19
1 Nissan Mobile App Usability Testing ENG 2311 – G6S14F16 10/26/2016 Lorena Ovalle. Rachel Elder. Reece Jorgenson. Dr. Susan Rauch

G6F16S14 usability test report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: G6F16S14 usability test report

1

Nissan Mobile App Usability TestingENG 2311 – G6S14F1610/26/2016Lorena Ovalle. Rachel Elder. Reece Jorgenson.Dr. Susan Rauch 

Page 2: G6F16S14 usability test report

Cover Slide01

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents02 Brief Introduction03 Summary04

Results & Findings14 Recommendations

or Next Steps

07

Test Objectives06Methods

18

Page 3: G6F16S14 usability test report

3

INTRODUCTION• The Nissan Mobile App Car Manual serves as an aide to new Nissan

car owners. This application contains valuable and helpful information for consumers to use when in search for a task or in need of assistance. 

• The Usability tests conducted for this project served as a research method in order to produce feedback from non-biased consumers. Our group conducted a recorded prototype test of the app using the Lookback app. The recordings were taken in order to observe our participants comments, reactions, and concerns while using the car manual application.

Page 4: G6F16S14 usability test report

4

SUMMARY

• The usability tests were conducted outside of the classroom.

•  Each member of the group had the task of finding and

testing two participants.  

• The Lookback app gave the group access to view the screen

on the app on the phone as the testers browsed through it. It

also recorded the voice and face,  if the participants

permitted the camera recording, in order to provide audible

feedback directly from the participants. 

Page 5: G6F16S14 usability test report

5

SUMMARY

• Incorrect swiping links to the adjacent screen.

• Links were layered over one another, causing commands to interfere with each other.

• Lack of clarity on the button commands found at the top of the app’s screen. 

• Not all links were operational.• Inaccurate commands between

swiping and clicking to move to an adjacent screen.

Issues found from test participants included:

Page 6: G6F16S14 usability test report

6

Test Objectives

• App Accessiblity• App Navigation• Can users find the desired

information?• Is the app more efficient

than a printed car manual?• Are the instructions simple

and easy to understand?

Page 7: G6F16S14 usability test report

7

Methodology

• 6 participants total • 4 male and 2 female • All tested on October 17, 2016 • Recruited as friends with no

familiarity to the project• Participants signed a consent form

to indicate that they voluntarily agreed to be audio recorded for the test.

Participants

Page 8: G6F16S14 usability test report

8

Methodology

• Class wide survey conducted to gather interest in a mobile app for a car manual• 344 Total Responses• 67% of people preferred Pictures accompanied with Text

Pre Test Class Survey

Page 9: G6F16S14 usability test report

9

Methodology

• Each test administrator conducted the test in their home on their own time.• The lookback app was used to record the

participant's progress through the test as well as audio record their feedback throughout the test.

Testing Environment and Equipment

Page 10: G6F16S14 usability test report

10

Methodology

• Find how to turn on the car's lights.• Find how to operate

the windshield wiper.• Find how to check the

brake fluid.

Evaluation Tasks

Page 11: G6F16S14 usability test report

11

Methodology

https://lookback.io/watch/XQD4rENjCdwGmLWj5https://lookback.io/watch/AXXLoPAyEupLtpaEi

https://lookback.io/watch/K8gHbPiu9rhybiHKt

https://lookback.io/watch/zwXqK47Khj9SArP6k

https://lookback.io/watch/wjY53cim2ytzLgox8

https://ttu.blackboard.com/

courses/1/201727-ENGL-2311-014/groups/

_48305_1//_2352749_1/

TestUser1_Pt3.3gp

Participant Completion Times

Participant Test URLs

Page 12: G6F16S14 usability test report

12

Methodology

• After the test, the administrator asked the participant:

    -What they liked about the app    -What they would change about      the app

• The administrator conducted a post test that asked the participant to rate some questions about the app.

Experiment Design

Page 13: G6F16S14 usability test report

13

Methodology

• 6 Question Survey

• Rate on a scale of Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree

• Mostly positive feedback

• Graphs of the results of the survey displayed in the results section

Post Test Survey

Page 14: G6F16S14 usability test report

14

RESULTS• Overall, users said that they:

• Found the app easy to use

• Found the content easy to

read/see

• Understood the instructions

• Thought the app was fast and efficient.

• Thought the app should have more

images

• Would use the product in place of

a paperback manual

Page 15: G6F16S14 usability test report

15

RESULTS

Page 16: G6F16S14 usability test report

16

RESULTS

Page 17: G6F16S14 usability test report

17

RESULTS

Page 18: G6F16S14 usability test report

18

RECOMMENDATIONS• Aside from asking users what they thought

of the app, we also asked them what they

thought we should change about the

app. Here are some of their suggestions:

• If there is an option to tap part of the diagram to be

taken to the instructions for that part, state it

explicitly.

• Make statements such as “tap to see image” bold for

emphasis.

• Make direct links for the representative contact

phone number and email.

• Replace some of the menu buttons with icons that

better represent what they do.

Page 19: G6F16S14 usability test report

• Rachel Elder• Reece Jorgenson• Lorena Ovalle thank you