Upload
law-senate
View
50
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Effects of newly enacted Arbitration & Conciliation
(Amendment) Act,2015
Presented by S. Ravi Shankar, Arbitration lawyer & Senior Partner
Law Senate Law Firm – New Delhi, [email protected]
Major achievements of the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act 2015
includes,• Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 • Deals with many major challenges faced by parties arbitrating in India and outside India.• Courts should try to dispose applications seeking appointment of arbitrators
within 60 days from the date of Notice (S.11)• Power to Chief Justice to designate an Institution to appoint arbitrators • After getting an interim order under S.9, Parties need to start the arbitration
proceedings within 60 days • Fees fixed for the ad-hoc arbitrators on the basis of the value of the dispute (4 th
Schedule) (No sitting, reading & writing fee)• Arbitral Institutions are allowed to have a higher Fee scale
Major challenges while arbitrating under the old Act includes
• An arbitration has to be completed within 12 months S.29A• Fast Track Arbitration S.29B • No automatic stay on filing of an appeal challenging an Arbitral
award S.36• Disclosure to be made by Arbitrators about their relationship
with parties & counsels (Fifth Schedule) to ensure impartiality• Costs follow the event S.31.A• Narrow scope for the Term Public Policy S.34
Suggestions • The Arbitration Amendment Act is a big step forward in our endeavour to make India an
International Arbitration hub• Designating High Court as the appropriate court for International Commercial arbitration
will help parties choosing India seated International arbitrations only• That designation of the High Court will not help Foreign investors who form Indian
Subsidiaries and invest in India, which is in large number • Very high stakes are involved in Domestic arbitration also, those Indian parties also
require help• Hence the following suggestion: • The supervisory courts over an India seated arbitration should be a Financially self
sufficient State level Expert tribunal and not our National Courts• The said supervisory court shall handle all the arbitration related litigation including
enforcement • No appeal/ revision over the Tribunal order except by way of a Special Leave Petition to
Supreme Court.
Thanks
•THANKS