29
Content Part 1: Topic Overview Part 2: Reasons to Implement Part 3: Value Drivers Part 4: Challenges Part 5: Performance Metrics Part 6: Success Story Part 7: Vendor Landscape Sidebars Survey Stats Benchmark KPIs Core Technologies Gleanster Numbers Vendor Quick Reference Guide Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited. Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use. Q1 2013 Gleansight Retargeting has emerged as an effective way to improve results from Web marketing. Originally limited to serving Web banner ads to people who had previously visited a company’s Web site, it has now been expanded to include messages based on search terms, content viewed elsewhere on the web, and other online/offline behaviors. What these activities all share is insight into a person’s intent, which forms the basis for targeted advertising. Intent-based personalization and targeting is more effective than targeting based on demographics or the location an ad displays, older and still more common approaches. The trade-off is that intent is harder to identify, so audiences for retargeting messages are much smaller than those available using less refined methods. As a result, marketers must use a mix of methods to generate enough response. Growth of retargeting faces other obstacles as well. One is the “creepiness” factor: some marketers fear that customers will be annoyed by messages based on information they did not intentionally provide. This concern is probably overrated and can largely be overcome by sending ads that do not explicitly reference customer-specific information. Government requirements for “do not track” options could reduce retargeting’s effectiveness but their final form, if any, remains to be seen. A more concrete obstacle is revenue attribution methods that understate the impact of retargeted messages: by definition, retargeted ads are served after the first interaction with a potential buyer, and Retargeting

Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Retargeting has emerged as an effective way to improve results from Web marketing. Originally limited to serving Web banner ads to people who had previously visited a company’s Web site, it has now been expanded to include messages based on search terms, content viewed elsewhere on the web, and other online/offline behaviors. What these activities all share is insight into a person’s intent, which forms the basis for targeted advertising. Intent-based personalization and targeting is more effective than targeting based on demographics or the location an ad displays, older and still more common approaches. The trade-off is that intent is harder to identify, so audiences for retargeting messages are much smaller than those available using less refined methods.

Citation preview

Page 1: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

ContentPart 1: Topic OverviewPart 2: Reasons to ImplementPart 3: Value DriversPart 4: ChallengesPart 5: Performance MetricsPart 6: Success StoryPart 7: Vendor Landscape

SidebarsSurvey StatsBenchmark KPIsCore TechnologiesGleanster NumbersVendor Quick Reference Guide

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Q1 2013

Gleansight

Retargeting has emerged as an effective way to improve results from Web marketing. Originally limited to serving Web banner ads to people who had previously visited a company’s Web site, it has now been expanded to include messages based on search terms, content viewed elsewhere on the web, and other online/offline behaviors. What these activities all share is insight into a person’s intent, which forms the basis for targeted advertising. Intent-based personalization and targeting is more effective than targeting based on demographics or the location an ad displays, older and still more common approaches. The trade-off is that intent is harder to identify, so audiences for retargeting messages are much smaller than those available using less refined methods. As a result, marketers must use a mix of methods to generate enough response.

Growth of retargeting faces other obstacles as well. One is the “creepiness” factor: some marketers fear that customers will be annoyed by messages based on information they did not intentionally provide. This concern is probably overrated and can largely be overcome by sending ads that do not explicitly reference customer-specific

information. Government requirements for “do not track” options could reduce retargeting’s effectiveness but their final form, if any, remains to be seen. A more concrete obstacle is revenue attribution methods that understate the impact of retargeted messages: by definition, retargeted ads are served after the first interaction with a potential buyer, and

Retargeting

Page 2: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 2

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

many act as intermediate reminders that precede an actual purchase. Thus, both first- and last-touch attribution fail to capture retargeting’s full contribution. A final barrier is many marketers’ unfamiliarity with retargeting techniques, which prevents them from even testing them.

Despite these issues, retargeting has been proven to offer higher response

and lower cost-per-click than traditional Web advertising. Initial success in e-commerce, retail, education, and travel marketing has been duplicated in other industries selling to both consumers and businesses. Those results ensure that marketers will continue to explore and adopt it at an increasing rate. This study will help you to understand the opportunity and use retargeting to its full advantage.

Page 3: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 3

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Retargeting systems perform three basic functions: behavior capture, targeting, and ad serving. Behavior capture includes tagging individuals by dropping cookies on their computer and associating these cookies with specific events or interests. Targeting determines which messages will be sent to which individuals. In addition to interests, targeting may take into account the price an advertiser is willing to pay for the message and how much other advertisers would pay for the same opportunity. Ad serving includes identifying tagged individuals when they appear on a Web site, selecting a message, and delivering the message to the Web site for display. Retargeting vendors may build their own network of Web sites to display messages, buy inventory from external ad networks, or do both. Vendors also differ in how much of the program set-up, administration, and optimization marketers do for themselves. Options range from full self-service, as in Google Ad Network “Remarketing” (Google’s term for retargeting), to fully outsourced.

Retargeting methods fall into two broad categories.

1. Site-based retargeting uses data gathered on a company’s own Web

site, such as pages viewed and products purchased. Anonymous visitors are tracked via cookies until they identify themselves by logging in or making an actual purchase. Site-based retargeting can capture very detailed information about each visitor, which in turn allows for precisely targeted messages. In some cases, the site-based ad is dynamically adjusted based on specific products the visitor has

previously considered or purchased. This is sometimes called product retargeting. Other types of company-based retargeting may use cookies dropped by an email message, social media content, or promotion landing

pages. These are fundamentally similar to site-based retargeting in starting with a direct interaction between the visitor and the company.

2. Search-based retargeting works uses data from search engine queries as the basis for targeting. Because search-based retargeting does not require direct interaction with a company’s content, it can reach a much larger audience than site-based retargeting. Search-based retargeting can also connect with prospects earlier in the buying cycle, including people who are not yet aware of the advertiser.

Survey StatsThe research findings featured in this Gleansight benchmark report are derived from the Q4 2012 Gleanster survey on Retargeting.

• Total survey responses: 234

• Qualified survey responses: 146

• Company size: <$1M (3%); $1 - 10M (17%); $10-100M (41%); $100M - $1B (25%); >$1B (14%)

• Geography: North America (95%); Europe (4%); Other (1%)

• Industries: Retail (18%); CPG (11%); Manufacturing (8%); Financial Services (5%); Travel & Hospitality (5%); Entertainment (4%); Other (49%)

• Job levels: C-level (17%); SVP/ VP (23%); Director (37%); Manager & Staff (23%)

Sample survey respondents:

EVP, StorkGifts

Manager, Microsoft

Owner, Leather Gloves Online

Director, Expedia

VP of Marketing, Blue Jeans Network

CMO, TireBuyer.com

EVP, Body Bath Shop

Manager, Bloomingdales

CMO, Paciolan

Director, Symantec

Part 1: Topic OverviewThis study defines retargeting as Web ads delivered outside a company’s own site and based on a customer or prospect’s previous behavior. This excludes practices such as emails reminding customers of abandoned shopping carts and product recommendations made within a Web site based on previous purchases, which are also sometimes labeled as retargeting. The narrower focus allows a deeper examination of the chosen topic.

Retargeting systems perform three basic functions: behavior capture, targeting, and ad serving.”

Page 4: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 4

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Benchmark KPIs Gleanster uses 2-3 key performance indicators (KPIs) to distinguish “Top Performers” from all other companies (“Everyone Else”) within a given data set, thereby establishing a basis for benchmarking best practices. By definition, Top Performers are comprised of the top quartile of qualified survey respondents (QSRs).

The KPIs used for distinguishing Top Performers focus on performance metrics that speak to year-over-year improvement in relevant, measurable areas. Not all KPIs are weighted equally.

The KPIs used for this Gleansight are:

• Year-over-year increase in revenue

• Average Click-Through Rate

• *Use of Retargeting

To learn more about Gleanster’s research methodology, please click here or email [email protected].

