Syutkin and Partner, Practices: LITIGATION

SYUTKIN AND PARTNERS FIRM OF ATTORNEY

LITIGATION

Kyiv, Ukraine

Mostly, our clients appeal for our help at such stage of judicial proceedings, which may be metaphorically described as “the patient is sooner dead than alive”,when

other legal companies delivered their verdict that it is impossible to win this case, or that the only option in your case would be appealing to the European Court on

Human Rights.

At this stage, it is very difficult to work on the case, since a whole number of legal companies have already “worked” on it, and we are forced to develop an efficient strategy on the case “resuscitation” in no time. In most cases, we “resuscitate” cases, but there are cases which are impossible to “resuscitate”, of which we

honestly tell the client before we start working.It is much easier for us and the client to start cooperation at the initial stage, at least at the stage of case consideration in

the first instance.

This will save our client financial expenses (since we spend time only on developing a strategy but not on eliminationof mistakes in judicial defence that have been

already made), and we will be able to reach the desired result within the shortest possible terms.

Syutkin and partners Law Firm, Ukraine, Kievwww.siutkin.com [email protected]

LITIGATION

The main issues, with which our clients come to us and which are the most problematic for businesses in

this area are

• The main issues, with which our clients come to us and which are the most problematic for businesses in this area are:

• 1 udicial disputes on annulment of decisions of state and/or local authorities regarding privatization or purchase-sale of real estate items

• 2 Judicial disputes regarding termination of title to real estate, demolition of buildings and constructions

• 3 Judicial disputes on annulment ofreal estate purchase-sale agreements


• 4 Judicial disputes regarding renewal of land lease agreements • 5 Judicial disputes regarding termination of real estate lease agreements • 6 Judicial disputes between the company’s members/shareholders,

including with regard to exclusion from the number of the company’s members, annulment of agreements on purchase-sale of a participatory interest in the authorized fund

• 7 Judicial disputes on annulment of general meetings of members/shareholders and minutes of such meetings

• 8 Judicial disputes regarding termination of corporate rights purchase-sale contracts, annulment of corporate rights purchase-sale contracts

• 9 Judicial disputes on charging penalties due to a party’s improper fulfilment of its obligations under corporate rights purchase-sale contracts


• 10 Judicial disputes regarding the appeal of actins (omissions) and tax notifications-decisions on determination of amounts of taxpayers’ financial obligations

• 11 Judicial disputes regarding the appeal of resolution on a taxpayer’s property attachment

• 12 Judicial disputes regarding the appeal of refusal of the State Tax Service authority to accept a tax return

• 13 Judicial disputes regarding the appeal of decisions on annulment of VAT payer registration

• 14 Judicial disputes regarding the appeal of inspection orders


About development of solutions in this area practices is engaged

Natalia Osadchaya, partner15 years in this field300 won cases


• Our lawyers are specialising on this area• Nataliya

Marchenko• email: [email protected]• Anastasiia

Lashkul• email: [email protected]• Yaroslav

Serputko• email: [email protected]• Valentina

Siletska• email: [email protected]• Yuriy Lutsyshun• email: [email protected]


mailto:[email protected]





• Successful cases • A company• We were approached by a client who wanted to assert his rights to the land on which he had

placed a large real estate.• A problem• The client was in constant litigations with government agencies, procuratorial authorities, with

third parties. Our client wanted to get a legal opinion about the prospect of lawsuits initiated by them (there were more than 20 processes that were going on for the past 5 years) and for legal plan (scheme) of its follow-up, in order to obtain the final decision for recognition of property rights on the ground.

• Solution• After the examining the results of the customer of court decisions and assessing of the

litigations, in which was at the time our client, we have come to the conclusion that all the judicial measures taken by the client were unpromising and made our client and his actions of their legal advisers can not lead to the consolidation of the client for the last rule ownership of the land. We have developed for our clients the legal scheme that included only one litigation (instead of 20) and who later brought the client guaranteed results and secured his rights to the land.


Syutkin and partners Law Firm Lawyer services Ukraine, [email protected]