2
British Prime Minister David Cameron’s EU Speech N°5 JANUARY 2013 CAMERON CALLS FOR REFERENDUM. BRITAIN’S STATUS IN THE EU TO BE RE-NEGOTIATED. On the morning of January 23, 2013 the British Prime Min- ister David Cameron delivered his long-awaited speech on the United Kingdom’s future in the European Union. He made clear that he had no desire to see the UK leave the EU. The current issues the EU faces can only be addressed with a “radically new thinking,stated the Prime Minister. He advocated that the EU should be based on the follow- ing five principles: Competitiveness, Flexibility, A flow of power and competences back to the Member States, Democratic accountability, and Fairness. An ideal EU would therefore have a network structure with the Single Market at its heart, taking into account the di- verse needs of its Member States. All Member States in such a union would need to be completely equal, unlike Norway or Switzerland who participate in the Single Mar- ket but have no say in its legislation. A renegotiation on the UK’s membership in the EU, how- ever, would need to wait until the British elections in 2015 so that a referendum on the outcome could take place at the end of 2017 almost five years from now. This schedule could grant Cameron more leeway to pursue his current EU policy more proactively, at least until 2015. Between now and the election in 2015, the other parties in Britain, and Labour in particular, have to reflect on their own stance towards the EU and the proposed referendum. Prior to Cameron’s speech, Ed Miliband, Leader of the Labour Party, stated that the speech would define Cam- eron “as a weak Prime Minister, being driven by his party, not by the national economic interest.” British business, he said, had warned the government about the consequences of creating “years of uncertainty for Britain.” Nick Clegg, the Leader of the Liberals, lamented that Cameron paved the way for “years of grinding uncertainty because of an ill- defined, protracted renegotiation of Britain's status within the European Union.” It is questionable, however, whether the other 26 EU Member States will allow the UK to renegotiate its position in the EU especially as other Member States might sub- sequently demand to renegotiate their membership. In addition, a referendum on EU membership carries the risk of an involuntary British exit. In recent years, EU-related referendums in other Member States have more often than not been used as an opportunity to voice popular dissatisfaction with the performance of national govern- ments. This has resulted in a number of unexpected nega- tive votes. Sir Stephen Sherbourne, political consultant in the UK and a former adviser to Prime Minister Thatcher, has com- mented that David Cameron’s speech should bring about changes in the relationship between Britain and the EU. He also believes that many EU members will privately, if not publicly, support many of the reforms which the British Prime Minister wants to see. The speech is timely as Ger- many and France are now celebrating 50 years of the 1963 Élysée Treaty. This was also the year President de Gaulle vetoed Britain’s first application to join the EU. But from the beginning of this European project, France and Ger- many have always wanted the UK to play its part as a member. And, Sir Stephen believes, they still do. In a bilateral meeting with Cameron last week, the Ameri- can President Obama openly expressed his concern re- garding a potential UK exit from the EU. From a US- perspective, a British exit would significantly weaken the UK’s standing in international politics and its position in the global economy. Meanwhile, Chancellor Angela Merkel commented “we are prepared to talk about British wishes but we must always bear in mind that other countries have different wishes and we must find a fair compromise. We will talk intensively with Britain about its individual ideas but that has some time over the months ahead. Image: conservatives.com

Nuances special edition newsletter: Prime Minister Cameron Calls for Refer…

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Nuances special edition newsletter: Prime Minister Cameron Calls for Refer…

British Prime Minister David Cameron’s EU Speech

N°5 – JANUARY 2013

CAMERON CALLS FOR REFERENDUM.

BRITAIN’S STATUS IN THE EU TO BE RE-NEGOTIATED.

– On the morning of January 23, 2013 the British Prime Min-ister David Cameron delivered his long-awaited speech on the United Kingdom’s future in the European Union. He made clear that he had no desire to see the UK leave the EU. The current issues the EU faces can only be addressed with a “radically new thinking,” stated the Prime Minister. He advocated that the EU should be based on the follow-ing five principles:

Competitiveness, Flexibility, A flow of power and competences back to the

Member States, Democratic accountability, and Fairness.

