Effectual Knowledge Services

Monthly Litigation Updates – July 2014

 

Effectual Services is a well established and fast growing patent and legal support services company having experience and expertise in providing patent and legal services. With an exceptional mix of technical and legal knowledge, research proficiency, and analytical depth, we are able to consistently provide cost-effective top-notch patent research and legal support services.

Effectual Services has technical and legal experts to handle every conceivable technology or situation and support at every stage of patent life cycle from drafting and prosecution to enforcement and litigation. Our firm’s clientele range from IP law firms, general law firms, patent licensing firms, patent brokers, legal departments at mid-sized companies, multinational conglomerates, research institutions and includes university and venture capital backed clients. We help our clients improve their business effectiveness and maximize ROI by leveraging deep domain expertise, engineering excellence, rock-solid execution and a comprehensive delivery model.

Our team members are tech savvy, proactive and have passion for excellence and are always on the forefront in bringing satisfaction to customers’ needs. Our team of paralegals has deep knowledge of rules and processes which allows us to reduce cost and still maintain quality and efficiency. Lawyers at Effectual Services successfully help clients in document review, legal research, deposition summarization, due diligence, and contract management.

A Benchmark For Perfection In IP

High

T

fi

41

W

C

fi

20

D

M

F

B

cl

an

T

ta

20

hlights:

Total numbe

led in the m

13.

With 92 lawsu

Court was a

ling lawsuits

014, followe

District Court

Most of the l

reeny et al (

Bryan E. Free

losely follow

nd Network

Top US class

argeted for p

014 were 514

er of Patent

month of Ju

uits, Delawar

preferred c

s in the mon

ed by Texa

t with 87 law

lawsuits wer

Charles C. F

eny, James P

wed by Rec

Congestion S

ses which w

patent lawsui

4, 455, and 70

t lawsuits

ly 2014 is

re District

choice for

nth of July

s Eastern

wsuits.

re filed by

Freeny, III

P. Freeny)

Software,

Solutions.

were most

its in June

09.

PA

Filing v

Patent li

lawsuits

from the

previous

filing tre

Also, the

presented

Week 2 w

Source: http

0100200300400500600700800900

1000

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

ATENT L

velocity:

itigation trend

were filed, w

e previous mo

s year (July 2

ends observed

e week wise p

d below:

witnessed pea

p://info.thomsonin

Ap

r-13

May

-13

Jun

-13

612516

988

Week 1

83

Patent Li

LITIGATIJuly

ds for the mo

which indicat

onth and ~16.

2013). The gr

d since April 2

patent lawsui

ak lawsuit fili

novation.com/

Jul-

13

Au

g-1

3

Sep

-13

Oct

-13

492 533453 45

Week 2

127

itigation U

TION INSy 2014

onth of July

tes an increas

7% decrease

raph below il

2013.

its trends for

ing activity cl

No

v-13

Dec

-13

Jan

-14

Fb

14

51558

330 292 3

Week 3

126

pdates – F

SIGHTS F

2014 show th

se of approxi

than the sam

llustrates the

the month of

losely followe

Feb

-14

Mar

-14

Ap

r-14

May

-14

302

487

678

375

Week 4

77

Filing trend

FOR

hat 413 paten

imately 9.84%

me month in th

patent lawsu

f July 2014 ar

ed by Week 3

Jun

-14

Jul-

14

5 374 413

 

ds

nt

%

he

uit

 

re

3.

The F

were f

Top P

The fi

et al

Netwo

Oth37

Figure above

filed in the D

Plaintiffs &

figure above s

(Charles C. F

ork Congestio

Delaware District Cour

22%

hers7%

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sam

sun

g

7

Most of the

by Freeny e

by Rec Soft

Congestion

shows top 5 p

Delaware Distr

Defendants

shows the top

Freeny, III B

on Solutions (

New JersDistrict Co

5%

rt

So

ny

7

lawsuits wer

et al closely fo

tware, and N

Solutions

P

preferred US

rict Court, clo

s:

p 8 Plaintiffs,

Bryan E. Free

(11 lawsuits).

sey ourt

C.D. Californ7%

N

LG

Ele

ctro

nic

s

6

re filed

followed

Network

Patent Litig

District Cou

osely followed

for the month

eny James P.

