45
New Age Ethics May 14, 2015 New York, New York Erin Gerstenzang

New Age Ethics: Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

New Age EthicsMay 14, 2015

New York, New York Erin Gerstenzang

Page 2: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 1.6(A) CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION

A lawyer shall not knowingly reveal confidential information, as defined in this Rule, or use such information to the disadvantage of a client or for the advantage of the lawyer or a third person, unless the client gives informed consent.

Page 3: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 1.6 CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION COMMENT

“Confidential information” consists of information gained during or relating to the representation of a client, whatever its source, that is (a) protected by the attorney-client privilege, (b) likely to be embarrassing or detrimental to the client if disclosed, or (c) information that the client has requested be kept confidential. “Confidential information” does not ordinarily include (i) a lawyer’s legal knowledge or legal research or (ii) information that is generally known in the local community or in the trade, field or profession to which the information relates.

Page 4: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

HOW TO RESPOND TO ONLINE CLIENT REVIEWS?

Tsamis accepted a $1,500 fee even though she knew full well that a law in Illinois would prevent me from obtaining unemployment BENEFITS!!”

Page 5: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

ATTORNEY RESPONDED

I dislike it very much when my clients lose, but I cannot invent positive facts for clients when they are not there. I feel badly for him, but his own actions in beating up a female co-worker are what caused the consequences he is now so upset about.”

PUBLIC REPRIMAND

Page 6: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

ATTORNEY’S BLOG POST

#127409 This stupid kid is taking the rap for his drug-dealing dirtbag of an older brother because "he's no snitch." I managed to talk the prosecutor into treatment and deferred prosecution, since we both know the older brother from prior dealings involving drugs and guns. My client is in college. Just goes to show you that higher education does not imply that you have any sense.

KRISTINE ANN PESHEK

60-DAY SUSPENSION

Page 7: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

IN RE QUILLINAN, 20 DB RPTR. 288 (2006)

90 DAY SUSPENSION FOR POSTING CLIENT’S NAME ON

LISTSERV.

Page 8: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Listerv post likened to emailing editor of a newspaper or

participating in a call-in radio LOS ANGELES BAR ASSOCIATION OP. 514 (2006)

Page 9: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

MARGARET SKINNER

Page 10: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

SKINNER OPINION RELIED ON TWO OUT-OF-STATE

DECISIONS

Page 11: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

“Proper attire for

trial?”

ATTORNEY’S FACEBOOK POST

ANYA CINTRON STERN

Page 12: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

When a lawyer broadcasts disparaging and humiliating words and pictures, it undermines the basic client relationship and it give’s the appearance that he is not receiving a fair trial.

Page 13: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

ABA ARTICLE COMMENT ON ARTICLE ABOUT ANYA CINTRON STERN

I personally know the attorney and the sad part is she is a brilliant trial attorney.  I can tell you, those of you who think this was stupid, watch out; this can happen to anyone!!!  Social media is so prevalent nowadays that anyone can make a mistake. Who hasn’t commented about photographs of this or that introduced as evidence at a trial?  This is not any different, especially with the younger generation who use social media as we used real social gatherings.  Let him who is free of sin cast the first stone.

Page 14: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

CYBER-RISK INSURANCE POLICIES ARE GROWING QUICKLY

Law firms today are responsible for massive amounts of electronic and nonelectronic information. This information represents significant liability exposure in the event of a security failure. Even if the failure doesn’t lead to an actual lawsuit, a firm may still need to deal with costs associated with notification, possible regulatory investigations, fines and penalties, forensic expenses, public relations expenses and more.”

CHRIS ANDREWS, VICE PRESIDENT OF PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY AT AIG

Page 15: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

LAWYER PHOTOSHOPPED CELEBRITY PHOTOS & POSTED TO HER FIRM WEBSITE

Page 16: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 8.4(C) MISCONDUCT

A lawyer or law firm shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.

Page 17: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Sangary’s American dream has come true, as she has been able to achieve a point wherein now, in her thirties, Sangary is a prominent donor and philanthropist, supporting important social causes, who had recently received the email from President Obama with the subject line ‘I need your help today,’ asking Svitlana Sangary for an additional donation…”

SIX MONTH SUSPENSION

Page 18: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Law enforcement, including prosecutors, have long engaged in the practice of using a ruse to obtain the truth … I think the public is better off for what I did.”

Aaron Brockler former Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Prosecutor

Page 19: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

While it is the law that when the possibility of deception is . . . self-evident a state is not required to produce evidence to justify its imposition of a disclosure requirement, we cannot allow rote invocation of the words ‘potentially misleading’ to supplant the burden to demonstrate that the harms it recites are real and that its restriction will in fact alleviate them to a material degree.”

DWYER V. CAPPELL, 762 F.3D 275 (3D CIR. 2014) (QUOTATIONS OMITTED)

WHAT ABOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT?

Page 20: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

LAW FIRM BLOG POST

Government regulation of corporate America’s disregard of consumer safety has been lackadaisical at best and when it comes to ‘tort reform’ there is a single winner: the insurance industry.”

SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY (2015)

Page 21: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

HORACE HUNTER (VIRGINIA 2013)

DOES IT MATTER IF IT IS A PUBLIC RECORD?

Page 22: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

“In 1972, legal ethics boiled down to: ‘Don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t steal and don’t advertise,’ ” said John W. Dean III, one of the lawyers brought down by Watergate with President Richard M. Nixon, during a 2012 interview with the ABA Journal for an article about the legacy of the scandal.

Page 23: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 7.1 (F) COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING A LAWYER’S SERVICES

Every advertisement other than those appearing in a radio, television or billboard advertisement, in a directory, newspaper, magazine or other periodical (and any web sites related thereto), or made in person pursuant to Rule 7.3(a)(1), shall be labeled “Attorney Advertising” on the first page, or on the home page in the case of a web site.

Page 24: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

BLOGSCALIFORNIA PROPOSED OPINION ADDRESSES ATTORNEY

BLOGS TO BE TREATED AS ADVERTISEMENTS

Page 25: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

GHOST BLOGGING?

Page 26: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 7.1 (K) COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING A LAWYER’S SERVICES

All advertisements shall be pre-approved by the lawyer or law firm.

Page 27: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 8.4(C) MISCONDUCT

A lawyer or law firm shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.

Page 28: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

BUT WHAT ABOUT TWEETS?

Page 29: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 7.1 (F) COMMUNICATIONS CONCERNING A LAWYER’S SERVICES

Every advertisement …shall be labeled “Attorney Advertising” on the first page, or on the home page in the case of a web site.

Page 30: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

CALIFORNIA’S PROPOSED OPINION 10-0001

The restrictions imposed by the professional responsibility rules and standards governing attorney advertising are not relaxed merely because such compliance might be more difficult or awkward in a social media setting.

Page 31: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

During the trial of a case a lawyer who is not connected therewith shall not communicate with or cause another to communicate with a juror concerning the case.

RULE 3.5(b) MAINTAINING AND PRESERVING THE IMPARTIALITY OF TRIBUNALS AND JURORS

Page 32: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online
Page 33: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

NEW YORK CITY BAR OP. 2012-2

It is incumbent upon the attorney to understand the functionality of any social media use for juror research. If an attorney cannot ascertain the functionality of a website, the attorney must proceed with great caution in conducting research on that particular site, and should keep in mind the possibility that even an accidental, automated notice to the juror could be considered a violation of Rule 3.5.

“Advisory Opinion

Page 34: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

CAN’T WE JUST IGNORE SOCIAL MEDIA ALTOGETHER?

Page 35: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

TWEETED DURING A MURDER TRIAL

Choices to be made.  Hearts to be broken. We each define the great line.”

Page 36: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Because of the very nature of Twitter as an on online social media site, [the juror's] tweets about the trial were very much public discussions. Even if such discussions were one-sided, it is in no way appropriate for a juror to state musings, thoughts, or other information about a case in such a public fashion.”

ERICKSON DIMAS-MARTINEZ V. STATE, 2011 ARK. 515 (ARK. DEC. 8, 2011)

JUSTICE DONALD CORBIN ARKANSAS STATE SUP CT.

Page 37: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Divulged confidential information about the case

Communicated or attempted to communicate directly with participants in the case (e.g., witnesses, attorneys, judges)

Revealed elements of the deliberation process

2013

6

3

2

“Friended” or intended to “friend” participants in the case

2011

3

0

0

3

Ways in which jurors used social media during a trial or deliberation

Federal Judicial Center data (2014).

Page 38: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Reported by another juror

Reported by an attorney

Reported by court staff

2013

13

8

Reported by one of the parties

2011

5

3

Ways in which judges learned about social media use by jurors

Federal Judicial Center data (2014).

Arose during post-trial motions

12

6

5

Page 39: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

The Supreme Court of Arkansas removed a thirteen-year tenured, Faulkner County Circuit Judge and barred him from ever returning to the bench.

“GEAUXJUDGE”(Screen names may not protect you)

Page 40: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

PROSECUTORS

Page 41: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Loyalty and independent judgment are essential elements in the lawyer's relationship to a client.

RULE 1.7 COMMENT [1] CONFLICTS ON INTERESTS

Page 42: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

The system is corrupt. The Supreme Court in Pennsylvania is corrupt and everybody knows it.”

Don Bailey's law license suspended for 5 years in Pennsylvania (2012).

Page 43: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

RULE 8.2(A) JUDICIAL AND LEGAL OFFICIALS

A lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact concerning the qualifications, conduct or integrity of a judge or other adjudicatory officer or of a candidate for election or appointment to judicial office.

Page 44: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

Email to bankruptcy judge, calling him a “bully and a clown.”

William Caldwell Hancock’s Tennessee license to practice law was suspended for 30 days (September 3, 2014).

Page 45: New Age Ethics:  Navigating the Ethical Implications for Attorneys Online

New Age EthicsMay 14, 2015

New York, New York Erin Gerstenzang