36
2014 Inbox Placement Benchmark Review Webinar Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research Return Path @tom_sather @returnpath

2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Join Tom Sather, Sr. Director Email Research, as he provides a look at the latest email deliverability benchmarks across the world, so you can find out how your inbox placement performance compares to other marketers today.

Citation preview

Page 1: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

2014 Inbox Placement Benchmark Review Webinar Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research Return Path @tom_sather @returnpath

Page 2: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Why You’re Not Reaching Your Goals

Page 3: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Marketing Sherpa, Email Marketing Benchmark Survey, 2013

Page 4: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

If your email doesn’t reach the inbox, you won’t reach your goals

Page 5: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

One-in-Six For every six commercial messages sent worldwide, one never reaches the subscriber’s inbox. ●  6% are sent to the spam folder ●  11% are missing or sent to spam

○  Missed opportunity

Page 6: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Delivered ≠ Inbox

Page 7: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Delivered Rate = (Total Sent – Bounces) / Total Sent

Page 8: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Inbox Placement Rate = (Total Sent – Bounces) – (Spam +

Missing) / Total Sent

Page 9: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

How Email Providers Filter Spam

Page 10: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Content Filters

Page 11: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Sender Reputation Filters

Page 12: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

But how do I know what my sender reputation is?

www.senderscore.org

Page 13: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Better Reputations Lead to Better IPR

Source: Return Path 2012 Sender Score Benchmark Report

Page 14: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Engagement Filters

Page 15: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

What Has (Not) Changed?

Page 16: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

While inbox placement rates are higher today, the inbox is more complicated:

•  Inbox Tabs and Categories •  Productivity tools •  Mobile •  Email Apps

Deliverability not getting easier

Page 17: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Global Inequality

Page 18: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Inbox Placement byIndustry

Winners •  Health and Beauty •  Retail •  Apparel •  Automotive •  Food & Beverage Losers •  Software and Internet •  Technology •  Media &

Entertainment •  Consumer Services

Page 19: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Factors Impacting Inbox Placement Rates

Page 20: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Throughout the year

Page 21: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Three Factors

Page 22: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Volume Effect

Black Friday Christmas

First Week of November

Page 23: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Over half of all emails were opened on smartphones over the 2013 holiday period. Where’s the spam button?

Page 24: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

The Cheer Effect: As People Look for Holiday Deals, They Read More Email

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Start of the New Year

First Week of November

Page 25: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Primary vs Promotions

Page 26: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Defining Placement in the New Inbox, but Which Inbox?

Source: OtherInbox.com

Page 27: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Applying New Measurement Approaches

Page 28: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Measuring Inbox Placement Rate: Seeding

Page 29: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Today Inbox Placement is Measured using both Seed and Consumer Data

Page 30: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

ACTIVE VS. INACTIVE MAILBOXES MATTER MORE

Source: Return Path, Win-Back Report 2014

Page 31: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

“Think of how you can make the user love

your emails rather than land in the inbox.”

-Gmail

Page 32: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Engagement Factors

Mailbox Providers look for signals that your subscribers love your emails:

•  Messages Read •  Messages Read Multiple Times •  Replies •  Deleted Without Reading •  Forwards •  This is Spam •  This is Not Spam

Page 33: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Target Mobile Users

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

iPad

iPhone OS 7

iPhone OS 8

Source: Return Path, Email Client Monitor

Page 34: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Source: Return Path, Email Client Monitor

Page 35: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Don’t Be Afraid to Increase Frequency

Average # of messages sent per week 5+ 4 3 2 1 Average subscriber spam complaint rate 0.005% 0.020% 0.026% 0.037% 0.571% Average retailer Sender Score 62 86 89 86 83 Average "This is not spam" Rate 0.40% 0.22% 0.73% 0.89% 1.07% Average Inbox Placement Rate 71% 96% 98% 94% 92%

Source: Return Path, Inbox Insight, October – December 2013

Page 36: 2014 Inbox Placement Benchmarks Review

Let’s Connect!

Tom Sather Sr. Director, Research

@ReturnPath @Tom_Sather

[email protected]

www.returnpath.com

Contact Us! http://www.returnpath.com/contact-us/