Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>
Regarding Curative Pet. D.No. 41026/16
1 message
Section X, Supreme Court of India <[email protected]> Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:52
PM To: [email protected]
D.NO. 4293/2016/X SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NEW DELHI. January 24, 2017
FROM : ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
TO : MR. OM PRAKASH, PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
S/O LATE SH. DEEP NARAYAN PODDAR
R/O RZF-893, NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART – 2,
PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110077
CURATIVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. ... OF 2016 (D.No. 41026)
IN
REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO. 825 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 136 OF 2016
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF CONSITITUTION OF INDIA)
OM PRAKASH & ANR. ...Petitioners
-Vs-
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. ...Respondents
Sir,
With reference to Point No.1 of your email dated 22.12.2016 in the matter
above-mentioned, I am directed to inform you that no action is called for
on your letter dated 16.12.2016 sent via e-mail dated 17.12.2016 as the
writ petition and the review petition have been dismissed on merits by
this Hon'ble Court and the Curative petition has been filed.
With reference to Point No.2 of your email dated 22.12.2016 in the matter
above-mentioned,I am directed to further inform you that the curative
petition above-mentioned is being processed for listing before the Hon'ble
Judge-in-Chambers and you shall be informed about the date of listing in
due course.
Yours faithfully
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>
Attn:The Registrar (Miscellaneous)
1 message
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:20
PM To: [email protected]
Date: 25.01.2017
To,
The Registrar (Miscellaneous)
Section X
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Sub: Reply to your email letter vide diary no.
4293/2016/X dated 24.01.2017 -reg.
Hon’ble Madam,
1. That the petitioner has filed a Writ Petition
Criminal titled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF
INDIA & ORS” vide diary No.2188 dated 18.01.2017
before Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India.
2. That the petitioner does not give his consent
to list the Curative Petition Criminal vide diary
no.41026 before Hon’ble Judge-in-Chamber WITHOUT
CERTIFICATE BY SR. ADVOCATE as it violates the
guideline laid down inRupa Ashok Hurra vs
Ashok Hurra & Anr. Reported in (2002) 4 SCC
388 because petitioner has not filed the
Certificate by Sr. Advocate with valid
reason clarified under para 15 of the same
petition.
3. That it is the discretion of Hon’ble Registrar
Misc. either to process or not to process the
same for listing under the above circumstances on
her own risk.
Prayed for urgency accordingly,
Petitioner-In-Person
Om Prakash
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar, Part-2. Palam Colony
New Delh-110077
Mob:9968337815
E-mail:[email protected]
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>
Attn:The Registrar Judicial (Section IB)
1 message
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]> Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 6:41
PM To: supremecourt <[email protected]>
To,
The Registrar Judicial
Section IB
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Sub: Regarding Notification of defects against diary
No.2188 dated 18.01.2017-reg.
Hon’ble Sir/Madam,
1. That the petitioner has filed a Writ Petition
Criminal titled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF
INDIA & ORS” vide diary No.2188 dated 18.01.2017
before Hon’ble the Supreme Court of India.
2. That the petitioner has not given his consent
through his email letter dated 25.01.2017 in
response to the letter dated 24.01.2017 vide
diary no. 4293/2016/X of Registrar Misc. Section
X to list the Curative Petition Criminal vide
diary no.41026 before Hon’ble Judge-in-Chamber
WITHOUT CERTIFICATE BY SR. ADVOCATE as it
violates the guideline laid down in Rupa Ashok
Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr. Reported in
(2002) 4 SCC 388 because petitioner has not
filed the Certificate by Sr. Advocate with
valid reason clarified under para 15 of the
same petition.
3. That the matter pertains to imminent
danger to the life and liberty of a Senior
Citizen Oxygen dependent Women as well as an
offence of perjury committed by the Lower
Court.
4. That the petitioner is trying to mention
the matter before Hon’ble the Chief justice
of India’s Court since 03.10.2016 but being
stopped by the Registry of this Hon’ble
Court.
5. That this happens to be the last resort
under the legal remedy before COURT OF LAW
for the petitioner. As this is a 12 years
long matter.
6. That the notification of defects has been
delayed by the normal time by Section IB.
7. That the petitioner is praying for urgent
notification of defects so that the matter
could be listed urgently and eventually
could be mentioned urgently for urgent
relief.
Prayed for urgency accordingly,
Filed on: 31.01.2017 OM PRAKASH
New Delhi: PETITIONER IN PERSON
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar
RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg
Raj Nagar, Part-2. Palam Colony
New Delh-110077
Mob:9968337815
E-mail:[email protected]
Om Prakash Poddar <[email protected]>
Letter regarding lodgement of W.P.(C) D.No. 2188/17
1 message
Section X, Supreme Court of India <[email protected]> Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 11:14 AM To: [email protected]
D.NO. 501/2017/X SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NEW DELHI. February 1, 2017
FROM : ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
TO : MR. OM PRAKASH, PETITIONER-IN-PERSON
S/O LATE SH. DEEP NARAYAN PODDAR
R/O RZF-893, NETAJI SUBHASH MARG
RAJ NAGAR PART – 2,
PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110077
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. ... OF 2017 (D.No. 2188)
(UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF CONSITITUTION OF INDIA)
OM PRAKASH & ANR. ...Petitioners
-Vs-
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...Respondents
Sir,
With reference to the writ petition above-mentioned filed by you on
18.01.2016, I am to inform you that the same was placed before Ld.
Registrar(J-I) on 28.01.2017, when the Ld. Registrar was pleased to
hold that the present writ petition is not maintainable and the same
does not disclose any reasonable cause to be received for
registration under Order XV, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules,
2013. Photocopy of the Order is enclosed herewith.
This is for your information.
Yours faithfully
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(JUDL.)
