls Enbridge to report visual confirmation of oil at the spill location. (Schauer, NTSB, Enbridge, EPA, county officials)

• 1:33 p.m. Enbridge officially reports the incident to the National Response Center. (NRC, NTSB, Enbridge)

17 hours after the alarms indicated an issue.

Source: Michigan Messenger, The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Page 8: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Lakehead Pipeline 6b

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Page 9: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Enbridge Oil Spill Marshall, MI

July 25th, 2010

Page 10: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 11: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 12: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 13: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

David Dodge

Page 14: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Peter Essick

Page 15: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Six primary agencies have responded to the emergency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment (MDNRE) Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division Calhoun County Public Health Department Calhoun County Sheriff Kalamazoo County Sheriff

Supporting and assisting agencies:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Allegan County Emergency Management American Red Cross Augusta Police Department B&B Fire Safety Emergency Response Calhoun Conservation District Calhoun County Commissioners Calhoun County Drain Commission Calhoun County Sheriff’s Office Calhoun County Treasurers Office Calhoun Conservation District Calhoun Greenation District City of Battle Creek, Michigan City of Marshall, Michigan Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Fredonia Township Fire Department Huron Potawatomi Kalamazoo County Office of Emergency Management Kalamazoo Public Safety Kalamazoo County Health Department Kalamazoo Watershed Council Marshall Township Government and Fire Department Marshall Police Department Michigan Department of Community Health Michigan Occupational Safety & Health Administration Natural Resource Group Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Department of Transportation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Occupational Safety & Health Administration

Page 16: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 17: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

EPA's Operational Update Photos

Page 18: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

EPA's Operational Update Photos

Page 19: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

John Grap/The Enquirer

Page 20: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

Kalamazoo Gazette / Jerry Campbell

Page 21: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

David Coates / The Detroit News

Page 22: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

John Grap/Battle Creek Enquirer/Associated Press

Page 23: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Wildlife

Page 24: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Photo: Todd Heywood

Page 25: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

The community tries to take matters into their own hands…

AP Photo/Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke

Page 26: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 27: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Keeping wildlife out of oil polluted areas…

Page 28: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Photo courtesy of EPA Region 5)

Page 29: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Current Status…

Page 30: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 31: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 32: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 33: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 34: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 35: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 36: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 37: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 38: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 39: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

National Online Action alert: Enbridge Oil Spill in Michigan: http://www.nwf.org/Global-Warming/Policy-Solutions/Drilling-and-Mining/Tar-Sands/Michigan-Oil-Spill.aspx

Templates letters to send to the President, Secretary of State, Congressional Members or even local officials.

Start a community action coalition or group

Resources/Reports: •Tar Sands Pipeline Safety Risks •Assault on America: A Decade of Petroleum Company Disaster, Pollution, and Profit•The Riverwatch: Special Report on Oil & Gas•Dirty Business, Friends of the Earth

What Can I do?

Page 40: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012
Page 41: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

Pipeline Safety LegislationPipeline Infrastructure and Community Protection Act of 2011 – HR2937

Page 42: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

RECOMMENDATIONS

•Great Lakes states should regulate interstate pipelines and participate in the oversight and inspection in interstate pipelines.•The Great Lakes basin should, in its entirety, be considered a High Consequence Area and/or Unusually Sensitive Area, which would require more frequent inspections, requires a risk-based analysis for pipelines and at least some defects to be repaired under the Integrity Management Programs administered by PHMSA. •All Great Lakes states need to consider strong renewable energy standards similar to Iowa, which gets 21% of its energy from clean renewable sources. Michigan voters should vote, this November, for the improved renewable energy standard of 25% by 2025. This will protect Michigan’s natural heritage by reducing dependency on oil, coal and gas. •The state of Michigan and our federal agencies should deny all new oil pipelines and expansions of existing pipelines within the Great Lakes basin due to economic and environmental sensitive’s, especially with Line 5.

Page 43: Oil Pipelines in the Great Lakes, Threats and Solutions-Wallace, 2012

RECOMMENDATIONS

•Enbridge needs to develop additional response centers on either peninsula, which would hopefully create an immediate response time, rather than 3 hours from Escanaba and 5 hours from Bay City. •No pipelines transporting raw or upgraded tar sands should be approved for construction or expansion until the National Academy of Sciences has concluded a study on how transportation of these products impacts current pipelines. •In the wake of the Kalamazoo River spill, any pipeline operator transporting DilBit should be required to develop alternative response plans; taking into account the unique characteristics of the toxic heavy bitumen and the need for increased safeguards. •Our federal agencies should require that Enbridge pay for a thorough health study, around the Kalamazoo River release, on how a release of DilBit impacts wildlife and human health—short and long term. •PHMSA Integrity management programs need to be overhauled and there needs to be increased oversight during pipeline inspections and when reviewing emergency response plans. •Pipeline information, including response plans, should be publicly available and PHMSA should allow for public comment periods.