Upload
sandeep-kumar
View
114
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation proposes a new framework to evaluate business performance of conglomerate firms and a final matrix score has been developed comprising of "Composite Business Performance Score" & "Overall Risk Score" on which each and every firm of the conglomerate would be mapped to make further business decision. Its implementation on Tata Group has also been discussed.
Citation preview
Business Leadership Award 2012 Case Defense Round
Team: CorpCommandos Indian Institute of Management, Indore
Team Members: Arun Kumar Tiwari Chetan Zarekar Sandeep Kumar Yogesh Yadav
Framework for Group Performance Evaluation & Business Plan for TATA Company
Leadership with Trust
Business Performance Evaluation
Framework
Existing Approaches:
Our Approach: To Map a Company in portfolio of Group on a graph of Business Performance & Risk Characteristics,
considering correlation with other group companies & then to recommend the Most appropriate Future strategy. Derivation of Two Scores: 1. Business Performance Score - indicate Performance of Company 2. Overall Risk Score – indicate complete Risk accepted by Management in that business
Path for Performance
Evaluation
Final Determinants
Derivation of
For All TATA Group Companies
Company Evaluation
Overall Risk Score
Company-Group Correlation
factor
Business Performance Score (BPS)
Composite BPS
Business Performance-Expectation Matrix:
Co
mp
osi
te B
PS
Overall Risk Score 0 2 4 6
0
4
8
12
Definitions: Business Performance Score (BPS)
It indicates the performance of individual company
Company Group Correlation Factor: It specify how the company is dependent on performance of other TATA Group company & also how it is endorsing other Group Company
Composite BPS: Composite BPS = BPS X Company-Group Correlation Factor
Overall Risk Score (ORS): It states the risk associated with business
Group Performance Index It is weighted average of composite BPS of all companies, considering weights of Invested Capital in companies of Group
Sector Performance Index It is average of composite BPS of all companies in sector, considering weights of Invested Capital in each company in that sector
Group Performance Index (GPI) Sector Performance Index (SPI)
Derivation of Business Performance
Score (BPS)
Business Performance
Score
Business & Market
Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance
Analysis
Stakeholder Delight
Indicator
Score Value range = 1 to 6; 1= Weak performance; 6= Strongest Performance
Business Performance Score (BPS) Calculation
1. Business & Market Assessment
Business & Market
Assessment
Industry Characteristics
Demand-Supply Gap
Government Policy
Input Related Risk
Extent of Competition
Company Commerce Assessment
Participation in Market
Product/Service Portfolio
Trade Aspects
Geographical Presence
Investment, Business Acquisitions & Joint
Ventures
Technology Implementation
Research & Development
Resultant Price Change Impact on Demand Level Impact on Supply Level
Tax Benefit and Technology Promotion Import Duty, Excise Duty, MAT Rate Union Budget Provision
Ease in Business Development Profit Margin Volatility Skilled Human Capital Availability
No. of Domestic Players & Price war situation Foreign Competition Accessibility to resources
Absolute & Relative Market Share Annual increase in Market share Increase in Market share over last 3 years
Product/Service Offering Diversity Brand Perception Price Level as compared to competition Unique Feature of product Stage of Product Life Cycle and recent innovation
Volume and Sales Growth, Customer Base Increase Concentration of buyers and suppliers Raw Material Availability and Price Securing of prepurchase agreement
Entry in new markets in last years Market share enhancement in new regions Extent of replication of existing skills in new market
Net Investment done in previous years Acquisition and synergy realized Business Alignment & Cost Saving
Additional Latest tech application in business Value generated by Technology addition
