28
The Impact of Human Capital Human Capital Strategy As a Business Differen<ator

The Impact of Human Capital on Startups

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The  Impact  of  Human  Capital  Human  Capital  Strategy  As  a  Business  Differen<ator  

   

3  Cri&cal  Success  Factors  

1.    The  Plan  -­‐  A  rigorous  and  constantly  examined  growth  strategy    2.    The  People  -­‐  A  sophis&cated,  smart  and  strategically  relevant  human  capital  strategy    3.    The  Market  -­‐  A  robust,  analy&cal,  on  &me  and  on  demand-­‐inbound  marke&ng  strategy  for  today!    

Survive  or  Thrive  

•  MISSING  ANY  OF  ONE  OF  THESE  THREE  AREAS  CAN  CAUSE  YOUR  STRATEGY  TO  GO  FROM  THRIVE  TO  SURVIVE:      –  Part  1  -­‐  GROWTH  STRATEGY    

•  LOSING  FOCUS  OF  YOUR  ‘NORTH  STAR”    –  Part  2  -­‐  HUMAN  CAPITAL  POTENTIAL  AND  ORGANIZATIONAL  ALIGNMENT    

•  WAITING  TOO  LONG  AND  INVESTING  TOO  LITTLE    –  Part  3  -­‐  MARKETING  &  ANALYTICS    

•  UNDERVALUING  THE  IMPACT  AND  DOING  TOO  LITTLE  

Human  Capital  Planning    

Value  Proposi&on    

The  best  strategy  can  fail  at  implementa7on  without  a  human  capital  strategy  suppor7ng  it  

 

Paradigms  Blocking  People  from  Achieving  Strategic  Ini<a<ves    

•  People  are  smart  and  people  are  busy  

•  All  our  people  are  always  working  at  their  highest  poten7al  

•  People  are  our  most  important  asset        

The  Current  Global  Business  Trends  2014  

•  27%  of  CEO’s  say  they  lose  sleep  over  human  capital  

–  Fortune    •  According  to  PE  surveys  –  85%  of  their  <me  is  spent  on  people  issues.    There  is  

a  crisis  in  leadership  –  crea<ng  organiza<onal  permafrost    

–  Phoenix  Strategic  Performance    

•  60%  of  employees  are  disengaged  

–  Towers  Watson  –  Global  Employment  Study  2014    

•  50%  of  Small  Businesses  Fail  within  the  first  5  years  

–  Geri  Stengel  –  Ventureneer  •  On  the  Values  –  Produc<vity  Matrix  -­‐  Too  much  <me  ,  over  60%,  is  spent  

tolera<ng  either  low  or  disengaged  performers    

–  Jana  Ma^hews  –  Kaufman  Ins&tute  6  

     Value  Proposi<on  

– Assess  people  on  current  and  trending  competency  criteria  

– Forecast  current  and  future  people  poten<al  and  capacity  to  pace  with  strategic  business  objec&ves  

– Unlock  people’s  performance  poten<al  

– Mi<gate  people  risk    

– Close  the  performance  accountability  loop    

 

Managing    Human  Capital  Poten&al    

•  3-­‐Filter  Funnel  Assessment                          Diagnos7c    

•  Organiza&onal  Agility  Assessment              Repor7ng,  Analy7cs  &  Gap  Analysis                          

•  Workforce  Planning,  Development                                &  Governance  

         Implementa7on  

 Filter  Funnel  Assessment  –  Diagnos&c      

 

•  Filter  Funnel  Organiza<onal  Assessment  Model  Diagnos<c    – Filter  1  –  RoleFit  ©  – Filter  2  -­‐  Competency  Assessment    – Filter  3  -­‐  PeopleFit©  

   

 Filter  Funnel  Assessment  –  Diagnos&c    

     

 Organiza&onal  Assessment      

 Organiza<onal  Assessment  Model  

                   Strategy      

                 Organiza<on                            RoleFit©                                Competencies                                          Assessments                                        Plans    

Organiza&onal  Assessment    

 Organiza<onal  Assessment  Model  –  Culture  

             Strategy                Organiza<on                      RoleFit  ©                                

             Competencies                                  Assessments                                  Plans                                  +  Culture  

 

RoleFit©  

Funnel  Filter  1:    RoleFit©  

 ©©©©  

   Strategy        Role  Clarity            Leader  Role  

   Knowledge  Role  

 

Competency  Assessment  

Funnel  Filter  2:    Competency  Assessment  Strategy    Phoenix  Factors        Knowledgeable        Accountable  and        Engaged  to  Deliver              Confident    

Making  Human  Capital  a  Strategic  Ini4a4ve    

15  

The transformation of Technology: Jumping the chasm

•  Some can make it easily

•  Some will need training

•  Some will need a jet pack

•  Some will not make the cut

•  How do you retain the people that can make the jump?

