2
1/27/2017 RTI Online :: Request/Appeal Form Details https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=9OC6JH%2FUtvX%2BNJxnEM1NWI%2F07pIiYuslcHo9m0aASe8%3D 1/2 Online RTI Appeal Form Details RTI Appeal Details :‐ RTI Appeal Registraon number CICOM/A/2017/60014 Public Authority Central Informaon Commission Personal Details of Appellant:‐ Request Registraon Number CICOM/R/2017/50006 Request Registraon Date 05/01/2017 Name OM PRAKASH Gender Male Address RZF‐893 NETAJI SUBHASH MARG , RAJ NAGAR PART‐2 PALAM COLONY, DWARKA SECTOR 08 NEW DELHI Pincode 110077 Country India State Delhi Status Urban Educaonal Status Literate Above Graduate Phone Number Details not provided Mobile Number +91‐9968337815 Email‐ID om[dot]poddar[at]gmail[dot]com Appeal Details :‐ Cizenship Indian Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? Yes Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Informaon CPIO of Public Authority approached RTI CELL ‐ ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided CPIO's Order/Decision Date (Descripon of Informaon sought (upto 500 characters) Prayer or Relief Sought DETAIL FIRST APPEAL HAS BEEN ATTACHED WITH 7 PAGES AND THE SAME HAS BEEN EMAILED TO rk dot mathur53 at gov dot in on 24 01 2017 I regret that CPIO RTI Cell CICNew Delhi has supplied the informaon incomplete misleading false and unsasfactorily so that either you can give it or else you can order him to supply the same sasfactorily or supply the same as per the rules under RTI Act 2005 My point wise averments and arguments are as under The citaon of Act and subsequent reply by DS CR depicts ABSOLUTE MISMATCH and the same depicts violaon of RULE OF LAW The citaon of PERUSAL OF RECORDS absolutely violates secon 11 ii procedure for deciding appeals of RTI Rules 2012 Arguments with citaon under reply no 1 and 2 to be read as the argument under reply no 03 which clearly indicates that the reply by the DS CR of Central Informaon Commission is NOT IN ORDER AT ALL Hence the Apex instuon is shielding protecng the BAD ELEMENTS of State Apparatus and offending harassing vicmizing the common man and senior cizen oxygen dependent woman

RTI online First Appeal against CIC for Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: RTI online First  Appeal against CIC for Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

1/27/2017 RTI Online :: Request/Appeal Form Details

https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=9OC6JH%2FUtvX%2BNJxnEM1NWI%2F07pIiYuslcHo9m0aASe8%3D 1/2

Online RTI Appeal Form Details RTI Appeal Details :‐

   

RTI Appeal Registra祶�on number CICOM/A/2017/60014

Public Authority Central Informa祶�on Commission

   

Personal Details of Appellant:‐

Request Registra祶�on Number CICOM/R/2017/50006

Request Registra祶�on Date 05/01/2017

Name OM PRAKASH

Gender Male

AddressRZF‐893 NETAJI SUBHASH MARG , RAJ NAGAR PART‐2 PALAM COLONY, DWARKA SECTOR

08 NEW DELHI

Pincode 110077

Country India

State Delhi

Status Urban

Educa祶�onal Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91‐9968337815

Email‐ID om[dot]poddar[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :‐

Ci祶�zenship Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? Yes

Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Informa祶�on

CPIO of Public Authority approached RTI CELL ‐ ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA

CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided

CPIO's Order/Decision Date

(Descrip祶�on of Informa祶�on sought (upto 500 characters)

Prayer or Relief Sought

DETAIL FIRST APPEAL HAS BEEN ATTACHED WITH 7 PAGES AND THE SAME HAS BEEN EMAILED TO rk dot mathur53 at gov dot in on 24 01 2017 

I regret that CPIO RTI Cell CIC New Delhi has supplied the informa祶�on incomplete misleading false and unsa祶�sfactorily so that either you can give it or

else you can order him to supply the same sa祶�sfactorily or supply the same as per the rules under RTI Act 2005 My point wise averments and arguments

are as under  

The cita祶�on of Act and subsequent reply by DS CR depicts ABSOLUTE MISMATCH and the same depicts viola祶�on of RULE OF LAW 

The cita祶�on of PERUSAL OF RECORDS absolutely violates sec祶�on 11 ii procedure for deciding appeals of RTI Rules 2012 

Arguments with cita祶�on under reply no 1 and 2 to be read as the argument under reply no 03 which clearly  indicates that the reply by the DS CR of

Central Informa祶�on Commission is NOT IN ORDER AT ALL 

Hence the Apex  ins祶�tu祶�on  is  shielding protec祶�ng  the BAD ELEMENTS of  State Apparatus  and offending harassing vic祶�mizing  the  common man  and

senior ci祶�zen oxygen dependent woman 

Page 2: RTI online First  Appeal against CIC for Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

1/27/2017 RTI Online :: Request/Appeal Form Details

https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=9OC6JH%2FUtvX%2BNJxnEM1NWI%2F07pIiYuslcHo9m0aASe8%3D 2/2

The informa祶�on supplied is absolutely false and protec祶�ng the bad elements of state apparatus Hence true informa祶�on to be supplied in accordance

with RTI Act 2005 and RTI Rules 2012 with appropriate puni祶�ve ac祶�on 

Suppor祶�ng document  (only pdf upto 1 MB)

Print Close