15
Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure Stephen Graham Newcastle University

Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Networked Risk:

Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Stephen Graham Newcastle University

Page 2: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

•  "If you want to destroy someone nowadays, you go after their infrastructure" (Phil Agre 2001)

•  "There is nothing in the world today that cannot become a weapon" (Liang and Xiangsui, 1999)

•  "Real security cannot be cordoned off. It is woven into our most basic social fabric. From the post office to the emergency room, from the subway to the water reservoir" (Naomi Klein, 2001)

Page 3: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Networked Risks: Starting Points •  Socio-technical ‘hybrids’ through which Nature is continually

metabolized into Culture to literally produce the City •  Many scales and scapes of simultaneous and interacting

flows and connectivities •  Often taken for granted, ubiquitous, banalised. •  Revealed when they fail, are disrupted or deliberately

destroyed. "The normally invisible quality of working infrastructure becomes visible when it breaks: the server is down, the bridge washes out, there is a power blackout" (Star, 1999).

•  In urbanising ‘network societies’ crucial in mediating construction and experience of hazards and risks

Page 4: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Hazards, Risks and Networked Urbanism •  Urbanites "are particularly at risk when their complex and

sophisticated infrastructure systems are destroyed and rendered inoperable, or when they become isolated from external contacts" (Barakat1998)

•  ‘Natural’ hazard events distributed in space and time via networked disruptions. Multiple orders of impacts caused by disruption

•  Current changes: privatisation/liberalisation? Just in Time flows: tightly coupled systems

•  Soon "people won't be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide" (Joy,2000).

Page 5: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

“War in the Weirdly Pervious World” I: Infrastructural Insurgencies

•  ”Today, wars are fought not in trenches and fields, but in living r o o m s , s c h o o l s a n d supermarkets" (Barakat, 1998).

•  War and geopolitical struggle are increasingly being fought through the infrastructures of everyday urban life

•  "The world struggle against terrorists will continue because our global economy simultaneously creates many possible weapons and angers many poss ib le enemies" (Luke, 2003)

Page 6: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure
Page 7: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

‘Homeland Security’ : Networked Infrastructures as Sources of

Boundless Threat

Page 8: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure
Page 9: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

“War in the Weirdly Pervious World” II: State Infrastructural Warfare

•  “It should be lights out in Belgrade : every power grid, water pipe, bridge, road and war-related factory has to be targeted. We will set your country back by pulverizing you. You want 1950 ? We can do 1950. You want 1389 ? We can do that, too!” (New York Times Columnist, Thomas Friedman, April 23rd, 1999)

Page 10: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

“We have not run out of targets. Afghanistan has!” Donald Rumsfeld

•  "We need to study how to degrade and destroy our adversaries' abilities to transmit their military, political, and economic goods, s e r v i c e s a n d i n f o r m a t i o n . Infrastructures, defining both traditional and emerging lines of c o m m u n i c a t i o n , p r e s e n t increasingly lucrative targets for airpower [The vision of] airmen s h o u l d f o c u s o n l i n e s o f c o m m u n i c a t i o n s t h a t w i l l i nc reas ing ly de f ine modern societies" (Felker, 1998).

Page 11: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

First Order Effects Second Order Effects Third Order Effects

No light after dark or in

building interiors

Erosion of command and

control capabilities

Greater logistics complexity

No refrigeration Increased requirement for

power generating equipment

Decreased mobility

Some stoves/ovens non

operable

Increased requirement for

night vision devices

Decreased Situational

Awareness

Inoperable hospital electronic

equipment

Increased reliance on battery-

powered items for news,

broadcasts, etc.

Rising disease rates

No electronic access to bank

accounts/money

Shortage of clean water for

drinking, cleaning and

preparing food

Rising rates of malnutrition

Disruption in some

transportation and

communications services

Hygiene problems Increased numbers of non-

combatants requiring

assistance

Disruption to water supply,

treatment facilities, and

sanitation

Inability to prepare and

process some foods

Difficulty in communicating

with non-combatants

Page 12: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Iraq 1991-2003: ‘Bomb Now, Die Later’

"Perhaps the real answer is that by declaring dual-use targets legitimate military objectives, the Air Force can directly target civilian morale. In sum, so long as the Air Force includes civilian morale as a legitimate military target, it will aggressively maintain a right to attack dual-use targets" (Rizer, 1998).

Page 13: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure
Page 14: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Towards State ‘Computer Network Attack’

•  ”Adversary military forces are ultimately an output or peripheral of a weapon system and its sustaining, often civil, infrastructure. Corrupt the sustaining systems and, like a driver deprived on his oxygen supply, the adversary

military force may be ineffective. Once the pattern of information-dependent human activities is identified, the information target can be detected and

identified, and the data on which the activity is dependent could be intercepted, destroyed, or corrupted by appropriate replacement

in peace and war" (Kelly, 1996).

Page 15: Networked Risk: Anxiety and Everyday Infrastructure

Conclusions •  Must integrate networked infrastructures and networked

risks fully into conceptualisations of hazards, risks and security

•  Challenge many conventional understandings of hazards

•  Socio-technical and socio-natural perspectives blend with critical geopolitics

•  All networked connections provisional; require continuous work; can easily shift to disconnection which mediate and distribute hazards and risks; can easily be manipulated or used as weapons of political violence

•  Just the sort of innovative/ interdisciplinary agenda for IHR squared?