42
Achieve Greater Certainty through Pension Derisking Legal Issues Lori W. Jones J.D. , LL.M., Taxation April 4, 2014

Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The presentation provided an overview of the changing landscape for defined benefit pension plans including higher PBGC premiums, new mortality tables and improved funding status as a result of favorable investment performance. These changing conditions have encouraged plan sponsors to consider “de-risking” defined benefit pension plans through annuitization and lump sum windows. Lori provided insight into legal issues within the context of de-risking including a background of applicable ERISA fiduciary rules, recently issued recommendations from the ERISA Advisory Council, IRS private letter rulings and a pending case involving Verizon’s annuitization of its pension plan.

Citation preview

Page 1: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Achieve Greater Certainty through Pension Derisking

Legal Issues

Lori W. Jones J.D. , LL.M., Taxation

April 4, 2014

Page 2: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Key Laws Governing Retirement Plans

Internal Revenue Code (IRC)Qualification requirements for favorable tax

treatment. ERISA

Imposes fiduciary duties, reporting and disclosure rules, claims procedures.

Page 3: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Settlor vs. Fiduciary Functions

Settlor functions.Decisions relating to the establishment, design,

amendment and termination of plans.Not governed by ERISA.

Fiduciary functions.Activities undertaken to implement settlor

decisions.Administration of plan. Must comply with the ERISA fiduciary provisions.

Page 4: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Examples of Settlor Functions

Adoption of plan. Plan design.

Determining who will be eligible.Determining level of benefits .

Plan amendments. Plan termination.

Page 5: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Example of Fiduciary Functions

Selection and monitoring of investment options.

Managing plan investments. Determining claims and appeals. Selection of service providers and

determining whether fees are reasonable. Oversight of service providers.

Page 6: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Ways to Become ERISA Fiduciary

Designated by plan or trust. Designated by another fiduciary. Actually perform fiduciary functions.

Exercise discretionary authority or control over plan or plan assets.

Render investment advice to the plan or participants for a fee.

Exercise discretionary authority over plan administration

Page 7: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

Exclusive benefit rule.Discharge duties solely in the interest of

participants and beneficiaries.Discharge duties for the exclusive purpose of:

Providing benefits to participants and beneficiaries;Defraying reasonable expenses of administering the

plan.

Page 8: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

Prudent person standard of care.Act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence

that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use.

Page 9: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

Diversify plan assets.Diversify the investments of the plan to minimize

the risk of large losses unless the circumstances indicate it is clearly prudent not to do so.

Operate plan in accordance with its terms.Unless inconsistent with ERISA.

Page 10: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

Do not cause plan to engage in prohibited transactionsTransactions between the plan and a party in

interest. Sale, exchange or leasing of property.Lending money.Transfer or use of plan assets to, by or for benefit of,

party in interest.Parties in interest include fiduciaries, service

providers, employer, related entities.

Page 11: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

Key exemptions from prohibited transaction rules.Participant loans satisfying statutory and

regulatory requirements.Transactions for services reasonably necessary for

establishment or operation of the plan if fees are reasonable.

Page 12: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Fiduciary Duties

No self-dealing or conflicts of interest.Fiduciary must not:

Deal with plan assets in his own interest or for his own account (self-dealing).

In transaction involving the plan, act on behalf of a person whose interests are adverse to the interests of the plan (conflict of interest).

Receive any consideration in a transaction involving the assets of the plan.

Page 13: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Plan Reporting and Disclosure

Summary plan description. Annual information return (Form 5500). Summary annual report. Participant request for plan documents. Fee disclosure. Various notice requirements including

qualified joint and survivor annuity (QJSA) notices and spousal consents.

Page 14: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Fiduciary Liability

Losses resulting from fiduciary breach. Secretary of Labor may impose additional 20%

penalty. Criminal penalties in the event of willful

violation.

Page 15: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Fiduciary Protection

Plan sponsor purchases insurance indemnifying ERISA fiduciaries for negligence, errors and omissions.

Page 16: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Best Practices

Plan administrator.In absence of designation, the plan sponsor is the

named fiduciary.Naming the plan sponsor as fiduciary in the plan

documents may blur the distinctions between fiduciary and settlor functions.

In whose interest were decisions made?

Page 17: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Identify in writing delegation of fiduciary duties.

Plan administrator. Investments. Administration. Claims.

Page 18: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Best Practices

Committees.Separate fiduciary committee from design committee.Consider committee assignments.Two hat” issues (same individual having fiduciary and

settlor functions). Likelihood of individuals having inside information.Skills needed to perform the specific fiduciary function. Consider self-perpetuating committee based on titles.

Page 19: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Best Practices

Service providers. Document due diligence and selection process. Ask for explanation of fees. Regularly review performance and fees.

Page 20: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Best Practices

Process is important.Regular meetings.Document decisions.

InvestmentsWritten investment policy.Review investments on a regular basis and make a

record of review.If material information is released re investments

(e.g., change of manager of fund), review and make record of review.

Page 21: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Best Practices

Consider retaining independent consultants.Note rationale for any deviation from policy.

Page 22: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Why Derisking?

Control plan asset volatility. Remove pension liabilities from balance sheet.