An ideal EU would therefore have a network structure with the Single Market at its heart, taking into account the di-verse needs of its Member States. All Member States in such a union would need to be completely equal, unlike Norway or Switzerland who participate in the Single Mar-ket but have no say in its legislation. A renegotiation on the UK’s membership in the EU, how-ever, would need to wait until the British elections in 2015 so that a referendum on the outcome could take place at the end of 2017 – almost five years from now. This schedule could grant Cameron more leeway to pursue his current EU policy more proactively, at least until 2015. Between now and the election in 2015, the other parties in Britain, and Labour in particular, have to reflect on their own stance towards the EU and the proposed referendum. Prior to Cameron’s speech, Ed Miliband, Leader of the Labour Party, stated that the speech would define Cam-eron “as a weak Prime Minister, being driven by his party, not by the national economic interest.” British business, he said, had warned the government about the consequences of creating “years of uncertainty for Britain.” Nick Clegg, the Leader of the Liberals, lamented that Cameron paved the way for “years of grinding uncertainty because of an ill-defined, protracted renegotiation of Britain's status within the European Union.”

It is questionable, however, whether the other 26 EU Member States will allow the UK to renegotiate its position in the EU – especially as other Member States might sub-sequently demand to renegotiate their membership. In addition, a referendum on EU membership carries the risk of an involuntary British exit. In recent years, EU-related referendums in other Member States have more often than not been used as an opportunity to voice popular dissatisfaction with the performance of national govern-ments. This has resulted in a number of unexpected nega-tive votes. Sir Stephen Sherbourne, political consultant in the UK and a former adviser to Prime Minister Thatcher, has com-mented that David Cameron’s speech should bring about changes in the relationship between Britain and the EU. He also believes that many EU members will privately, if not publicly, support many of the reforms which the British Prime Minister wants to see. The speech is timely as Ger-many and France are now celebrating 50 years of the 1963 Élysée Treaty. This was also the year President de Gaulle vetoed Britain’s first application to join the EU. But from the beginning of this European project, France and Ger-many have always wanted the UK to play its part as a member. And, Sir Stephen believes, they still do.

In a bilateral meeting with Cameron last week, the Ameri-can President Obama openly expressed his concern re-garding a potential UK exit from the EU. From a US-perspective, a British exit would significantly weaken the UK’s standing in international politics and its position in the global economy. Meanwhile, Chancellor Angela Merkel commented “we are prepared to talk about British wishes but we must always bear in mind that other countries have different wishes and we must find a fair compromise. We will talk intensively with Britain about its individual ideas but that has some time over the months ahead.”

Image: conservatives.com

Page 2: Nuances special edition newsletter: Prime Minister Cameron Calls for Refer…

British Prime Minister David Cameron’s EU Speech

N°5 – JANUARY 2013

CAMERON MÖCHTE EU-REFERENDUM 2017.

NEUVERHANDLUNGEN ÜBER GROßBRITANNIENS STATUS IN DER EU AB 2015 GEFORDERT.

– Am Morgen des 23. Januar 2013 hat der britische Premi-erminister David Cameron seine lang erwartete Rede zur Zukunft Großbritanniens in der EU gehalten. Er stellte klar, dass er kein Interesse daran habe, dass Großbritannien die EU verlässt. Die derzeitigen Probleme könnten nur durch ein „radikales Umdenken“ bewältigt werden, so der Pre-mierminister. Er setze sich daher für eine Union ein, die auf den folgenden fünf Grundprinzipien aufbaut:

Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Flexibilität, Eine Rückwanderung nationaler Befugnisse an die

Mitgliedstaaten, Demokratische Rechenschaftsverpflichtungen und Fairness.