Both site- and search-based retargeting can be purchased either on the number of impressions (cost per thousand, or CPM) or the number of responses (cost per click, or CPC). The CPM model is best suited to brand marketers, who are more interested in repeated exposure than generating immediate action. Direct marketers, who carefully monitor their cost per sale, often prefer

the CPC model. Some retargeting plans also offer a cost per action model, where advertisers pay only for specified conversion events such as providing contact information or making a purchase. Even when marketers pay on CPM or CPC, they often evaluate their retargeting programs in terms of cost per action.

Page 5: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 5

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Because retargeting systems can store very detailed information about each visitor, they may also permit messaging that is precisely tailored to each individual. This improves both advertising effectiveness and the over-all brand experience.

Increase Revenue. Retargeting expands the audience for your ads and helps convert a higher percentage of visitors to customers. Both factors create more revenue. In addition, because retargeting will probably replace other, less effective ad targeting methods, it should result in higher return on ad budgets, either allowing a smaller spend to create the same revenue or the same spend to yield a revenue increase.

Increased new customer acquisition. Both site- and search-based retargeting

can help to acquire new customers. Site-based retargeting uses cookies to tag anonymous visitors and then recontact them as they visit other sites. Search-based retargeting can reach prospects whose behavior seems appropriate even though they have never visited the company’s own Web site. Both applications allow the company to reach and capture more new customers than they would with traditional Web advertising.

Increased marketing ROI. Retargeting improves marketing ROI by identifying highly responsive audiences, sending those audiences precisely targeted messages, and allowing use of lower cost ad impressions. The result is both higher response and lower investment. Converting these benefits into an actual ROI calculation requires a way

Part 2: Reasons to ImplementRetargeting was originally used to recontact potential customers who had visited a Web site but not made a purchase. This provided a direct boost to sales at a lower acquisition cost than other, less focused advertising. The emergence of search retargeting has extended the reach to include prospects in earlier stages of the purchase cycle, since ads can be based on general search terms and be sent to people who have yet visited the advertiser’s own site. Since the ads can be served on any Web site within the retargeting vendor’s network, the inventory of available impressions is higher and the cost per contact is potentially reduced. The net result, again, is more cost effective advertising as marketers reach a targeted audience for less.

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

95%90%86%MostCompellingReasons toImplement*

Increase marketing ROI Increase new customeracquisition

Increase revenue

29%**

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

43%**

Page 6: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 6

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

to relate responses to actual business value. This can be difficult if analytical techniques fail to credit retargeting messages with a contribution towards subsequent purchases through different channels.

Raise brand awareness. The ability of remarketing campaigns to reach customers outside of the marketer’s own Web site allows broader distribution of brand awareness messages. Search-based retargeting in particular can expand awareness by concentrating messages on individuals who have not previously engaged with the company. Techniques such as sequential messages streams and individual-level frequency caps can further increase the effectiveness of brand promotions.

Increase cross-selling and up-selling revenue. Retargeting can be used to contact existing, identified customers as well as anonymous prospects. Once a customer has identified herself by filling out a form or making a purchase, their identity can be linked to the previously-anonymous cookie. Selection rules can then look up information about past purchases and use this to offer related products or upgrades. The system can constantly check for updated information, so it does not send offers that are no longer relevant.

Reactivate recent customers. TRetargeting can send messages to recent customers based both on actual purchases and on purchases they did

not make. Messages can highlight a specific product, make a generic reactivation offer, or simply remind the consumer of the brand. Reactivation messages may be based on behavior information gathered from transactions, emails, social networks, or other sources, in addition to messages based on Web site activity.

Lower marketing costs. The primary cost savings from remarketing come from more effective advertising, which allows marketers to get the same results for less money. Marketers may also save money through lower content creation costs, if they can create fewer or simpler ads, and through time savings from replacing more elaborate acquisition campaigns with simple-to-run remarketing campaigns. Actual changes in labor will depend on the degree of automation within the remarketing system, which services they perform for themselves or outsource, and the effort they put into analytics.

Micro-target audiences with personalized messaging. The retargeting system can capture detailed profiles of on-site behavior, and then use these to target off-site messages. This allows much more precise targeting than the generic demographic or contextual data that would otherwise be used to guide Web advertising. The degree of personalization within the ads themselves must sometimes be limited to avoid making customers feel that their privacy has been invaded.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

33%24%19% Compelling

Reasons to Implement*

Reactivate recent

customersIncrease cross-selling and

up-selling revenueRaise brand awareness

57%**

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 7: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 7

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Extend a more personalized brand experience. Because retargeting is based on individual behaviors, it inherently allows a more personalized experience than traditional advertising. In addition, some retargeting systems can deliver a sequence of messages to each individual, allowing very tight control over which messages they receive. The systems do this by keep track of which messages have already been delivered to each person. Messages can also vary based on visitors’ response to past messages, other behaviors, and the current Web site or Web page contents.

Speed of implementation. Deployment of retargeting is relatively straightforward. Marketers must add a snippet of tracking code to the company Web site, either in shared footer or on individual pages. There might be some additional integration to capture and classify specific details, but this should not be a major project. They must also provide ads or dynamic ad templates and develop rules to match these ads to visitor segments. Even some of these steps may be automated in certain systems. Set-up should be a matter of hours or days, although preliminary research and decision-making may extend this considerably.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

14%14%10%LessCompellingReasons toImplement*

Extend a more personalbrand experience

Micro-target audiences with personalized brand experience

Lower marketing costs

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 8: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 8

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Part 3: Value DriversSuccess of a retargeting campaign depends on a few simple conditions: marketers must be able to tag members of the target audience and later reach them on other Web sites; the audience must care enough about the messages to respond; costs must be in line with results. But meeting those conditions may be complicated. The system needs to capture appropriate data and interpret it correctly. Segmentation and selection rules must accurately reflect audience interests. Advertising content must be effective and reach a large enough audience. Individuals must not be contacted too often or at the wrong times. Vendor technology and services must match the marketer’s needs.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

93%89%57%MostImportantValueDrivers*

Set measurable objectives for each campaign

Continuous optimization of campaigns

Measure ROI for each campaign

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

54%**

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Testing is one key to reaching these goals. Other success factors include effective program design, execution, and result measurement. The retargeting campaign must be developed in the context of the company’s larger marketing strategy, both to ensure it has appropriate objectives and to allow meaningful assessment of its results.

Measure ROI for each campaign. Measuring ROI in general depends on capturing accurate costs and revenues, and in particular on having an attribution methodology that accurately measures the incremental impact of each program on over-all results. Campaign ROI requires further refinement, looking at individual campaigns within the retargeting program. This is essential for optimal results, since campaign performance can vary widely. Without campaign-level analysis, unprofitable

campaigns will run undetected or, even worse, the entire retargeting program could be cancelled because the average return is inadequate.

Continuous optimization of campaigns. Each retargeting campaign has many individual components, including audience definition, selection rules, ad locations, marketing messages, frequency limits, and cost targets. Each of these needs to be monitored and adjusted as the campaign proceeds. Without this optimization, there is little chance of retargeting reaching anything near its full potential.

Set measurable objectives for each campaign. Retargeting campaigns may be designed to build brand awareness, attract new customers, generate incremental revenue, or meet other targets. Marketers need to define these

Page 9: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 9

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

goals explicitly in a way that they can be measured. The metric will not always be financial, since some goals have only a loose relationship with actual revenue.

Unique creative. The amount of content required for retargeting depends on the number of segments. If many versions are needed, marketers must have a cost-effective way to create the materials. This may be done manually, with standard templates that are adapted for each version, or with dynamic content generators. Content may include display ads, landing pages, special offers, coupons, and other materials. Top Performers indicate the tone of content used in retargeting campaigns can have a material impact on the success of campaigns. In fact, Top Performers frequently referenced a need to adjust the creative engaging and borderline humorous messaging tends to drive the best click-through performance..

