Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This infographic is for anyone that is on the fence about using TAR/PC for a current matter and/or for the first time. It spells out the components of a case that you need to consider in order to make the right decision. Using TAR on your case might save you $315,000 or you might be better off with a manual-only review process. Take a look and decide for yourself.
Citation preview
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
TECHNOLOGY ASSISTED REVIEW/PREDICTIVE CODING W/
HIGH DOCUMENT COUNT AND RICHNESS GREATER THAN 2%
*Information drawn from the following studies: e-Discovery Takeaways from the CEIC, ABA Study Shows “Traditional Linear Review” Almost Accounts for 73% of e-Discovery Costs, RAND Study: Where the Money Goes, EDI-Oracle TAR/PC Study Phase 1 Results Confirm Human Resources are Key
Infographic Published by D4 LLC All Rights Reserved 2013 www.d4discovery.com
“Software is only as good as its operators. Human contribution is the most
significant element.”
-Patrick Oot, Phase 1 Results, EDI-Oracle Study*
Additional TAR/PC Resources/Content
| FOR EXAMPLE | MANUAL–ONLY REVIEW COMPARED TO TAR/PC
*ACCORDING TO INDUSTRY STUDIES…....…......…...……....………..
AVERAGE “ALL-IN” COST
EACH DOCUMENT IN A LITIGATION MATTER
TO HANDLE & REVIEW
30 TO 70 REDUCE THE # OF DOCUMENTS
THAT NEED EYES-ON MANUAL REVIEW
BY USING PREDICTIVE CODING OR TECHNOLOGY ASSISTED REVIEW
1. there are sound policies and procedures in place from the start;
2. the training processes are consistent and well-documented;
3. statistically significant sampling is used to verify the results.
GARBAGE IN GARBAGE OUT
TRAINING
PEOPLE
THREE IS THE MAGIC NUMBER
3
1 LEAD COUNSEL 1 IN-HOUSE COUNSEL 1 SENIOR ASSOCIATE
DATA
MUST BE “TEXT FRIENDLY”
HELP!
2 MA IN BENEF ITS
$450,000
$135k - 315k
MANUAL-ONLY
TAR/PC
# OF DOCS NEEDING MANUAL REVIEW
200,000
60k-140k
TAR/PC SAVES
TAR/PC provides defensible results ONLY if…
70%
80%
TECHNOLOGY ASSISTED REVIEW/ PREDICTIVE CODING
STARTING DOCUMENT POPULATION
200,000
200,000
DOCUMENT RICHNESS
TARGETED
HOW WAS THE DATA COLLECTED?
FORENSICS HIGH RICHNESS May Not Need Prioritization
LOW RICHNESS Likely Needs Prioritization
*Must perform a statistically significant random sample and use as a Control Set to know the Richness
IDEAL RICHNESS 2% - 50%
< 2% Too Low > 50% Too High
TYPE/FORMAT OF DATA SHOULD NOT USE TAR/PC........
$ OR WHEN KEY EVIDENCE IS IN THE FORM OF IMAGES, SUCH AS PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEOS OR BLUEPRINTS.
WHERE KEY EVIDENCE IS ONLY NUMERIC:
2. HUMAN REPLACEMENT 1. AN EASY BUTTON IS NOT
< 20K NOT A GOOD CANDIDATE 20K – 50K DEPENDS ON OTHER FACTORS 50K – 200K GOOD CANDIDATE > 200K CRAZY NOT TO USE IT!
NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS # Use the following determining factors as a guide in your decision-making, but bear in mind - there may be exceptions.
1. Identify Key Documents Earlier 2. Prioritize Documents by Relevance
TAR/PC provides results that are as defensible as manual-only review in significantly less time for a fraction of the cost.
LITIGATION REVIEW COST
OF SAID “ALL-IN” COST IS
ATTORNEY REVIEW COST/DOCUMENT= $2.25
ATTRIBUTED TO EYES-ON
OR MORE
A FEW MORE THINGS TO KEEP
IN MIND…
