Upload
obaid-ali
View
525
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Saturday, October the 10, 2015
Quality, a Lifestyle for Success
Full day workshopHabib University, Karachi
Dr. Iftikhar A. JafriChief Operating Officer, PharmEvo
Thanks & References:
Mary Oates, 2012Global Quality Operation Pfizer
Guy Villax, 2014, Pharmaceutical Technology
1 Quality of Product &Safety of Consumer
2Birth of Quality Culture
5 Quality Culture Indicators
6Closing Words
3 Criticality of Quality Culture
4Maintaining Quality Culture
Your decision impacts product quality Uncounted decisions taken daily
Every decision is not supported by SOPs
Complexmanufacturingenvironment
Potential risks
Does compliance not guarantee?
Is compliance not enough?
Are System & Controls meaningless?
Is Experience not bullet proof?
An environment where every person understands Product Quality & Patient Safety
Without quality culture, product & public safety cannot be assured
Single most important indicator to determine the ability of delivering the quality drugs
QUALITY
CULTURE
Quality is built in from the beginning
Risk to providing quality medicines are understood & mitigated
Performance is monitored in real time & course corrections are made as needed
CoQ
An eagerness to solve problem
Share learning and drive to RFT
Issues are escalated and resolved collaborately
CoQ
No pointing of finger or laying blame
Difficult decisions are made to do the right things
Don’t care about obstacles for right things
CoQ
Birth of Quality Culture
Does not happen by accidentIt has to be created
Relevant process & control must be in place Understood & Followed
Numerous workarounds
Numerous waivers
Lack of ControlPlease close your eyes & try to visualize the
operation floor
Kindly remember
Quality culture builds on the expertise & processes in the organization and results in behaviors & decision
making that will result in quality outcome
Doing the right things and doing things right
is valued above cost & speed
Continuous improvement is the priority resulting in eagerness to
identify & address issues
Must create an environment in which
Culture driven by leadership … Must provide the fundamentals to product quality
Strong management oversight
Adequate resources
Training of colleagues
Maintenance of plant & equipment
Focus on continual improvement
An organization capable of making right decisions to protect product quality
Provide Fundamentals
Is Quality Culture Measurable?
The concept is not new
• What’s your inner (gut) feeling whether it exists or not?
Challenges of current environment urged to quantitatively evaluate
• A semi-quantitative tool was developed that uses data gathered mainly frominterviews of employees across all levels in the firm together withobservations of operations and review of supporting documentation
The tool can be used both internally & externally
A relationship with a third party was under evaluation
Due diligence identified the acceptability of all relevant systems, controls and processes at a potential partner
The quality culture assessment identified significant weaknesses
Cont’d
Hypothetical External Example 1
Particularly, on this basis the business agreement was not pursued
The potential partner later experienced significant quality failures
Hypothetical External Example 1
Open, eager to learn, committed to continuous improvement, management focused on delivery of quality product
Systems & controls were inadequate but culture was strong
Third party partnership under evaluation
Cont’d
Hypothetical External Example 2
When combined with existing culture, product quality was assured
The firm worked diligently to improve systems, resulting in acceptable controls
Hypothetical External Example 2
Management must proclaim the value of escalating issues & opening deviation
investigations
Management must help employees recognize
deviations & implement a process for effectively
raising them
Management must establish a monitoring
mechanism and track and publish metrics
What if Lack of Culture: Symptoms & Actions
Management must celebrate an increase in deviations and hold accountable those who do not bring them forward
Management must ensure that deviation investigations get to true root cause and define full scope of the issue
What if Lack of Culture: Symptoms & Actions
Management must ensure that holistic corrective actions are implemented to prevent recurrence
Management must reinforce the criticality of continuous improvement
What if Lack of Culture: Symptoms & Actions
Its about behaviors, not SOPs
• Without a strong quality culture, risks to product quality cannot be fully mitigated
Criticality of Quality Culture
Quality culture cannot be externally imposed and is not introduced only through changes to GMP systems• Quality culture cannot be changed in the
near-term but can be lost very quickly if focus on it is lost
Criticality of Quality Culture
Management must be vigilant in keeping the organization focused on the right behaviors and decisions
Pressures exist and culture can change quickly if not protected• Supply demands• Supply chain complexity• Cost reduction
Maintaining Quality Culture
May result in organizational & procedural changes
The risk of such changes must be understood and mitigated• Risk assessment tools can be utilized• Assessment may indicate the risk is too great to take• Can be utilized retrospectively
Cost Pressures
May erode quality culture by driving decisions that can adversely affect product quality
Early indicators should be in place• Quantitative (e.g. over-due items)• Decision-making at the operational level
If early signals indicate potential impact, corrective actions should be implemented immediately
Cost Pressures
Resource & System Maturity
1 • An expedited compliant becomes overdue
2 • ↑ in number of operator errors/ batch
3 • ↑ in Doc. Errors corrected before lot release
4 • ↑ in # of unplanned quarantine shipments
5 • ↑ in % employee turnover
6 • Relative degree of experience with staff
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area
Leadership Quality
1• Leadership drives programs that enhance
quality culture, RFT. etc.
2
• % of reported near misses addressed, this means action defined & communicated & colleague rewarded for reporting
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area
Change Impact
1 • ↑ in number of rejected lots
2 • ↑ in % complaints per units produced
3• # of capital projects linked to GMP or compliance being
delayed
4• ↓ in process robustness/ capability (% products that have
defined capabilities that are tracked
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area
Regulatory Impact
1
• Self-identified risk areas (Internal Audits)-step back from tactical findings from audits &look more across the board
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area
Cultural Aspects
1 • ↓ in compliance to training curriculum
2 • ↓ in investigation effectiveness ratio
3 • Feedback loop
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area
Resource Availability
1 • ↑ in average disposition cycle time
2 • ↓ in % PM completed on time
3 • Minimum staffing requirements met
4 • Staffing per workload unit
Quality indicators from the Pyramid characterized by key focus area