Page 23: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Current Parameters for Derisking

Active employees. Can’t pay lump sums w/out plan

termination.Can’t annuitize without plan termination.

Term Vested not in pay status.Lump sums permitted.Annuitization permitted.

Page 24: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Current Parameters

Retirees in pay status.Lump sum w/out plan termination; consider

seeking private letter ruling from IRS.Annuitization w/out plan termination permitted.Both lump sum and annuitization permitted with

plan termination.

Page 25: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Advisory Council (EAC)

ERISA § 512 provides for the establishment of EAC.

Advises and submits recommendations regarding the DOL’s functions under ERISA.

In 2013 EAC commenced examination of issues relating to derisking.

Hearings in August 2013, Executive summary of recommendations on November 5, 2013.

Page 26: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

ERISA Advisory Council

Originally EAC expected to recommend derisking regulations.Pros – Notice and comment procedures allow

input by plan sponsors and practitioners.Cons – Time-consuming

Page 27: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

EAC Recommendations

Enhance IB 95-1 safest annuity available guidance.IB 95-1 provides fiduciary standards for selection

of annuity providers.Confirm that IB 95-1 applies to any purchase of

annuities (and not just plan termination).Consider implementation of safe harbors for such

purchases.

Page 28: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IB 95-1 Guidance on Annuity Purchases

All fiduciary duties apply.Act solely in best interest of participants and

beneficiaries.Act prudently.Obtain safest annuity available after thorough

review based on following factors:Quality and diversification of provider’s investment

portfolio.Size of insurer relative to contract for annuities.

Page 29: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IB 95-1 Guidance on Annuity Purchases

Level of insurer’s capital and surplus. Losses of business of annuity provider and other

indications of exposure to liability. Structure of annuity contract and guarantees

supporting annuities (e.g. use of separate account). Availability of additional protection through state

guaranty association and extent of guaranty.• May need consultants to determine.

Page 30: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IB 95-1 Guidance on Annuity Purchases

Need not choose safest available annuity where that option is only marginally safer but disproportionately more expensive.

Increased cost or other considerations never justify putting benefits of annuitized participants at risk.

Special care to avoid conflicts of interest. Consider engaging independent expert to select

annuity provider.

Page 31: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

EAC Recommendations (cont.)

Provide guidance under ERISA §502(a)(9).Consequences of breach of fiduciary duty in

selection of annuity provider.What is appropriate relief under §502(a)(9).When is posting security required.

Page 32: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

EAC Recommendations (cont.)

Enhanced disclosure for lump sum windows.90-day minimum advance notice.Disclosures similar to plan termination.Whether early retirement or other subsidies

included.Compare lump sum to promised benefits under

plan.Possible impact of tax penalties, if any.

Page 33: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

EAC Recommendations (cont.)

Educate and outreach to plan sponsors concerning derisking.

Collect data on derisking transactions.

Page 34: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IRS Guidance

Treasury regulations prohibit lump sum for retirees in pay status unless exception applies.Generally, under IRC §401(a)(9) payments may not

be changed after commencement of benefits.Exception to pay increased benefits resulting from

a plan amendment.

Page 35: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IRS Private Letter Rulings

PLR 201228045.Amendment offered lump sum option during 60-

90 day window. Participants in pay status.Retired participants not yet in pay status.Term vested participants.Beneficiaries and alternate payees.

One-time offer to retirees in pay status does not violate §401(a)(9) because constitutes increased benefits from plan amendment.

Page 36: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IRS Private Letter Rulings

PLR 201228045 (cont.).No rulings under §§411, 415, 417 or 436.

PLR 201228051.Amendment offered lump sum option during 30-

60 day window. Participants and beneficiaries in pay status.

No violation of §401(a)(9). Affected participants could elect lump sum,

QJSA, or QOSA.

Page 37: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IRS Private Letter Rulings

Spousal consent required from current spouse and former spouse if annuitant remarried after the initial benefit commencement.

Page 38: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

IRS Private Letter Rulings

Pending PLRs are being held up; apparently Treasury is considering policy implications.

Only taxpayers receiving PLRs can rely on them.

Page 39: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Verizon Case

Filed by retirees challenging annuitization of pension.Ended PBGC insurance protection.Not described in SPD.

District Court dismisses case with instructions.SPD not required to disclose possibility of

annuitization as a circumstance that could lead to loss of benefits.

Amendment of plan to permit annuitization was a settlor function and not a fiduciary function.

Page 40: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Verizon case (cont.)

No allegation that fees paid to Prudential were unreasonable or that choice of Prudential was imprudent.

No discrimination in choice of retirees eligible for annuitization.

Continuing participants have no standing; no injury because no sharing of impact on benefit payments.

Court did not actually approve annuitization.Plaintiffs given 30 days to reply and allege new

facts.

Page 41: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Verizon case (cont.)

Amended complaint filed on July 12, 2013. Verizon filed motion to dismiss on July 25,

2013. Various extensions. Court heard oral arguments on motion to

dismiss on March 7, 2014. More to come.

Page 42: Achieve greater certainty through pension derisking

Thank you

The purpose of this slide show is to provide news and information on legal issues and all content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice.

Lori W. JonesPartner (314) 552-6568 [email protected]