.

ia

.D. California8%

E.D. Texas21%

Network Cong

Nexus Displ

Quest Nett

E

HT

C

5

gation Upd

 

urts for patent

d by Eastern

h of July 201

Freeny – 12

Freeny et a

Rec Softwar

estion Solution

ay Technologie

tech Corporatio

Sequent Dat

Uniloc USA

EMG Technolog

Act

avi

s L

abo

rato

ries

Mic

roso

ft

5 5

ates – Top

 

t lawsuit filin

District Cour

4. Clearly, m

2 lawsuits) fo

0 2

al

re

ns

es

on

ta

A

gy

5

Delaware D

for filing la

followed by

Together, th

lawsuits file

p Courts, Pl

ng. Evidently,

rt of Texas.

most of the law

ollowed by R

Sony (7)

Electronic

top 6 de

followed

(5), HTC

4 6

1

11

11

10

10

10

9

8

District Cour

awsuits in t

Texas Easte

he top 5 cour

ed during the

laintiffs & 

, maximum P

wsuits were f

Rec Software

, Samsung (

cs (6) were a

fendants for

by Actavis L

(5) and Micr

6 8

12

rt was a pre

the month o

ern District C

rts accounted

e past month

Defendant

Patent Lawsui

filed by Freen

(11 lawsuits

(7) and LG

amongst the

the month,

Laboratories

osoft (5).

10 12

ferred choic

of July 2014

Court.

d ~63% of th

.

ts

its

 

ny

s),

ce

4,

he

The n

incre

comp

Patent

have

shows

Arriva

S.A. e

Stand

Zydus

Pharm

the m

The Top

Top US s

455/550.1

709/235 w

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Others51%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

number of

eased, Com

panies or i

t litigation i

increased th

s the trend

alStar and W

et.al Stands

ds second wit

s Pharmaceu

maceuticals I

month of July

PATENT L

Subclasses covof the entir

sub classes targ

1 which relates

which relates to

Jan

-13

Feb

-13

Mar

-13

Ap

r-13

7

4 4

2

514/7%

5

514 455 70

29

23 2

f patent inf

mputer/Ele

industries

itself has be

heir patent a

of Patent L

Wyncomm L

first with 45

th 38 Patent

uticals USA

Inc. and Len

y-2013.

15

12

7

66

LITIGATION

vered ~7% litigare class. 

geted were:

to –Telecomm

o – Electrical C

May

-13

Jun

-13

Jul-

13

Au

g13

4 4

2

023%

514/2797% 51

514/7

51

514/47%

514/210.137%

09 340 725

22

14 14

fringemen

ectronics, B

have incre

come a boo

actions and c

Litigations f

LLC. Arrival

5 number of

Litigations

Inc., Dell In

novo are the

55 5

N CASES FIL

ation US

munications: R

Computers An

Au

g-1

3

Sep

-13

Oct

-13

No

v-13

45

2

0

14/3147%

/345%

14/4117%

469%

455

3

358 717 36

13 13 1

nt lawsuits

Business/C

easingly be

oming busine

continuing to

filed by the

lStar has thr

f Patent Litig

filed in the s

nc., Rea, Son

top defenda

4

LING BY TO

Subclass 455/5

litigation of th

Radio Telephon

nd Digital Proc

Dec

-13

Jan

-14

Feb

-14

Mar

-14

7

1

3

1

5/550.1

30%

Others22%

69 370 424

12 12 11

Pa

brought b

Consumer,

ecome targ

ess. NPE’s (

o filing Pate

e top 10 Pla

reatened man

gations filed

same month

ny Corporati

ants who are

45

38

OP PLANTI

550.1 covered ~3

he entire class.

ne Equipment

cessing System

Mar

14

Ap

r-14

May

-14

Jun

-14

12

43

455/00913%

45

45

455/45013%

Top

51

fo

co

Top

were

45

co

cla

Pateatent Litig

by Non-Pra

, Biotech/P

gets. 

(Non-Practic

ent Litigatio

antiffs and

ny Compani

in Past mon

of July.

on, Unisour

e defending t

FFS

ITIn

co

In

Jo

an

Sy

A

C

te

30%

Details

ms: Multicompu

Jul-

14

5

55/2589%

55/41813%

0

US classes th

14 covered ~9

llowed by 45

overed ~7% of

US subclass

e:

55/550.1 whic

overed ~50%,

asses.

ent Litigatigations Fi

acticing En

Pharmaceu

cing Entities

ons in the U

the Chart i

ies with cost

nth (July-20

ce Worldwid

two or more

ArrivalStar S.

