Upload
patexia-inc
View
883
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IP VALUATION – UNDERSTANDING THE FINANCIAL VALUE OF IP ASSETS
Efrat Kasznik, Founder & President Foresight Valuation Group, LLC
August 13th, 2015 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
2 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
About Me: Efrat Kasznik
¨ Founder and President, Foresight Valuation Group, a Silicon-Valley based IP valuation, strategy and start-up advisory firm.
¨ IP valuation and strategy expert, with 20 years of experience
¨ Lecturer on IP Strategy, Stanford Grad. School of Business (GSB)
¨ Chair, Internet of Things (IoT) Committee, Licensing Executives Society (LES USA-Canada).
¨ Listed on IAM 300 list of top IP strategists: 2013, 2014, 2015.
¨ Co-founder and adviser to startups, incubators and funds in the US and Europe
¨ Conference speaker and regular contributor to VenureBeat, Biz Journal, IAM Magazine, Reuters and other IP/business publications.
3 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Webinar Outline
¨ Why is IP Valuation So Challenging?
¨ When are IP Assets Being Valued?
¨ What is the IP Valuation Context?
¨ How Do We Value IP Assets?
¨ Key Takeaways
4 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Why is IP Valuation So Challenging?
¤ Internally-grown IP Assets are NOT valued annually nor reported on the financial statements of companies n Companies only required to report IP Assets acquired through
M&A or through IP asset acquisitions
¤ Most IP transactions (licensing, sales) are highly confidential n Lack of transparency into basic deal terms like: royalty rates, key
licensing terms, patent prices
¤ IP assets are unique, which makes it difficult to compare one deal to another, even if the data were available
The IP “Valuation Gap”
5 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Method Description Advantages Disadvantages When Used
Market
Based on market transactions
involving comparable intangibles
Market driven, reflects market
prices (supply and demand
equilibrium)
Comparable transactions are
not always available
Most desirable, but rarely used (lack of market
data)
Income
Based on future economic utility
generated by the intangible (royalties
or incremental profits)
Top-down approach, based
on economic utility and on industry
norms
Input factors may be hard to
estimate: Future projections,
Royalty rates, Market
penetration
Most commonly used (based on
studies by KPMG, Deloitte)
Cost Based on estimation
of the cost to replicate/reproduce
the intangible
Easy to calculate – based on known factors (time and materials, hourly rates, overhead)
No measure of utility or market
demand
Not very common
IP Valuation Methods: At a Glance
6 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014
When Are IP Assets Being Valued?
IP Valuation
Funding
Buying/Selling
Licensing
Pre- M&A
Enforcement Litigation Damages
Financial Reporting
(Post M&A)
Transfer Pricing
Bankruptcy
7 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Reporting (Compliance) Situations: IP Valuation is Mandatory
IP Assets
Financial/Tax Reporting
Financial Reporting: - IP acquired in M&A
Tax Planning: - IP holding companies - Transfer pricing
Litigation
Damages
8 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014
Patents
Patents +Know How
Technology/product
IP Holder IP Type Transaction
Type Purpose
Sale
License
Enforcement
External Reporting
Licensing Spin Off
Operating Company
University
NPE
IP Valuation is Highly Contextual
What is the IP Valuation Context?
9 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014
Valuation Purpose
IP Assets Assessment = Evaluation
Valuation Scenario & Analysis
How We Value IP Assets?
• Technology • Legal • Business
(Industry & market)
10 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Case Study: Patent Acquisition in Litigation
¨ Litigation scenario: ¤ Company A: a large LED market leader in the US ¤ Company B: a Chinese mfg entering the US market with cheap
LED light bulbs, no patents ¤ Company C: a mid-size LED component maker with very valuable
IP assets, selling to entire market (incl. A and B)
¨ Company A suing company B over patent infringement (plus unfair competition)
¨ Company B approaches company C to acquire a patent for counter suing company A
** What’s the value of the patent? **
11 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014
Patent Acquisition Case Study
Company A: Large LED Player
Company B: Chinese LED Manufacturer
Company C: LED Patent Holder
Patent Lawsuit
Counter-Suit
12 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Range of Patent Value Scenarios
¨ Value to Company C (Seller): ¤ Development cost (design around) ¤ Opportunity cost (Comp. A is a client)
¨ Value to Company B (Buyer): ¤ Litigation Avoidance: delta in probability (with/without the
patent) applied to litigation & damages cost
¨ Other strategic options: ¤ Sell to Company A ¤ Sell to another competitor ¤ Start an enforcement campaign
13 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015
Key Takeaways
¨ There’s an IP Valuation Gap: ¤ Most IP Assets are not valued on a regular basis ¤ There is lack of transparency into transaction data
¨ IP Valuation is highly contextual, depending on: ¤ The Holder ¤ The IP Type ¤ The Transaction ¤ The Purpose
THANK YOU!
Efrat Kasznik President, Foresight Valuation Group
[email protected] www.linkedin.com/in/ekasznik
650-561-3374
www.foresightvaluation.com
Presentation available upon request