New Research Outputs Patents filed in last year Cost Effectiveness due to R&D Better quality output due to R&D
Business Performance Score (BPS) Calculation
2. Operational Efficiency Measurement
Operational Efficiency
Creation of Supply Chain Surplus
Inventory Management Fill Rate, Inventory as Days of Sale,
Response Time
Location Advantages
Infrastructure Facilities, Proximity to Inputs and Market, Presence of
favorable govt. regulations
Distribution Network Delivery Time, IT in network design, E-
Business, Distribution Network Penetration, Transportation Cost
Demand Forecasting Match
Meeting Sales projections, Overstock/Understock Cost
Waste Management Strategy for Waste Management and Recycle Options Availability
Production Standards Process, Degree of Automation, Standard Certificates Achieved
Ratio Analysis
Capacity Capacity Utilization and improvement
over previous year
Operational Efficiency Operating Margin and change over
previous period
Business Performance Score (BPS) Calculation
3. Management Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Innovation
Strategic Launches
New Products/Offerings
Abrupt benefit from Strategic Planning
Strategic Clarity
Awards Awards/Accolades
Organization Culture
Development
Managing Labor Relations
Management-Employee Coordination
Labor Union Relationship
Organization Hierarchy
Workflow Efficiency
Agility
Business Performance Score (BPS) Calculation
4. Financial Performance Analysis
Financial Performance
Analysis
Economic Analysis
Growth Parameters Sales Turnover Growth, EBIDTA/EBIT/PAT
Growth
Value Additions Economic Value Added, Market Value Added,
Cash Conversion Cycle
Other Financial Parameters Cost of Equity and Debt, Discount Rate, Beta of
firm, Retention Rate
Stock Performance 365 days Moving Average, %Change in Stock price in 1 year, Change in P/E ratio
Proportionate Analysis
Profitability ratios
EBIDTA/EBIT/PBT/PAT Margins and improvement over last year; ROA/ROE/ROCE
and improvement over last year; Asset Turnover Ratio
Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, Operating Cash Flow to Current Liability Ratio
Solvency Ratios D/E, CFO to Total Liability Ratio, Interest
Coverage Ratio, Financial Leverage, DSCR, TOL?TNW
Business Performance Score (BPS) Calculation
5. Stakeholder Delight Indicator
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
Customers
Customer Delight Customer Complaints, Warranty Issues, Repeat
Customers
Offerings Discounts (with no additional Cost to Company),
Additional Features
Employees
Job Performance Revenue per Employee, Employee Cost as a
percentage of Sale
Job Satisfaction Attrition Rate, Variable Component in CTC,
Cashless Compensation, Employee motivation practices
Shareholders Monetary Benefits Percentage increase in EPS, Dividend Offering,
Stock Return in a year
Society Benefits
Environment Conserve Actions
Green Initiatives, Promotion of Environmental Cause
Serving Bottom of Pyramid Exceptional beneficial idea for Low Cost Segment,
General Awareness Programs
Calculation of Company-Group
Correlation Factor
Company-Group Correlation Score
Trade relationship with other Tata Group Companies
Customer of Group Companies
Supplier of Group Companies
Shareholding Pattern
Shareholding of Group’s other Companies
Share Allocation to Group’s other Companies
Distribution Network Sharing
Dependency on Group’s other Companies
Allowing use of own to Group’s other Companies
Financial Support Loans & Advances from Group’s other Companies
Loans & Advances to Group’s other Companies Company-Group Correlation factor = =1+ (Correlation Score )/6
Computation of BPS
& Group/Sector Performance Index
Business Performance Score: It is calculated on basis of weighted performance of underlying metrics score, having weights as shown in graph -> Significance of Scores
Score – 1 to 2 => Red Zone Need urgent attention
Score – 2 to 4 => Orange Zone Need improvement in system
Score – 4 to 6 => Green Zone Sustainability Measures
ManagementEfficiency
OperationalEfficiency
StakeholderDelight
Indicator
FinancialPerformance
Analysis
Business &Market
