18
Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility CASE STUDY Chevron v. Ecuador What can we learn from the Texaco’s operations in Amazonia?

Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility

CASE STUDY Chevron v. Ecuador

What can we learn from the Texaco’s operations in Amazonia?

Page 2: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

TEXACO

Founded: Texas 1901 Revenues: $ 46 billion (1997)

Total Assets: $ 29 billion (1997)

Net Production of Crude Oil: 833 000 barrels a day

CHEVRON CORPORATION

Founded: California 1879 Revenues: $ 200 billion (2014)

Total Assets: $ 266 billion (2014)

Net Production of Crude Oil: 1 744 000 barrels a day

Page 3: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Rainforest

TexacoCofànSionaSecoya

Napo Lowland Quichua Waorani

Los Afectados

Page 4: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

1937 Royal Dutch Shell First Seismic Prospecting

1964 Texaco-Gulf Consortium

First Extraction Site

1967 First Oil Spill

1971 Trans-Ecuadorian

Pipeline

1972 20 years

Concession Agreement

1992 End of the

Concession and Texaco’s operations

Page 5: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

- 339 wells - 18 central production stations - 1.5 billion barrels - 1000 km of secondary pipelines - 600 km of unpaved roads

Cancer of the larynx: 30 times higher

Bile duct cancer: 18 times higherLiver cancer and melanoma: 15 times higher

Stomach cancer: 4,6 times higher

Leukemia: 2,6 times higher

Leukemia for children under age 14 : 2,6 times higher

Page 6: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

2003 Ecuador

Los Afectados v. Chevron $9.51 Billion

2009 The Hague

Investor-State Arbitration

Chevron v. Ecuador

2012 Argentina Recognition and enforcement of the judgment

2012 Brazil Recognition and enforcement of the judgment

2012 Canada Recognition and enforcement of the judgment

2012 Washington Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

2013 New York Chevron v. Donzinger (Los Afectados’ Lawyer) Corruption

1993 New York Aguinda v. Texaco Dismissal

2014 The Hague International Criminal Court / Inadmissible

Page 7: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

“To adopt suitable measures to protect the flora, fauna, and other natural resources and to prevent contamination of water, air and soil under the control of pertinent organs of the state”

Concession Agreement (1972)

“Adopt necessary measures to protect flora, fauna and other natural resources [...] and prevent contamination of water, air, and soil.”

Ecuador’s Law of Hydrocarbons (1971)

Reglamento General para la Aplicación de la Ley de Aguas 1972

Ley de Pesca y Desarrollo Pesquero 1974

Ley para la Prevencion y Control de la Contaminacion Ambiental R.O. No. 204 (1976)

National Law

Page 8: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

“…indigenous peoples have been, and are still being, discriminated against and deprived of their human rights and fundamental freedoms and in particular that

they have lost their land and resources to colonists, commercial companies and State enterprises …”

Business and Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Soft Law)

U.N. Comm. on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination “General Recommendation XXII: Indigenous Peoples” (1997)

“…the traditional lands of indigenous peoples have been reduced or occupied, without their consent, by timber, mining and oil companies, at the expense of the

exercise of their culture and the equilibrium of the ecosystem…”

U.N. Comm. on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights “Concluding observations of the Committee on Colombia” (2001)

Page 9: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

“… urgent need to respect and promote the inherent rights of indigenous peoples which derive from their political, economic and social structures and from their cultures,

spiritual traditions histories and philosophies, especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources …”

United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights “Human rights and the extractive industry” (2005)

“… extractive industry can also add stress to human rights, particularly in the context of certain risk situations, including the presence of indigenous communities…”

Page 10: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

International Law (State Obligations)

American Convention on Human Rights (1969): Art. 4. Right to Life: “Every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.”

Art. 5. Right to Humane Treatment: “Every person has the right to have his physical, mental, and moral integrity respected.”

Art. 21. Right to Property: “Everyone has the right to the use and enjoyment of his property. The law may subordinate such use and enjoyment to the interest of society.”

Page 11: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (2001):

“… Indigenous groups, by the fact of their very existence, have the right to live freely in their own territory; the close ties of indigenous people with the land must be recognized and understood as the fundamental basis of their cultures, their spiritual life, their integrity, and their economic survival. For indigenous communities, relations to the land are not merely a matter of possession and production but a material and spiritual element which they must fully enjoy, even to preserve their cultural legacy and transmit it to future generations….”

Page 12: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Art. 3: “Indigenous and tribal peoples shall enjoy the full measure of human rights and fundamental freedoms…”

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)

Art. 13: “… governments shall respect the special importance for the cultures and spiritual values of the peoples concerned of their relationship with the lands or territories, or both as applicable, which they occupy or otherwise use, and in particular the collective aspects of this relationship…”

Art. 4: “Special measures shall be adopted as appropriate for safeguarding the persons, institutions, property, labour, cultures and environment of the peoples concerned.…”

Art. 14: “…The rights of ownership and possession of the peoples concerned over the lands which they traditionally occupy shall be recognised…”

Page 13: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

Is it worth it?

$3 saved per barrel of oil produced

X1.5 billion barrels in 28 years

Tot. $4.5 billion

Page 14: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

$ 2 Billion for legal fees

+

+

$ 40 Million for remediation

Reputational damage $$$ ?

Tot. ???

Page 15: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case
Page 16: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

The importance of corporate social responsibility for business

Media interest and good reputation

Saving money on energy and

operating cost

Differentiating yourself from the competitors

Access to funding opportunities

Enhanced Relationship with

stakeholders

Winning new businesses

Enhancing your influence in the

industry

Page 17: Environmental Protection and Corporate Social Responsibility: the Chevron case

What did Chevron learn?

TEXACO ANNUALREPORT

Texaco Annual Report

2015 corporate responsibility

report highlights

getting results the right way for complete reporting, visit chevron.com/reporting

In Rakhine State, Myanmar, Kayala Oo of Unocal

Myanmar Offshore Co., Ltd. (a Chevron subsidiary)

leads a social impact assessment meeting with

local community members and other stakeholders.

although governments have the

primary duty to protect and ensure fulfillment

of human rights, chevron believes that

we have a responsibility to respect human

rights and that we can play a positive

role in the communities where we operate

respecting human rights

integrity

learn more!!chevron.com/humanrights

protecting people and the environment

chevron is committed to preventing serious incidents and fatalities, which requires operational discipline among our more than 58,000 employees and our full-time-equivalent contractor workforce of 214,000

preventing serious

incidents

Kelly Gray, Chevron Australia production technician, monitors operating units in the Gorgon Operations central control room on Barrow Island, Western Australia.

learn more!!chevron.com/healthsafety

chevron.com/cr10

protecting people and the environment

advancing environmental

stewardshipprotecting people and the environment

is a chevron way value that guides our actions so that we get

results the right way, every time

Great hornbills (Buceros bicornis), a large bird species from the hornbill family, found near Chevron’s Dumai Camp, Sumatra, Indonesia.

learn more!!chevron.com/environment

chevron.com/cr14