Former  Skills  

New  Skills  

Do You Have the Right Skills?

New Strategy

l  6  –  Knowledgeable    Accountable  &  Engaged  Secure,  Ac&on  Required    

5  -­‐  Knowledgeable  Accountable  &  Engaged  Secure    

4A  -­‐    Knowledgeable,  Accountable  &  Engaged  ,  Insecure  4B-­‐  Knowledgeable,  Not  Accountable  &  Disengaged,  Secure    3  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge    Not  Fully  Accountable  but  Engaged    Increasing  Confidence    

1  -­‐  Limited  to  No  Knowledge  Engaged  but  Not  Accountable  Not  confident    

Phoenix  Strategic  Assessment  System    Competency  Assessment  

2A  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge,  Not    Accountable  but  Engaged,  Overly  Confident    2B  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge,  Not  Accountable  &  Disengaged,  Not  Confident  

People  Style    

Funnel  Filter  3:    PeopleFit©–  DISC  Profile    Strategy    DiSC®          D  –  Dominant            I  –  Influencer            S  –  Steadiness          C  –  Conscien<ous    

Filter  Funnel  Diagnos&c    Summary  

18  

   

Organiza&onal  Agility    Assessment  Results    

   

•  Organiza<onal  Agility  Assessment  Results  Repor<ng,  Analy<cs  and  Gap  Analysis  

•  Heat  Map    

•  Phoenix  Competency  Report  –  Gap  Analysis    

•  Phoenix  Competency  Report    Rou<ne  &  Non-­‐Rou<ne  -­‐  Gap  Analysis    

The transformation of Technology: Jumping the chasm

•  Some can make it easily

•  Some will need training

•  Some will need a jet pack

•  Some will not make the cut

•  How do you retain the people that can make the jump?

Former  Skills  

New  Skills  

Do You Have the Right Skills?

New Strategy

l  

6  –  Knowledgeable    Accountable  &  Engaged  Secure,  Ac&on  Required    

5  -­‐  Knowledgeable  Accountable  &  Engaged  Secure    

4A  -­‐    Knowledgeable,  Accountable  &  Engaged  ,  Insecure  4B-­‐  Knowledgeable,  Not  Accountable  &  Disengaged,  Secure    3  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge    Not  Fully  Accountable  but  Engaged    Increasing  Confidence    

1  -­‐  Limited  to  No  Knowledge  Engaged  but  Not  Accountable  Not  confident    

Phoenix  Strategic  Assessment  System    Competency  Assessment  

2A  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge,  Not    Accountable  but  Engaged,  Overly  Confident    2B  -­‐  Limited  Knowledge,  Not  Accountable  &  Disengaged,  Not  Confident  

90  –  100%  Produc&vity    

90  –  100%  Produc&vity    

75  –  85%  Produc&vity  

60  –  75%  Produc&vity  

 50  –  60%  Produc&vity    

30  –  50%  Produc&vity  

Competency  Assessment    Cost  vs.  Produc&vity  Impact  Analysis  Part  1    

Data  provided  by  2014  Research  Study:    Phoenix  Group  Interna&onal    Phoenix  Strategic  Performance       Making  Human  Capital  a  Strategic  Ini4a4ve  

