34
Lessons Learned from Litigating Real Estate Development Projects Presented By: Philip W. Bledsoe, Colin C. Deihl, Kelly D. Stohs, David P. Vallas 1

Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Lessons Learned from Litigating RealEstate Development Projects

Presented By: Philip W. Bledsoe, Colin C. Deihl,Kelly D. Stohs, David P. Vallas

1

Page 2: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Topics

Defeating land use challenges and appealing land use denials

The illusory protections that zoning ordinances and approvals provideagainst liability

Settling land use disputes in the public context, and what makes themunique

The usual suspects leading to litigation in development deals, such as besteffort, time of the essence clauses and “side deals” or oral “amendments”

2

Page 3: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Defeating Land Use Challenges &Appealing Land Use Denials

Presented By:

Colin Deihl

3

Page 4: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Stakeholders

Be ready for the impacton your brand

Be ready for how this willtranslate to your consumer

Be ready for whatcould be said

4

Page 5: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Early Assessment

5

Page 6: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Legal Guideposts

Government’s Position Legal Boundaries

Improper Conditions

6

Page 7: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Changing Guideposts

New Zoning Code Amendment of a Zoning Ordinance

New Development Plan

7

Page 8: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Going to Court

Type of Claims to Bring Expedited Timing

Discuss vs. Claims

8

Page 9: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Additional Evidence

FOIA and State Analogues Sunshine Laws

Depositions & Other Discovery

9

Page 10: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Judicial Review

Has governmental body exceeded itsjurisdiction; or abused its discretion; orapplied an erroneous legal standard?

Government decision will be upheld unless

there is no competent evidence in the

record.

Courts defer to agency -- abuse of discretionstandard

10

Page 11: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Types of Decisions

Variances

Use by Special Review

Subdivision application

Planned Unit Development

Site Specific Rezoning

11

Page 12: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Basis of Claims

No record evidence

Failure to apply standards

Illegal conditions or exactions

12

Page 13: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Declaratory Judgment

New Zoning Code

Subdivision Regulations

Comprehensive Plan

13

Page 14: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Examples

Exceeds authority

Regulatory taking

Unconstitutionally Vague

Procedural Violations

14

Page 15: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Scope of Review

De novo review

Court does not need to defer to agency

15

Page 16: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Illusory Protection Zoning Ordinances& Approvals Provide Against Liability

Presented By:

David Vallas

16

Page 17: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Competing Goals

Goal of Zoning and Land Use Approval Goal of Civil Liability

Not Always Aligned

17

Page 18: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

State Law Claims

Trespass

Nuisance

18

Page 19: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Types of Approval

Municipal approval– Cannot bypass State law by obtaining a local

municipality’s approval of a development.

– Fact that zoning allows such activity does NOTnecessarily stop such activity from beingconsidered a nuisance.

Too much noise or pollution from an entitycan still allow action for nuisance even if thearea is zoned industrial.

Statutory approval– Various laws have passed to prohibit actions

based on nuisance for various activities the statedetermines are worthwhile.

Typically applies to agricultural activity.

19

Page 20: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Available Remedies

Injunction

Damages

20

Page 21: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Timing of Third Party Claims

Need more than issuance of a special use permit.– Must be some actual development.– Fear of a future nuisance which has yet to occur cannot justify an immediate

filing of suit.– Prompt work may defeat the claim.

21

Page 22: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Settling Land Use Disputes in PublicContext, and What Makes them Unique

Presented By:

Kelly Stohs

22

Page 23: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

What Makes Settlement Unique

Protecting the Public Interest No Contract Zoning

Zoning is an exercise of a governing body’s police power.

23

Page 24: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Applicable Law

General contract law applies.

Informal communications may constitutean enforceable agreement

– Even if a more formal contract iscontemplated

– Where material terms were agreed uponand the communications evidence theintent of the parties

24

Page 25: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Protecting the Public Interest

Settlement agreements with a governingbody

– Cannot be agreed upon in executivesession of the governing body

– Must follow other applicable laws,including public hearing requirements, toprotect the public interest

25

Page 26: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

No Contract Zoning

Where the resolution involves thesubmission of a new or revisedapplication:

– The Agreement must be consistentwith the requirements of local law

– Follow the procedures for notice tothe public

– The governing body generally cannotagree to any certain outcome.

Thank you for submittingyour application.

26

Page 27: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

When the settlement involvessubmission of a revised or newapplication

– Specify developer or landowner’sremedy in event of delay

– Anticipate how conditionalapprovals will impact the settlement

– Specify that the lawsuit will bedismissed only upon issuance of therequested permit

– May need to request a stay orextensions of time from the Court tokeep lawsuit pending until final

resolution.

Anticipating Outcomes

27

Page 28: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Usual Suspects Leading to Litigationin Development Deals

Presented By:

Philip Bledsoe

28

Page 29: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Best Efforts

Equal to commercially reasonable?

More than good faith?

What happens when the effortsare not successful?

What happens if there are noefforts?

29

Page 30: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Time of the Essence Clause

Not the same as a drop dead date.

Look at entire deal.

Problematic if seeking forfeiture.

Using it to rescind easier.

30

Page 31: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Addressing Usual Suspects

Context matters.

Often a problem of fit to theproject or deal.

A special problem of admissibility.

Say what you want and mean inthe contract.

VS.

31

Page 32: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Is there even such an animal?

Is it less of a deal?

Could it be misrepresentation?

Is it a good deal or a self-dealing?

“Side” Deals

32

Page 33: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Documentation Dilemmas

Oral “amendments”

“We can do that later.”

The “E” in email stands for evidence

33

Page 34: Lessons learned from litigating real estate development projects

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. Thematerial provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice.Nothing herein should be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyerto consider your specific circumstances, possible changes to applicablelaws, rules and regulations and other legal issues. Receipt of this materialdoes not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but youshould know that past results do not guarantee future results; that everycase is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choiceof a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely uponadvertisements.

© 2016 Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.Polsinelli is a registered mark of Polsinelli PC

34