Upload
marcus-evans
View
679
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
For more information: [email protected] Rob Edmund from PetSmart, Inc. & Tanya L. Menton atABC, Inc. and speakers at the marcus evans Chief Litigation Officer Summit Fall 2012, held in Las Vegas, NV, delivered a joint presentation on Social Media in the Workplace and Its Impact on Litigation. Join the 2015 Summit along with top Chief Litigation Officers and service providers in an intimate environment for a focused discussion of key new drivers shaping the legal industry today. For more information: [email protected]
Citation preview
Social Media in the Workplace:Best Practices for Managing Social Media g g
Use at Work
Tanya MentonABC IABC, Inc.
Rob EdmundPetSmart IncPetSmart, Inc.
FOUR MAJOR TOPICS
The impact of social networking sites on employee recruitment;employee recruitment;
The use of social networks by employees in the workplace and outside the workplace;the workplace and outside the workplace;
Social media policies;
Using social media to support your in‐house practice
22
Proliferation of Web 2.0 Technologies
Social Networking Sites (Facebook, MySpace)
Business Networking Sites (LinkedIn, Plaxo)
l d ( b )Online media (YouTube)
Blogs (PerezHilton, Gizmodo)
Social News Sites (Digg, Mixx)
3
H R ’ U f S i l M diHuman Resources’ Use of Social Media
44
How Might an Employer Use Social Media when Hiring?
45% of companies said their organization used social networking sites to look up candidates before inviting them for an interview (down from 80% in 2011)
Over 75% of those employers said they would be less likely to hire a candidate if the candidate’s social networking profile or tweets showed evidence of unprofessional behavior.
55
Social media can be a highly efficient cost effective
The Impact of Social Media Sites on Recruitingg y
recruiting tool
“Millennials” are heavy users of social media
Social media tools have pitfalls
Misidentification of candidate
Incomplete informationIncomplete information
Categories of information that should not affect hiring decisions
Photographs are problematic
66
SOCIAL MEDIA & RECRUITMENT
Using social media to research and reject candidates
Provocative or inappropriate photographs of (or information about) candidates
Alcohol or drug use
Disparaging current/former employees
Disclosure of confidential/proprietary information
Poor communication skills
Di i iDiscriminatory comments
Misrepresentations about background or qualifications
77
U i i l di i ki hi i d i i
SOCIAL MEDIA & RECRUITMENT
Using social media in making hiring decisions
Misuse or overuse by active recruiters / screeners
Develop policies/best practicesDevelop policies/best practices
FCRA – 3rd party/vendors
Liability for not doing social media searches
88
Recruiters should rely on objective criteria contained in a
Develop Policies for Use of Social Media in Recruitment
y jwritten job description
Screen based on qualifications
Document reasons for applicant’s rejection
Uniform retention policies (OFCCP requirements)
Clear policies regarding purpose of using social media inClear policies regarding purpose of using social media in recruiting and list of appropriate, credible sites
Verify information relates to applicant and not y ppsomeone else
Handbooks and applications should reference possible f i l di i iti
9
use of social media in recruiting
9
Al b i t t Ch k did t ’ fil
Tips When Using Social Media as a Hiring Tool
Always be consistent. Check one candidate’s profile ‐‐ check all.
M k h i l i i j b l dMake sure there is a legitimate job‐related reason for viewing a candidate’s online profile. Mere curiosity may kill the catcuriosity may kill the cat.
Online information may not necessarily be accurate Be sure to cross reference with theaccurate. Be sure to cross reference with the candidate’s submitted application materials.
1010
Risk: Anti-Discrimination Law Violations
Blogs and social networking sites provide information that the employer would never request during an interview includingduring an interview including:
race; religion; sex; age; national origin; sexual orientation; recreational activities; political leaningsrecreational activities; political leanings
Use of such information could violate a range of antidiscrimination statutes.antidiscrimination statutes.
1111
Choosing Someone to View the Profile
If conducting the search yourself, always try and get the candidate’s written consent first.
Consider using a third party to view candidate’s pages ‐‐ this way, the hiring party will not be
d i f i hexposed to extraneous information that may later give rise to discrimination claims.