Wyncomm LL

UCB Inc. et al

Telecomm In

Sundesa LLC

Arunachalam

GlobeTecTrus

Icon Health a

Digital Signal

Eisai Co. Ltd. 

TC Complain the month

omplaints we

nc., Enterpr

ohnson Outd

nd Valeo. T

ystems Tech

Apple, LG E

irrus Logic

echnology or C

Source:

US Subcla

litigati

uter Data Tran

709/23550%

hat witnessed

9% of the litig

55 which cov

f the litigation

ses that wit

ch covered ~

of the litigati

on Updateiled by To

ntities (NP

utical and

s) and practi

S jurisdictio

is topped by

tly litigation

13) and Wyn

de Inc., Gato

e litigation c

A. et. al.

LC

l

novations LLC

m

st LLC

and Fitness Inc

 Innovations L

et al.

ints trend h of July

ere filed by

rise system

doors Inc, B

The complain

hnologies wa

Electronics,

c Inc on

Computer De

http://info.usitc.g

ass 709/235 cove

ion of the entire

nsferring; Con

70918

Others5%

d litigation ac

gation activity

vered ~7% an

n activity in Ju

nessed litiga

~30% and 7

on activity in

es – Technoop Plantif

PEs) has

Telecom

 

icing entitie

ons. Figure 3

y NPE’s i.e

n, ArrivalSta

ncomm LLC

orade, Mylan

cases, filed in

c

LLC

2014, five

Choon’s De

m Technolog

ose Corpora

nt by Enterp

as filed aga

Samsung, H

Communica

evices.

gov/sec/dockets.nsf

ered ~50%

e class.

ngestion Avoid

/2038%

709/20614%

709/2239%709/224

4%

ctivity were:

y in July 2014

nd 709 which

uly 2014.

ation activity

709/235 which

respective US

ology trenffs

s

3

e.

ar

C

n

n

ITC

esign

gies,

ation,

prise

ainst

HTC,

ation

f/337?

ding

4,

h

y

h

S

ds

EFFE

We recowe empwhen semost skhaving oto retaintechnica EffectuaMS) in and havthe closensuring Our teaLaw Scsystems

NoidaB-55, Noida Phone90136

ECTUAL

ognize our stafploy a sophistielecting personilled, diligent, one of the bestn the brightest al experts in In

al’s subject mascience & tec

ve years of indse supervisiong quality and c

ams consist ofhools. They a to meet the re

a, India Ground Floor,201301 – Indi

e: +91 120 45673286

TEAM

ff to be our numicated and thornnel. We do and dedicated

t-trained teamsand most talendia.

atter experts hachnology, excdustry experien

n of US patenonsistency on

f experienced are educated anequirements of

Sector 2, ia 1797, + 91

mber one assetrough screeninour utmost to

d staff. We prid in the industry

nted patent pro

ave advanced dellent communnce. Our team

nt and trademall work produ

Lawyers fromnd trained in Cour Global cus

Delhi, In210, DDADistrict CeNew DelhPhone: +9

. Accordingly,ng mechanismo maintain thede ourselves iny. We are able

ofessionals and

degrees (PhD /nication skills

m works undermark attorneys,ucts.

m India's BestCommon Lawstomers.

ndia A Building No-enter, Janak Pu

hi-58 91 9013948557

Email: info@

m

n

d

/

r

t w

OUR L C P P R In G In B

CustWe se

CustWe kewhen

Offices

Texa-5, uri,

7

2727DallaPhonFax:

@effectualservi

R CUSTO

Law Firms – GCorporations/IPatent MonetizPatent BrokersResearch Institndividual Inv

Government ansurance com

Banks

tomers – Gerve customer

tomers – Keep our customit comes to cus

as, USA LBJ Freeway,

as, Texas 7523ne: +1-972-256+1-972-910-06ices.com

OMERS

General/ SpecIn-house Couzation Compas tutions / Acadentors gencies

mpanies

Global foors across the

Keeping Cmers happy – wstomers.

U, Suite 309, 4, US

6-8133 664

P

Simp

cialized unsels anies

demia

otprint globe

Customerswe have a very

UK/Europe SPhone: +44-20

lifying Le

s happy high retention

Sales Contac03-286-8233

gal Servic

 

n rate

ct

ces