Robustness of features in the tool. Retargeting systems vary greatly in scope and complexity. Some are designed for self-service while others are used primarily by the vendor’s own staff. Some provide just basic campaign set-up while others add automated optimization, dynamic content, self-tuning predictive models, precise audience selection, semantic analysis, message sequences, and other capabilities. Marketers need to assess their own requirements and find

a system that meets them. They may choose to start with one type of system and then move to another as their needs evolve.

Integrate data and activities across multiple systems. Retargeting messages should be adjusted in response to customer actions, such as purchasing a product they had previously considered. These actions may take place in different systems, whose data must be combined in an integrated customer view. This integration takes place outside the retargeting system, but the results must be stored in a location that is immediately accessible. Failure to make these adjustments may significantly damage the customer’s relationship with the company, reversing many benefits gained from retargeting.

Coordinate offers across channels. TAlthough retargeting messages are directly tailored to specific individuals, those same people will also receive untargeted company messages through other channels. The two sets of messages need not be identical, but nor should they conflict. To avoid this, marketers must ensure that retargeting messages are based on the same brand platform as all other company messages. This takes special attention with system-generated dynamic messages, which may be assembled from components without being individually reviewed.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

43%29%29% Important

Value Drivers*

Integrate data and activities

across multiple systemsRobustness of

features in the toolCreate unique

creative

0%**

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Types of Retargeting

Product targets users based on a specific product and/or displaying highly personalized recommendations at a product level.

Demographic targets users based on inferred information about demographic factors--including age, gender, and social class--and creates specific audience groups to facilitate ad targeting.

Geographic targets users by country or region.

Contextual (search retargeting) targets users based on digital content. Audience segments are created using a topic, keyword, URL, or other page parameters to customize offers for each user.

Behavioral (site retargeting) targets users based on specific actions including keywords, pages visited, or engagement with certain objects on the web page.

Site List targeting enables advertisers to specify the sites or sets of sites on which to serve advertisements.

Page 10: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 10

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

14%14%11%LessImportant ValueDrivers*

Integration with: email, mobile, social

Establish minimum investmentthreshold to realize a return

Coordinate offers across channels

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Integration with email, mobile, social. Retargeting programs can capture behaviors that originate in media other than a Web page. Pixels embedded in emails can drop cookies even before a user clicks through to the specified landing page. Mobile programs can capture responses and link them to known customer identities. Social retargeting may be based on shared messages that also drop cookies, or use the social network’s own identity-tracking mechanisms. Retargeting messages can be delivered within whatever media can be linked to the original customer identity: this may reside only within the original media or be available across several media.

Establish minimum investment threshold to realize a return. Many retargeting systems require a minimum number of impressions to function effectively. This quantity may not be available for a particular retargeting message if few people take the targeted action, or if those people are not found on other Web sites that can display the ads. Marketers also need a minimum volume to cover fixed costs for program

creative and set-up.

Reuse existing creative. One way to reduce program costs is to reuse existing creative, often with slight modifications for different products or offers. Making this work effectively requires that the creative itself be constructed in formats that allow easy modification. Sharing components across multiple programs also expands the benefit received from testing, since winning designs can be applied to several programs simultaneously. However, marketers should also validate that the winning design for one program is in fact the best design for others.

Establish a sufficient timeline to test benefits. Marketers will need to gain experience with retargeting before they know how best to use it. Initial tests may not be profitable but could lay the foundation for future success. Marketers should plan to fund several money-losing research projects before they can accurately assess the relative value of retargeting compared with other marketing programs.

Page 11: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 11

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Part 4: ChallengesAlthough retargeting has proven successful in many organizations, a new deployment still faces challenges. Marketers must first fund an adequate budget for initial set-up and tests. They must then educate themselves on how the programs work, define clear success measures, and find a suitable attribution technique They need to select a vendor and integrate with corporate systems. They need to design the initial programs, create appropriate content, overcome any regulatory or privacy issues, and ensure the audience is large enough to be worthwhile. Once they achieve initial success, they’ll need to justify shifting operational funds into retargeting from other programs.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

77%71%48%MostChallengingAspects*

Consumer privacy concerns

Adequate attribution methodology

Managing potential brand fatigue

18%**

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Overcoming these challenges requires a clear understanding of the process, adequate commitment to initial projects, clear planning, disciplined execution, and management support. Marketers should learn from others’ success and rely as necessary on external resources, including vendors and consultants, to help manage the process.

Managing potential brand fatigue. Repeated retargeting messages could easily annoy a prospect, and would have diminishing returns even if they didn’t. Retargeting systems prevent this by setting caps on how many times the same person sees the same message, how close in time the messages are presented, and how long after the initial event the person remains active. These rules are controlled by the marketer and can be adjusted based on

the situation: people stay in the market for some products much longer than others.

Adequate attribution methodology. Accurately measuring the impact of individual marketing programs is always difficult. Retargeting faces specific challenges because its advertising messages may be seen without generating an explicit response. Marketers can best overcome this limit through formal split testing, which divides a pool of similar customers into two groups, sends retargeting messages to only one group, and compares their long-term performance. Fortunately, retargeting lends itself to this sort of testing more easily than many other marketing techniques. Additionally, new generations of retargeting platforms are starting to address this challenge by tracking

Other Key Features

Unique features in some Retargeting platforms include:

Frequency Caps. Frequency is the number of times a specific ad is displayed to a user in a given period of time. Frequency caps allow users to limit the number times a user sees a particular advertisement to help manage brand fatigue.

Split tests. Similar to website a/b testing and multi-variant testing, users can run multiple retargeting campaigns and determine the optimal message, frequency, and reach.

Recency optimization. Sometimes the flow of data across retargeting platforms and ad networks leads to delays in the timeliness of information used to trigger campaigns. For some keywords, there’s no point in triggering an impression if users rarely convert after a set period of time. The ability to manage and monitor recency of search criteria is unique to a handful of vendors.

Customer data uploads. Internal customer data can be loaded to a retargeting solution and used to target key prospects and customers without an initial website visit from these individuals. Customer data can also be used in conjunction with data management platforms to locate new audiences or optimize existing campaigns based on past success.

Page 12: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 12

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

engagement all the way to the final sale. Some retargeting solution providers even offer pricing that is exclusively based on measurable lift in sales.

Consumer privacy concerns. Most consumers realize that their Web behaviors are tracked to some degree. But companies must still be sensitive to consumers’ personal attitudes and to general public opinion. Retargeting programs should collect the minimum data necessary, inform consumers of data collection practices, and provide opt-out where feasible. Advertising should display specific information sparingly: targeting can be based on recorded behaviors without that information in the resulting ad.

Adequate audience reach and data. A company may simply not have enough volume for the remarketing program it wants to test. In this case, it may be possible to design a broader program that will include more people, to run the program over a longer period, or to include more customer sources such as email and social messages. If the problem is too few advertising opportunities for the retargeting messages, a different retargeting vendor may have a larger advertising inventory, or there may be options to run ads on a broader range of Web sites.

Budget constraints. A new retargeting program needs an adequate budget to meet minimum volume requirements and to cover fixed costs for training,

set-up, and content creation. If adequate funds are not immediately available, marketers may be able to try alternative retargeting methods that require lower initial investment. Given the generally high success rate of retargeting, most departments should be able to find a way to fund at least a small initial test.

Generating appropriate content. Retargeting programs need compelling content to entice customers to return for another look, or even to just stand out in the general fog of online advertising. Marketers may find this hard to create, especially in the early stages when they have no previous experience with what works. Aggressive early testing can help fill this gap, along with advice from vendors, agencies, and consultants who can draw on experience elsewhere.