1212
E l U f S i l M diEmployee Use of Social Media
1313
How often do employees really visit social networking sites?
Did you know?How often do employees really visit social networking sites?
2/3 of the World’s Internet population visit social networking sites
2010 – Americans spent 25% of their online time on social networking sites
1414
How often do employees visit social networking
Did you know?How often do employees visit social networking sites each week?
In 2009 ‐‐ 22% of employees visit social p ynetworking sites 5 or more times per week and 23% visit social networking sites 1‐4 times per week.
In 2010 – 77% of employees visit Facebook during h kd ( f h h b kthe workday (68% of which visit Facebook more than 2 hours per day*)
*Wasting Time at Work Salary com ‐March 14 2012
15
Wasting Time at Work, Salary.com ‐March 14, 2012
15
Did you know?
How do most employees feel about their employers’ concerns over their socialemployers concerns over their social networking activity?
53% of employees said their social53% of employees said their social networking pages are none of their employers’ businessemployers business.
1616
54% of U.S. companies ban workers from using
Did you know?54% of U.S. companies ban workers from using social media during the workday
19% only allow social media for business related ypurposes
16% allow limited personal use of social media p
10% allow full access – those employers report a 5% decline in productivity
(S. Gaudin, Computerworld U.S. October 7, 2009)
1717
The NLRB on Protected and Concerted Activity
Under the recent settlement agreement in In Re American Medical Response, the employer must revise its "overly‐broad" rules so as to ensure that employees are
Compare to May 2010 NLRB Advice Memorandum:
In a dispute involving a medical transport company, the Board found
not improperly restricted in discussions regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.”
See In re American Medical Response of Connecticut Inc Case No 34‐CA‐
p p y,legal an employer's decision to discipline employees for Facebookposts suggesting they might withhold care from patients who personally offended themof Connecticut, Inc., Case No. 34‐CA‐
12576 (October 27, 2010).
Protected activity may include comments disparaging, criticizing, or critiquing an
offended them.
Activity may be concerted if:The employee notified other employees about the blogp g g, g, q g
employer if:there is a nexus between the remarks made and employee interests or working conditions, and
employees about the blogDiscussed the work environment/terms of employmentAllowed other employees to post responses and comments
18
are not egregious in naturep
18
Risk: Off-Duty Conduct Statutes
E.g., California (Cal. Lab Code § § 96(k), 98.6): protects employees who engage in lawful conduct during non‐working hours, away from employer’s premises, from adverse employment.
E.g., N.Y. Lab. Law § 201(d): employer may discharge an employee whose conduct creates a material conflict of interest related to trade secrets, proprietary information, or business interests.
1919
POST - NLRB Advice Memoranda
Is there concerted activity or is it just one employee’s individual gripes?
Are the posts about working conditions?
If the posts include profanity can you separateIf the posts include profanity, can you separate profanity from work‐related content?
Is confidential/proprietary information disclosed?Is confidential/proprietary information disclosed?
2020
PROHIBITIONS
Disclosure of confidential or proprietary informationinformation
Disclosure of information on clients
Disclosure of business plans, projects, client engagements
2121
Requires balancing the Company’s legitimate business
SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIESRequires balancing the Company s legitimate business needs against employee’s Section 7 rights
Policy cannot have a “chilling effect” on Section 7 rightsPolicy cannot have a chilling effect on Section 7 rights
Policy cannot be overbroad – avoid use of “inappropriate” or “disrespectful”
Will a “savings clause” help you? Not in the NLRB’s view…
2222
Using images without consent may present
SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES
Using images without consent may present problems with:
F l dFalse endorsements
Intellectual property rights to trademarks and op ri htscopyrights
Social advertisements
P i iPrivacy issues
False light
23
Exploitation
23
Using images without consent may present
SOCIAL MEDIA POLICIES
Using images without consent may present problems with:
F l dFalse endorsements
Intellectual property rights to trademarks and op ri htscopyrights
Social advertisements
P i iPrivacy issues
False light
24
Exploitation
24
Using Social Media to Support Your In-House PracticeHouse Practice
2525
Apps and Ideas
FlipboardFlipboard
Cor.kz
Start o r o n blog?
2626
Start your own blog?
Questions?
27