Assessment
* 15% 25% 10% 25% 25%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
We
igh
ts A
ssig
ne
d
Composite BPS: It indicate business performance in relation with other Group company relationship
Composite BPS = BPS * Company Group Correlation factor Composite BPS range = 2 to 12 ; 2 – Low company prospective , 12- Highest Company Supremacy
Company – Group correlation factor : Value Range : 1 to 2 Score 1 = None relationship with other group companies Score 2 = Strongest relationship with other group companies
Group Performance Indicator: Average Score of composite BPS, with weights of invested capital in Group Sector Performance Indicator: Average Score of composite BPS, with weights of invested capital in Sector
Overall Risk Score (ORS)
Calculation
Overall Risk Score
Business Risk
Industry Risk
Company Business Risk
Product/Service Portfolio Diversity in Product/Service offering, Stage of Product Life Cycle,
Substitute Product Risk
Geographical Presence Presence Across Different Regions, Global Presence
Trade Risk Concentration of Buyers & Suppliers, Ease in raw material availability
and their price impact, Securing Prepurchase Agreements
Financial Risk
Cost of Capital Discount Rate, Cost of Debt & Equity, Beta of the firm
Credit Risk
Liquidity Risk Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, Operating Cash Flow to Current Liability
Ratio
Long term Solvency Ratio D/E, Interest Coverage Ratio, Financial Leverage, DSCR, TOL/TNW, CFO
to Total Liabilities Ratio
Trade Payment Ratio Account Receivable Turnover, Day Receivable Outstanding, Account
Payable Turnover
Operational Risk
People Related Risk
Workplace Safety Risk Employee Safety Risk, Work Location Risk
Risk in Process & Delivery Impact due to Data Entry, Product Loss risk in Delivery, Technology
risk, Transaction risk
Labor Relation
Internal Fraud Misappropriation of facts, Bribery, Intentional Mismarking of positions
External Fraud Theft of Information, Hacking Damage, 3rd Party Theft * Forgery
Physical Risk Natural Disaster, Terrorism,
Vandalism Risk
Country Risk
Interest Rate Risk, Currency Risk, Regulatory Risk
A Tool for Decision Making
Business Performance-Risk Matrix
0
4
8
1
2
Co
mp
osi
te B
PS
Overall Risk Score 0 2 4 6
High Risk, High Performance Zone: Focus on Risk Mitigation Strategy Performance Prolongation approach
High Risk, Moderate Performance Zone: Focus on Risk Mitigation Strategy Need to Focus on Performance Hindering Parameters
High Risk, Low Performance Zone: If Past Business Performance Score(BPS) is consistently low, then Need to Divest If Risk is temporary, then try for Risk Mitigation points
Moderate Risk, Low Performance Zone: Need of Performance Improvement Focus on Risk Mitigation
Low Risk, Low Performance Zone: Urgent Need of Performance Improvement Maintain minimized Risk level
Low Risk, Moderate Performance Zone: Focus on Performance Improvement Maintain minimized Risk level
Low Risk, High Performance Zone: Superlative Business Practices Spotlight on Performance Sustainability Maintain minimized Risk level
Moderate Risk, Moderate Performance Zone: Focus on :Performance Improvement Focus on Risk Mitigation
Moderate Risk, High Performance Zone: Focus on Risk Mitigation Strategy :Performance Sustainability
Sector: Chemical Industry: Pesticide /Agro
Sector: Materials Industry: Metals
Sector: Telecomm Industry: Tele-Comm Equipment
Sector: Service Industry: Finance - Investment
Sector: Energy Industry: Power Generation/Distribution
Current Business performance
Of TATA Group
Consideration of Seven Companies of TATA group for Business Performance Analysis
TATA Investment Corporation
NELCO
TATA Global Beverages TATA Steel Voltas
Sector: Consumer Products Industry: Tea&Coffee - Plantation
Sector: Industrial Goods Industry: Engineering Products
Evaluation Metric Scores for
TATA Group Companies (1/2)
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
2.73
2.24
2.55
2.17
2.69
Nelco BPS: 2.44
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
3.57
3.26
3.10
3.56
3.44
Voltas BPS: 3.41
