Upload
gordon-fowler
View
236
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation to Framingham Town Meeting
Citation preview
Spring 2009 Town MeetingSpring 2009 Town MeetingArticle 40 Article 40
Birch Road Water Treatment Birch Road Water Treatment FacilityFacility
May 2009May 2009
Town of Framingham Department of Public Works
"Preserving Your Investment in the Public Infrastructure"
Presentation AgendaPresentation Agenda
Birch Road Water Treatment Facility Birch Road Water Treatment Facility Background and RationaleBackground and Rationale
Preliminary Concept PlansPreliminary Concept Plans
Key MilestonesKey Milestones
BackgroundBackground
Project identified by DPW - 2003Project identified by DPW - 2003 Preliminary testing of site geology - 2004Preliminary testing of site geology - 2004 Aquifer testing - Spring 2006Aquifer testing - Spring 2006 Pilot water quality testing - Summer 2006Pilot water quality testing - Summer 2006 State permitting 2006 – presentState permitting 2006 – present
Project RationaleProject Rationale
2004 –water purchased from MWRA cost 2004 –water purchased from MWRA cost $4.1M $4.1M
2008 – water purchased from MWRA cost 2008 – water purchased from MWRA cost $6.3M $6.3M
2014 –MWRA’s Projected Water Cost 2014 –MWRA’s Projected Water Cost for Framingham - $9.3Mfor Framingham - $9.3M
Project RationaleProject RationaleAnticipated Water Cost Analysis
($/Mgal)
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035Year
$/M
G
MWRA Projected Purchase Cost
MWRA & BR Blended Costs
Birch Road Operational Costs
Project RationaleProject Rationale Birch Road Water Treatment Facility Project - $40M Birch Road Water Treatment Facility Project - $40M
– Designed to treat 4 + million gallons per dayDesigned to treat 4 + million gallons per day– 2008 - MWRA cost for water is $1M more than BRWTF would have been2008 - MWRA cost for water is $1M more than BRWTF would have been– 2013 - BRWTF water costs approximately 60% of MWRA cost 2013 - BRWTF water costs approximately 60% of MWRA cost – 2030 - Annual savings in excess of $5M, with a cumulative savings 2030 - Annual savings in excess of $5M, with a cumulative savings
to date of over $60Mto date of over $60M
$(10,000,000)
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Cumulative Savings Cumulative Costs
Approximate Capital Expenditure Approximate Capital Expenditure by Fiscal Year ($ Millions)by Fiscal Year ($ Millions)
FYFY20092009
FYFY20102010
FYFY20112011
FYFY20122012
FYFY20132013 TotalTotal
$2.9$2.9 $5.5$5.5 $13.4$13.4 $11.4$11.4 $7.1$7.1 $40.3$40.3
Project RationaleProject Rationale
While reallocating and keeping financial resources While reallocating and keeping financial resources local is a local is a primary benefit, there are other primary benefit, there are other important important advantages….advantages….– Reduced reliance on MWRA as a sole source of water Reduced reliance on MWRA as a sole source of water – Increased control of a critical utility and resourceIncreased control of a critical utility and resource– Community’s ability to have more control over their Community’s ability to have more control over their
direction (50-100 year planning cycle) direction (50-100 year planning cycle) – Optimization of DPW staff Optimization of DPW staff – Local policy decision opportunities Local policy decision opportunities – Preservation of open space, a natural resource and Preservation of open space, a natural resource and
unusually high yield groundwater supplyunusually high yield groundwater supply– Preservation of a watershedPreservation of a watershed
Project DescriptionProject Description State-of-the-art membrane water treatment State-of-the-art membrane water treatment
processprocess Administrative space for treatment operations and Administrative space for treatment operations and
certain adjunct Department functions certain adjunct Department functions Energy efficient plant Energy efficient plant
– Active and passive solar technologyActive and passive solar technology– Energy efficient lightingEnergy efficient lighting– Innovative geothermal heating and cooling systemInnovative geothermal heating and cooling system– Sustainable design principles incorporated throughoutSustainable design principles incorporated throughout
Birch Road Water Quality FacilityBirch Road Water Quality Facility
PRELIMINARY
Project DescriptionProject Description- What might the Facility Look Like?- What might the Facility Look Like?
PRELIMINARY
Conceptual Interior SpaceConceptual Interior Space
PRELIMINARY
Post TreatmentTreatment
Pre Treatment
Schedule of Key MilestonesSchedule of Key Milestones
Retained Engineering Design Firm – Oct ‘08Retained Engineering Design Firm – Oct ‘08 Procurement of Membranes – June ’09Procurement of Membranes – June ’09 100% Design – Spring 2010100% Design – Spring 2010 Contractor Selection – Summer 2010Contractor Selection – Summer 2010 Groundbreaking – Fall 2010Groundbreaking – Fall 2010 Plant Operational – 2013Plant Operational – 2013