Accurately personalizing messages. Most retargeting programs rely heavily on cookies to track individual customers. Cookies are not a perfect mechanism, since they can be deleted and they identify a computer, which may be shared by several users. The cookies in turn may be linked with other data, such as the name provided with a purchase made on the computer. This linkage could also be wrong. The more specific the information used by a retargeting program, the more likely an error. Marketers can minimize this problem by avoiding unnecessary personalization.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

48%42%42% Challenging

Aspects*

Generating appropriate content

Budget contraints Adequate audience reach and data

18%** 71%**

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 13: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 13

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Note: While Gleanster strives to include all of the most relevant and noteworthy solution providers in the Vendor Landscape section, the list is by no means comprehensive in nature. Omissions may occur due to lack of sufficient market presence, as judged by the Gleanster research analyst team. Space constraints may necessitate some amount of paring of even those vendors that do have sufficient market presence. Simple oversights may also happen on occasion. To submit information about a solution provider, please complete the Solution Provider Information Form. To schedule a vendor briefing, please email [email protected]. Vendor descriptions are taken verbatim from company websites or from vendor-submitted profile information. Gleanster Skinny (GS) commentaries are based on vendor briefings, customer interviews and Gleansight research findings as well as on company press releases and various other information sources.

Integration with other marketing programs. Retargeting programs sometimes generate revenue by themselves, but they more often feed customers into existing programs for acquisition, upsell, and cross sell. These programs must capture information necessary to identify customers who were influenced by the retargeting program. Otherwise, even a successful retargeting program may not appear profitable.

Lack of staff knowledge. Although retargeting is not especially difficult, it does require learning a new process and systems. This takes time which marketers could easily spend on other, more pressing projects. Unless a staff member has already done retargeting in a previous job, someone in the marketing department will need to set aside time to learn about remarketing. Management will have to make this a priority or it probably won’t happen.

Regulatory constraints. Apart from special situations such as health-related data, personally identifiable information, and data about children, there are few legal rules that directly constrain retargeting. However, marketers must still be certain to explore the precise rules that do apply to their situation and to comply fully. They should also take care to understand exactly where and how collected data is stored within the retargeting system itself, since there may be hidden repositories with unexpected contents.

Justifying value compared to level of effort. Setting up and running a retargeting program takes a certain amount of staff time, even for highly automated systems. A small, time-intensive retargeting program may generate less value than spending the same time on another marketing project. This could be true even if the retargeting program had a higher ROI. Marketers who are concerned about the time investment can outsource more of their retargeting work to a vendor or agency, although this may raise the program’s out-of-pocket cost.

Adequate systems and technology. Most of work in retargeting is done by vendor systems, which are well proven to be adequate. However, these much interact with the company Web site and possibly with other corporate systems. Some companies may have problems setting up those connections or extracting usable data, especially if their systems are old or highly customized. There could also be problems with analytical systems to evaluate results. These problems don’t have easy solutions, but none are fatal to a successful retargeting program.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

36%36%18%LessChallengingAspects*

Lack of staff knowledge

Integration with other marketing programs

Accurately personalizing messages

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 14: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 14

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Part 5: Performance MetricsRetargeting programs can be measured like other Web advertising, using click rates, cost per click, cost per action, and site visits. But those measures are designed primarily for programs intended to drive Web traffic. Retargeting programs may other goals, such as increasing brand awareness, encouraging future site visits, or expanding lifetime value. Those goals require other measures that use information gathered outside of the retargeting transaction itself: brand attitudes are usually based on surveys, while lifetime site visits and purchases are tracked in Web analytics and accounting systems. This information must then be tied to retargeting program participants, ideally in the context of a controlled test that compares performance of participants to otherwise-similar non-participants. If controlled tests are not available, measures may need to employ attribution techniques that estimate the indirect influence of retargeting contacts. .

Marketers also need measures related to program execution, such as staff time, creative costs, and other non-media expenses. These help determine whether retargeting is the best use for limited staff resources. Because retargeting may raise privacy issues, marketers should also keep an eye on customer complaints and opt-outs.

Click-through conversions. This is the percentage of people who click on an ad who later complete a specified conversion action, such as filling out a form or making a purchase. It makes most sense when marketers pay per click, since it can be combined with the cost per click to calculate a cost per conversion. This, in turn, can be combined with the value per conversion to calculate a profit per click (value – cost) or Return on Investment (value / cost, or, more properly, profit / cost).

View-through conversions. This is the percentage of people who view an ad who later complete the conversion action. Unlike cost-through conversion, it captures conversions from people who do not click on the ad itself. This

identifies additional value created by the retargeting program, but may overstate the value since other marketing programs may have also contributed to the subsequent conversion. “Fractional attribution” techniques attempt to assign the correct share of the value to each program that touches a customer, although doing this accurately is very challenging.

Cost per conversion. This is a fundamental measure for most retargeting programs. It is most effective where the conversion action is a direct measure of the program goal, such as revenue in a revenue-generating program or new customer registration in an acquisition program. The measure makes less sense for programs with goals that cannot be measured by a conversion action, such as brand awareness.

ROI on marketing spend. Return on investment is properly calculated as a ratio of profit to expense, although it is often calculated as the revenue-to-expense ratio instead. Either way, the real challenge is the same as with other revenue figures: determining how much

What does that mean?Definitions and jargon for measuring the success of retargeting efforts.

CPA. Cost-Per-Acquisition is essentially performance based advertising. The solution provider assumes all the risk, and you only pay when someone actually completes a transaction.

CPC. Cost-Per-Click is a common metric for pricing from vendors. You pay every time a user clicks one of your ads.

CPE. Cost-Per-Engagement means advertisers pay when a user engages with the ad, (such as a mouse rollover or playing a video). This emerged as a way of tracking physical engagement with a product recommendation beyond a mere impression.

CPM. Cost per 1,000 impressions (M is the roman numeral for 1,000). This is a common pricing model for retargeting vendors.

Click Through Rate (CTR). The percentage of users who saw an ad and actually clicked it.

Frequency. The rate a particular user is exposed to specific creative or campaign during a designated period of time.

Impression. The display of a single piece of creative to a web site user. An individual page can generate more than one impression if there is more than one ad space available on the page.

Page 15: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 15

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

revenue to attribute to the marketing program.

Revenue from retargeting spend. This applies to all types of retargeting programs intended to generate direct revenue, as opposed to programs aimed at influencing brand attributes. The specific meaning will depend on how revenue is calculated: it might include only immediate purchases by new customers who enter through retargeting, or all purchases by all customers ever touched by retargeting, or something in between. When using this figure, marketers need to understand how it was generated and ensure it is suitable for the intended purpose.

Number of leads generated. This is a key measure for acquisition programs. There may be additional stages before a lead becomes a paying customer, but those occur after the lead has first been attracted by the retargeting program. Like all other response-

based measures, the number of leads generated only credits the retargeting program for actions captured through the program’s own content. Responses the program may have influenced, but did not capture directly, are lost. This measure also focuses strictly on new customers, so it does not give the retargeting program credit for any increase in activity it causes among existing customers.

Stage-to-stage conversion rates. Stage conversion rates measure the movement of prospects through the buying cycle, typically in a progression of attitudes such as awareness, interest, consideration, and action. Breaking the process into stages makes it easier to measure the impact of programs that are aimed at particular transitions, such as moving a prospect from being interested in a product to considering it a viable purchase option. Search retargeting programs often aim at the initial stages of this process, making prospects aware of a product

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

92%88%80%MostCommonMetrics*

Cost per conversion

View-through conversions

Click-through conversions

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

64%**64%**

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

78%73%66% Common

Metrics*

Precentage of targetaudience reached

Revenue from retargeting spend

ROI on marketing spend

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

57%** 57%**

* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 16: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 16

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

or interested in exploring it. Site retargeting programs are more focused on driving customers to action. As with revenue, it can be hard to measure the impact of a particular marketing program on stage conversions.