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
3.30
3.43
3.50
3.82
3.62
Tata Investment BPS: 3.52
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
4.17
4.28
4.51
4.04
3.99
Tata Steel BPS: 4.20
Evaluation Metric Scores for
TATA Group Companies (2/2)
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
3.75
3.56
3.85
3.05
3.79
Tata Global Beverage BPS: 3.55
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
3.52
3.69
3.58
3.31
3.64
Tata Power BPS: 3.53
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
3.69
3.42
3.70
3.58
3.67
Rallis India BPS: 3.59 Company
Company-Group Correlation Factor
Composite BPS
Overall Risk Score
Tata Steel 1.604 6.74 1.94
Nelco 1.434 3.50 4.91
Voltas 1.417 4.83 3.44
Tata Investment Corporation 1.458 5.14 3.27
Tata Power 1.438 5.07 3.62
Tata Global Beverages 1.438 5.10 3.34
Rallis India 1.563 5.61 3.17
Mapping of Companies on
Business Performance Risk Matrix
0
4
8
12
0 2 4 6
Co
mp
osi
te B
PS
Overall Risk Score
Tata Steel (1.94, 6.74)
Nelco (4.91, 3.50)
Voltas (3.44, 4.83)
Tata Investment Corporation (3.27 ,5.14)
Tata Power (3.62, 5.07)
Tata Global Beverage
(3.34, 5.10)
Rallis India (3.17, 5.61)
Possible Exit: If Nelco perform consistently in “High Risk, Low Performance” zone for 1 more year, then we will be recommend to detach Nelco. Possible Entry: If Sector performance index (SPI) for a particular sector is consistently greater than 8 for continuous 3 years, then we urge Entry in a sector, with company of low Risk profile
Strategic Business Plan
for TATA Steel
Business Performance Score (BPS) = 3.84 Company-Group Correlation Factor = 1.60 Composite BPS = 6.15 Overall Risk Score (ORS) = 2.6
Objective: To develop the business action strategy for TATA Steel on basis of Business Performance – Risk Matrix, in relation with internal Qualitative & Quantitative Factors of Matrix
TATA Steel – instate in
“Moderate Risk, Moderate
Business Performance zone “
Key Facts & Figures of TATA Steel: Revenue = Rs 30746.45 crore Net Profit = Rs 6865.69 crore Market Cap = Rs 33438.42 crore (21 Dec ) Revenue GAGR of last 5 years = 14.54%
Recent Corporate Actions of TATA Steel Launched FPO in Jan to raise US $778m Raised US $506m by Corporate Hybrid Securities in Mar & May Sold Teesside Cast Products plant for US $469m Signed definitive agreement with KHC to induct as a strategic partner in Tata Refractories Ltd Declared dividend of 120.00% amounting to Rs 12 per share 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Business & Market Assessment
Operational Efficiency
Management Efficiency
Financial Performance Analysis
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
4.17
4.28
4.51
4.04
3.99
Business Performance Metrics Score
Business Overview
of TATA Steel • Tata Steel has won `The Businessworld Most Respected
Company Award 2011’ in the Metals category • Setting up of a 6 mtpa integrated steel plant worth Rs
30500 crores in Kalinganagar, Odhisa • Company wide focus to ensure casualty free operations • Capacity utilization below pre-crisis level, in spite of
improved demand
Tata Steel Shares: 2006 – 11 Steel Use and Capacity Utilization
Iron Ore Fines, US $/tonne
Hard Coking Coal, US $/tonne
HRC Spot Price, US $/tonne
Business & Market
Assessment
Industry Characteristics
Demand-Supply Gap
Government Policy
Input Related Risk
Extent of Competition
Company Commerce Assessment
Participation in Market
Product/Service Portfolio
Trade Aspects
Geographical Presence
Investment, Business
Acquisitions & Joint Ventures
Technology Implementation
Research & Development
High Supply by Brownfield expansion & Greenfield expansion, Lower Demand due to Economy Slowdown, Derived Demand
Gross Budgetary Support (GBS) of Rs.118.00 crore has been provided for promotion of R & D
High prices of Iron ore & Coking coal, High Volatility, Less Contract durations
High Competition to focus on Volume strategy due to Consolidation in industry
37.5% Market share , Market Leader
Diversified Products for Automotive, Construction, Consumer Goods, Packaging, Lifting & Excavating, Aerospace, Ship Buidling etc.
