Upload
hub-institute
View
315
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mercredi 8 et jeudi 9 octobre se tenait la 5ème édition du HUBFORUM. Un rendez-vous annuel pour networking, mais aussi pour faire un état des lieux des meilleurs pratiques digitales de l’années pour tirer vers le haut son business. Cette année le sujet était « Connect, Transform or Die ». Pour revivre le HUBFORUM Paris 2014, l’équipe du HUB Institute vous invite à retrouver les meilleurs moments à travers les présentations et dans le replay : http://www.hubinstitute.com/replay-integral-du-hubforum-paris-2014/
Citation preview
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
Retail everywhere Guénaëlle GAULT Chief Digital Officer TNS Southern Europe, France & Benelux
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
Decision making in a connected world
If we understand
why people do what they do,
we can use this knowledge to develop strategies that
disrupt, create or reinforce behaviours
New channels and formats to experience and interact with brands
New ways to get better information
New ways to activate strategies
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
As consumers accumulate more devices and access to more sources of information the number of digital touch points multiplies
5,6 5,7 6,4
7,8
Func
tiona
l
Con
nect
ors
Obs
erve
rs
Lead
ers
Number of online touchpoints Total touchpoints
Functional markets
Connector markets
Observer markets
Leader markets
Proportion of touchpoints accessed online 19% 23% 37% 32%
G1. Steps taken pre-purchase | G2. Touchpoints Base: Functional markets (6170) | Connector markets (4438) | Observer markets (16997) | Leader markets (4856)
6 Average number of touchpoints used by French consumers
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
The consumer journey can become complex
Go to store
Buy offline
Milestone Online touch point Offline touch point
France Total no. of touchpoints used: 3
G1. Steps taken pre-purchase | G2. touch points | G3. Needs met by touch points Base: South Korea (1); Nigeria (1)
Post-purchase Discovering Planning Who Deciding
Leader (female, 24) wants to buy cosmetics
France Total no. of touchpoints used: 7
Buy online
Talked to friends and family for ideas and inspiration
$ Read product packaging
Functional (female, 40) wants to buy cosmetics $
Went online to find more information
Read consumer reviews online to compare brands and check product features and prices
Search for information in-store to look for the best deal and make a final decision
Checked the price of different products to make sure she got the best deal
Used a search engine to find out about brands and check prices and narrow the selection Go to
store
Visited brand site to find out more and compare products, and to check prices Spoke to store staff
to get ideas, find the best deal and make a final decision
Read product packaging
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
Mobile is playing an increasing role in the journey
Incidence of mobile research in-store and mobile wallet
Weekly mobile research in-store
(The use of a mobile device to research products or
services whilst in a store) %
Weekly use of Mobile wallet
(A mobile device to pay for products or services)
%
26 22 25 19
29 37
18 12 8
Global France Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-65
C1. Digital activities Base: Global (54,775) | France (968)
20 15 19 10
23 28
13 4
Global France Male Female 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-65
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
Cosmetics/ facial care Skin care
Personal hygiene
Over-the-counter medicines
Confectionery, snacks, treats
Clothes and Shoes
Music
Movies Software or Apps
Baby care - food, diapers / bodycare
Baby care - prams, mats /
toys
Holiday/travel
Credit cards
Insurance
Banking products
PC / Laptop Tablet
Mobile phone or smartphone
Camera
TV White goods and home appliances
e-Cigarettes
Relationship between research online and purchase online by category
A strong relationship exists between online research and online purchase
Purchase product offline
E3. Purchase made on/offline | E4. Pre-purchase research conducted on/offline Base: France (968)
Predominately online categories
Offline research driving online purchase (Showrooming)
Predominately offline categories
Purchase product online
Research online
No online research
Online research driving offline purchase (ROPO)
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
22
45 59
78
Keny
a G
hana
In
dia
Egyp
t N
iger
ia
Indo
nesi
a Tu
rkey
Th
aila
nd
Arg
entin
a Vie
tnam
Bra
zil
Sou
th A
fric
a Col
ombi
a Po
rtug
al
Hun
gary
G
reec
e Ph
ilipp
ines
M
exic
o M
alay
sia
Hon
g Ko
ng
Chi
na
Can
ada
Fran
ce
Taiw
an
USA
U
AE
Sau
di A
rabi
a Spa
in
Ital
y Ja
pan
New
Zea
land
Bel
gium
Sw
eden
Sin
gapo
re
Rus
sia
Aus
tria
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
Finl
and
Den
mar
k Slo
vaki
a Is
rael
G
erm
any
Aus
tral
ia
Pola
nd
Sou
th K
orea
U
K
Switz
erla
nd
Net
herlan
ds
Nor
way
eCommerce penetration is driven by access, with four stages of development across markets
Total category (net) incidence of eCommerce (%)
E4. Purchase made on/offline Base: Global (54,701)
Access Lack infrastructure or payment mechanisms
Trust Security concerns, lack of trust!
Experience Prefer offline to guarantee quality!
Price / choice Developed, buy on or offline based on price
N.B. The development funnel has factored in internet penetration and is cross-referenced to eCommerce barriers.
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
72 70
63 67 66
62 64
60 60
75 72
55 73
69
Home delivery Efficient process
No queues online Reputable retailer
Flexible, secure payment Buy direct from brand Online-only products
Exclusive products Good experience
Price or value Free delivery Bulk buying
Knowing you get the best price Product info
A range of barriers competing with eCommerce drivers in France
Global eCommerce drivers and barriers (%)
E5a. Reasons to purchase online | E6. Reasons not to purchase online Base: Global (54,775)
Convenience
Trust
Price
Choice / Exclusivity
Trust / security
Price
Personal experience
Convenience
Experience
Transparency
67 66
52 52
70 66
62 52
68 59
54 63
58
Easier to buy offline Want product straight away
Poor availability online Process too complex
Unsure of product quality Unsure if brand is genuine
Not secure Don’t trust websites
Prefer to touch products Prefer personal assistance
Prefer to shop w/friends Delivery costs
Not cheaper
eCommerce drivers eCommerce barriers
Connected Life 2014 © TNS 2014
Implication: Successful integration of on and offline channels has a demonstrable impact on sales
Case study: Macy’s omnichannel strategy