Time spent on site. This is an engagement measure, used to determine how interested site visitors are in the company or its products. It provides insight into the quality of traffic a program generates, supplementing figures on the volume such as the number of clicks or visitors. Engagement may predict future behavior, such as purchases and lifetime value. and can thus help to estimate the long-term value of a retargeting program.

Percentage of target audience reached. This measures how many people who took the original target activity will later be reached through

retargeting messages. It helps marketers to understand the factors influencing program results. If the proportion is small, even a highly attractive program may not generate enough volume to be worth the effort.

Lifetime value of customers acquired through retargeting. Lifetime value includes the sum value of all past and future transactions. Since the future value is an estimate, the figure is always somewhat uncertain. It is used to set allowable acquisition costs and to compare the quality of customers from different sources. The usual challenges apply of identifying truly incremental results – in this case, finding which people would not have become customers without the retargeting program. This measure ignores any increase in lifetime value that retargeting may cause among current customers.

NUMBERS

65Percentage of Top Performers (compared to 13% of Everyone Else) using retargeting.

32Percentage of all respondents allocating >$50,000 to retargeting annually.

44Percentage of Top Performers engaging in retargeting for the stated purpose of “General Branding & Awareness”

26Percentage of B2C companies engaged in retargeting to personalize products after online shopping cart abandonments.

45Percentage of All Respondents indicating they have not engaged in retargeting because “it’s unclear how retargeting works”

16Percentage of Top Performers offering “special offerings and discounts” via retargeting.

* According to Top Performers, based on 135 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q3 2011 Gleanster survey

30%28%23%LessCommonMetrics*

Cost per order Time spent on site Stage-to-stage conversion rates

** According to Everyone Else, shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers* According to Top Performers, based on 146 Qualified Survey Responses to the Q4 2012 survey on Retargeting.**According to Everyone Else shown only when a notable disparity occurs relative to Top Performers

Page 17: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 17

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Part 6: Success StoriesKinderCare Learning Centers is an American operator of for-profit child care and early childhood education facilities founded in 1969 and currently owned by Knowledge Universe. The company provides educational programs for children from six weeks to 12 years old. Some 200,000 children are enrolled in more than 1,600 early childhood education community centers, over 600 before-and-after school programs, and over 100 employer-sponsored centers in 39 states.

The Challenge

Kindercare need a way to make their display impressions more effective. With thousands of locations and many different program options, it was difficult for one piece of creative to speak effectively to the wide array of user needs. The retargeting display campaign had to also hit specific cost-per-inquiry targets.

The Solution

KinderCare engaged retargeting and ulta-relevant messaging combining site behavior and a media buying strategy utilizing hyper granular data. The creative was customized with geo-specific service offerings, and site

behavioral information was dynamically informed, created and served in real-tim.

The Results

A control-exposed study was conducted to identify lift- an attribution percentage that helped inform and optimize the media-buying portion of the campaign. The campaign resulted in 1,700 inquiries at one sixth the target cost. The dynamic ads delivered a lift of 50% in click-through rates and nearly 30% in conversion rates. The exposed group had 116% lift in conversion rate over the control group – 54% of overall conversion could be attributed to the retargeting campaign.

Note: The original version of these Success Stories may have been prepared—and previously published—by an enabling solution provider. If so, it is edited and reproduced here by permission. While reasonable efforts have been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained herein through independent fact-checking, Gleanster disclaims liability for any content that was developed and submitted by third parties. Success Stories are selected based solely on the merits of the content as judged by Gleanster’s Research Oversight Committee. Vendors are not charged a fee for inclusion and no preference is given to vendors based on their ability to purchase other Gleanster products or services. Any questions or concerns regarding this particular Success Story–or Gleanster’s selection criteria or policies, in general–should be directed to [email protected]. Case studies may be submitted for publishing consideration using the Success Stories Submission Form.

Michigan State University, widely considered to be one of americas Public Ivy universities, is also a sports powerhouse with over 25 varsity squads.

The Challenge

Michigan State University Athletics wanted to boost season ticket sales and increase renewals among their loyal fans. Additionally, they wanted to maintain engagement throughout the season and create excitement around each game.

The Solution

Michigan State University implemented a granular retargeting campaign to engage first time ticket purchasers

and past season ticket holders. High intent site visitors who had frequented the ticketing prices, game schedule, or seating page were served custom ad units. They also created a re-engagement campaign to target past ticket and season pass purchasers that incentivized them to purchase a new season pass or luxury seating.

The Results

The campaign generated a $340 return for every dollar spent on retargeting generating a 0.179% click-through rate.

Page 18: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 18

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Part 7: Vendor Landscape

In Section 1, we noted that there are mainly two types of retargeting: site retargeting and search retargeting. However, there are some nuances to the solution landscape and the respective product/service offerings that are important to understand before investing in retargeting.

Retargeting largely started about a decade ago when ecommerce sites combined cookie technology and behavioral targeting in complex predictive algorithms to offer more relevant and personalized user experiences online. Today there are about two dozen different vendors that provide retargeting solutions, but small subsets of this landscape actually compete head-to-head with comparable offerings. In fact, in many cases vendors cite a general lack of competition when on-boarding new customers – a clear indication that the “retargeting industry” is still largely in an innovative and early adopter stage of growth.

Vendor & Solution Showcases

Visit www.gleanster.com to access vendor and solution showcases for this topic area, where you’ll find:

• Vendor Descriptions

• Analyst Commentary

• Related White Papers

• Videos & Presentations

• Solution Demos

• Other Related Research

• And much more...

It’s everything you need to make smart technology decisions. All in one place.

View the InteractiveRetargeting

Vendor Landscape

First, let’s review some industry-specific jargon that you might run into.

Site retargeting: The vendor inserts a tracking pixel on your website. This is used to track site visitors and display retargeting ads on specific web properties after visitors have left your website.

Search retargeting: The vendor aggregates or purchases search data that is then used to target and optimize retargeting campaigns for specific audiences. For example, search retargeting could effectively target users who recently searched for hotels in New York on Google.com. These users have expressed intent and would therefore be likely targets for relevant product recommendations in retargeting campaigns based on search terms.

Ad exchanges & demand-side platforms (DSPs): Reach and the number of advertisers a vendor has relationships with impact the

effectiveness of retargeting campaigns. These relationships allow the vendor to serve retargeting ads across web properties a site visitor is likely to visit, such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo!, AOL, etc. A demand-side platform (DSP) is a system that allows buyers of digital advertising to manage multiple ad exchanges and data exchanges in one interface. DSPs work like paid search, allowing users to optimize retargeting purchases based on key performance indicators such as cost per click (CPC) or cost per acquisition (CPA).

Data management platforms (DMPs): Some vendors provide a central “data management” repository of aggregated customer data. Data is sourced through third-party relationships, search engines, CRM systems, and proprietary algorithms to provide an additional layer of information to optimize retargeting ad spend. This data is layered on top of targeting criteria and ad spend to create more effective campaigns.

Page 19: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 19

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Today, there are four main criteria that differentiate retargeting offerings:

Pricing models. In most cases, retargeting is based on a cost-per-click (CPC) or cost-per-impression (CPM) model similar to a traditional paid search campaign. However some vendors offer cost-per-acquisition (CPA) pricing whereby the vendor only gets paid when they contribute to a closed sale. Today, the vast majority of retargeting vendors look to onboard clients with over 100,000 unique website visits per month because they can confidently drive measurable value for these organizations. However, there are also more accessible products that can be acquired for as little as $100-$500 in ad spend per month and deliver some impressive results.

Customer focus. Retargeting has largely gained traction in the consumer goods, retail, and ecommerce industries. In fact, over half of the solution providers in the space exclusively target large enterprise retail and ecommerce clients with over 100,000 unique visits to the

website each month. That said, there are lots of great opportunities and ways to leverage retargeting in every industry regardless of your company size.