Increase in Sale by 18%, Shifted focus towards Niche Customers, Less impact of RM price volatility due to Captive mines
Operations in 26 countries & Commercial Presence in 50+ Countries,
Acquired NatSteel in South East Asi & Millennium Steel in Thiland , Synergy take up phase for Corus acquisition
BOF based integrated plants, LD steel making process technology
In a phase of Value appropriation through 4 R & D centers of acquired Corus
Being currently lower side of business cycle, more focus on Cost saving & optimization to keep bottom line intact
Focus on R & D deployment , which in turn create better quality products with low cost
Backward integration for critical input materials, probable Long term contracts
First move in case of New Customer Segment, Scheme for boosting Customer relationship
The Exact specification requirement offering to customer can promote market share
Swing towards High value added steel products meeting customer specifications, Products of Lighter metals & stronger alloys
More focus on Pre purchase agreement, High duration future contracts with suppliers
potential acquisition in developing countries of growing per capita steel consumption
Acquisition for Backward integration can help in securing raw materials of high capacity of TATA steel
Joint Venture & Technology Transfer agreement with Global Players
Research in process enhancement to reduce cost, Possible Collaboration with Other players to reduce cost
TATA Steel - Business Performance Development
1. Business & Market Assessment Current Situation Future Plan of Action
TATA Steel - Business Performance Development
2. Operational Efficiency
Operational Efficiency
Creation of Supply Chain Surplus
Inventory Management
Inventory as days of sale = 40
Above average fill rate & moderate response time
Location Advantages Geographically present in Central and
South parts of India
Distribution Network Special subsidiary – TATA steel
processing & distribution Ltd. focused on Retail & B2B sale
Demand Forecasting Match
Most proportion of derived demands of customer sector growth, Moderate
overstock & under stock cost
Waste Management Enhanced production efficiency
through waste reduction, Recycle steel scrap
Production Standards
Well established Standard Operating Procedures, Modest degree of
Automation, Matched government norms of CO2 emissions
Ratio Analysis
Capacity Current Capacity of 28 MTPA , further capacity expansion of 2.9 MT,to start
in FY2013
Operational Efficiency High capacity utilization rate of 86% ,
Operating margin of 34%
Shift towards Just in Time approach
New expansion at location of proximity to inputs / market, & favorable Govt. regulations
Chase strategy in aggregate planning
Cost effectiveness mode to enhance Operational margin
Continuous Improvement approach, Kaizen system Increase in degree of automation
Steel being 100% recycle product, focus on scrap collection & faster recycling
Steel Demand Growth (%) = 2.5 + 0.2*GDPGrowth % + 1.7*IIP Growth % Analysis by Statistical Tools,
Move towards e-business for faster administration Setting up plant close to captive sources
Current Situation Future Plan of Action
TATA Steel - Business Performance Development
3. Management Efficiency
JV & acquisition on perspective of a single value loop in business model
Focus of campaign in countries having considerable market share
Dedicated Talent Management centre
Introduction of 360 degree feedback
Family insurance schemes for workers,
Cultural Event, sport competitions organization for workers
Efforts for Nomination in Foreign / Global awards
Capital raise for optimized Capital structure
Current Situation Future Plan of Action
Management Efficiency
Innovation
Strategic Launches
Investment in development of Dharma Port, JV with L & T with aim of reducing transportation cost
Campaign - “Value Stronger than Steel” Campaign – ValueAbled.com
FPO of 5.7Cr shares issued in
Jan 2011
Awards
Business world most Respected Company award 2011, 1st prize in Udyog Mela 2011
Organization Culture
Development
Managing Labor Relations
Cooperative Labor Union Relationship
Helping to Polytechnic & ITI institute to train student which interns are hired by company
Organization Hierarchy
Promoting teamwork, nurturing talent, enhancing leadership qualities & acting with pride, passion & pace
A well defined Human Resource Manual focused on Individual recognition
TATA Steel - Business Performance Development
4. Financial Performance Analysis
Financial Performance
Analysis
Economic Analysis
Growth Parameters
Sale CAGR of 12% in last 3year
EBITDA CAGR of 13% in last 3year
Profit CAGR of 15% in last 3year
Value Additions
Economic Value Added = 1264 Crs
Market Value Added = 845 Crs
Cahs Conversion cycle = 19 days
