14
IP VALUATION – UNDERSTANDING THE FINANCIAL VALUE OF IP ASSETS Efrat Kasznik, Founder & President Foresight Valuation Group, LLC August 13 th , 2015 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

IP Valuation – Understanding the Financial Value of IP Assets

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

IP VALUATION – UNDERSTANDING THE FINANCIAL VALUE OF IP ASSETS

Efrat Kasznik, Founder & President Foresight Valuation Group, LLC

August 13th, 2015 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

2 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

About Me: Efrat Kasznik

¨  Founder and President, Foresight Valuation Group, a Silicon-Valley based IP valuation, strategy and start-up advisory firm.

¨  IP valuation and strategy expert, with 20 years of experience

¨  Lecturer on IP Strategy, Stanford Grad. School of Business (GSB)

¨  Chair, Internet of Things (IoT) Committee, Licensing Executives Society (LES USA-Canada).

¨  Listed on IAM 300 list of top IP strategists: 2013, 2014, 2015.

¨  Co-founder and adviser to startups, incubators and funds in the US and Europe

¨  Conference speaker and regular contributor to VenureBeat, Biz Journal, IAM Magazine, Reuters and other IP/business publications.

3 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Webinar Outline

¨  Why is IP Valuation So Challenging?

¨  When are IP Assets Being Valued?

¨  What is the IP Valuation Context?

¨  How Do We Value IP Assets?

¨  Key Takeaways

4 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Why is IP Valuation So Challenging?

¤  Internally-grown IP Assets are NOT valued annually nor reported on the financial statements of companies n  Companies only required to report IP Assets acquired through

M&A or through IP asset acquisitions

¤  Most IP transactions (licensing, sales) are highly confidential n  Lack of transparency into basic deal terms like: royalty rates, key

licensing terms, patent prices

¤  IP assets are unique, which makes it difficult to compare one deal to another, even if the data were available

The IP “Valuation Gap”

5 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Method Description Advantages Disadvantages When Used

Market

Based on market transactions

involving comparable intangibles

Market driven, reflects market

prices (supply and demand

equilibrium)

Comparable transactions are

not always available

Most desirable, but rarely used (lack of market

data)

Income

Based on future economic utility

generated by the intangible (royalties

or incremental profits)

Top-down approach, based

on economic utility and on industry

norms

Input factors may be hard to

estimate: Future projections,

Royalty rates, Market

penetration

Most commonly used (based on

studies by KPMG, Deloitte)

Cost Based on estimation

of the cost to replicate/reproduce

the intangible

Easy to calculate – based on known factors (time and materials, hourly rates, overhead)

No measure of utility or market

demand

Not very common

IP Valuation Methods: At a Glance

6 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014

When Are IP Assets Being Valued?

IP Valuation

Funding

Buying/Selling

Licensing

Pre- M&A

Enforcement Litigation Damages

Financial Reporting

(Post M&A)

Transfer Pricing

Bankruptcy

7 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Reporting (Compliance) Situations: IP Valuation is Mandatory

IP Assets

Financial/Tax Reporting

Financial Reporting: -  IP acquired in M&A

Tax Planning: -  IP holding companies -  Transfer pricing

Litigation

Damages

8 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014

Patents

Patents +Know How

Technology/product

IP Holder IP Type Transaction

Type Purpose

Sale

License

Enforcement

External Reporting

Licensing Spin Off

Operating Company

University

NPE

IP Valuation is Highly Contextual

What is the IP Valuation Context?

9 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014

Valuation Purpose

IP Assets Assessment = Evaluation

Valuation Scenario & Analysis

How We Value IP Assets?

•  Technology •  Legal •  Business

(Industry & market)

10 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Case Study: Patent Acquisition in Litigation

¨  Litigation scenario: ¤  Company A: a large LED market leader in the US ¤  Company B: a Chinese mfg entering the US market with cheap

LED light bulbs, no patents ¤  Company C: a mid-size LED component maker with very valuable

IP assets, selling to entire market (incl. A and B)

¨  Company A suing company B over patent infringement (plus unfair competition)

¨  Company B approaches company C to acquire a patent for counter suing company A

** What’s the value of the patent? **

11 Foresight Valuation Group © 2014

Patent Acquisition Case Study

Company A: Large LED Player

Company B: Chinese LED Manufacturer

Company C: LED Patent Holder

Patent Lawsuit

Counter-Suit

12 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Range of Patent Value Scenarios

¨  Value to Company C (Seller): ¤ Development cost (design around) ¤ Opportunity cost (Comp. A is a client)

¨  Value to Company B (Buyer): ¤  Litigation Avoidance: delta in probability (with/without the

patent) applied to litigation & damages cost

¨  Other strategic options: ¤ Sell to Company A ¤ Sell to another competitor ¤ Start an enforcement campaign

13 Foresight Valuation Group © 2015

Key Takeaways

¨  There’s an IP Valuation Gap: ¤ Most IP Assets are not valued on a regular basis ¤ There is lack of transparency into transaction data

¨  IP Valuation is highly contextual, depending on: ¤ The Holder ¤ The IP Type ¤ The Transaction ¤ The Purpose

THANK YOU!

Efrat Kasznik President, Foresight Valuation Group

[email protected] www.linkedin.com/in/ekasznik

650-561-3374

www.foresightvaluation.com

Presentation available upon request