Product features. Retargeting vendors largely differentiate with platform analytics, usability, and audience reach. The two most common offerings include search and site retargeting. Retargeting is also possible via email, social, and mobile, and not all solution providers can address these channels.

Customer support. Retargeting comes in three flavors: self-service, full-service, and hybrid models. Self-service offerings usually give users access to a platform where they can manage ad budget, upload creative, and view analytics around campaigns – akin to a software-as-a-service model. Full-service offerings typically come with dedicated account executives. Most solution providers with full-service offerings even provide creative services for an end-to-end solution from creative to execution, measurement, and optimization.

Page 20: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 20

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

AdRollwww.gleanster.com/vendors/adroll

“AdRoll is the most effective retargeting platform in the world. We’re trusted by more companies than anyone else. From small mom and pop shops, to Fortune 100 companies, AdRoll has more active customers than any other retargeting platform. Our approach has been tested, and proven thousands of times. In fact, 96% of all companies that try AdRoll, stick with AdRoll.”

Gleanster Skinny: AdRoll was founded in 2007 with investment rounds totaling $4M. AdRoll offers a comprehensive platform with both contextual targeting and site retargeting. In 2012 the company reportedly reached profitability after quadrupeling year-over-year revenue (a 414%

increase in revenue). AdRoll launched the beta version of its retargeting service in 2009, but now offers more comprehensive features like LiquidAds for dynamic changes to brand ads, a single smart pixel for audience segmentation, and A/B test of ads and user groups.

ARroll claims to have tripled the number of advertisers that it’s working with in 2012. AdRoll is largely considered one of the industry darlings because of their wide reaching network of advertisers that form the foundation for contextual retargeting as well as a pricing and features that are accessable to all industries and company sizes. The weekly minimum investment in retargeting programs is $25. Survey participants using AdRoll often report previous experience with Google Remarketing

Note: As with all Gleanster research findings, vendor rankings on the FLASH charts are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners and not by Gleanster’s own analyst assessment or opinion. The omission of a particular vendor name from one or more of the FLASH charts may be due to a lack of sufficient data about that vendor and may be no indication of its performance relative to other solution providers. Using a 1-5 point rating scale, survey respondents are asked to assess the solution provider(s) they are currently using, or have had the experience of using within the past two (2) years, across four (4) different dimensions: Ease of Deployment, Ease of Use, Features and Functionality, and Overall Value. To qualify for possible inclusion on one or more FLASH charts, vendors with less than $10M in annual revenue must be rated by a minimum of two (2) qualified survey responses and vendors with more than $10M in annual revenue must be rated by a minimum of five (5) qualified survey responses. A mean class performance score is calculated for each vendor. Top-scoring vendors are then assigned to the FLASH charts on a rank-order basis. Gleanster screens all survey submissions that are used as the basis for vendor rankings and removes duplicate submissions from the same client company (factoring in only the highest scores). The final rankings are not intended to provide conclusive advice or recommendations but to merely serve as a source of directionally relevant data points. All solution providers included in the Vendor Landscape section are given an opportunity to invite their customers to participate in the survey at least six (6) weeks in advance of publication. Through no other means are solution providers allowed to influence their placement on these FLASH charts.

Good

Best

Ease of Deployment

Better

Marketing Automation Solution Providers

AdRollChangoCriteo

Magnetic

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, December 2011. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

GooglemediaFORGE

RetargeterSimpli.fi

DotomiFetchback

Ease of DeploymentRetargeting Solution Providers

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, March 2013. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

Page 21: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 21

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

and cite they transitioned to AdRoll in search for a more robust retargeting platform.

Atosho www.gleanster.com/vendors/atosho

“Atosho is short for atomised shopping which is the core of what we do. We are a market place where retailers can offer their products through a wide range of channel partner websites; we are an advertising network that pushes relevant products to visitors of thousand of websites. But we don’t just display ads. We give the website visitors the ability to purchase the products directly at the website through what we call a MicroShop. Being able to receive a payment on a third party website – and on behalf of a third party retailer – is something that only Atosho offers.”

GS: Atosho, headquartered in Denmark and launched in April 2012, doesn’t traditionally fit into the retargeting vendor landscape. While capable of site retargeting, Atosho is actually a platform for creating a full plug-and-play widget to showcase and sell products online (in a matter of minutes). Atosho is a merchant portal sort of like an online marketplace, but without a destination site. Atosho works with a network of publishers to dynamically personalize product offerings on destination sites allowing companies of all sizes benefit from targeted product exposure across the web.

Buysightwww.gleanster.com/vendors/buysight

“Buysight gathers real-time shopping transaction and activity data and transforms it into real-time insight into what millions of consumers want to buy across hundreds of product and service categories.We transform data into actionable knowledge, and use it to connect people and advertisers in an automated, real-time marketplace that unlocks significant value for both consumers and businesses.”

GS: Alsamarketing is a fairly new entrant to theBuysight was founded in 2008 under the Permuto brand – which was later rebranded to Buysight. In December 2012, Buysight was acquired by AOL’s Advertising.com Group. Buysight is exclusively focused on the mid-to-large sized online retail vertical.

Unlike most retargeting solutions, Buysight is not a self-service platform. Buysight offers a full-service product level retargeting offering including creative development, campaign management, and a sophisticated back-end technology. Clients are typically retail organizations with sales greater than $10M or unique site visits greater than 100,000 a month.

Chango www.gleanster.com/vendors/chango

“Chango is a real-time marketing technology company with an advanced platform and full-service solutions for brands & agencies. We have a team of seasoned technology and media entrepreneurs who worked hard building technology to be able to deliver the kinds of results that we see.”

GS: Chango received $4.25M in Series B funding in the beginning of 2011 and continues to demonstrate a strong track record for client satisfaction. Chango delivers targeted ads to your site based on search targeted traffic coming to your website from search engines. Chango offers traditional search retargeting capabilities whereby a single pixel is placed on the confirmation page or homepage- not every individual page on a site. Unlike traditional ad networks, Chango buys ads through real-time bidding, a new technique / technology that is allows marketers to layer data on top of their media buys. Chango has access to billions of search terms and ad impressions, and utilizes machine learning techniques to combine data from different sources and deliver more efficient and better-targeted campaigns.

Chango exclusively focuses on the retail industry, and differentiates with a robust product level retargeting offering as swell as a programmatic retargeting solution that marries traditional demand-side platform capabilities with a data management platform that consolidates online and offline data for more effective targeting.

Criteowww.gleanster.com/vendors/criteo

“Criteo has grown to become the world’s leading pay-per-click (PPC) performance display advertising solution. Criteo’s advanced technology enables online e-commerce sites

Page 22: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 22

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

literally to “expand their search” marketing campaigns - to re-engage with people who have left their website.”

GS: Criteo has been doing re-targeting since 2009, and traditionally had roots as a product recommendation engine. Criteo offers a full-service retargeting offering that includes creative development, a robust technology platform, and CPC optimization. The company primarily targets the retail organizations with greater than 100,000 unique site visits per month (the “Internet Retail Top 2000”). Criteo is capable of dynamically segmenting website visitor, based on their engagement (browsing history, frequency of visits, number and type of pages viewed, etc...). This is done to predict and generate the most relevant campaign for

each audience in terms of segment, product and frequency. Criteo is a well established full-service retargeting provider with over 3,000 clients globally (with the majority in the EMEA) Criteo is capable of applying recommendations to retargeting campaigns delivering higher performance than traditional static advertisements.