Other Financial Parameters
WACC = 15%, Beta of firm = 1.3
Retention rat e= 77 %
Stock Performance % change in stock price in 1 yr = -44%
Change in P?E ratio = -22%
Proportionate Analysis
Profitability ratios
EBITDA margin = 39%
Improvement in EBITDA = 100BP
ROE = 16.36%, ROCE = 16.68%
Liquidity Ratios Current ratio= 1.82, Quick ratio = 1.42
CFO to current liabilities ratio = 55%
Solvency Ratios Debt to Equity ratio = 64%
Interest coverage ratio = 6.8
Leverage on Brand image for sale improvement
Sustaining Low level of Cash conversion cycle
Maintain moderate retention ratio of foster growth
Low valuation due to economic slowdown, but it will be lucrative in near term future
Cost saving approach
Maintaining Optimal current ratio
Optimal capital structure
Current Situation Future Plan of Action
TATA Steel - Business Performance Development
5. Stakeholder Delight Indicator
Current Situation Future Plan of Action
Stakeholder Delight Indicator
Customers
Customer Delight Less customer complaints, Less warranty issues, High degree of Repeat customer
Offerings Less discount to customer due to High cost environment, Customized product supply
Employees
Job Performance Industry comparable Revenue per employee, Moderate employee compensation
Job Satisfaction High Level of job satisfaction indicated by less attrition rate
Shareholders Monetary Benefits Negative return on stock prices
Dividend payout ratio = 24%
Society Benefits
Environment Conserve Actions
Less CO2 emission than competitor SAIL
Serving Bottom of Pyramid
Own TATA steel rural development society
Better quality products and Service
No Discount as per current short term outlook
Employee motivation practices – Goal setting, Equity Theory
Employee awards, Job enrichment as per performance
Considering current economy slowdown, Need to maintain status quo
Promotional activities for Environment cause Green Initiatives
Maintaining Low cost to extent possible
Company-Group Correlation Factor
Trade relationship with other Tata Group Companies
Suppliers of TATA companies in Automotive, Engineering Sectors as TATA Motors, TATA autocomp system
Moderate raw material purchase through
Shareholding Pattern
Major Promotor : TATA Son (26%), Minor Promoters: TATA Motors, TGB, TATA Chemical, TATA investment Corp, TATA AIG
Investment tin TATA Ryerson, TATA Refractories, TATA sponge iron, TATA Metaliks, TATA Pigments, TATA BlueScope steel etc. TATA NYK
Distribution Network Sharing Low overlap in distribution network between TATA steel & other group companies
Financial Support
No loan from group companies
NO Loan to Subsidiary, Group Associate company
Current Situation
TATA Steel Company-TATA Group
Correlation Factor
Overall
Risk
Score
Business Risk
Industry Risk
Company Business Risk
Product/Service Portfolio
Geographical Presence
Trade Risk
Financial Risk
Cost of Capital Discount Rate, Cost of Debt &
Equity, Beta of the firm
Credit Risk
Liquidity Risk
Long term Solvency Risk
Trade Payment Ratio
Operational Risk
People Related Risk
Workplace Safety Risk
Labor Relation
Internal Fraud
External Fraud
Physical Risk Natural Disaster, Terrorism,
Vandalism Risk
Country Risk
Risk in Process & Delivery
High Interest rate, High inflation environment
Below average risk due to strong product portfolio
Risk of Global economic slowdown
Moderate risk due to concentration of buyers & less impact due to PPA
15% discount rate – reflect higher risk
Less risk due to availability of sufficient current assets
Moderate risk due to comparatively higher financial leverage
Moderate risk due to ordinary receivable parameters
High due to work place nature
Moderate – reduced due to automation in process
Less probability
Less Probability
Moderate
Future Plan of Action Current Situation
Business Plan for
TATA Steel Risk aspect Mitigation
Focus on niche segments
Expansion in less impacted Developing Economy
Chase for more customer
Optimum Capitals structure
Optimum cash availability
Optimum Financial leverage
Try for reducing Account receivables
Safe SOP
Safety enabled Work flow
Self ownership sense building Organization culture
Hierarchical Authentication Procedures
Safety Precautionary Equipments & Guidelines
Hedging Strategies
Time line for TATA Steel
Business Plan Action
Economic Movement Prediction
Global Slowdown
Recovery Phase
Growth Resurgence
Development Ride
Market Maturity
2013 2014 2015 2016 2012
R & D boost with foreign collaboration
Indentifying Niche customer segment
Focus of De integration
Backward Integration of low valuation
Client consultancy for new component
Recommended Business Plan across Timeline
Commodity to High end solution provider
Focus on volume for economy of Scope
Sector focused B2B & Retail Saleteam
Focus on Recycling
Strong branded Product portfolio