Copyright  2014©  Phoenix  Strategic  Performance,  Inc.SM  

90  –  100%  Produc&vity    

90  –  100%  Produc&vity    

75  –  85%  Produc&vity  

60  –  75%  Produc&vity  

 50  -­‐60%  Produc&vity    

30  –  50%  Produc&vity  

   Competency  Assessment        Cost  vs.  Produc&vity  Impact  Analysis      

VALUE  

CREATION  

VALUE    STAGNATION  

VALUE  

EROSION  

Example  –  Ra&ngs  Heat  Map  

3  

2b  

4b  

•  Knowledgeable  •  Accountable  &  Engaged  •  Confident  

•  Knowledgeable  •  Accountable  &  Engaged  •  Not  Confident  

•  Limited  Knowledge  •  Accountable  &  Engaged  •  Increasing  Confidence  

•  Limited  Knowledge  •  Unaccountable  &  Disengaged  •  Not  Confident  

5  

•  ‘Go  To’  Person  

•  U&lity  Player  

•  Overwhelmed  

•  Developer  

4a  

6  

•  Knowledgeable  •  Unaccountable  &  Disengaged  •  Confident  

•  Knowledgeable  •  Accountable  &  

Engaged  •  Confident  •  Ac&on  Required  

1  •  Limited  to  No  Knowledge  •  Engaged  but  Unaccountable  •  Not  Confident  

•  New  

2a  •  Limited  Knowledge  •  Unaccountable  &  Disengaged  •  Overly  Confident  

•  Over  Achiever  

•  Under  Achiever  

•  Complacent  

     Inves&ng  in  People  Development      

Inves&ng  in  people  is  no  longer  a  nice  to  do.    It  is  a  must  do,  a  strategic  impera&ve  that  is:  

–  Strategically  aligned  to  business  goals    –  Targeted,  high  quality,  relevant,  immediately  applicable  and  accountable  to  change  

 Why  is  investment  in  the  upskilling  and  development  of  human  capital  no  longer  an  op<on  but  a  strategic  impera<ve?  

–  When  the  consequences  of  not  doing  it  are  compromising  your  ROI,  strategic  goals,  compe&&ve  advantage  and  organiza&onal  agility  

–  When  having  skilled  employees  are  the  table  stakes  needed  for  your  organiza&on  to  stay  in  play    

 

 Organiza&onal  Agility  Assessment  –  Analy&cs    Example  1:    Low  Performance  Levels  (Senior  Leadership)  Competency  Summary  Report  –  Implica&ons    

Produc<vity  &  Cost  Implica<ons:  Overpaying  for  Underperformance    •  Low  to  moderate  levels  rela&ve  to  job  

benchmarks  and  compensa&on  costs  •  Leadership  team  is  being  overpaid  rela&ve  

to  current  performance,  strategic  results  &  costs  

 Implica<ons  for  Organiza<on  Results:    Forecast    •  Value  Crea&on  –  Low  probability  •  Value  Stagna&on  –  High  Probability    •  Value  Erosion  –  High  Probability      

Total  Competency  Ra<ngs  -­‐  Senior  Leadership    

Organiza&onal  Agility  Assessment  -­‐  Analy&cs  Example  1:    Comparison  Reports  (Senior  Leadership)    Senior  Leadership  &  Organiza&onal  Implica&ons    

Key  Strategic  Organiza<onal  Considera<ons:    •  What  is  the  probability  of  strategic  success?  

Low  probability  of  strategic  success,  on  &me,  on  budget  &  high  quality.    

•  What  is  the  impact  to  organiza&onal  agility?  Human  capital  not  agile,  resilient  nor  deployable  on  demand.    

•  What  is  the  strategic  result  probability?    Value  stagna&on  to  value  erosion  is  highly  probable.                                  

 

           Phoenix  Strategic  Performance  System            Assessment  Recommenda&ons      

Delivering  Human  Capital  Value    

– Current  people  analysis      

– Gap  analysis  and  workforce  planning      

– Targeted  and  aligned  employee  development  plans    

– Targeted  and  aligned  learning  and  development      

– A  governance  process  to  ensure  accountability  and  sustainability  

     

Regarding  Human  Capital  Planning  

 “A  Goal  Without  a  Plan  Is  Just  a  Wish”  

                                                                                                                           Antoine  de  Saint-­‐Exupery  Wishing  does  not  make  it  so……..so  •  Set  Your  Inten4ons  Clearly  •  Visualize  the  Outcome  You  Desire  with  UAer  Certainty    •  Be  Brave!    •  Track  Your  Progress  •  Plan,  Plan  &  Plan  Some  More                      

                     Good  luck!    

Ques&ons?    

Joanne  Flynn  Phoenix  Strategic  Performance  

 www.phoenixstrategicperformance.com  [email protected]  

 

Making  Human  Capital  a  Strategic  Ini4a4ve  

 

27  

Follow  us:  @PHXStrategy