Dotomi www.gleanster.com/vendors/dotomi

“Dotomi is rethinking the way marketers manage online display advertising with an approach we call ‘Personalized Media’. Billions of messages later we’ve proven that Personalized Media works to create relevancy and big marketing impacts. But we’ve just begun. In September

Good

Best

Ease of Use

Better

Marketing Automation Solution Providers

AdRollGoogle

MagneticRetargeter

ChangoCriteoDotomi

Fetchback

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, December 2011. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

BuySightmediaFORGE

Simpli.fi

Ease of UseRetargeting Solution Providers

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, March 2013. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

AdRoll

Atosho

Buysight

Chango

Criteo

Dotomi

FetchBack

Google

Magnetic

mediaFORGE

myThings

OwnerIQ

Perfect Audience

Retargeter

Rocketfuel

Simpli.fi

Steel House

Tell Apeart

TheTradeDesk

Triggit

Vizury

Quick Reference Guide

Page 23: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 23

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

2011 we became part of ValueClick, Inc., joining one of the world’s largest integrated online marketing companies. We have 200+ employees at Dotomi who continually work to explore deeper and deeper personalization strategies - blending art and science to improve client programs.”

GS: Dotomi offers both full and self-service site retargeting solutions that often include brand strategy and creative development for large retail clients. The company was acquired by ValueClick in September 2011 for $80M. The platform offers a variety of features including A/B Testing, Creative Design/Creation, Dynamic Creative Optimization and Frequency Capping. Clients mainly include retail and travel organizations. The Dotomi platform provides data driven personalization and can pull in anonymous data from web visitors to optimize online display ads.

Fetchbackwww.gleanster.com/vendors/fetchback

“FetchBack is a leading fully-managed, targeted display company, specializing in retargeting. We’ve been trail blazing the world of targeted display since our inception in 2007 and it’s been quite a ride! FetchBack was founded with one objective in mind-to bring our customers increased incremental conversions and sky-high return on investment like never before. FetchBackSite is our innovative retargeting product. In the simplest terms, Site Retargeting means putting messages in front of lost prospects who’ve left your Web site in order to attract them back and convert – finish the purchase, sign up for the newsletter, or whatever action you’re looking for. Some prefer the term “remarketing” over “retargeting,” but we think the latter better describes what we do: deliver a specific message to a specific target customer.”

GS: FetchBack is a site retargeting company founded in 2007. FetchBack was acquired by GSI Commerce in 2010 which was later acquired by eBay. GSI commerce also owns e-Dialog, M3 Mobile, Perperjam Excachange, and Clearsaleing. In addition to site retargeting, FetchBack also offers intent targeting. When a prospect performs an online search, they often enter keywords displaying intent to purchase. Using carefully selected, relevant keywords, targeted ads are served to that prospect without

the necessity of an initial site visit, driving new and incremental traffic to a website.

Googlewww.gleanster.com/vendors/google

“Remarketing with Google Analytics lets you tap into valuable insights about your website visitors who show an interest in your products and services -- for example, visitors who spend time viewing specific pages or who put items in their shopping cart. Once you’ve identified your target audience, you can run ads across the Google Display Network (GDN) that are tailored to that audience.”

GS: Google Remarketing is a fast and affordable way to target customers from predefined remarketing lists. Users can access the capability from within Google Analytics to select from predefined remarketing lists, or customized lists— based on Google Analytics metrics such as pages viewed, visit duration, and goal completions. The system will automatically send customer lists to Google AdWords and run targeted ads.

Google Remarketing is a great first step for companies that are looking to boost the benefits of traditional AdWords spend with remarketing. Google customers frequently report double the click-through rate on ads, with significantly lower cost-per-click spend.”

Magneticwww.gleanster.com/vendors/magnetic

“Billions of searches are happening around the web each month creating valuable audience data for brands. Marketers need a solution that combines the intent and interest from search with the scale and creative opportunities found in display advertising. We are the first company to focus 100% on search retargeting to help our customers find and expand their audience with superior efficiency.”

GS: Magnetic offers both search and site retargeting.

mediaFORGEwww.gleanster.com/vendors/mediaforge

“mediaFORGE is an innovative retargeting company with display extensions for prospecting,

Page 24: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 24

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

nurturing, retention, reacquisition and brand loyalty. We know. There are a lot of retargeting and display companies out there. So to make it easy, we’re going to come right out and tell you why we’re different: mediaFORGE is the only retargeting and display company that bases all aspects of its business around the value of Consumer Engagement – the performance metric comScore says has the highest correlation with conversions, according to a 2012 study.”

GS: mediaFORGE was founded in 2005 with roots developing digital widgets. After combining widgets with digital banner ads, the company came to a conclusion that there had to be a better way to personalize and measure the value of that personalization based on actual interaction. Today they have a full-service

portfolio of technology and services that deliver highly personalized retargeting. Today mediaFORGE offers product level retargeting, recommendations, audience segmentation and gender targeting (a unique offering in the retargeting space). The company primarily works with apparel and retail organizations with a minimum of 100,000 unique website visits each month.

myThings www.gleanster.com/vendors/mythings

“myThings specializes in driving incremental sales across the entire sales funnel through personalised retargeting, pretargeting and look-alike targeting. Our proprietary, unique set of optimization algorithms run with one goal in

Good

Best

Features and Functionality

Better

Marketing Automation Solution Providers

FetchbackRetargeter

Simpli.�

AdRollChango

Magnetic

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, December 2011. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

CriteoGoogle

mediaFORGE

Features and FunctionalityRetargeting Solution Providers

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, March 2013. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

Page 25: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 25

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

mind: To produce the most relevant banner to a specific user in real time, while controlling the cost by matching it to the expected return on investment.”

GS: myThings was founded in 2005 with roots in online CPA. Today the company offers a comprehensive stack of full and self-service site retargeting solutions. The company use a unique positioning they call “pretargeting” which matches 3rd party search data with 1st and 2nd party site-side data to personalize dynamic display ads to users who haven’t yet visited a website. The company has a global presence and primarily works with brands, retailers, and ecommerce organizations.

OwnerIQ www.gleanster.com/vendors/owneriq

“OwnerIQ is THE advertising network that pioneered the concept of Ownership Targeting. Powered by our unique partnerships with top retailer, manufacturer and online publishers, we enable advertisers to define and reach their ideal online consumer based on the specific products and brands they currently own or are actively shopping for. This is the power of Ownership Targeting.”

GS: OwernIQ works with retailers, manufacturers, and publishers to drive advertising revenue from websites and ecommerce platforms. In addition, OwnerIQ offers advertising solutions that are powerd by a database of over 5,000 prodcuts and 7,000 brands to personalized campaigns and recommendations based on products and brands consumers actually own.

PerfectAudiencewww.gleanster.com/vendors/perfectaudience

“We’re making Facebook retargeting and web retargeting fast, effective, and affordable so companies can grow with ease. Our vision is a world where every person sees the perfect ads at the perfect time and companies can easily reach their ideal customer at scale. Our simple but powerful tools give marketers everything they need to retarget their lost customers across Facebook and the web and track ROI from click to conversion.”

GS: PerfectAudience has all the traditional features of a site and search retargeting solution with a specific emphasis on retargeting on Facebook. The solution is ideal for organizations that want to expand the reach of website retargeting to Facebook’s 955M users.

Retargeterwww.gleanster.com/vendors/retargeter

“ReTargeter is a full-service display advertising solution specializing in retargeting and audience targeting. Our solutions can help you optimize your marketing spend by serving targeted display ads to the right people at the right times.”

GS: ReTargeter is a San Fransisco based retargeting provider that was founded in 2009. The service was initially developed for site retargeting, but new features added in early 2012 offer social retargeting and email retargeting. Pricing starts at $500 per month, but rapidly accelerates from there making ReTargeter one of the more pricier options on the market. But, emerging research suggests a minimum investment threshold north of $200 is necessary to truly recognize a return on investment in retargeting. ReTargeter is known to have good customer service. ReTargeter could be considered a top five provider for search retargeting and is accessible to companies of all sizes and industries. ReTargeter also has a differentiating capability called CRM Retargeting whereby a company can load a database of email addresses to the system and ReTargeter will locate them across the web and retarget to them.