Eine ideale EU hätte daher eine Netzwerkstruktur mit Fokus auf den europäischen Binnenmarkt, unter Berück-sichtigung der Bedürfnisse jedes einzelnen Mitgliedstaates. Alle Mitgliedstaaten eines solchen Netzwerkes wären voll-ständig gleichberechtigt, im Unterschied zur derzeitigen Situation von Norwegen und der Schweiz. Diese sind Mit-glieder des Binnenmarktes, haben jedoch kein Mitsprache-recht bei der Gesetzgebung. Neuverhandlungen über die Position Großbritanniens müssten jedoch bis nach den nächsten britischen Unter-hauswahlen warten, so dass ein Referendum über die Ergebnisse dieser Verhandlungen Ende 2017 stattfinden könnte – also in knapp fünf Jahren. Dieser Zeitplan würde Cameron wieder mehr Spielraum gewähren, seine bisherige Europapolitik weiterzuverfol-gen, zumindest bis 2015. Bis dahin müssen sich die ande-ren Parteien über ihre eigene Position zur EU und dem geplanten Referendum im Klaren sein. Im Vorfeld von Camerons Rede sagte Ed Miliband, der Vorsitzende der Labour-Partei, bereits, die Rede würde zeigen, dass Came-ron „ein schwacher Premierminister ist, der die Interessen seiner Partei, nicht die nationalen wirtschaftlichen Interes-sen verfolgt.“ Britische Unternehmen, so Miliband, hätten die Regierung schon mehrfach vor den Folgen von „Jahren der Unsicherheit“ gewarnt. Nick Clegg, Vorsitzender der Liberals, beklagte ebenso, dass Cameron „Jahre der na-

genden Unsicherheit wegen langwierigen Neuverhandlung von Großbritanniens Status in der EU“ verursache. Es ist ebenfalls unklar, ob die übrigen 26 EU-Mitgliedstaaten den Briten erlauben würden, ihre Position neu zu verhandeln – vor allem da andere Mitgliedstaaten daraufhin ebenso einen Sonderstatus fordern könnten. Zudem birgt ein Referendum auch das Risiko eines unfrei-willigen Austrittes Großbritanniens. EU-bezogene Referen-den in anderen Mitgliedstaaten sind von den Wählern immer wieder dazu genutzt worden, ihrer Unzufriedenheit mit der Regierungspolitik öffentlichen Ausdruck zu verlei-hen. Dies hatte eine Reihe unerwarteter Negativabstim-mungen zur Folge. Sir Stephen Sherbourne, Politikberater in London und ehemaliger Berater von Premierministerin Thatcher, kom-mentierte, dass Camerons Rede zu Veränderungen in der Beziehung zwischen der EU und Großbritannien führen sollte. Er glaubt auch, dass viele EU-Staaten etliche der Reformen unterstützen, die Cameron vorschlägt. Die Rede fällt auf die Feiern zum fünfzigjährigen Jubiläum des Élysée-Vertrages von 1963. Im selben Jahr lehnte de Gaulle auch Großbritanniens erstes Beitrittsgesuch ab. Von An-fang an wollten Deutschland und Frankreich jedoch immer, dass Großbritannien als Mitglied eine wichtige Rolle spielt. Und, so Sir Stephen Sherbourne, das tun sie immer noch. In einem bilateralen Treffen vorige Woche drückte der amerikanische Präsident Obama offen seine Sorge über einen möglichen Austritt Großbritanniens aus der EU aus. Die USA sind der Meinung, dass die Briten außerhalb der EU in der Weltwirtschaft und der internationalen Politik in einer deutlich schwächeren Position wären. Bundeskanzle-rin Angela Merkel kommentierte inzwischen, sie sei bereit, über die Wünsche der Briten zu sprechen. „Wir müssen jedoch immer im Auge haben, dass Länder unterschiedli-che Interessen haben und dass ein fairer Kompromiss ge-funden werden muss. Wir werden intensive Gespräche mit Großbritannien führen. Das hat allerdings Zeit in den Mo-naten, die vor uns liegen“, so die Bundeskanzlerin. ............................................................................................... * If you wish to be removed from the newsletter mailing list, please contact [email protected] and place “unsubscribe” in the subject heading. * Sollten Sie den Newsletter nicht weiter beziehen wollen, senden Sie uns eine e-mail an: [email protected] mit der Nachricht: „unsubscribe“.