18
Practical Triple Bottom Line Development Part 3

GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Part three of a series of three presentations demonstrating the best thing about GSR projects is that they not only work on a small budget – they actually make a large profit while they help rural economies to grow.

Citation preview

Page 1: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Practical Triple Bottom Line Development

Part 3

Page 2: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Feeding Africa sustainably depends on …

©2009 Green Self Reliance 2

Page 3: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

©2009 Green Self Reliance 3

…small farmers

Page 4: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

For the last 50 years African rural economic development has been stagnant. Development agencies are trying to help Africa feed itself by introducing “modern agriculture”

©2009 Green Self Reliance 4

Page 5: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

High tech mechanized farming is capital intensive, with high productivity and a low labor component

©2009 Green Self Reliance 5

Page 6: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

But Africa has little capital and millions of unemployed people eager to work

©2009 Green Self Reliance 6

Page 7: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Small farms are capable of employing a great sum of people but subsistence farmers in Africa cannot

compete in the global market

©2009 Green Self Reliance 7

Page 8: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

GSR’s solution is small farms working together as marketing cooperatives

©2009 Green Self Reliance 8

Page 9: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

©2009 Green Self Reliance 9

Small farm holders more productively utilize the land

Page 10: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

and use more marginal land productively, when compared with large scale plantation

©2009 Green Self Reliance 10

Page 11: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

smallholders understand the long-term importance of their land as a productive asset, they tend to treat the land

better from an environmental management standpoint

©2009 Green Self Reliance 11

Page 12: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

This sustainability is enhanced by biodiversity—most smallholders raise many plant species, often ones in

complementary relationships

©2009 Green Self Reliance 12

Page 13: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

The small farm holder model is far more socially coherent and provide more mutual assistance and “sense of community”

than plantation worker model—that is, more family values and village solidarity, whereas plantations are plagued with

prostitution, substance abuse, STDs and many other social ills derived from rapid displacement from traditional village life

©2009 Green Self Reliance 13

Page 14: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Because of their small size and high crop diversity, smallholders are more flexible producers, able to “turn on a dime” by quickly

adapting to changing crops as the market shifts in terms of demand; by contrast large scale farms are tied to technologies

of scale that are not flexible, like expensive machinery dedicated to a single crop—this in turn means small farm

holders are less often caught in the situation of crops becoming too cheap to harvest.

©2009 Green Self Reliance 14

Page 15: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Small farm cooperatives actually enjoy a significant price advantage over mechanized

plantations

©2009 Green Self Reliance 15

Page 16: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

GSR cooperatives stress building local economies. Only surpluses are exported.

This results in social stability, phenomenal local economic growth and massive surpluses for export.

©2009 Green Self Reliance 16

Page 17: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

Once the local self reliant communities get this jump start,

their social stability and sustained economic growth is

impressive

©2009 Green Self Reliance 17

Page 18: GSR Rural Development Planning (Part 3)

www.greenselfreliance.com 18