RocketFuel www.gleanster.com/vendors/rocketfuel

“Rocket Fuel is the leading provider of artificial intelligence advertising solutions that transform digital-media campaigns into self-optimizing engines that learn and adapt in real time, and deliver outstanding results from awareness to sales. Recently named #22 on the Forbes Most Promising Companies in America list, over 700 of the world’s most successful marketers trust Rocket Fuel to power their advertising across display, video, mobile, and social media.”

GS: Rocket Fuel is a predictive analytics solution designed to optimize site and social retargeting

Page 26: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 26

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

efforts. Rocket Fuel is a turnkey platform that targets and optimizes messages no matter where an audience sees them—whether it’s across display, video, mobile, or your social-media inventory. Rocket Fuel works with advertisers and agencies to inject artificial intelligence, big data, machine learning and decisions science to score impressions.

Simpli.fiwww.gleanster.com/vendors/simpli-fi

““Simpli.fi is a completely customizable element level marketing platform leveraging the power of unstructured data for better performance and deeper insights on display campaigns. Part demand side platform, part data management

platform, and part supply side platform. We simply do display differently. Our platform provides you with immediate access to an inventory of billions of impressions each month, across hundreds of thousands of websites, which you can then target on a keyword level in a real-time bidding environment. Leverage consumer intent search data to deliver the right impression to the right consumer each time. We offer search retargeting, site retargeting, contextual targeting and demographic targeting for display advertising campaigns.”

GS: Simpli.fi offers a comprehensive retargeting platform with site and search retargeting capabilities. Simpli.fi offers a unique approach to targeted search which allows marketers to

Good

Best

Overall Value

Better

Marketing Automation Solution Providers

AdRollCriteo

Fetchback

ChangoGoogle

RetargeterSimpli.fi

mediaFORGE

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, December 2011. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

Overall ValueRetargeting Solution Providers

Vendor Rankings FLASH chart © Gleanster, March 2013. Note: Vendor rankings are determined by the experiences of industry practitioners, according to survey feedback, and not by the assessment or opinion of Gleanster analysts. The omission of a particular vendor may be due to lack of sufficient data and may be no indication of that company’s performance relative to other solution providers. Information on the research methodology used for vendor rankings is available elsewhere in this Gleansight benchmark report and also in the FAQ section of the Gleanster website.

Page 27: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 27

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

micro-target internet search results the instant an individual lands on a page selected from the search results. Simpli.fi’s “instant search regargeting” platform allows marketers to target users in as little as 5 minutes after a page is selected from search results. Traditional search retargeting uses a recency window of anywhere from a day to a month. What’s so cool about that? The platform allows you to set separate bids on keywords targeted in a campaign based on users who are searching now and users that have searched sometime in the past offering increased targeting, campaign optimization, and investment management. Simpli.fi is a demand-side platform (DSP) which allows buyers of digital advertising to manage multiple ad exchange and data exchange accounts through one interface. Real-time bidding for displaying online ads takes place within the ad exchanges, and by utilizing a Simpli.fi, marketers can manage bids for banners and layer this with pricing data to target their audiences. Typically, Simpli.fi clients spend about $150-200 per day on retargeting efforts – anything less makes it difficult to demonstrate a real tangible return on the effort.

SteelHousewww.gleanster.com/vendors/steelhouse

“SteelHouse Retargeting combines the industry’s best targeting system with a powerful ad creation technology that serves visually stunning ads across all devices. All Retargeting is NOT created equal. Only SteelHouse Retargeting is powered by an award-winning platform that targets site visitors based on their buying behaviors and shopping personalities.”

GS: SteelHouse offers full and self-service retargeting solutions. Solutions include real-time offers, across a variety of channels including display, mobile, and video. The company primarily works with brands, agencies, and ecommerce marketers.

TellApart www.gleanster.com/vendors/tellapart

“Retargeting is the process of showing display ads to potential buyers who visited but abandoned their shopping activity on your e-commerce website. 95%+ of your visitors are not buying… TellApart Transactional Retargeting

helps bring them back through the use of dynamic, personalized banner ads which show your products to the right visitors. Simply put, it turns lost shoppers into return customers.”

GS: TellAparts is exclusively focused on addressing the unique needs of large retail organizations. The company was founded in 2009 by former Google product and engineering executives. To date, TellApart has raised almost $20M and boasts a prestigious list of globally known brands and retailers as clients (many of which are not publicly referencable). TellApart has a robust transactional reporting offering that targets shopping cart abandonment- a process they call transactional retargeting. In fact, TellApart only charges for the platform when clients can physically track a purchase as a direct result of online ad engagement.

Triggit www.gleanster.com/vendors/triggit

“Triggit continues to be the most technologically advanced DSP in the market, pushing the envelope in areas ranging from integrated data management through its own DMP, to the development of built-in campaign attribution technology that gives advertisers the first truly accurate measure of overall display media ROI. With access to over 10 billion impressions a day from millions of sites across the web, Triggit uses advanced algorithmic calculations to optimize impression-based pricing and bidding, executing real time buying decisions in less than 50 milliseconds.”

GS: Trigget is a demand-side platform for site and CRM retargeting. Triggit was founded in 2005 Triggit was one of the first companies to leverage real-time bidding exchanges when they appeared in the fall of 2008, and one of the first bidders integrated into the Google AdX Exchange in the summer of 2009. The company emphasizes the Facebook retargeting, which is backed by a data management platform with built in attribution management technology.

Vizurywww.gleanster.com/vendors/vizury

“Established in 2008, Vizury is privately held and backed by leading VC firms from India, Singapore and the Silicon Valley. Vizury

Page 28: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 28

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

is headquartered in Bangalore, India with operations in China, Australia, South East Asia, Japan and South America. Vizury’s customers include Industry leaders like Makemytrip, Cleartrip, Jet Airways, Jabong, Virgin Airlines, Ctrip, Snapdeal and Zuji.”

GS: Vizury offers a full and self-service offering for site retargeting. Vizury is largely used by online retailers and boasts almost 2 billion impressions per month Online Travel and E-Commerce businesses amass large volumes of digital data pertaining to their users daily across disparate sources (e.g. Site Visitor data, Clickstream data, Purchase history data, Social Media data etc). Vizury harnesses this data for display optimization and personalization.

Page 29: Retargeting Benchmark 2013

Gleansight: Retargeting 29

Note: This document is intended for individual use. Electronic distribution via email or by posting on a personal website is in violation of the terms of use.

Entire content © 2013 Gleanster, LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited.

Lead Authors

Ian MichielsPrincipal Analyst

David RaabContributing Analyst

A globally-recognized thought leader, research analyst and consultant on marketing technology, Raab advises major consumer and business marketers on marketing processes, technology and service vendors. He established Raab Associates in 1987. He holds an MBA from the Harvard Business School.

Note: Research and analysis for the Vendor Landscape section was conducted by Gleanster research support staff.

Headquarters

Gleanster, LLC 825 Chicago Avenue - Suite C Evanston, Illinois 60202

For customer support, please contact [email protected] or +1 877.762.9727

For sales information, please contact [email protected] or +1 877.762.9726

Related ResearchRecently published Gleanster reports that may be of interest to senior industry practitioners include:

Harnessing the Power of Social Data to Predict (and Improve) Consumer Buying Behavior

Asking, Listening and Observing: How Top Performers Win with Customer Intelligence

5 Marketing Automation Capabilities Top Performers Can’t Live Without

The Future of Marketing Analytics & the Power of Big Data

A Crash Course on Big Data . . . for Marketers

Mobile Relationship Management

The Gleanster website features research, white papers, video, upcoming webinars, social media feeds, and interactive vendor landscapes. To download Gleanster content please visit www.gleanster.com.

About Gleanster Gleanster benchmarks best practices in technology-enabled business initia-tives, delivering actionable insights that allow companies to make smart business decisions and match their needs with vendor solutions.

Gleanster research can be downloaded for free. All of it.

For more information, please visit www.gleanster.com.